eMedicine Specialties > Orthopedic Surgery > Hand & Upper Extremity

Radial-Ulnar Synostosis

Author: Raymond Wurapa, MD, Consulting Surgeon in Orthopaedics, The Cardinal Orthopaedic Institute
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 9, 2009

Introduction

Synostosis, or osseous union, of any 2 adjacent bones can involve any part of the upper extremity. Synostosis between the radius and ulna can take 2 forms: congenital and posttraumatic.

Radioulnar synostosis occurs as either a congenit...

Radioulnar synostosis occurs as either a congenital or a posttraumatic condition.

Radioulnar synostosis occurs as either a congenit...

Radioulnar synostosis occurs as either a congenital or a posttraumatic condition.


The degree of fusion in radioulnar synostosis var...

The degree of fusion in radioulnar synostosis varies and may or may not involve the radial head.

The degree of fusion in radioulnar synostosis var...

The degree of fusion in radioulnar synostosis varies and may or may not involve the radial head.


In 1793, Sandifort provided the initial description of congenital radial-ulnar (radioulnar) synostosis. This condition is caused by a failure of segmentation between the radius and ulna. Embryologically, the upper limb bud arises from the unsegmented body wall at 25-28 days. The elbow becomes visible at 34 days, and the humerus, radius, and ulna become visible at 37 days. Initially, the 3 cartilaginous analogs of the humerus, radius, and ulna are connected before segmentation. Therefore, for a short time, the radius and ulna share a common perichondrium. Abnormal events at this time can lead to a failure of segmentation. The duration and severity of the insult can determine the degree of subsequent synostosis.

Endochondral ossification then proceeds, and the cartilaginous synostosis ossifies, either partially or completely, in the longitudinal or transverse plane. In the forearm, congenital radioulnar synostosis usually occurs between the proximal radius and the ulna. Although the condition is present at birth, it usually is not discovered until early adolescence, when the patient presents with a lack of pronation and supination. Initially, the union may be more of a synchondrosis, but as the skeleton matures, the osseous bridge between the radius and ulna becomes more radiographically apparent. Usually, motion between the 2 adjacent bones, if existent, is minimal.1,2,3,4,5,6

Posttraumatic radioulnar synostosis is a separate entity from the congenital form, having a different cause, treatment, and prognosis.7 The traumatic form can occur anywhere between the radius and ulna along the length of the interosseous membrane. Gros first described posttraumatic radioulnar synostosis in 1864, reporting on a vicious union found in autopsy specimens. Groves later postulated that the success of treatment depended on where in the forearm synostosis had occurred.8,9

Related eMedicine topics:

Radius, Distal Fractures

Forearm Fractures

Middle Third Forearm Fractures

Wrist and Forearm Amputations

Problem

Wilkie described 2 types of congenital synostosis, based on the proximal radioulnar junction.10 In type 1, complete synostosis has occurred, with the radius and ulna fused proximally for a variable distance. Type 2 is less involved, and may exist as a partial union. Type 2 involves the region just distal to the proximal radial epiphysis and is associated with radial head dislocation.

Cleary and Omer described 4 types of congenital synostosis, as follows11 :

  • Fibrous synostosis
  • Bony synostosis
  • Associated posterior dislocation of the radius
  • Associated anterior dislocation of the radius

Simmons and colleagues considered congenital synostosis to be a spectrum of anomalies in which the synostosis occurred in varying lengths, with or without involvement of the radial head.12

Posttraumatic radioulnar synostosis has been classified into the following 3 types, based on location:

  • Type 1 - Least common; occurs in the distal forearm
  • Type 2 - Occurs in the midforearm
  • Type 3 - Occurs in the proximal forearm

Frequency

Congenital radioulnar synostosis occurs rarely, with approximately 350 cases reported in the literature. The rarity of this condition often leads to a delayed clinical diagnosis. Cleary and Omer reported an average patient age at diagnosis of 6 years, with a range of from 6 months to 22 years.11 There is no sex predilection in congenital radioulnar synostosis, and no particular inheritance pattern is apparent. Sixty percent of cases are bilateral.

