Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Bicipital Tendon Injuries Treatment & Management

  • Author: John P Salvo, Jr, MD, MS; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD  more...
 
Updated: May 04, 2016
 

Approach Considerations

Most surgeons agree that the vast majority of bicipital tendon ruptures benefit from early surgical repair. Indications for surgical intervention include a complete tendon rupture, with or without lacertus fibrosus rupture, in an otherwise healthy, cooperative, and active individual. Acute ruptures are best treated early, within 8 weeks of the injury. Chronic injuries may require reconstruction or augmentation of the tendon, a much more complicated procedure.[3]

Surgical repair of a bicipital tendon rupture has few contraindications. Contraindications include the presence of little functional impairment from the injury, medical contraindications to a surgical procedure, and a sedentary or uncooperative patient. A relative contraindication is chronic disruption. Because of tendon retraction and muscle contraction, it is difficult or impossible to reattach the tendon anatomically to the radial tuberosity. In these situations, delayed reconstruction using autograft or allograft tissue is required, and the outcome is less dependable.

With early repair, success rates with either the two-incision or the one-incision technique (see Surgical Therapy) are high. The use of multiple drill holes instead of a high-speed burr to excavate the radial tuberosity should improve outcomes by decreasing the incidence of synostosis. The one-incision approach will continue to advance with the development of more anatomic repair techniques. In theory, a greater emphasis on anatomic repair of the distal biceps tendon to the bicipital tuberosity may improve supination, endurance strength testing, and functional outcomes.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Early surgical intervention for complete ruptures provides the best results. Two techniques are commonly used: the two-incision (modified Boyd-Anderson) technique and the one-incision technique.[4, 24, 25]

The two-incision technique, which Boyd and Anderson described in 1961, is the one more commonly employed; however, with the advent of suture anchors, the single-incision technique is becoming more popular. An advantage of the two-incision technique is potentially stronger fixation to the radial tuberosity. The most common complication is heterotopic bone, which can create a mechanical block to motion. As a result, this bone may have to be removed surgically. Another reported complication is injury to the posterior interosseous branch of the radial nerve.[26]

The one-incision technique has the obvious advantage of involving fewer incisions. Fixation usually is achieved with suture anchors, cortical buttons, or interference screws placed into the radial tuberosity. The most common complication with the current one-incision technique is lateral antebrachial nerve neurapraxia.

A clinical trial comparing the single- and double-incision techniques showed no significant difference in outcomes between the two types of surgery.[27]

Preparation for surgery

A thorough history, physical examination, and radiographic workup should be completed prior to surgery. Range of motion (ROM) and stability of the elbow should be assessed.

Procedural details

Examination with the patient under anesthesia is essential to surgery in any extremity. Surgery should be performed by using a tourniquet placed as high on the arm as possible. After standard sterile preparation and draping, the limb is exsanguinated and the tourniquet inflated.

Two-incision technique

With the two-incision technique, a small incision in the antecubital fossa (~3-4 cm) is made in the flexion crease. Dissection is taken through the fascia, and the biceps tendon is easily identified. Sometimes, a "milking" maneuver must be performed to deliver the tendon into the wound. Once the tendon is identified, it is prepared for fixation. The tendon invariably has bulbous degeneration at the rupture site. Once the bulbous degeneration is resected, two nonabsorbable braided 5-0 sutures are placed in a Bunnell or Krakow fashion to secure the tendon.

A curved Kocher or Kelly clamp is used to mark the second incision. The clamp is placed through the sheath of the biceps tendon and curved toward the radius with the forearm in supination. Great care is taken not to disturb the periosteum of the ulna to prevent synostosis. The clamp is used to tent the skin dorsally after it passes by the radial tuberosity. Once the clamp is past the tuberosity, the forearm is placed in pronation. Pronation of the forearm protects the radial nerve.

