Background
Bicipital tendon injuries of the elbow most commonly occur in the dominant extremity of men aged 40-60 years. Injuries range from tendonitis to partial tears to complete ruptures. A rupture usually occurs at the insertion of the tendon to the radial tuberosity, resulting in pain and deformity about the elbow, as well as weakness, especially with supination. Most surgeons agree that the best results are obtained with early surgical intervention and reattachment of the tendon to the radial tuberosity.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] See the image below.
Biceps muscle and tendons. Recent studies
Freeman et al retrospectively compared the outcome of 18 patients with 20 distal biceps tendon ruptures managed nonoperatively with historical controls from 6 published series of operatively treated patients. The median supination and elbow flexion strengths for the injured arm in the nonoperative group were 63% and 93% of those for the contralateral arm, compared with values of 92% and 95% for the historical controls that had been treated surgically. Patients had satisfactory outcomes overall, with median scores on the Broberg and Morrey Functional Rating Index, the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire of 85, 95, and 9, respectively. The authors concluded that nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures may yield acceptable outcomes with modestly reduced strength, especially supination.[9]
Nesterenko et al measured isokinetic strength and endurance in elbow flexion and forearm supination in both arms of 9 patients with an untreated unilateral complete distal biceps tendon rupture; 1 additional patient underwent isokinetic testing only. Peak torque was found to be significantly lower in involved limbs regarding both flexion and supination, but no significant differences were found in the fatigue index between involved and uninvolved limbs for flexion or supination. The authors noted that although nonoperative treatment is rarely recommended for complete distal biceps tendon ruptures, when it is selected, rehabilitation should concentrate on improving strength, not endurance.[10]
Schneider et al performed a retrospective study of 10 patients who sustained non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps brachii tendon ruptures repaired surgically. They found that bilateral distal biceps tendon ruptures tended to occur in middle-aged men who commonly participated in weightlifting, manual labor, or sports and had higher rates of nicotine use (50%) and anabolic steroid use (20%) than the general population. The mean time from the first tendon rupture to the contralateral tendon rupture was 2.7 years (range, 0.5 - 6.3 y).[11]
Cil et al studied an immediate active range-of-motion protocol after modified 2-incision distal biceps tendon repair in 21 patients with acute ruptures. After repair, the arms were placed in a sling for 1-2 days, followed by immediate active range of motion. For the first 6 weeks, the elbow was allowed activities of daily living, with a 1-lb weightlifting restriction. Mean follow-up extension was 0º, and mean follow-up flexion was 141º on the operated arm, with supination of 74º and pronation of 75º. Mean DASH score was 3.6 ± 3.6; mean follow-up isometric flexion strength was 5%; and the power (dynamic strength) of flexion was 12% greater on the operated side. However, on the operated arm, follow-up isometric supination strength was 9% less and the power of supination was 11% less. According to the authors, the modified 2-incision distal biceps repair allows a safe immediate active range-of-motion protocol with early return of nearly full range of motion and strength.[12]
History of the Procedure
Boyd and Anderson first described a modified 2-incision approach for repair of a distal biceps tendon in 1961.[13] The original approach involved subperiosteal dissection on the ulna. This led to an increased incidence of synostosis and heterotopic bone formation.
A modified approach with muscle splitting rather than subperiosteal dissection decreases the incidence of synostosis and heterotopic bone formation. The biceps tendon is secured after the tuberosity is excavated. The tendon is fixed through 3 drill holes in the tuberosity.
The advent of suture anchors has increased the popularity of the single-incision approach. This approach has the theoretical advantage of a low risk of synostosis. The originally described anterior single-incision extensile approach was associated with radial nerve injury. Today's limited anterior approach has been associated with neurapraxic injuries only.
