Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment & Management

  • Author: Gianni Persich, DPM; Chief Editor: Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS  more...
 
Updated: Apr 23, 2014
 

Medical Therapy

Medical therapy for tarsal tunnel syndrome may consist of local injection of steroids into the tarsal canal. An acceptable conservative approach in the early treatment of tarsal tunnel neuropathy includes the use of local anesthetics and soluble steroids, which may aid in the reduction of the patient's pain. These therapies may occasionally produce complete relief of symptoms, but they need to be performed judiciously, as additional nerve injury may occur from improperly placed syringe needles. Physical therapy may be of some value in reducing local soft-tissue edema, thereby easing pressure on the compartment.

Also, in symptomatic patients who exhibit a contracture of the gastrocnemius muscle of the triceps surae, stretching exercises that are designed to improve the flexibility of the gastrocnemius should be initiated. In cases in which the patient has a pes planovalgus foot type, a well-designed foot orthosis may reduce tension on the tibial nerve by decreasing the load on the medial column. This is accomplished by providing a medial longitudinal posting on the orthotic for both the hindfoot and forefoot.

The use of night splints with the foot in plantar flexion and varus may be considered in patients with a valgus foot. The long-term efficacy of this modality lacks well-controlled comparison studies with outcome measures, but it is commonly used in clinical practice.[14]

Next

Surgical Therapy

When conservative therapy fails to alleviate the patient's symptoms, surgical intervention may be warranted. Space-occupying masses require removal. Numerous reports exist of neurilemoma of the tibial nerve, which may need to be removed. A thorough knowledge of the local anatomy is a prerequisite before attempting release of the affected nerve.

External neurolysis of the nerve may be necessary if surgical exploration demonstrates adhesions or scar tissue as the cause of the nerve impingement. Moreover, if scarring or entrapment encapsulates the nerve tissue, in addition to external neurolysis, a release of the epineurium is warranted.

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

The patient may be placed in either the supine or the lateral recumbent position to facilitate exposure of the medial aspect of the operative foot. Use of a pneumatic tourniquet is recommended.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

A curved incision should be made approximately 1 cm posterior to the distal tibia and carried in the plantar direction, paralleling the shaft and malleolus and curving gradually toward the sustentaculum tali. The retinaculum should be identified and carefully released in its entirety. The posterior tibial nerve should be identified, visualized, and left undisturbed along the course until its bifurcation at the porta pedis. Care should be exercised to avoid cutting the small calcaneal branches that arise from the posterior tibial nerve; these branches are often surrounded by fatty tissue and may be difficult to easily visualize.

The medial plantar branch of the posterior tibial nerve should be identified and traced along the margin of the flexor sheath of the hallucis longus. The lateral branch should be followed into the abductor hallucis. Any fibrous bands that are noted to be constricting the nerves should be carefully released.

After release, all the branches of the tibial nerve should be lying free of any fascial covering. The tourniquet should be deflated to observe for and control bleeding. A layered closure should be performed, including the subdermal layer but not the flexor retinaculum. The skin may be closed with sutures or staples; a drain is not necessary. In a tarsal tunnel release, a layer closure of the wound should be performed by taking care not to reapproximate the extensor retinaculum, because this is the most common cause of the entrapment neuropathy.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

A mild compression dressing and the initial immobilization should be applied with slight inversion to the affected area by using a splint for 3 weeks of non — weight bearing. After the splint is discontinued, the patient may begin joint mobilization and a graduated return to weight bearing.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

The patient should be non — weight bearing for a period of 3 weeks to allow for proper healing. Early mobilization should be initiated to decrease the formation of scar tissue, which may itself contribute to compression neuropathy. The use of surgical shoe aids in reducing pressure on the surgical site is recommended. Formal physiotherapy may be helpful for the patient to regain strength and motion and for the relief of residual pain.

After suture removal, the patient should be able to resume the use of soft shoes, taking care to avoid shoes that may cause pressure or irritation of the surgical site. In patients who have a pes planus foot type, insole orthoses should be considered to stabilize the medial column.

Previous
Next

Complications

Because of the anatomy of the affected region, several complications of compression release surgery may arise, most of which can be minimized with meticulous dissection and careful identification of the local anatomy.

Laceration of the nerve or posterior artery could have significant deleterious effects on foot function. A failure to adequately release the retinaculum along its entire course may lead to poor postoperative results. This is the most likely etiology of surgical failure.

Additionally, associated plantar fasciitis may be a cause of persistent pain in the medial heel region after decompression, which may need to be addressed separately. A case study by Kim and Dellon demonstrated that a neuroma of the distal saphenous nerve may need to be considered as a causative factor if pain continues after surgical release.[15]

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Properly performed decompression may yield satisfactory results. An initial marked decrease in pain and paresthesias may occur, followed by a reduction of symptoms to the extent that the patient may be able to tolerate the symptoms. Complete resolution of symptoms may not be possible because the disorder has numerous etiologies and because the likelihood of irreversible nerve damage exists. An increase in pain after decompression, however, is extremely rare.

