Surgical Treatment of Interphalangeal Joint Arthritis 

  • Author: Carlos A Garcia-Moral, MD; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD   more...
 
Updated: Mar 29, 2011
 

Repair of the Degenerated PIP Joint

Arthrodesis has been the time-honored surgical choice for the degenerated proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. In the late 1950s, Brannon and Klein developed total joint arthroplasty for the PIP joint.[1] Adrian Flatt then reported his experience with a metallic, hinged prosthesis for the rheumatoid arthritis of the PIP and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints.[2] These devices routinely failed due to loosening or cortical breakout that was primarily caused by an artificially high center of rotation.

Numerous total joint devices have been introduced to reconstruct the PIP joint, but regardless of design, these devices typically fail due to difficulties in restoring the biomechanics of the joint. Swanson developed the silicone interpositional arthroplasty for the PIP joint.[3] Although this device is a joint spacer and not a total joint replacement, pain relief has been predictable while durability has been suboptimal. The silicone PIP joint spacer remains the preferred choice for the prosthetic reconstruction of the PIP joint.[4, 5]

Surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) was developed as the first prosthetic device for the PIP joint that closely resembles the anatomic configuration of the phalangeal head and the articular base of the middle phalanx.[6] Short-term results have indicated good function and durability. Current implant arthroplasty alternatives for the PIP joints are primitive; longevity and results will improve with better designs. As in other joints, anatomically and biomechanically sound restoration of the PIP joint with compatible materials will be the future goal of implant arthroplasty of the PIP joint.

Next

The Arthritic PIP Joint

The arthritic proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint demonstrates fusiform joint swelling. With progression of the condition, marginal osteophytes (Bouchard nodes) become evident with progressive lateral deviation of the digits, as shown below.

Radiograph depicting the clinical picture of a hanRadiograph depicting the clinical picture of a hand with fusiform swelling at the proximal interphalangeal joints. These are called Bouchard nodes.

During finger flexion, overlapping of the digits increases the functional impairment of the hand. Swan-neck and boutonniere deformities occur infrequently. Erosive osteoarthritis is an aggressive form of this condition that primarily affects the PIP and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints in middle-aged women.[7]

Previous
Next

Anatomy of the PIP Joint

The proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint is a ginglymus joint, or hinged joint, with a functional stability throughout its normal arc of flexion and extension. This bicondylar joint comprises a pair of concentric condyles that are separated by the intercondylar notch and allows a range of motion of 90-120°. The 2 corresponding articular surfaces of the middle phalanx are separated by a median ridge.

In contrast to the metacarpal articular head, the center of rotation of the phalangeal head remains constant throughout flexion and extension. This phalangeal joint configuration provides functional stability for lateral and rotatory forces. The oblique collateral ligaments arise from the dorsal and lateral aspect of each condyle to insert into the lateral tubercle, near the volar margin of the middle phalanx base. These collateral ligaments are 2-3 mm thick.

The volar plate consists of a distal portion of a thick fibrocartilaginous tissue that inserts into the volar lip of the middle phalanx base and is suspended by the transversely oriented accessory collateral ligaments. The proximal aspect of the volar plate is membranous and is attached to the neck of the proximal phalanx. The lateral portion of the volar plate thickens to form the volar check ligaments. See the volar view of a finger below.

Schematic volar view of a finger. Note that betweeSchematic volar view of a finger. Note that between A3 and C1 is the volar plate. The lateral extension represents the restraining triangular ligaments. A2, A3, A4 = annular pulleys 2-4; C1 = cruciform pulley 1; Cl.lig. = Cleland ligament; d.a. = digital artery; m.p. = middle phalanx; p.p. = proximal phalanx; and p.t.d.a. = transverse digital artery.

Additional stability is provided to the interphalangeal joint by the extensor aponeurosis on the dorsal surface of the digit. The central slip of the extensor digitorum communis tendon attaches to the dorsal lip of the middle phalanx.

The oblique retinacular ligament arises from the side of the proximal phalanx and passes laterally into the PIP joint to join the lateral margin of the extensor band on the dorsal lateral aspect of the middle phalanx. The transverse retinacular ligament is superficial and runs dorsally from the volar surface of the capsule and flexor tendon sheath; it is attached to the lateral margin of the lateral tendon of the extensor mechanism. The Cleland ligament is dorsal to the neurovascular bundle, and the transverse Grayson ligament is volar to the neurovascular bundle, as shown below.