Because congenital radioulnar synostosis is caused by an in utero insult, its association with other abnormalities is not surprising. About one third of cases are associated with general skeletal abnormalities, such as hip dislocation, knee anomalies, clubfoot, polydactyly, syndactyly, Madelung deformity, ligamentous laxity, thumb hypoplasia, carpal coalition, and problems of the cardiac, renal, neurologic, and GI systems.

Some associated abnormalities and syndromes are genetically determined, including acrocephalosyndactyly, Apert syndrome, Carpenter syndrome, arthrogryposis, mandibulofacial dysostosis, William syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, Holt-Oram syndrome, microcephaly, multiple exostoses, and fetal alcohol syndrome.13,14 In 20% of their patients, Cleary and Omer found a genetic basis for an autosomal dominant form (with variable penetrance) of congenital radioulnar synostosis.11

Etiology

The most common cause of posttraumatic radioulnar synostosis is an operatively treated forearm fracture. Patients with high-energy, comminuted, open fractures appear to be more likely to develop this complication. Monteggia and proximal forearm fractures also appear to have a higher incidence of synostosis.15 The use of bone graft and of screws protruding through the opposite cortex also increase the incidence of synostosis. Additionally, radioulnar synostosis is described as a consequence of soft-tissue injury, reconstructive procedures, any trauma causing hematoma formation between the radius and ulna, or injury to the interosseous membrane.16 Patients with closed head injuries (skull/cranial trauma) appear to be more prone to this complication, presumably for the same reason that they develop heterotopic ossification.17,18

Pathophysiology

The skeletal anomaly includes varying degrees of proximal radial and ulnar fusion, with or without involvement of the radial head. If the radial head is involved, it may be dislocated anteriorly or posteriorly.19 A fibrous synostosis may allow limited motion. Regional soft-tissue hypoplasia is often present in severe cases, including when atrophy and fibrosis of the brachioradialis, pronator teres, pronator quadratus, and supinator muscles occur. The interosseous membrane also may be abnormal. 

Presentation

Functional deficits associated with congenital radioulnar synostosis depend on the severity of the deformity and on whether or not it is bilateral. In cases involving severe, fixed forearm pronation deformity, the patient cannot compensate for the resulting functional limitations by using scapular and glenohumeral motion. The forearm usually lies in the pronated or hyperpronated position.

Radioulnar synostosis occurs as either a congenit...

Radioulnar synostosis occurs as either a congenital or a posttraumatic condition.

Radioulnar synostosis occurs as either a congenit...

Radioulnar synostosis occurs as either a congenital or a posttraumatic condition.


The degree of fusion in radioulnar synostosis var...

The degree of fusion in radioulnar synostosis varies and may or may not involve the radial head.

The degree of fusion in radioulnar synostosis var...

The degree of fusion in radioulnar synostosis varies and may or may not involve the radial head.


Hypermobility at the midcarpal and radiocarpal joints can disguise this lack of forearm rotation, particularly with neutral or mild pronation deformities. There is usually full or nearly full elbow range of motion, with flexion contractures rarely exceeding 30 º. An abnormal carrying angle of the elbow or a shortening of the forearm may be observed.

Pain is usually not a presenting symptom until the teenage years, when progressive and symptomatic radial head subluxation may be noted. This accounts for the delayed clinical diagnosis in many cases, but it also indicates that function may be satisfactory. The disability is most significant in bilateral cases with severe pronation. Children may initially have a reduced radial head and in adolescence may develop symptomatic radial head subluxation. Therefore, radiographic follow-up is necessary.

