Introduction
Clubfoot can be classified as (1) postural or positional or (2) fixed or rigid. Postural or positional clubfeet are not true clubfeet. Fixed or rigid clubfeet are either flexible (ie, correctable without surgery) or resistant (ie, require surgical release, though this is not entirely true according to the Ponseti experience1,2,3 ).
See images related to clubfoot below:
Posteromedial release for clubfoot.
Complications of manipulation treatment. Rockerbottom foot.
Ilizarov distraction for arthrogrypotic clubfoot.
Schematic representation of posteromedial release.
Traditional manipulation and casting methods fail, as they do not allow the free rotation of the calcaneum and the talus.
Never forcibly evert or pronate the foot during clubfoot casting.
Spontaneous correction of the hind foot varus by abducting the forefoot and allowing the calcaneum to freely rotate under the talus.
The Pirani, Goldner, Di Miglio, Hospital for Joint Diseases (HJD), and Walker classifications have been published, but no classification system is universally used.4,5,6
Recent studies
Parker et al pooled data from several birth defects surveillance programs (6139 cases of clubfoot) to better estimate the prevalence of clubfoot and investigate its risk factors. The overall prevalence of clubfoot was 1.29 per 1,000 livebirths, with 1.38 among non-Hispanic whites, 1.30 among Hispanics, and 1.14 among non-Hispanic blacks or African Americans. Maternal age, parity, education, and marital status were significantly associated with clubfoot, along with maternal smoking and diabetes.7
Steinman et al compared the Ponseti and French functional method for idiopathic clubfeet (265 feet [176 patients] by Ponseti method; 119 feet [80 patients] by French functional method). The study showed that although there was a trend toward improved results with the Ponseti method, the difference was not significant. Parents chose the Ponseti method twice as often as the French functional method. Initial correction rates were 94.4% for the Ponseti method and 95% for the French functional method. Relapses occurred in 37% of the Ponseti-method feet, and in a third of these cases, further nonoperative treatment was successful; however, surgical treatment was necessary for the other two thirds. Relapses occurred in 29% of the feet treated by the French functional method; surgical intervention was necessary in all those cases. At the latest follow-up, outcomes with the Ponseti method were good in 72% of cases, fair in 12%, and poor in 16%. For the French functional method, outcomes were good in 67%, fair in17%, and poor in 16%.8
Parada et al reviewed the safety of general anesthesia in infants who underwent percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy. The procedure was performed in 137 patients (182 tenotomies). Of the tenotomies, 92 were unilateral and 45 bilateral. No complications related to anesthesia were identified, and nearly all patients were discharged on the day of surgery.9
History of the Procedure
In the past, clubfoot surgery was performed in a way that did not differentiate severity. The same procedure was performed for all patients. Bensahel has proposed a more individualized approach (ie, addressing only the structures that are required are released). The surgery is tailored to the deformity. For example, if the forefoot is well corrected and externally rotated, if there is no cavus, but if there is still significant equinus, a posterior approach alone should suffice (see Intraoperative details).10
Problem
See Relevant Anatomy.
Frequency
The incidence of clubfoot is approximately 1 case per 1000 live births in the United States. The incidence differs among ethnicities. For example, it is close to 75 cases per 1000 live births in the Polynesian islands, particularly in Tonga.
The male-to-female ratio is 2:1. Bilateral involvement is found in 30-50% of cases. There is a 10% chance of a subsequent child being affected if the parents already have a child with a clubfoot.
Etiology
The true etiology of congenital clubfoot is unknown. Most infants who have clubfoot have no identifiable genetic, syndromal, or extrinsic cause.7
Extrinsic associations include teratogenic agents (eg, sodium aminopterin), oligohydramnios, and congenital constriction rings. Genetic associations include mendelian inheritance (eg, diastrophic dwarfism; autosomal recessive pattern of clubfoot inheritance).
Cytogenetic abnormalities (eg, congenital talipes equinovarus [CTEV]) can be seen in syndromes involving chromosomal deletion. It has been proposed that idiopathic CTEV in otherwise healthy infants is the result of a multifactorial system of inheritance.11 Evidence for this is as follows:
- Incidence in the general population is 1 per 1000 live births.
- Incidence in first-degree relations is approximately 2%.
- Incidence in second-degree relations is approximately 0.6%.
- If one monozygotic twin has a CTEV, the second twin has only a 32% chance of having a CTEV.