Cross-section of a finger at the proximal interphaCross-section of a finger at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint level. The Cleland ligament is dorsal to the neurovascular bundle (n.v.b.), and the transverse Grayson ligament is volar to the neurovascular bundle. A3 = annular pulley 3; a.c.l. = accessory collateral ligament; c.l. = collateral ligament; e.t. = extensor tendon; f.d.p. = flexor digitorum profundus; f.d.s. = flexor digitorum superficialis; l.e.t. = lateral band; o.r.l. = oblique retinacular ligament; t.r.l. = transverse retinacular ligament; and v.p. = volar plate.

Indications and Contraindications for PIP Joint Surgery

Operative treatment is indicated for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint when medical management has failed to relieve the pain, when the digit deformity is interfering with hand function, or when a significant restriction of motion limits the activities of daily living. When choosing the method of surgical treatment for a painful arthritic PIP joint, consider the clinical role of the PIP joint in the patient's particular activities.

Arthrodesis of the PIP joint is indicated mainly in the index and middle finger in a young or active patient or when a significant loss of bone has occurred.[8, 9, 10] Arthrodesis should also be considered for anyone who is highly active on a regular basis.

Arthroplasty is indicated in less-active patients with painful, stiff, arthritic joints.[4, 6, 11] Arthrodesis and implant arthroplasty of the PIP joint are contraindicated in the presence of recent or chronic infection or in infirm individuals who are unable to sustain the rigors of elective surgical intervention. Flatt noted that the PIP joint has the greatest degree of movement and functional adaptations of the hand.[2] He found loss of movement to be a frequent complaint, especially in the third, fourth, and fifth digits.

Stability considerations are as important as motion considerations, especially in the radial digits that are involved during pinching activities. During pinching, the index finger must withstand forceful contact with the thumb, especially in the lateral or key pinch. Patients with impaired index fingers pinch with the middle finger when possible, so stability of the middle finger becomes more important when the index finger is also affected. Relatively few surgical options exist for the painful arthritic PIP joint. Most surgeries are arthroplasties or arthrodeses.

Previous
Next

Arthroplasty of the PIP Joint

A Swanson interpositional arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint through a dorsal approach has been recommended. However, the author has used a volar surgical approach that helps in the following ways:

  • Minimizes the risk of extensor lag
  • Avoids interference with the extensor tendons, preserving the central slip
  • Allows for more prompt active range of motion in the postoperative period
  • Eliminates the risk of central slip rupture with a resultant boutonniere deformity or a flexion contracture deformity

The volar approach also has better cosmetic and functional results. This approach provides an excellent exposure, which is critical given the importance of the technique with this type of procedure. However, with the volar approach, the risk of creating a swan-neck deformity exists.

A shortcoming of the Swanson implant is the sacrifice of the collateral ligaments, which makes implantation of the device in the index or long PIP undesirable. In contrast, the collateral ligaments are spared with implantation of most surface replacement arthroplasties (SRAs) of the PIP joint.

Many surgeons favor a dorsal approach, with longitudinal splitting of the extensor tendon or through a distally based flap of the central slip, as described by Chamay.[12] The Chamay approach is the favored approach for SRAs.

Various nonsilicone implant arthroplasties are either available for use or under investigation. They include the Saffar, the Digitos, the DJO3A, the Mathy, and the Avanta PIP SRA.

In the volar arthroplasty approach (see below), a radial- or ulnar-based Bruner incision is made, with the apex at the PIP joint flexion crease. After the skin flap is elevated, the Grayson ligaments are completely released from their origin, exposing the neurovascular bundle. The bundle is then retracted, exposing the Cleland ligaments dorsally, which are also released.

Surgical picture of the volar approach for an arthSurgical picture of the volar approach for an arthroplasty. This image depicts the extensor tendons, retracted to the side, and the volar plate.

The proximal and interphalangeal transverse digital arteries, which are consistently present as communicating branches from the digital arteries, are cauterized and transected, allowing full mobilization of the neurovascular structures.

The flexor tendon sheath is released by dividing the origin of the first and second cruciform pulleys and the third annular pulley at the volar plate. The volar plate is fully exposed and is released proximally and along its lateral margins from the accessory collateral ligaments, which are seen upon release of the transverse retinacular ligament from the volar capsule and tendon sheath.

The collateral ligaments are then released proximally, and the joint is opened by hyperextension, as shown below. The flexor tendons retract to one side, and the neurovascular bundles are displaced dorsally. Both articular surfaces are completely exposed in this manner. The medullary cavities of the bone are reamed in order to accommodate the proper size of the implant. See the images below. At this time, the authors use the recommended radiographic examination in order to assess adequate space and alignment of the digit. After the implant is inserted in place, it is essential that full range of motion exists and the implant is stable.