A 4- to 6-cm incision is made over the tip of the clamp. The dissection is taken down through the fascia of the common extensor and supinator and down to the radial tuberosity, which is cleared of overlying soft tissue. The tuberosity can be excavated with a high-speed burr. D'Arco et al described a better technique in 1998.[5] In their method, the radial tuberosity is prepared with multiple drill holes in an oval fashion and then excavated with small, curved curettes. This approach avoids creating the bone dust from the burr that may lead to synostosis.

After the tuberosity is prepared, three drill holes are made along the lateral margin of the tuberosity. The tendon is then delivered from the anterior wound to the tuberosity. This step can be expedited by placing a passing stitch when the curved clamp is removed from the biceps tendon sheath. The tendon is delivered into the tuberosity, and the sutures are tied, securing the tendon. Finally, the wound is closed in layers.

One-incision technique

Single-incision techniques through an anterior approach are becoming more popular. With the one-incision technique, a larger, anterior incision may be necessary to safely expose the bicipital tuberosity and avoid neurovascular injury.

Care is taken to avoid excessive retraction on the surrounding neurologic structures, specifically the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) and the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve. If a nerve palsy of the PIN develops, it is usually traction-related and resolves with time.[28] The distal biceps tendon can be secured to the bicipital tuberosity from the anterior incision with different types of fixation devices.

Three types of fixation devices have been successfully used to repair biceps tendon injuries with the one-incision technique, as follows:

Anchors are inserted into the radial tuberosity, and sutures from an eyelet on the anchor are passed into the biceps tendon. With cortical-button and interference-screw techniques, the tendon stump is delivered into a bone trough. The screw provides fixation with interference fit of the tendon and the surrounding bony socket, whereas the cortical button provides fixation over a bone bridge on the opposing cortical bone. When the cortical button is used, care must be taken to avoid drilling distal and radial to minimize risk of injury to the PIN.[31]

Lacertus fibrosus transfer

Caputo et al published a case series of 12 patients with distal biceps tendon injuries who were treated with an operative approach that used a transfer of the lacertus fibrosus to augment the tendon repair.[32] The authors concluded that in cases of distal biceps tendon injuries where operative management is indicated and the lacertus fibrosus intact, this approach can yield predictable outcomes without the complications associated with autograft or allograft tendon reconstruction.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Care

Whether the two-incision or the one-incision technique is used, the elbow should be immobilized in 90° of flexion and slight supination for 7-10 days for the patient's comfort. Outpatient physical therapy begins with gentle ROM. A hinged ROM brace can help initially block the terminal 30° of flexion to protect the repair. This angle is gradually increased to full extension. Pronation and supination should be initiated early in therapy.

Previous
Next

Complications

The most common complication from a two-incision approach is heterotopic bone formation. This complication can be minimized by avoiding use of a burr to excavate the radial tuberosity, decreasing the amount of bone dust created. In addition, by avoiding disruption of the ulnar periosteum, the risk of synostosis can be minimized.

The most common complication from a one-incision approach is nerve palsy.[33] Most of these palsies are transient in nature and completely resolve. They are best avoided by minimizing traction on the nerve.

Proponents of the one-incision technique argue that there is a lower risk of radioulnar synostosis and heterotopic ossification. Proponents of the two-incision technique argue that there is a lower risk of neurovascular injury and a more anatomic repair of the biceps to the radial tuberosity is possible.

Cadaveric studies have shown that a two-incision technique more adequately restores the original footprint more adequately than a one-incision technique does.[34] Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown that single-incision techniques can cause anterior tendon reattachment, which can be associated with a decrease in supination strength.[35]

There are complications specific to the more recent types of fixation. High rates of bone resorption have been observed with bioabsorbable screws made out of poly-L-Lactide (PLLA), though there was no correlation with clinical outcomes.[36] Transient PIN palsy, persistent radial nerve palsy, disengagement of the button, and heterotopic ossification have been reported with the use of cortical-button fixation.[37]

Previous
Next

Long-Term Monitoring

Unrestricted motion can usually be achieved by 6-8 weeks after surgery. Full, unrestricted resistance activities should be delayed at least 4 months.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

John P Salvo, Jr, MD, MS Clinical Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

John P Salvo, Jr, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy Association of North America, Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Society, International Society for Hip Arthroscopy, New Jersey Orthopaedic Society

Disclosure: Received consulting fee from Smith & Nephew Endoscopy for speaking and teaching.

