Ulnar Clubhand 

  • Author: Minoo Patel, MBBS, MS, FRACS; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD   more...
 
Updated: Apr 2, 2010
 

Background

Ulnar clubhand is much less common than radial clubhand and is more appropriately referred to as ulnar deficiencies of the forearm. Most cases are sporadic in occurrence, although genetic syndromes are associated with ulnar dysplasia.[1] Focal dermal hyperplasia, or Goltz syndrome (also known as Goltz-Gorlin syndrome), is an X-linked dominant condition that consists of ulnar dysplasia, long-bone defects, and split-hand or split-foot, with skin atrophy; anal, vulval, or lip papillomata; microphthalmia; iris coloboma; and mental retardation.[2, 3, 4] Split-hand and split-foot with ulnar dysplasia have an autosomal dominant inheritance. An ulnar defect with mammary gland aplasia syndrome is associated with polydactyly or camptodactyly.

Close to 70% of cases of ulnar clubhand are unilateral. A partial rather than complete absence of the ulna is common. Ulnar shortening with radial bowing and abnormal digits is the classic presentation of this condition, and digital anomalies can be found in close to 90% of cases with postaxial absence of ulnar rays.[5] The fourth and fifth metacarpals, as well as the capitate, lunate, triquetrum, hamate, and pisiform, are absent or deformed.

Synostosis with the humerus is possible when the ulna is present; radiohumeral synostosis can also be present. The radial head is dislocated in close to 50% of cases.

Radial bowing is produced by the tethering effect of the fibrocartilaginous ulnar anlage, which can also tether the carpus, producing limitation of wrist movement. The radiocarpal joint has a fixed ulnar deviation in these cases. In most cases, however, function is very good, and the carpus can be actively centralized. The presence of a thumb makes for a functional hand, unlike the case for radial clubhands.

Recent studies

Elliott et al studied 28 patients with posterior congenital dislocation of the radial head and proximal radioulnar fusion to help identify whether they are different clinical manifestations of the same primary developmental abnormality. Of 28 patients studied, 16 had bilateral involvement (8 had posterior dislocation of the radial head only; 5 had posterior radial head dislocation with radioulnar fusion; and 2 had radioulnar fusion without dislocation). Nine patients had only left-sided involvement, and 3 had only right-sided involvement. According to the authors, the suggestion of a developmental relationship between posterior dislocation of the radial head and proximal radioulnar fusion is supported by the fact that the 2 anomalies can occur in the same patient. In addition, they noted that both anomalies can be seen in different patients with the same genetic diagnosis, further supporting the notion that these defects are developmentally related.[6]

Nygaard et al evaluated the pressure distribution in the wrist joints with ulnar shortening and lengthening. They found that compressive forces in loaded wrists were distributed with 67% across the radiocarpal joint and 33% across the ulnocarpal joint; that shortening the ulna by 3 mm increased load in the radius to 80%; and that lengthening the ulna by 1 mm increased its load to 55%. In addition, they noted that load share of the distal radioulnar joint was constant even when the ulna was shortened 3-4 mm. They therefore suggested shortening the ulna by 3 mm, since the increased load in the related joints are constant within a range of -2 to -4 mm.[7]

Oberg et al described the rare combination of right radial and left ulnar deficiencies in 2 cases. In one case, there was a history of 2 separate, distinct episodes of bleeding during early gestation. In the other case, there was associated hematoma formation early in development. According to the authors, variation in longitudinal deficiencies is likely related to the timing and duration of an insult during early limb development, and in experimental models, teratogenic insults have been shown to induce ulnar deficiencies earlier in gestation than radial deficiencies.[8]

Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

Ulnar deficiency of the forearm is much less common than the occurrence of radial clubhand.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Most cases of ulnar deficiency of the forearm are sporadic in occurrence, although genetic syndromes are associated with ulnar dysplasia (see Introduction).

Previous
Next

Presentation

The patient's affected upper limb is examined in supination, pronation, extension, and flexion. Clinical considerations of this condition include the following:

  • Ulnar deviation of the hand
  • Absent ulnar digits[9]
  • Syndactyly
  • Elbow stability
  • Elbow stiffness
  • Limited pronation, supination, or both
  • Radial head subluxation or dislocation
  • Deficient carpal bones
  • Stable wrist
  • Upper limb-length discrepancy

Classification

According to the traditional classification, there are 4 types of ulnar deficiencies of the forearm, which can have varying degrees of radial bow, with or without radial head dislocation. The classification is as follows:

  • Type 1 – Ulnar shortening (distally) with minor radial bow
    • Hypoplasia of the ulna
    • Proximal and distal epiphyses present
    • Hypoplastic or absent ulnar digits
    • Minimal radial bowing
  • Type 2 – Significant ulnar shortening with a fibrocartilaginous anlage attached to the ulnar carpus, with significant radial bowing
    • Partial aplasia of the ulna, distal third
    • Distal ulnar anlage
    • Bowed radius with anlage acting as a tether
    • Presence/absence of progressive radial head dislocation
  • Type 3 – Complete absence of the ulna
    • Unstable elbow
    • Straight radius
  • Type 4 – Complete absence of the ulna, with a fibrocartilaginous anlage attached to the ulnar carpus
    • Radiohumeral synostosis at the elbow
    • Bowed radius
Previous
Next

Indications

See Treatment, Surgical therapy.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