Pathophysiology
Theories of the pathogenesis of clubfeet are as follows:
- Arrest of fetal development in the fibular stage
- Defective cartilaginous anlage of the talus
- Neurogenic factors: Histochemical abnormalities have been found in posteromedial and peroneal muscle groups of patients with clubfeet. This is postulated to be due to innervation changes in intrauterine life secondary to a neurologic event, such as a stroke leading to mild hemiparesis or paraparesis. This is further supported by a 35% incidence of varus and equinovarus deformity in spina bifida.
- Retracting fibrosis (or myofibrosis) secondary to increased fibrous tissue in muscles and ligaments: In fetal and cadaveric studies, Ponseti also found the collagen in all of the ligamentous and tendinous structures (except the Achilles tendon), and it was very loosely crimped and could be stretched. The Achilles tendon, on the other hand, was made up of tightly crimped collagen and was resistant to stretching. Zimny et al found myoblasts in medial fascia on electron microscopy and postulated that they cause medial contracture.1,2,12
- Anomalous tendon insertions: Inclan proposed that anomalous tendon insertions result in clubfeet.13 However, other studies have not supported this. It is more likely that the distorted clubfoot anatomy can make it appear that tendon insertions are anomalous.
- Seasonal variations: Robertson noted seasonal variations to be a factor in his epidemiologic studies in developing countries.14 This coincided with a similar variation in the incidence of poliomyelitis in the children in the community. Clubfoot was therefore proposed to be a sequela of a prenatal poliolike condition. This theory is further supported by motor neuron changes in the anterior horn in the spinal cord of these babies.
Presentation
Seek a detailed family history of clubfoot or neuromuscular disorders, and perform a general examination to identify any other abnormalities. Examine the feet with the child prone, with the plantar aspect of the feet visualized, and supine to evaluate internal rotation and varus. If the child can stand, determine if the foot is plantigrade, if the heel is bearing weight, and if it is in varus, valgus, or neutral.
Similar deformities are seen with myelomeningocele and arthrogryposis. Therefore, always examine for these associated conditions. The ankle is in equinus, and the foot is supinated (varus) and adducted (a normal infant foot usually can be dorsiflexed and everted, so that the foot touches the anterior tibia). Dorsiflexion beyond 90° is not possible.
The navicular is displaced medially, as is the cuboid. Contractures of the medial plantar soft tissues are present. Not only is the calcaneus in a position of equinus but also the anterior aspect is rotated medially and the posterior aspect laterally.
The heel is small and empty. The heel feels soft to the touch (akin to the feel of the cheeks). As the treatment progresses, it fills in and develops a firmer feel (akin to the feel of the nose or of the chin).
The talar neck is easily palpable in the sinus tarsi as it is uncovered laterally. Normally, this is covered by the navicular, and the talar body is in the mortise. The medial malleolus is difficult to palpate and is often in contact with the navicular. The normal navicular-malleolar interval is diminished.
The hindfoot, as shown below, is supinated, but the foot is often in a position of pronation relative to the hindfoot. The first ray often drops to create a position of cavus. The Ponseti method of closed management of clubfeet through manipulations and casting describes the elevation of the first metatarsal as a first step, even if it means seemingly exacerbating the supination of the foot.
Spontaneous correction of the hind foot varus by abducting the forefoot and allowing the calcaneum to freely rotate under the talus.
The tibia often has internal torsion. This assumes special importance in the casting management of clubfeet, as shown in the images below, where care should be taken to rotate the feet into abduction, avoiding spurious tibial rotation through the knee.
Never forcibly evert or pronate the foot during clubfoot casting.
Traditional manipulation and casting methods fail, as they do not allow the free rotation of the calcaneum and the talus.
Even following correction, the foot often remains short and the calf thin.
Indications
Traditionally, surgery is indicated when a plateau has been reached in nonoperative treatment. Surgery is usually performed when the child is of sufficient size to enable anatomy to be recognized.
Relevant Anatomy
- Bone
- Tibia: Slight shortening is possible.
- Fibula: Shortening is common.
- Talus: In equinus in the ankle mortise, with the body of the talus being in external rotation, the body of the talus is extruded anterolaterally and is uncovered and can be palpated. The neck of the talus is medially deviated and plantar flexed. All relationships of the talus to the surrounding bones are abnormal.
- Os calcis: Medial rotation and an equinus and adduction deformity are present.
- Navicular: The navicular is medially subluxated over the talar head.