Coauthor(s)

Elliot S Mendelsohn, MD Fellow in Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Rothman Institute of Orthopedics, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Elliot S Mendelsohn, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Thomas R Hunt III, MD Professor and Chairman, Joseph Barnhart Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine

Thomas R Hunt III, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Southern Orthopaedic Association, AO Foundation, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Mid-America Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Received royalty from Tornier for independent contractor; Received ownership interest from Tornier for none; Received royalty from Lippincott for independent contractor.

Chief Editor

Harris Gellman, MD Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center; Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami, Leonard M Miller School of Medicine, Clinical Professor, Surgery, Nova Southeastern School of Medicine

Harris Gellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Arkansas Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Michael S Clarke, MD Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Michael S Clarke, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Arthroscopy Association of North America, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Hand Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, Clinical Orthopaedic Society, Mid-Central States Orthopaedic Society, Missouri State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Haverstock J, Athwal GS, Grewal R. Distal Biceps Injuries. Hand Clin. 2015 Nov. 31 (4):631-40. [Medline].

  2. Mazzocca AD, Spang JT, Arciero RA. Distal biceps rupture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008 Apr. 39(2):237-49, vii. [Medline].

  3. Hamer MJ, Caputo AE. Operative treatment of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2008 Sep. 16(3):143-7. [Medline].

  4. Chavan PR, Duquin TR, Bisson LJ. Repair of the ruptured distal biceps tendon: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug. 36(8):1618-24. [Medline].

  5. D'Arco P, Sitler M, Kelly J, et al. Clinical, functional, and radiographic assessments of the conventional and modified Boyd-Anderson surgical procedures for repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Mar-Apr. 26(2):254-61. [Medline].

  6. Churgay CA. Diagnosis and treatment of biceps tendinitis and tendinosis. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Sep 1. 80(5):470-6. [Medline].

  7. D'Alessandro DF, Shields CL, Tibone JE, Chandler RW. Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1993 Jan-Feb. 21(1):114-9. [Medline].

  8. Gaskin CM, Anderson MW, Choudhri A, Diduch DR. Focal partial tears of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon at the entrance to the bicipital groove: MR imaging findings, surgical correlation, and clinical significance. Skeletal Radiol. 2009 Oct. 38(10):959-65. [Medline].

  9. Tangari M, Carbone S, Gallo M, Campi A. Long head of the biceps tendon rupture in professional wrestlers: treatment with a mini-open tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Apr. 20(3):409-13. [Medline].

  10. Boyd HB, Anderson LD. A method for reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Bone Joint Surg. 1961. 43:1041-3.

  11. Schneider A, Bennett JM, O'Connor DP, Mehlhoff T, Bennett JB. Bilateral ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct. 18(5):804-7. [Medline].

  12. Morrey BF, Askew LJ, An KN, Dobyns JH. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Mar. 67(3):418-21. [Medline].

  13. Sutton KM, Dodds SD, Ahmad CS, Sethi PM. Surgical treatment of distal biceps rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Mar. 18(3):139-48. [Medline].

  14. Hughes JS, Morrey BF. Injury of the flexors of the elbow: biceps tendon injury. The Elbow and its Disorders. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2008. 518-35.

  15. Mazzocca AD, Burton KJ, Romeo AA, Santangelo S, Adams DA, Arciero RA. Biomechanical evaluation of 4 techniques of distal biceps brachii tendon repair. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Feb. 35(2):252-8. [Medline].

  16. Fenton P, Qureshi F, Ali A, Potter D. Distal biceps tendon rupture: a new repair technique in 14 patients using the biotenodesis screw. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct. 37(10):2009-15. [Medline].