Problem
The biceps brachii is the most powerful supinator of the forearm, and along with the brachialis, it provides elbow flexion. Rupture of the distal biceps tendon results in loss of supination power and deformity, as well as pain in the elbow. Without early surgical repair, chronic weakness and deformity persist. Pain typically resolves in time. Because this injury is most common in the dominant extremity of active middle-aged men, it may lead to significant impairment of their daily activities.
Epidemiology
Frequency
The overall frequency of bicipital tendon injuries is not truly known but has been reported to occur in 1.2 patients per 100,000 population. It has been reported with increasing frequency, but generally is considered to represent only 3% of biceps tendon injuries as a whole. This injury is more common in men and rarely reported in women.
Etiology
Bicipital tendon injuries most commonly occur when an extension force is applied with the elbow in flexed position. This force overpowers the tendon and causes its rupture. It is believed that a degenerative process occurs in the tendon prior to the rupture. This process is evident clinically at the time of surgery with the finding of a bulbous, degenerated end of the tendon. Histologic studies have confirmed the degenerative process. Exactly how partial ruptures are related to this process is unknown. In addition, mechanical and vascular issues contribute.
Presentation
Bicipital tendon ruptures most commonly occur in the dominant extremity in men aged 40-60 years, with an average patient age of about 50 years. Patients often have a history of acute pain in the antecubital fossa, and typically give a history of either lifting or holding something heavy with the elbow flexed immediately prior to the injury. Patients may or may not have a history of previous elbow pain. This pain, if present, may be related to tendon degeneration or a previous partial tear.
The acute pain is accompanied by deformity in the antecubital fossa due to tendon retraction. An obvious deformity indicates rupture of the tendon and the lacertus fibrosis. Some patients have swelling and/or ecchymosis in the antecubital fossa as well, typically over the medial proximal forearm. Initially, they may have weakness with flexion due to pain. This symptom may subside in a few days as the swelling decreases, but weakness with supination does not subside. If the tendon is completely ruptured but the lacertus fibrosis is intact, little deformity may be present.
On examination, tenderness may be noted in the antecubital fossa, as well as deformity due to the tendon retraction. If the lacertus fibrosis is not ruptured, the deformity is not as pronounced, but it can still be appreciated on comparison with the opposite extremity. The deformity is accentuated with resisted supination with the elbow in flexion.
Indications
Most surgeons agree that the vast majority of bicipital tendon ruptures benefit from early surgical repair. Indications for surgical intervention include a complete tendon rupture, with or without lacertus fibrosis rupture, in an otherwise healthy, cooperative, and active individual.
Acute ruptures are best treated early, within 8 weeks of the injury. Chronic injuries may require reconstruction or augmentation of the tendon, a much more complicated procedure.[2]
Relevant Anatomy
The biceps brachii travels in the anterior compartment of the arm and is innervated by the musculocutaneous nerve. It is the most powerful supinator of the forearm and also acts as a flexor of the elbow. It has 2 separate proximal origins: the coracoid process and the bicipital tuberosity of the superior glenoid. Distally, a single tendon inserts on the radial tuberosity after passing through the antecubital fossa. The lacertus fibrosis, an aponeurotic expansion, originates at the musculotendinous junction medially, blends distally with the fascia of the superficial flexor mass, and inserts on the proximal ulna.
The lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve travels between the brachialis and biceps brachii and exits the arm in the subcutaneous tissue laterally. It supplies sensation to the lateral aspect of the forearm.
The median nerve courses with the brachial artery and vein medial to the biceps tendon in the antecubital fossa. The artery bifurcates into the radial and ulnar arteries at the level of the radial head. A recurrent branch from the radial artery travels lateral and proximal across the antecubital fossa.
The radial nerve travels laterally between the brachialis and brachioradialis to enter the antecubital fossa. The superficial branch travels deep to the brachioradialis in the forearm. The deep branch enters the supinator muscle lateral to the radius and becomes the posterior interosseous nerve.