Nonspecific contraindications to ulnar clubhand surgery are as follows:

  • The presence of no or minimal functional deficit. In such cases, the surgeon is wary of making the condition functionally worse. (In most cases, the hand is reasonably functional, and correction of the forearm deformity is required to position the hand in a more favorable position in space.)
  • Any surgical risk factor due to associated syndromes
  • A severely affected limb and poor neurologic function
Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Minoo Patel, MBBS, MS, FRACS  Senior Lecturer, Monash University; Director, Centre for Limb Reconstruction and Deformities, Epworth Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Orthopaedic Adult/Pediatric Surgeon, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Consulting Adult/Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Monash Medical Center, Australia

Minoo Patel, MBBS, MS, FRACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, AO Foundation, Australian Association of Surgeons, Australian Medical Association, Australian Orthopaedic Association, Bombay Orthopedic Society, Indian Orthopedic Association, Orthopaedic Research Society, Orthopaedics Overseas, and Royal Australasian College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

John Herzenberg, MD, FRCSC  Head of Pediatric Orthopedics, Director of International Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore

John Herzenberg, MD, FRCSC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society ASAMI-North America, and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America

Disclosure: Smith and Nephew, EBI, Orthofix Educational Grant None

Specialty Editor Board

Joseph E Sheppard, MD  Professor of Clinical Orthopedic Surgery, Chief of Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, University Physicians Healthcare

Joseph E Sheppard, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Orthopaedics Overseas

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Michael Yaszemski, MD, PhD  Associate Professor, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Bioengineering, Mayo Foundation, Mayo Medical School

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Harris Gellman, MD  Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center; Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine

Harris Gellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Arkansas Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. El Hassan B, Biafora S, Light T. Clinical manifestations of type IV ulna longitudinal dysplasia. J Hand Surg [Am]. Sep 2007;32(7):1024-30. [Medline].

  2. Reddy J, Laufer MR. Congenital anomalies of the female reproductive tract in a patient with Goltz syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. Aug 2009;22(4):e71-2. [Medline].

  3. Mougel F, Debarbieux S, Ronger-Savlé S, Dalle S, Thomas L. Methylaminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy in patients with multiple basal cell carcinomas in the setting of Gorlin-Goltz syndrome or after radiotherapy. Dermatology. 2009;219(2):138-42. [Medline].

  4. Maas SM, Lombardi MP, van Essen AJ, Wakeling EL, Castle B, Temple IK, et al. Phenotype and genotype in 17 patients with Goltz-Gorlin syndrome. J Med Genet. Oct 2009;46(10):716-20. [Medline].

  5. Swanson AB, Tada K, Yonenobu K. Ulnar ray deficiency: its various manifestations. J Hand Surg [Am]. Sep 1984;9(5):658-64. [Medline].

  6. Elliott AM, Kibria L, Reed MH. The developmental spectrum of proximal radioulnar synostosis. Skeletal Radiol. Jan 2010;39(1):49-54. [Medline].

  7. Nygaard M, Nielsen NS, Bojsen-Møller F. A biomechanical evaluation of the relative load change in the joints of the wrist with ulnar shortening: a 'handbag' model. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. Dec 2009;34(6):724-9. [Medline].

  8. Oberg KC, Harris TE, Wongworawat MD, Wood VE. Combined congenital radial and ulnar longitudinal deficiencies: report of 2 cases. J Hand Surg Am. Sep 2009;34(7):1298-302. [Medline].

  9. Ogino T. Clinical features and teratogenic mechanisms of congenital absence of digits. Dev Growth Differ. Aug 2007;49(6):523-31. [Medline].

  10. Tetsworth K, Krome J, Paley D. Lengthening and deformity correction of the upper extremity by the Ilizarov technique. Orthop Clin North Am. Oct 1991;22(4):689-713. [Medline].

  11. Peterson BM, McCarroll HR Jr, James MA. Distraction lengthening of the ulna in children with radial longitudinal deficiency. J Hand Surg Am. Nov 2007;32(9):1402-7. [Medline].

  12. Paley D, Herzenberg JE. Distraction treatment of the forearm. In: Buck-Gramcko D, ed. Congenital Malformations of the Hand and Forearm. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1998:90-2.

  13. Foucher G. [Toe transplantation in congenital malformations of the hand] [French]. Bull Acad Natl Med. Nov 1997;181(8):1737-44; discussion 1744-5. [Medline].

  14. Kakarala G, Kavarthapu V, Lahoti O. Distraction osteogenesis to improve limb function in congenital bilateral humeroradioulnar synostosis. Acta Orthop Belg. Dec 2006;72(6):765-8. [Medline].

  15. Malpas T, Anderson N, Langley S. Ulnar club-hand and constriction-ring syndrome. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25(3):233-4. [Medline].

  16. Minguella-Solá J, Cabrera-González M, Escolá-Teixidó J. [Radial club-hand and contralateral pre-axial polydactyly and ulnar club-hand and contralateral post-axial polydactyly. Report of 2 unusual cases] [Spanish]. An Esp Pediatr. Jul 1999;51(1):68-70. [Medline].

  17. Saffar P. Ulna oblique osteotomy for radius and ulna length inequality: technique and applications. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. Mar 2006;10(1):47-53. [Medline].

  18. Wang AA, Hutchinson DT. Use of the elbow compass universal hinge in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 2006;26(1):58-60. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.