Sprengel Deformity 

  • Author: Mihir M Thacker, MBBS, MS(Orth), DNB(Orth), FCPS(Orth), D'Ortho; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD   more...
 
Updated: Feb 17, 2012
 

Background

Eulenberg first described what later became known as Sprengel deformity in 1863, and, 2 decades later, Willet and Walsham reported 2 cases with anatomic descriptions of this clinical entity.[1, 2] Sprengel then described 4 cases of upward displacement of the scapula in 1891.[3] Multiple case reports and surgical techniques followed in the literature for Sprengel deformity, also known as congenital elevation of the scapula. A photograph and radiograph of the deformity are below.

Clinical photograph of a child with Sprengel deforClinical photograph of a child with Sprengel deformity and Klippel-Feil syndrome. Posteroanterior chest radiograph. This image depicPosteroanterior chest radiograph. This image depicts bilateral Sprengel deformities.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Bone, Joint, and Muscle Center and Hand, Wrist, Elbow, and Shoulder Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Spina Bifida and Scoliosis.

Next

History of the Procedure

In 1863, Eulenberg described Sprengel deformity as "hochgradige dislocation der scapula" (ie, a high-grade dislocation of the scapula).[1] In 1883, Willet and Walsham were the first to describe the omovertebral bone, as well as the first to describe the excision of the bone, with good results.[2] Sprengel described 4 cases of the condition in 1891.[3] Kolliker, who also described 4 cases in 1891, gave the condition its eponym, Sprengel deformity.[4]

Previous
Next

Problem

Sprengel deformity is a complex anomaly that is associated with malposition and dysplasia of the scapula.[5, 6, 7, 8, 9] This condition also involves regional muscle hypoplasia or atrophy, which causes disfigurement and limitation of shoulder movement.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

Sprengel deformity is the most common congenital malformation of the shoulder girdle.[10] The male-to-female ratio is 3:1.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Genetics

The condition is sporadic. Rarely, it may run in families (autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance).[11, 12]

Embryology

The scapula is a cervical appendage that normally differentiates opposite the fourth, fifth, and sixth cervical vertebrae at about 5 weeks' gestation.[13] This structure normally descends to the thorax by the end of the third month of intrauterine life; any impediment to its descent results in a hypoplastic, elevated scapula, known as the Sprengel deformity.

Congenital elevation of the scapula is caused by an interruption in the normal caudad migration of the scapula. This produces both cosmetic and functional impairment and probably occurs between the 9th and 12th week of gestation. An arrest in the development of bone, cartilage, and muscle also occurs. The trapezius, rhomboid, or levator scapulae muscle may be absent, hypoplastic, or contain multiple fibrous adhesions. The serratus anterior muscle may be weak, leading to winging of the scapula. Other muscles, such as the pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, or the sternocleidomastoid, may be hypoplastic and similarly involved.

Associated malformations are almost always present with a Sprengel deformity. These can include anomalies in the cervicothoracic vertebrae or the thoracic rib cage. The most common anomalies are absent or fused ribs, chest-wall asymmetry, Klippel-Feil syndrome, cervical ribs, congenital scoliosis, and cervical spina bifida. When scoliosis is present, the most common curves are in the cervicothoracic or upper thoracic region. A relationship between a Sprengel deformity and diastematomyelia has also been shown.

Another anomaly that is seen in approximately one third of patients with a Sprengel deformity is the omovertebral bone. This is a rhomboid- or trapezoid-shaped structure of cartilage or bone that usually lies in a strong fascial sheath, which extends from the superomedial border of the scapula to the spinous processes, lamina, or transverse processes of the cervical spine, most commonly the fourth to seventh cervical vertebrae. A well-developed joint can form between the scapula and the omovertebral bone; this bone can also be a solid osseous bridge. The omovertebral bone is best visualized on a lateral or oblique radiograph of the cervical spine.