- Cuboid: The cuboid is medially subluxated over the calcaneal head.
- Forefoot: The forefoot is adducted and supinated; severe cases also have cavus with a dropped first metatarsal.
- Muscle
- Atrophy of the leg muscles, especially in the peroneal group, is seen in clubfeet.
- The number of fibers in the muscles is normal, but the fibers are smaller in size.
- The triceps surae, tibialis posterior, flexor digitorum longus (FDL), and flexor hallucis longus (FHL) are contracted.
- The calf is of a smaller size and remains so throughout life, even following successful long-lasting correction of the feet.
- Tendon sheaths: Thickening frequently is present, especially of the tibialis posterior and peroneal sheaths.
- Joint capsules: Contractures of the posterior ankle capsule, subtalar capsule, and talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joint capsules commonly are seen.
- Ligaments: Contractures are seen in the calcaneofibular, talofibular, (ankle) deltoid, long and short plantar, spring, and bifurcate ligaments.
- Fascia: The plantar fascial contracture contributes to the cavus, as does contracture of fascial planes in the foot.
Contraindications
No specific contraindications to surgery exist, although the child's size dictates that surgery is best performed at approximately age 6 months. With greater acceptance of the Ponseti conservative technique, surgery is seen to be a contentious issue. Surgery for clubfeet is no longer the only standard of care.
More on Clubfoot |
 Overview: Clubfoot |
| Workup: Clubfoot |
| Treatment: Clubfoot |
| Follow-up: Clubfoot |
| Multimedia: Clubfoot |
| References |
| Further Reading |
| Next Page » |
References
Docker CE, Lewthwaite S, Kiely NT. Ponseti treatment in the management of clubfoot deformity - a continuing role for paediatric orthopaedic services in secondary care centres. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. Jul 2007;89(5):510-2. [Medline].
Ippolito E, Ponseti IV. Congenital club foot in the human fetus. A histological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 1980;62(1):8-22. [Medline].
Scher DM. The Ponseti method for treatment of congenital club foot. Curr Opin Pediatr. Feb 2006;18(1):22-5. [Medline].
Hussain FN. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Apr 2007;89(4):561; author reply 561-2. [Medline].
Lejman T, Kowalczyk B. [Results of treatment of congenital clubfoot with modified Goldner's technique]. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2002;67(4):351-5. [Medline].
Kaewpornsawan K, Khuntisuk S, Jatunarapit R. Comparison of modified posteromedial release and complete subtalar release in resistant congenital clubfoot: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. May 2007;90(5):936-41. [Medline].
Parker SE, Mai CT, Strickland MJ, Olney RS, Rickard R, Marengo L, et al. Multistate study of the epidemiology of clubfoot. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. Aug 20 2009;[Medline].
Steinman S, Richards BS, Faulks S, Kaipus K. A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 1 2009;91 Suppl 2:299-312. [Medline].
Parada SA, Baird GO, Auffant RA, Tompkins BJ, Caskey PM. Safety of percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy performed under general anesthesia on infants with idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. Dec 2009;29(8):916-9. [Medline].
Celebi L, Muratli HH, Aksahin E, Yagmurlu MF, Bicimoglu A. Bensahel et al. and International Clubfoot Study Group evaluation of treated clubfoot: assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Pediatr Orthop B. Jan 2006;15(1):34-6. [Medline].
Paton RW, Freemont AJ. A clinicopathological study of idiopathic CTEV. J R Coll Surg Edinb. Apr 1993;38(2):108-9. [Medline].
Zimny ML, Willig SJ, Roberts JM, D'Ambrosia RD. An electron microscopic study of the fascia from the medial and lateral sides of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1985;5(5):577-81. [Medline].
Inclan. Anomalous tendon insertions theory, though other studies have not supported this; the distorted anatomy can make it appear that tendon insertions are anomalous. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40:159.
Robertson. CORR Prenatal polio-like condition; epidemiological evidence,seasonal variation.
Dyer PJ, Davis N. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Aug 2006;88(8):1082-4. [Medline].
Cummings RJ. The effectiveness of botulinum A toxin as an adjunct to the treatment of clubfeet by the Ponseti method: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep 2009;29(6):564-9. [Medline].
Hsu WK, Bhatia NN, Raskin A, Otsuka NY. Wound complications from idiopathic clubfoot surgery: a comparison of the modified Turco and the Cincinnati treatment methods. J Pediatr Orthop. Apr-May 2007;27(3):329-32. [Medline].