Indications

Indications for surgical treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis still remain somewhat controversial but are related to bilaterality and to the degree of deformity. Patients with neutral rotation, mild pronation, or rare supination positions can compensate somewhat with ipsilateral shoulder motion. Wrist hypermobility allows further functional compensation. Severe pronation deformities (specifically, those >60º) cause significant functional difficulty, especially with activities requiring supination. Therefore, indications for surgery must be determined based more on individual functional limitations than on absolute forearm position.

It is recommended that surgery be performed in childhood before patients are school-aged. In patients with symptomatic subluxation of the radial head, the radial head may be excised at maturity. Appropriate workup includes plain radiography performed in orthogonal planes (eg, posteroanterior [PA] and lateral views).

The indication for surgery in posttraumatic radioulnar synostosis is functional limitation of forearm rotation. This limitation must be assessed on an individual basis. An appropriate workup includes taking plain radiographs in orthogonal (eg, PA, lateral) planes. Surgery should be performed following maturation of the synostosis and after distinct radiographic borders are observed, to decrease the likelihood that the synostosis will recur. Waiting more than 3 years, however, has been shown to adversely affect final outcome, probably because of soft-tissue contracture. A 100º arc of motion is desired so that the patient can perform all activities of daily living, and a 60º arc is required to perform most activities of daily living without assistance.

Contraindications

The only contraindication to surgical correction is the presence of milder deformity in an older patient, if the patient has only minimal functional deficit and has already made adjustments in his/her activities to accommodate the synostosis.

More on Radial-Ulnar Synostosis

Overview: Radial-Ulnar Synostosis
Workup: Radial-Ulnar Synostosis
Treatment: Radial-Ulnar Synostosis
Follow-up: Radial-Ulnar Synostosis
Multimedia: Radial-Ulnar Synostosis
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Dawson HG. A congenital deformity of the forearm and its operative treatment. Br Med J. 1912;2:833-5.

  2. Hansen OH, Andersen NO. Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis. Report of 37 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1970;41(3):225-30. [Medline].

  3. Kelikian H. Congenital deformities of the hand and forearm. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1974.

  4. Lewis WH. The development of the arm in man. Am J Anat. 1901;1:145-83.

  5. Miura T, Nakamura R, Suzuki M. Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis. J Hand Surg [Br]. Jun 1984;9(2):153-5. [Medline].

  6. Spritz RA. Familial radioulnar synostosis. J Med Genet. Apr 1978;15(2):160-2. [Medline].

  7. Sachar K, Akelman E, Ehrlich MG. Radioulnar synostosis. Hand Clin. Aug 1994;10(3):399-404. [Medline].

  8. Hanel DP, Pfaeffle HJ, Ayalla A. Management of posttraumatic metadiaphyseal radioulnar synostosis. Hand Clin. May 2007;23(2):227-34, vi-vii. [Medline].

  9. Watson FM Jr, Eaton RG. Post-traumatic radio-ulnar synostosis. J Trauma. Jun 1978;18(6):467-8. [Medline].

  10. Wilkie DP. Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis. Br J Surg. 1914;1:366-75.

  11. Cleary JE, Omer GE. Congenital proximal radio-ulnar synostosis. Natural history and functional assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 1985;67(4):539-45. [Medline].

  12. Simmons BP, Southmayd WW, Riseborough EJ. Congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Hand Surg [Am]. Nov 1983;8(6):829-38. [Medline].

  13. Jaffer Z, Nelson M, Beighton P. Bone fusion in the foetal alcohol syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63B(4):569-71. [Medline][Full Text].

  14. Giuffre L, Corsello G, Giuffre M, et al. New syndrome: autosomal dominant microcephaly and radio-ulnar synostosis. Am J Med Genet. Jul 1 1994;51(3):266-9. [Medline].

  15. Bauer G, Arand M, Mutschler W. Post-traumatic radioulnar synostosis after forearm fracture osteosynthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;110(3):142-5. [Medline].