  17. Citak M, Backhaus M, Seybold D, Suero EM, Schildhauer TA, Roetman B. Surgical repair of the distal biceps brachii tendon: a comparative study of three surgical fixation techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov. 19(11):1936-41. [Medline].

  18. Peeters T, Ching-Soon NG, Jansen N, Sneyers C, Declercq G, Verstreken F. Functional outcome after repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using the endobutton technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr. 18(2):283-7. [Medline].

  19. Snir N, Hamula M, Wolfson T, Meislin R, Strauss EJ, Jazrawi LM. Clinical outcomes after chronic distal biceps reconstruction with allografts. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Oct. 41(10):2288-95. [Medline].

  20. Freeman CR, McCormick KR, Mahoney D, Baratz M, Lubahn JD. Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct. 91(10):2329-34. [Medline].

  21. Nesterenko S, Domire ZJ, Morrey BF, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Elbow strength and endurance in patients with a ruptured distal biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Aug 5. [Medline].

  22. Cil A, Merten S, Steinmann SP. Immediate active range of motion after modified 2-incision repair in acute distal biceps tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jan. 37(1):130-5. [Medline].

  23. Chen HS, Lin SH, Hsu YH, Chen SC, Kang JH. A comparison of physical examinations with musculoskeletal ultrasound in the diagnosis of biceps long head tendinitis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Sep. 37(9):1392-8. [Medline].

  24. Checo FJ, Rodner CM. Bone tunnel and suture anchor fixation of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2008 Sep. 16(3):124-9. [Medline].

  25. Papp DF, Skelley NW, Sutter EG, Ji JH, Wierks CH, Belkoff SM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis. Orthopedics. 2011 Jul 7. 34(7):e275-8. [Medline].

  26. Cohen MS. Complications of distal biceps tendon repairs. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2008 Sep. 16(3):148-53. [Medline].

  27. Grewal R, Athwal GS, Macdermid JC, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, El-Hawary R, et al. Single versus double-incision technique for the repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 3. 94(13):1166-74. [Medline].

  28. Nigro PT, Cain R, Mighell MA. Prognosis for recovery of posterior interosseous nerve palsy after distal biceps repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan. 22(1):70-3. [Medline].

  29. Lintner S, Fischer T. Repair of the distal biceps tendon using suture anchors and an anterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jan. 116-9. [Medline].

  30. Bain GI, Prem H, Heptinstall RJ, Verhellen R, Paix D. Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture: a new technique using the Endobutton. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000 Mar-Apr. 9(2):120-6. [Medline].

  31. Lo EY, Li CS, Van den Bogaerde JM. The effect of drill trajectory on proximity to the posterior interosseous nerve during cortical button distal biceps repair. Arthroscopy. 2011 Aug. 27(8):1048-54. [Medline].

  32. Caputo AE, Cusano A, Stannard J, Hamer MJ. Distal biceps repair using the lacertus fibrosus as a local graft. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Apr 8. [Medline].

  33. Garon MT, Greenberg JA. Complications of Distal Biceps Repair. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Apr. 47 (2):435-44. [Medline].

  34. Hasan SA, Cordell CL, Rauls RB, Bailey MS, Sahu D, Suva LJ. Two-incision versus one-incision repair for distal biceps tendon rupture: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jul. 21(7):935-41. [Medline].

  35. Schmidt CC, Diaz VA, Weir DM, Latona CR, Miller MC. Repaired distal biceps magnetic resonance imaging anatomy compared with outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec. 21(12):1623-31. [Medline].

  36. Potapov A, Laflamme YG, Gagnon S, Canet F, Rouleau DM. Progressive osteolysis of the radius after distal biceps tendon repair with the bioabsorbable screw. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jul. 20(5):819-26. [Medline].

  37. Banerjee M, Shafizadeh S, Bouillon B, Tjardes T, Wafaisade A, Balke M. High complication rate following distal biceps refixation with cortical button. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Oct. 133(10):1361-6. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Biceps muscle and tendons.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.