Singh BI, Vaishnavi AJ. Modified Turco procedure for treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Sep 2005;438:209-14. [Medline].
Bensahel H, Csukonyi Z, Desgrippes Y, Chaumien JP. Surgery in residual clubfoot: one-stage medioposterior release "à la carte". J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 1987;7(2):145-8. [Medline].
Bensahel H, Jehanno P, Delaby JP, Themar-Noël C. [Conservative treatment of clubfoot: the Functional Method and its long-term follow-up]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2006;40(2):181-6. [Medline].
Ferreira RC, Costa MT, Frizzo GG, Santin RA. Correction of severe recurrent clubfoot using a simplified setting of the Ilizarov device. Foot Ankle Int. May 2007;28(5):557-68. [Medline].
Freedman JA, Watts H, Otsuka NY. The Ilizarov method for the treatment of resistant clubfoot: is it an effective solution?. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 2006;26(4):432-7. [Medline].
Ferreira RC, Costa MT, Frizzo GG, Santin RA. Correction of severe recurrent clubfoot using a simplified setting of the Ilizarov device. Foot Ankle Int. May 2007;28(5):557-68. [Medline].
Graham GP, Dent CM. Dillwyn Evans operation for relapsed club foot. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 1992;74(3):445-8. [Medline].
Morcuende JA, Abbasi D, Dolan LA, Ponseti IV. Results of an accelerated Ponseti protocol for clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 2005;25(5):623-6. [Medline].
Ponseti IV. Relapsing clubfoot: causes, prevention, and treatment. Iowa Orthop J. 2002;22:55-6. [Medline].
Ponseti IV. Clubfoot management. J Pediatr Orthop. Nov-Dec 2000;20(6):699-700. [Medline].
Haft GF, Walker CG, Crawford HA. Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 2007;89(3):487-93. [Medline].
Dobbs MB, Corley CL, Morcuende JA, Ponseti IV. Late recurrence of clubfoot deformity: a 45-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jun 2003;(411):188-92. [Medline].
Simons GW. Calcaneocuboid joint deformity in talipes equinovarus: an overview and update. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4(1):25-35. [Medline].
Simons GW. A standardized method for the radiographic evaluation of clubfeet. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Sep 1978;(135):107-18. [Medline].
Schlegel UJ, Batal A, Pritsch M, Sobottke R, Roellinghoff M, Eysel P, et al. Functional midterm outcome in 131 consecutive cases of surgical clubfoot treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Aug 4 2009;[Medline].
Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 1995;77(10):1477-89. [Medline].
Wallander H, Larsson S, Bjönness T, Hansson G. Patient-reported outcome at 62 to 67 years of age in 83 patients treated for congenital clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Oct 2009;91(10):1316-21. [Medline].
Bohm. Arrest of fetal development in the fibular stage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1929;11:229.
Bor N, Herzenberg JE, Frick SL. Ponseti management of clubfoot in older infants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Mar 2006;444:224-8. [Medline].
Cowell HR, Wein BK. Genetic aspects of club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 1980;62(8):1381-4. [Medline].
Faulks S, Luther B. Changing paradigm for the treatment of clubfeet. Orthop Nurs. Jan-Feb 2005;24(1):25-30; quiz 31-2. [Medline].
Irani RN, Sherman R. Defective cartilaginous anlage of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45A:45.
Isaacs H, Handelsman JE, Badenhorst M, Pickering A. The muscles in club foot--a histological histochemical and electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Nov 1977;59-B(4):465-72. [Medline].
Noonan KJ, Richards BS. Nonsurgical management of idiopathic clubfoot. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Nov-Dec 2003;11(6):392-402. [Medline].
Further Reading
Clinical trials
Gen etic Linkage Study of Idiopathic Talipes Equinovarus (ITEV) (Clubfoot)
Clubfoot DNA Repository
Using Botox to Treat Patients With Idiopathic Clubfoot
A Double-Blind, Randomized Control Trial Comparing Botulinum Toxin Type A (Botox) and Placebo in the Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot
Pedobarographic Assessments of Clubfoot Treated Patients
Related eMedicine topics
Clubfoot (Radiology)
Body Contouring, Calf Augmentation
Limping Child
Ankle Valgus, Pediatrics
Keywords
clubfoot, congenital talipes equinovarus, CTEV, rockerbottom foot, rockerbottom deformity, foot deformity, clubfeet, clubfoot surgery