Studies by Mann demonstrated that approximately 75% of patients who undergo surgical decompression have appreciable pain relief, and 25% obtain little or no relief.[16] Mann also stated that a repeat surgical exploration of a previous tarsal canal release rarely causes appreciable benefit to the patient.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Some concern exists regarding whether decompression of the tibial nerve in patients with marked pes planovalgus deformity may cause a deleterious effect because decompression of the medial retinacular compartment may be associated with an increase in nerve tension. Questions arise regarding whether a joint stabilization procedure may be a necessary adjunct in determining long-term postoperative success. To the author's knowledge, no studies have been performed to assess the long-term efficacy of decompression and stabilization, decompression and orthoses management, and decompression alone.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Gianni Persich, DPM Clinical Instructor, Department of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Associate Chief, Department of Podiatry, The Mount Sinai Hospital of Queens

Gianni Persich, DPM is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Forensic Examiners Institute, American Podiatric Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Steven Touliopoulos, MD Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, State University of New York-Downstate; Consulting Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital of Queens, Lenox Hill Hospital, St Vincent's Medical Center of New York

Steven Touliopoulos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Chief Editor

Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS Department Chief, Musculoskeletal Sciences, Spectrum Health Medical Group

Jason H Calhoun, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Diabetes Association, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Michigan State Medical Society, Missouri State Medical Association, Southern Medical Association, Southern Orthopaedic Association, Texas Medical Association, Texas Orthopaedic Association, Musculoskeletal Infection Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

John S Early, MD Foot/Ankle Specialist, Texas Orthopaedic Associates, LLP; Co-Director, North Texas Foot and Ankle Fellowship, Baylor University Medical Center

John S Early, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Received honoraria from AO North America for speaking and teaching; Received consulting fee from Stryker for consulting; Received consulting fee from Biomet for consulting; Received grant/research funds from AO North America for fellowship funding; Received honoraria from MMI inc for speaking and teaching; Received consulting fee from Osteomed for consulting; Received ownership interest from MedHab Inc for management position.

References
  1. Alshami AM, Babri AS, Souvlis T, Coppieters MW. Biomechanical evaluation of two clinical tests for plantar heel pain: the dorsiflexion-eversion test for tarsal tunnel syndrome and the windlass test for plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Apr. 28(4):499-505. [Medline].

  2. Bracilovic A, Nihal A, Houston VL, et al. Effect of foot and ankle position on tarsal tunnel compartment volume. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Jun. 27(6):431-7. [Medline].

  3. DiDomenico LA, Masternick EB. Anterior tarsal tunnel syndrome. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2006 Jul. 23(3):611-20. [Medline].

  4. Franson J, Baravarian B. Tarsal tunnel syndrome: a compression neuropathy involving four distinct tunnels. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2006 Jul. 23(3):597-609. [Medline].

  5. Lamm BM, Paley D, Testani M, Herzenberg JE. Tarsal tunnel decompression in leg lengthening and deformity correction of the foot and ankle. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007 May-Jun. 46(3):201-6. [Medline].

  6. Vijayan J, Therimadasamy AK, Teoh HL, Chan YC, Wilder-Smith EP. Sonography as an aid to neurophysiological studies in diagnosing tarsal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jun. 88(6):500-1. [Medline].

  7. Dellon AL. The four medial ankle tunnels: a critical review of perceptions of tarsal tunnel syndrome and neuropathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008 Oct. 19(4):629-48, vii. [Medline].

  8. Lambert A, Ben Salem D, Regis A, Soichot P, Ricolfi F. [Post-traumatic tarsal tunnel syndrome: interest of muscular MRI]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2008 Jan. 164(1):77-81. [Medline].

  9. Gondring WH, Trepman E, Shields B. Tarsal tunnel syndrome: assessment of treatment outcome with an anatomic pain intensity scale. Foot Ankle Surg. 2009. 15(3):133-8. [Medline].

  10. Antoniadis G, Scheglmann K. Posterior tarsal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Nov. 105(45):776-81. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Daniels TR, Lau JT, Hearn TC. The effects of foot position and load on tibial nerve tension. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Feb. 19(2):73-8. [Medline].

  12. Almeida DF, Scremin L, Zúniga SF, Oh SJ. Focal conduction block in a case of tarsal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Sep. 42(3):452-5. [Medline].

  13. Duran-Stanton AM, Bui-Mansfield LT. Magnetic resonance diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome due to flexor digitorum accessorius longus and peroneocalcaneus internus muscles. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Mar-Apr. 34(2):270-2. [Medline].

  14. Hudes K. Conservative management of a case of tarsal tunnel syndrome. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2010 Jun. 54(2):100-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  15. Kim J, Dellon AL. Pain at the site of tarsal tunnel incision due to neuroma of the posterior branch of the saphenous nerve. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001 Mar. 91(3):109-13. [Medline].

  16. Mann RA, DuVries HL, Inman VT, eds. Surgery of the Foot. 5th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1986. 205-7.

  17. Bailie DS, Kelikian AS. Tarsal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis, surgical technique, and functional outcome. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Feb. 19(2):65-72. [Medline].

  18. Courtney TK, Webster BS. Disabling occupational morbidity in the United States. An alternative way of seeing the Bureau of Labor Statistics' data. J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jan. 41(1):60-9. [Medline].

  19. Dyck PJ, Dyck PJ, Grant IA, Fealey RD. Ten steps in characterizing and diagnosing patients with peripheral neuropathy. Neurology. 1996 Jul. 47(1):10-7. [Medline].

  20. Green DP, ed. Operative Hand Surgery. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. 2157-63.

  21. Masson C, Boulu P, Hénin D. Iatrogenic neuropathies [French]. Rev Med Interne. 1992 May-Jun. 13(3):225-32. [Medline].

  22. McMaster WC. How can chronic heel pain be treated?. Postgrad Med. 2001 Apr. 109(4):137-8. [Medline].

  23. Oh SJ, Meyer RD. Entrapment neuropathies of the tibial (posterior tibial) nerve. Neurol Clin. 1999 Aug. 17(3):593-615, vii. [Medline].

  24. Perry MD, Manoli A 2nd. Foot compartment syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001 Jan. 32(1):103-11. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Surgical approach for release of the flexor retinaculum in a patient with tarsal tunnel syndrome.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.