Fractures of the acetabulum occur primarily in young adults as a result of high-velocity trauma (eg, vehicular accidents or falls from heights). These fractures are often associated with other life-threatening injuries.
Displacement of the fracture fragments leads to articular incongruity of the hip joint that results in abnormal pressure distribution on the articular cartilage surface. This can lead to rapid breakdown of the cartilage surface, resulting in disabling arthritis of the hip joint.  Anatomic reduction and stable fixation of the fracture, such that the femoral head is concentrically reduced under an adequate portion of the weightbearing dome of the acetabulum, is the treatment goal in these difficult fractures.
Fractures of the acetabulum were treated nonoperatively until the middle of the 20th century. The Judet brothers and, subsequently, Emile Letournel studied acetabular fractures extensively and were responsible for popularizing the surgical management of these challenging injuries. [2, 3, 4] Pioneering work, such as the development of the ilioinguinal approach by Letournel, led to acetabular surgery becoming the accepted standard of care for virtually all displaced fractures of the acetabulum. 
With advances in imaging technologies, performing acetabular fracture surgery through smaller incisions is now possible. In the future, computer-assisted surgery may contribute to the operative management of these injuries, as well.
The acetabulum is formed by a portion of the innominate bone. It lies at the point where the ilium, ischium, and pubis are joined by the triradiate cartilage, which later fuses to form the innominate bone. The acetabulum is enclosed by the anterior and the posterior columns like the two limbs of an inverted Y (see the images below).
The anterior column comprises the anterior border of the iliac wing, the entire pelvic brim, the anterior wall of the acetabulum, and the superior pubic ramus. The posterior column makes up the ischial portion of the bone, including the greater and lesser sciatic notch, the posterior wall of the acetabulum, the majority of the quadrilateral surface, and the ischial tuberosity. The roof of the acetabulum is the thick, weightbearing portion and forms a separate fragment in bicolumnar fractures. The thin quadrilateral plate forms the medial wall or the floor of the acetabulum.
The innominate bone is irregular in shape and has differing thickness in cross-section in different areas. The posterior column and sciatic buttress provide the best purchase for screws. The areas suitable for implant placement are shown in the images below. 
An intimate knowledge of the nerves and vessels in the area is essential to prevent iatrogenic complications at the time of surgery. Details of the relevant anatomy are elaborated further in the discussion on surgical approaches (see Treatment).
Fractures of the acetabulum occur as a result of the force exerted through the head of the femur to the acetabulum. The femoral head acts like a hammer and is the last link in the chain of forces transmitted from the greater trochanter, knee, or foot to the acetabulum. The position of the femur at the time of impact and the direction of the force determine the type and displacement of the fracture.
Point of impact and resulting fracture patterns
Although it is difficult to pinpoint the exact relation between the point of impact and the mechanism of injury in acetabulum fractures, certain relations are well recognized. These can help in understanding the forces involved in creating the fracture, the direction of displacement, and the fracture patterns involved.
Force applied to greater trochanter in axis of femoral head
The point of impact of the femoral head is decided by the degrees of adduction and abduction and rotation of the femur.
With the hip in neutral adduction-abduction, external rotation of the hip predisposes to anterior column injury, and internal rotation predisposes to posterior column injury. Rotations and associated fractures are as follows:
Neutral - Central/anterior column
External (~25°) - Anterior column
External (~50°) - Anterior lip
Internal (~25°) - Transverse/T-shaped/bicolumnar, depending upon the degree of force applied
Internal (~50°, extreme) - Posterior column with transverse element
With the hip in neutral rotation, the greater the degree of adduction of the femur, the higher the level of the fracture (greater involvement of the roof). The greater the degree of abduction, the lower (more inferior) is the fracture line. Positions of the femur and associated fractures are as follows:
Neutral adduction-abduction - Transverse or T-shaped fracture beginning at the inner margin of the roof of the acetabulum
Increasing adduction - Transverse or T-shaped fracture with increasing involvement of the roof of the acetabulum
Increasing abduction - Transverse or T-shaped fracture with progressively inferior shift of the fracture line
Force applied to flexed knee in axis of femoral shaft
Acetabulum fracture morphology depends on the degrees of flexion or extension and adduction or abduction. The degree of hip rotation generally does not contribute significantly to the fracture pattern.
With the hip flexed to 90°, positions of the femur and associated fractures are as follows:
Neutral adduction-abduction - Posterior wall
Maximum abduction - Posterior column with transverse element
Mild (~15°) abduction - Posterior column
Adduction - Posterior dislocation of the hip, with or without posterior-wall fracture
With different degrees of hip flexion, positions of the femur and associated fractures are as follows:
Increasing flexion - Progressively lower involvement of the posterior column
Decreasing flexion (<90°) - Involvement of the posterosuperior portion of the acetabulum
Force applied to foot with knee extended
Positions of the femur with associated acetabulum fractures are as follows:
Hip extended (eg, fall from a height) - Transtectal transverse fracture
Hip flexed (eg, frontal collision in a vehicle, with force transmitted through the foot pedal) - Depending on the position, similar to force acting through a flexed knee
Force applied to lumbosacral region
A force applied to the lumbosacral region is a rare cause of acetabular fractures.