  16. Henket M, van Duijn PJ, Doornberg JN, et al. A comparison of proximal radioulnar synostosis excision after trauma and distal biceps reattachment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Sep-Oct 2007;16(5):626-30. [Medline].

  17. Garland DE, Dowling V. Forearm fractures in the head-injured adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jun 1983;(176):190-6. [Medline].

  18. Sauder DJ, Athwal GS. Management of isolated ulnar shaft fractures. Hand Clin. May 2007;23(2):179-84, vi. [Medline].

  19. Mital MA. Congenital radioulnar synostosis and congenital dislocation of the radial head. Orthop Clin North Am. Apr 1976;7(2):375-83. [Medline].

  20. Kelikian H, Doumanian A. Swivel for proximal radioulnar synostosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1957;39:945-51.

  21. Ogino T, Hikino K. Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis: compensatory rotation around the wrist and rotation osteotomy. J Hand Surg [Br]. Jun 1987;12(2):173-8. [Medline].

  22. Khalil I, Vizkelety T. Osteotomy of the synostosis mass for the treatment of congenital radio-ulnar synostosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1993;113(1):20-2. [Medline].

  23. El-Adl W. Two-stage double-level rotational osteotomy in the treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis. Acta Orthop Belg. Dec 2007;73(6):704-9. [Medline].

  24. Green WT, Mital MA. Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis: surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1979;61(5):738-43. [Medline].

  25. Smith RJ, Lipke RW. Treatment of congenital deformities of the hand and forearm (second of two parts). N Engl J Med. Feb 22 1979;300(8):402-7. [Medline].

  26. Failla JM, Amadio PC, Morrey BF. Post-traumatic proximal radio-ulnar synostosis. Results of surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 1989;71(8):1208-13. [Medline].

  27. Hankin FM, Smith PA, Kling TF Jr, et al. Ulnar nerve palsy following rotational osteotomy of congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 1987;7(1):103-6. [Medline].

  28. Bayne LG, Costas BL, Lourie GM. Lovell and Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.

  29. Bolano LE. Congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis: treatment with the Ilizarov method. J Hand Surg [Am]. Nov 1994;19(6):977-8. [Medline].

  30. Brady LP, Jewett EL. A new treatment of radioulnar synostosis. South Med J. 1960;53:507-10.

  31. Cullen JP, Pellegrini VD Jr, Miller RJ, et al. Treatment of traumatic radioulnar synostosis by excision and postoperative low-dose irradiation. J Hand Surg [Am]. May 1994;19(3):394-401. [Medline].

  32. Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 4th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.

  33. Kanaya F, Ibaraki K. Mobilization of congenital radioulnar synostosis using vascularized fascio-fat graft. In: Vastamaki M, ed. Current Trends in Hand Surgery: Proceedings of the 6th Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand, Helsinki, 3-7 July 1995. New York, NY: Excerpta Medica; 1995.

  34. Morrey BF, Askew LJ, Chao EY. A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1981;63(6):872-7. [Medline].

  35. Morrey B, ed. The Elbow and Its Disorders. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1993.

  36. Vince KG, Miller JE. Cross-union complicating fracture of the forearm. Part I: Adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1987;69(5):640-53. [Medline].

Keywords

radial-ulnar synostosis, radioulnar synostosis, radial-ulnar osseous union, osseous union, congenital synostosis, posttraumatic synostosis

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Raymond Wurapa, MD, Consulting Surgeon in Orthopaedics, The Cardinal Orthopaedic Institute
Raymond Wurapa, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Columbus Orthopaedic Society, Ohio Orthopaedic Society, and Ohio State Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

A Lee Osterman, MD, Director of Hand Surgery Fellowship, Director, Philadelphia Hand Center; Director, Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Hand Surgery, University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

N Ake Nystrom, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital
Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, American College of International Physicians, and American College of Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Harris Gellman, MD, Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center; Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine
Harris Gellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Arkansas Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.