The proximal interphalangeal joint in hyperextensiThe proximal interphalangeal joint in hyperextension. Note the marked degenerative changes of the articular joint surface. The medullary cavities of the phalanges are preparThe medullary cavities of the phalanges are prepared for placement of an implant of the proper size. After the medullary cavities of the phalanges are After the medullary cavities of the phalanges are prepared, an implant of the proper size is placed.

Resurfacing prosthetic procedures, with or without bone cement, have been designed for replacement of the PIP joint. Limited experience with this design has shown promise for future consideration as an alternative treatment. The exposure for most surface replacement arthroplasties spares the collateral ligaments; therefore, these joint replacements are an option for the index and long fingers.

Previous
Next

Arthrodesis of the PIP Joint

An alternative treatment for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint osteoarthritis is arthrodesis of the joint in a functional position. Arthrodesis offers stability, durability, and little need for further procedures. This option is the procedure of choice for the index finger, which is usually subjected to lateral stress during pinching activities.

Arthrodesis is indicated mainly for the index and middle fingers in patients who are young or active or when a significant loss of bone has occurred, and this procedure continues to be the best surgical treatment for the painful, unstable PIP joint in the index or long finger. However, depending upon the patient's needs, arthrodesis may impair or even be incompatible with satisfactory function.

According to the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, PIP arthrodesis is associated with a 50% impairment of the finger.[13] On the ulnar aspect of the hand, preservation of mobility at the level of the PIP joint is important, especially to obtain the functional ability to grasp small objects.

The preferred position for arthrodesis of the PIP joints is 30-40° for the index and the middle finger, 50° for the ring finger, and 55° for the small finger.

Several different arthrodesis techniques for the PIP joint are based on the type of fixation that is used. The appropriate finger position varies for the radial to the ulnar fingers and with the assessment of the patient's particular needs. Kirschner wires (K-wires), interosseous wiring, tension band wiring, and screw fixation have been used to achieve a solid, nonpainful arthrodesis.[8] [9] [11] The rate of nonunion is 0-10%.

Previous
Next

Patient Care after PIP Surgery

Primary wound healing is the first goal of postoperative care. Elevation of the affected digit is important to prevent swelling. Active motion of the PIP joint usually begins on the third to seventh day, as the swelling subsides. A Coban elastic bandage helps to control swelling, as shown in the images below.

Following arthrodesis surgery, the PIP joint is protected in a dorsal and volar Orthoplast splint for approximately 4-6 weeks (see the image below). Motion of the MCP and DIP joints is allowed shortly after surgery. A hand therapist evaluates the patient to ensure adequate splinting, joint protection, and assistive devices to carry out the activities of daily living. (See the image below of a postoperative splint).

After the initial postoperative swelling subsides,After the initial postoperative swelling subsides, the patient may wear a splint to control the lateral deviation of the digit and to encourage active range of motion.
Previous
Next

Complications after PIP Surgery

Swanson reported a need for revision of the silicone interposition arthroplasty in about 11% of digits.[3] Implant fracture continues to be common, and recurrent ulnar deviation can also be present. Infection does not appear to be a problem with this type of prosthesis, and no infections have been recorded in any of the author's patients. In a follow-up study of 424 implants, Swanson et al reported a 5.19% rate of implant failure.[11]

The rate of nonunions is 0-10% after arthrodesis. For Herbert screw fixation, the nonunion rate is 2%. Tension band wiring has been reported to have a 0% failure rate.

Previous
Next

Long-term Patient Monitoring

Patients with silicone implant arthroplasties are monitored indefinitely for signs of fracture. Patients who have undergone surface replacement arthroplasties are likewise monitored indefinitely for signs of loosening. Those who have undergone arthrodeses are monitored radiographically for signs of bony union. Hardware removal may become necessary, but this is not recommended until a year after surgery.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Both silicone implant arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) offer predictable motion and excellent pain relief for osteoarthritis of the PIP joint. More than 90% of arthroplasties achieve a functional arc of motion of more than 40° within 6-8 weeks after surgery. The best long-term results to date have been obtained with the silicone interposition arthroplasty.[4]

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Carlos A Garcia-Moral, MD  Clinical Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Oklahoma Health Services Center

Carlos A Garcia-Moral, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association for Hand Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Oklahoma State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Peter M Murray, MD  Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; Director of Education, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Jacksonville; Consultant, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Consulting Staff, Nemours Children's Clinic and Wolfson's Children's Hospital