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Despite the work of Engel (Bleb theory), Oxnard, and Ogden et al, no satisfactory explanation exists regarding the pathogenesis of the Sprengel deformity.[7, 14, 15, 16]

The gross pathology can be described as follows:

  • Scapula: The scapula is dysplastic and is located higher than normal in the neck or upper thoracic region. This bone is smaller than normal in the vertical plane and appears larger horizontally. The inferior angle is rotated medially, causing the glenoid to face inferiorly. An inverse correlation exists between the superior displacement and rotation of the scapula; with a higher scapula, the rotation is decreased. Convexity of the upper (supraspinous) portion of the scapula is increased and curvature of the clavicular shaft is decreased, forming a narrower scapuloclavicular space, which may contribute to brachial plexus compression postoperatively.
  • Omovertebral connection: An omovertebral connection, which may be fibrous, cartilaginous, or bony, may exist in about one third of cases.[5, 10] This connection attaches the superomedial angle of the scapula to the spinous process, lamina, or transverse process of the cervical vertebrae and may be the primary cause of restricted shoulder motion in patients with a Sprengel deformity.[17] The omovertebral connection is usually unilateral, is always associated with a fixed, elevated scapula, and has a major role in determining the shape and the malpositioning of the scapula.[18, 19] According to Willet and Walsham, the omovertebral bar is homologous to the suprascapular bone in lower vertebrates.[2]
  • Periscapular muscles: The spinoscapular muscles may be fibrotic and contracted, with the trapezius muscle the most commonly affected.
Previous
Next

Presentation

The hallmarks of the Sprengel deformity are shoulder asymmetry and restriction of shoulder abduction. Clinically, the affected scapula usually is elevated 2-10 cm and is adducted, and its inferior pole is rotated medially. Because of this rotation, the glenoid faces inferiorly. A prominence in the suprascapular region is characteristic because of the upwardly rotated superomedial angle of the scapula, which causes the ipsilateral side of the neck to appear fuller and its normal contour to be lost. The scapula is hypoplastic, and the length of the vertebral border is decreased. Occasionally, some anterior bending of the supraspinous portion is present.

Passive movement of the glenohumeral joint, including abduction and external and internal rotation, may be normal. However, scapulothoracic movements may be severely limited. In 40% of patients with a Sprengel deformity, combined abduction is limited to less than 100º. The omovertebral bone may also limit abduction by affecting scapular mobility, and can also limit neck movement if this bone is attached high in the cervical spine. Other causes of limited abduction include abnormal and weakened scapular muscles.

The left side is more commonly affected than the right side. The condition may sometimes be bilateral, in which case, although it is cosmetically much more acceptable, functionally, it is more disabling.

Problems that may be associated with this condition include syndromes such as the following:

These syndromes are extremely rare, with the possible exception of the Klippel-Feil syndrome.

Based on the severity of the condition, a Sprengel deformity can be classified as follows (Cavendish grades)[8] :

  • Grade 1: The deformity is very mild. The shoulders are almost level, and the deformity cannot be noticed with the clothes on.
  • Grade 2: The deformity is mild. The shoulders are almost level, but the superomedial portion of the high scapula is visible as a lump.
  • Grade 3: The deformity is moderate. It is visible, and the affected shoulder is elevated 2-5 cm higher than the opposite shoulder.
  • Grade 4: The deformity is severe. The scapula is very high, with the superomedial angle at the occiput, with neck webbing and brevicollis.

This classification, however, is difficult to apply in bilateral cases, as in the photo below.

Clinical photograph of a child with Sprengel deforClinical photograph of a child with Sprengel deformity and Klippel-Feil syndrome.
Previous
Next

Indications

Indications for surgical intervention of a Sprengel deformity include significant cosmetic concerns and significant restriction of shoulder abduction in children younger than age 6 years.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

Some vital structures are at risk during the extensive dissection that is required as part of the relocation procedure. These structures include the following[30] :

  • The dorsal scapular nerve: This nerve courses close to the superomedial border of the scapula in the plane between the rhomboid and erector spinae muscles. The dorsal scapular nerve remains anterior to the serratus anterior and the subscapular muscles. There exists a risk of injuring the nerve during dissection of the periscapular muscles at the superomedial angle of the scapula, and when the trapezius and rhomboid muscles are reflected off as a single unit from the spine in the Woodward procedure (see Treatment, Intraoperative details, below). Therefore, staying subperiosteal during the process of freeing the periscapular muscles is essential, especially at the superomedial angle of the scapula.
  • The spinal accessory nerve: This nerve is located between the trapezius and rhomboid muscles and is, therefore, at risk theoretically; however, because the spinal accessory nerve is sandwiched between the 2 muscles, it is rarely ever injured when these muscles operate as a unit.
  • The suprascapular nerve: This nerve runs in the suprascapular notch of the scapula and may be injured if the dissection is carried too far laterally when the superior portion of the scapula is resected. By staying at least 1 cm medial to the notch, injury to the nerve during the procedure can be avoided.
Previous
Next

Contraindications

The presence of a mild deformity with minimal restriction of movement is a contraindication to surgery. Although treatment of the Sprengel deformity is essentially surgical, some factors exist that could compromise the results of surgery and, thus, may be considered to be contraindications. These factors include the presence of associated syndromes that affect the final functional outcome.

Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Mihir M Thacker, MBBS, MS(Orth), DNB(Orth), FCPS(Orth), D'Ortho  Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University; Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children; Orthopedic Oncologist, Helen F Graham Cancer Center and Christiana Care Health Services

Mihir M Thacker, MBBS, MS(Orth), DNB(Orth), FCPS(Orth), D'Ortho is a member of the following medical societies: Children's Oncology Group, Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society ASAMI-North America, Medical Council of India, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

David S Feldman, MD  Chief, Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Director, Center for Children, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York University Medical Center

David S Feldman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Scoliosis Research Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Michael S Clarke, MD  Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Michael S Clarke, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Hand Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, Arthroscopy Association of North America, Clinical Orthopaedic Society, Mid-Central States Orthopaedic Society, and Missouri State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Robert J Nowinski, DO  Clinical Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine; Private Practice, Orthopedic and Neurological Consultants, Inc, Columbus, Ohio

Robert J Nowinski, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Osteopathic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Osteopathic Association, Ohio Osteopathic Association, and Ohio State Medical Association

Disclosure: Tornier Grant/research funds Other; Tornier Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Harris Gellman, MD  Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center; Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami, Leonard M Miller School of Medicine

Harris Gellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Arkansas Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Eulenberg M. Casuistische mittelheilungen aus dem gembeite der orthopadie. Arch Klin Chir. 1863;4:301-11.

  2. Willet A, Walsham WJ. A second case of malformation of the left shoulder-girdle; removal of the abnormal portion of bone; with remarks on the probable nature of the deformity. Med Chir Trans. 66;1883:145-58. [Full Text].

  3. Sprengel OK. Die angeborene verschiebung des schulterblattes nach oben. Archiv Fur Klinische Chirurgie, Berlin. 1891;42:545-9.

  4. Kolliker T. Mittheilungen aus der chirurgischen casuistik und kleinere mittheilungen. Bemerkungen zum aufsatze von Dr. Sprengel. Die angeborene verschiebung des schulterblattes nach oben. Arch Klin Chir. 1891;42:925.

  5. Hamner DL, Hall JE. Sprengel's deformity associated with multidirectional shoulder instability. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1995;15(5):641-3. [Medline].

  6. Tachdjian MO. Pediatric Orthopedics. Vol 1. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1990:136-8.

  7. Ogden JA, Conlogue GJ, Phillips MS, Bronson ML. Sprengel's deformity. Radiology of the pathologic deformation. Skeletal Radiol. 1979;4(4):204-11. [Medline].

  8. Cavendish ME. Congenital elevation of the scapula. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Aug 1972;54(3):395-408. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  9. Mooney JF 3rd, White DR, Glazier S. Previously unreported structure associated with Sprengel deformity. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 2009;29(1):26-8. [Medline].

  10. Grogan DP, Stanley EA, Bobechko WP. The congenital undescended scapula. Surgical correction by the Woodward procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Nov 1983;65(5):598-605. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Chen CP. Syndromes and disorders associated with omphalocele (III): single gene disorders, neural tube defects, diaphragmatic defects and others. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2007;46(2):111-20. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  12. Ferlini A, Ragno M, Gobbi P, et al. Hydrocephalus, skeletal anomalies, and mental disturbances in a mother and three daughters: a new syndrome. Am J Med Genet. Dec 4 1995;59(4):506-11. [Medline].

  13. Matsuoka T, Ahlberg PE, Kessaris N, Iannarelli P, Dennehy U, Richardson WD, et al. Neural crest origins of the neck and shoulder. Nature. Jul 21 2005;436(7049):347-55. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  14. Engel D. The etiology of the undescended scapula and related syndromes. J Bone Joint Surg. 1943;25:613-25. [Full Text].

  15. Oxnard CE. Evolution of the human shoulder: some possible pathways. Am J Phys Anthropol. May 1969;30(3):319-31. [Medline].

  16. Ogden JA, Phillips SB. Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. VII. The scapula. Skeletal Radiol. 1983;9(3):157-69. [Medline].

  17. Doita M, Iio H, Mizuno K. Surgical management of Sprengel's deformity in adults. A report of two cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 2000;371:119-24. [Medline].