Contraindications
Surgical repair of a bicipital tendon rupture has few contraindications. Contraindications include the presence of little functional impairment from the injury, medical contraindications to a surgical procedure, and a sedentary or uncooperative patient.
A relative contraindication is chronic disruption. Because of tendon retraction and muscle contraction, it is difficult or impossible to anatomically reattach the tendon to the radial tuberosity. In these situations, delayed reconstruction using autograft or allograft tissue is required and the outcome is less dependable.
Mazzocca AD, Spang JT, Arciero RA. Distal biceps rupture. Orthop Clin North Am. Apr 2008;39(2):237-49, vii. [Medline].
Hamer MJ, Caputo AE. Operative treatment of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures. Sports Med Arthrosc. Sep 2008;16(3):143-7. [Medline].
Chavan PR, Duquin TR, Bisson LJ. Repair of the ruptured distal biceps tendon: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. Aug 2008;36(8):1618-24. [Medline].
D'Arco P, Sitler M, Kelly J, et al. Clinical, functional, and radiographic assessments of the conventional and modified Boyd-Anderson surgical procedures for repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med. Mar-Apr 1998;26(2):254-61. [Medline].
Churgay CA. Diagnosis and treatment of biceps tendinitis and tendinosis. Am Fam Physician. Sep 1 2009;80(5):470-6. [Medline].
D'Alessandro DF, Shields CL, Tibone JE, Chandler RW. Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures in athletes. Am J Sports Med. Jan-Feb 1993;21(1):114-9. [Medline].
Gaskin CM, Anderson MW, Choudhri A, Diduch DR. Focal partial tears of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon at the entrance to the bicipital groove: MR imaging findings, surgical correlation, and clinical significance. Skeletal Radiol. Oct 2009;38(10):959-65. [Medline].
Tangari M, Carbone S, Gallo M, Campi A. Long head of the biceps tendon rupture in professional wrestlers: treatment with a mini-open tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Apr 2011;20(3):409-13. [Medline].
Freeman CR, McCormick KR, Mahoney D, Baratz M, Lubahn JD. Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 2009;91(10):2329-34. [Medline].
Nesterenko S, Domire ZJ, Morrey BF, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Elbow strength and endurance in patients with a ruptured distal biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Aug 5 2009;[Medline].
Schneider A, Bennett JM, O'Connor DP, Mehlhoff T, Bennett JB. Bilateral ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Sep-Oct 2009;18(5):804-7. [Medline].
Cil A, Merten S, Steinmann SP. Immediate active range of motion after modified 2-incision repair in acute distal biceps tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med. Jan 2009;37(1):130-5. [Medline].
Boyd HB, Anderson LD. A method for reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Bone Joint Surg. 1961;43:1041-3.
Chen HS, Lin SH, Hsu YH, Chen SC, Kang JH. A comparison of physical examinations with musculoskeletal ultrasound in the diagnosis of biceps long head tendinitis. Ultrasound Med Biol. Sep 2011;37(9):1392-8. [Medline].
Checo FJ, Rodner CM. Bone tunnel and suture anchor fixation of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Sports Med Arthrosc. Sep 2008;16(3):124-9. [Medline].
Papp DF, Skelley NW, Sutter EG, Ji JH, Wierks CH, Belkoff SM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis. Orthopedics. Jul 7 2011;34(7):e275-8. [Medline].
Cohen MS. Complications of distal biceps tendon repairs. Sports Med Arthrosc. Sep 2008;16(3):148-53. [Medline].
Lintner S, Fischer T. Repair of the distal biceps tendon using suture anchors and an anterior approach. Clin Orthop. Jan 1996;116-9. [Medline].
Morrey BF. Tendon injuries about the elbow. In: The Elbow and its Disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1993:. 492-504.
Morrey BF, Askew LJ, An KN, Dobyns JH. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1985;67(3):418-21. [Medline].
Ramsey ML. Distal biceps tendon injuries: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. May-Jun 1999;7(3):199-207. [Medline].