Peter M Murray, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Florida Medical Association, Orthopaedic Research Society, and Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Thomas R Hunt III, MD  John D Sherrill Professor and Director of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgeon in Chief of UAB Highlands Hospital, Director of Hand and Upper Extremity Fellowship, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Thomas R Hunt III, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, AO Foundation, Mid-America Orthopaedic Association, and Southern Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Tornier Consulting fee Review panel membership; Tornier Royalty None; Tornier Ownership interest None; Lippincott Royalty Independent contractor

Chief Editor

Harris Gellman, MD  Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center; Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine

Harris Gellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Arkansas Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. BRANNON EW, KLEIN G. Experiences with a finger-joint prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 1959;41-A(1):87-102. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  2. Flatt AE. Restoration of the rheumatoid finger-joint function--Interim report on trial of prosthetic replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1961;43(5):753-74. [Full Text].

  3. Swanson AB 16-9. Flexible Implant for Replacement of Arthritic or Destroyed Joints in the Hand: Inter-Clinic Information Bulletin. 1966. New York, NY: New York University; 1966:16-19.

  4. Branam BR, Tuttle HG, Stern PJ, Levin L. Resurfacing arthroplasty versus silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am. Jul-Aug 2007;32(6):775-88. [Medline].

  5. Namdari S, Weiss AP. Anatomically neutral silicone small joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am. Feb 2009;34(2):292-300. [Medline].

  6. Linscheid RL, Murray PM, Vidal MA, Beckenbaugh RD. Development of a surface replacement arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg Am. Mar 1997;22(2):286-98. [Medline].

  7. Grainger AJ, Farrant JM, O'Connor PJ, Tan AL, Tanner S, Emery P, et al. MR imaging of erosions in interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis: is all osteoarthritis erosive?. Skeletal Radiol. Aug 2007;36(8):737-45. [Medline].

  8. Olivier LC, Gensigk F, Board TN, Kendoff D, Krehmeier U, Wolfhard U. Arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint: description of a new technique and clinical follow-up at 2 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Mar 2008;128(3):307-11. [Medline].

  9. Leibovic SJ. Instructional Course Lecture. Arthrodesis of the interphalangeal joints with headless compression screws. J Hand Surg Am. Sep 2007;32(7):1113-9. [Medline].

  10. Uhl RL. Proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using the tension band technique. J Hand Surg Am. Jul-Aug 2007;32(6):914-7. [Medline].

  11. Swanson AB, Maupin BK, Gajjar NV, Swanson GD. Flexible implant arthroplasty in the proximal interphalangeal joint of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. Nov 1985;10(6 Pt 1):796-805. [Medline].

  12. Chamay A. A distally based dorsal and triangular tendinous flap for direct access to the proximal interphalangeal joint. Ann Chir Main. 1988;7(2):179-83. [Medline].

  13. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 4th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1993.

Previous
Next
 
Radiograph depicting the clinical picture of a hand with fusiform swelling at the proximal interphalangeal joints. These are called Bouchard nodes.
Schematic volar view of a finger. Note that between A3 and C1 is the volar plate. The lateral extension represents the restraining triangular ligaments. A2, A3, A4 = annular pulleys 2-4; C1 = cruciform pulley 1; Cl.lig. = Cleland ligament; d.a. = digital artery; m.p. = middle phalanx; p.p. = proximal phalanx; and p.t.d.a. = transverse digital artery.
Cross-section of a finger at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint level. The Cleland ligament is dorsal to the neurovascular bundle (n.v.b.), and the transverse Grayson ligament is volar to the neurovascular bundle. A3 = annular pulley 3; a.c.l. = accessory collateral ligament; c.l. = collateral ligament; e.t. = extensor tendon; f.d.p. = flexor digitorum profundus; f.d.s. = flexor digitorum superficialis; l.e.t. = lateral band; o.r.l. = oblique retinacular ligament; t.r.l. = transverse retinacular ligament; and v.p. = volar plate.
Surgical picture of the volar approach for an arthroplasty. This image depicts the extensor tendons, retracted to the side, and the volar plate.
The proximal interphalangeal joint in hyperextension. Note the marked degenerative changes of the articular joint surface.
The medullary cavities of the phalanges are prepared for placement of an implant of the proper size.
After the medullary cavities of the phalanges are prepared, an implant of the proper size is placed.
Lateral radiographic view of the finger with an implant in place.
Photograph depicting the degree of flexion in a hand at 10 weeks following surgery.
After the initial postoperative swelling subsides, the patient may wear a splint to control the lateral deviation of the digit and to encourage active range of motion.
After the initial postoperative swelling subsides, the patient may wear a splint to control the lateral deviation of the digit and to encourage active range of motion.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.