  18. Jeannopoulos CL. Congenital elevation of the scapula. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 1952;34 A(4):883-92. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  19. Cho TJ, Choi IH, Chung CY, Hwang JK. The Sprengel deformity. Morphometric analysis using 3D-CT and its clinical relevance. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jul 2000;82(5):711-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  20. Floemer F, Magerkurth O, Jauckus C, Lütschg J, Schneider JF. Klippel-Feil syndrome and Sprengel deformity combined with an intraspinal course of the left subclavian artery and a bovine aortic arch variant. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Nov 16 2007;epub ahead of print. [Medline].

  21. Samartzis D, Herman J, Lubicky JP, Shen FH. Sprengel's deformity in Klippel-Feil syndrome. Spine. Aug 15 2007;32(18):E512-6. [Medline].

  22. Hensinger RN. Orthopedic problems of the shoulder and neck. Pediatr Clin North Am. Nov 1977;24(4):889-902. [Medline].

  23. Hensinger RN, Lang JE, MacEwen GD. Klippel-Feil syndrome; a constellation of associated anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 1974;56(6):1246-53. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  24. Keats TE. Ocular hypertelorism (Greig's syndrome) associated with Sprengel's deformity. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. Sep 1970;110(1):119-22. [Medline].

  25. Hadley MD. Carpal coalition and Sprengel's shoulder in Poland's syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br]. Jun 1985;10(2):253-5. [Medline].

  26. Fernbach SK, Glass RB. The expanded spectrum of limb anomalies in the VATER association. Pediatr Radiol. 1988;18(3):215-20. [Medline].

  27. Pollard ME, Cushing MV, Ogden JA. Musculoskeletal abnormalities in velocardiofacial syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1999;19(5):607-12. [Medline].

  28. Hersh JH, Groom KR, Yen FF, Verdi GD. Changing phenotype in floating-harbor syndrome. Am J Med Genet. Feb 26 1998;76(1):58-61. [Medline].

  29. Avon SW, Shively JL. Orthopaedic manifestations of Goldenhar syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop. Nov-Dec 1988;8(6):683-6. [Medline].

  30. Boon JM, Potgieter D, Van Jaarsveld Z, Frantzen DJ. Congenital undescended scapula (Sprengel deformity): a case study. Clin Anat. Mar 2002;15(2):139-42. [Medline].

  31. Leibovic SJ, Ehrlich MG, Zaleske DJ. Sprengel deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Feb 1990;72(2):192-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  32. Dilli A, Ayaz UY, Damar C, Ersan O, Hekimoglu B. Sprengel Deformity: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Two Pediatric Cases. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2011;1:13. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  33. McMurtry I, Bennet GC, Bradish C. Osteotomy for congenital elevation of the scapula (Sprengel's deformity). J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jul 2005;87(7):986-9. [Medline].

  34. Ross DM, Cruess RL. The surgical correction of congenital elevation of the scapula. A review of seventy-seven cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jun 1977;125:17-23. [Medline].

  35. Woodward JW. Congenital elevation of the scapula: correction by release and transplantation of muscle origins. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1961;43:219-28. [Full Text].

  36. Green WT. The surgical correction of congenital elevation of the scapula (Sprengel's deformity). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957;39-A:1439-48.

  37. Gonen E, Simsek U, Solak S, Bektaser B, Ates Y, Aydin E. Long-Term Results of Modified Green Method in Sprengel's Deformity. J Child Orthop. Aug 2010;4(4):309-14. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  38. Siu KK, Ko JY, Huang CC, Wang FS, Chen JM, Wong T. Woodward procedure improves shoulder function in Sprengel deformity. Chang Gung Med J. Jul-Aug 2011;34(4):403-9. [Medline].

  39. Mears DC. Partial resection of the scapula and a release of the long head of triceps for the management of Sprengel's deformity. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 2001;21(2):242-5. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Clinical photograph of a child with Sprengel deformity and Klippel-Feil syndrome.
Posteroanterior chest radiograph. This image depicts bilateral Sprengel deformities.
Photo illustrating the Leibovic method for determining scapular rotation and position. ISA = inferior scapular angle; Line 1 = line drawn from the midpoint of the acromioclavicular joint to the midpoint of the sternoclavicular joint; Line 2 = line drawn from the midpoint of the acromioclavicular joint to the ISA; Line 3 = vertical line drawn along the spinous processes of the vertebrae; SSA = superior scapular angle.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.