In actuality, however, it is very difficult to pinpoint the exact site of impact and the mechanism of injury. These mechanisms are important, in that they help in understanding the acting forces, direction of displacement, and the fracture patterns involved.
Various classifications of acetabular fractures have been propounded, but the easiest classification is that of Judet and Letournel, who classified acetabular fractures according to the fracture morphology as elementary fracture patterns. [2, 3] These have only one fracture line and include the following:
Posterior-wall fractures (see the images below) typically involve the rim of the acetabulum, a portion of the retroacetabular surface, and a variable segment of the articular cartilage. The articular cartilage may also be impacted. Impacted articular cartilage should be diagnosed preoperatively on computed tomography (CT); these impacted fragments require elevation at the time of surgery.
Extended posterior-wall fractures can involve the entire retroacetabular surface and include a portion of the greater or lesser sciatic notch, the ischial tuberosity, or both. The ilioischial line, however, remains intact on the anteroposterior (AP) view.
Posteriocolumn fractures include only the ischial portion of the bone. The entire retroacetabular surface is displaced with the posterior column. As the vertical line separating the anterior column from the posterior column traverses inferiorly, it most commonly enters the obturator foramen. An associated fracture of the inferior pubic ramus is present.
Sometimes, the fracture line traverses just posterior to the obturator foramen, splitting the ischial tuberosity. The ilioischial line typically is displaced and disassociated from the teardrop. However, when a large portion of the quadrilateral surface remains intact with the posterior column, the teardrop and a portion of the pelvic brim displace with the posterior column.
Anterior-wall fractures (see the images below) are uncommon injuries and often occur in conjunction with anterior dislocations.
Low anterior-column fractures involve only the superior ramus and pubic portion of the acetabulum. High anterior-column fractures can involve the entire anterior border of the innominate bone. The pelvic brim and iliopectineal line are displaced. Medial translation of the entire roof or a portion of the roof is typical of displacement of a high or intermediate anterior-column fracture.
Transverse fractures (see the image below) divide the innominate bone into two portions. A horizontally displaced fracture line crosses the acetabulum at a variable level. The innominate bone is then divided into a superior part and a lower part. The superior part is composed of the iliac wing and a portion of the roof of the acetabulum. The lower part of the bone, the ischiopubic segment, is composed of an intact obturator foramen with the anterior and posterior walls of the acetabulum.
Letournel further divided transverse fractures into the following three subtypes:
Transtectal, in which a transverse fracture line crosses the superior acetabular articular surface
Juxtatectal, in which a transverse fracture line crosses at the junction of the superior acetabular articular surface and superior cotyloid fossa
Infratectal, in which a transverse fracture line crosses through the cotyloid fossa
Associated acetabulum fracture patterns are the more complicated fracture patterns and include the following:
Anterior with posterior hemitransverse
Posterior-column with posterior-wall
Transverse with posterior-wall
Anterior with posterior hemitransverse fractures combine an anterior-wall or anterior-column fracture with a horizontal transverse component, which traverses the posterior column at a low level. The distinction between the associated anterior-column and associated posterior hemitransverse and T-shaped patterns is often subtle. In the anterior plus posterior hemitransverse fracture, the anterior component typically is at a higher level and is more displaced than the posterior component.
The posterior-column with posterior-wall pattern (see the images below) divides the posterior column into a larger posterior-column component and an associated posterior-wall component. The ilioischial line typically is displaced and disassociated from the teardrop.
The transverse with posterior-wall pattern (see the image below) combines a normal transverse configuration with one or more separate posterior-wall fragments. A fracture of the inferior pubic ramus typically is not seen.
A T-shaped fracture (see the images below) is similar to a transverse fracture except for the addition of a vertical split along the quadrilateral surface and acetabular fossa (the stem of the T), which divides the anterior column from the posterior column. An associated fracture of the inferior pubic ramus typically is present.
In both-column fractures (see the images below), the anterior and posterior columns are separated from each other, and all articular segments are detached from the intact portion of the posterior ilium, which remains attached to the sacrum. A fracture of both columns is associated with the spur sign, in which the fractured edge of the intact posterior iliac wing is seen prominently relative to the medially displaced articular segments on the obturator oblique radiographic view. This sign is pathognomonic of an injury to both columns.
The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen–Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO-ASIF) classification is more comprehensive and is shown in the image below. This can be simplified as follows:
Type A fractures - Involving either a single wall or column (anterior or posterior)
Type B fractures - Include both anterior and posterior columns but not bicolumnar fractures (transverse, T-shaped, anterior with posterior hemitransverse type injuries)
Type C fractures - Bicolumnar fractures, with the roof as a separate fragment
Pediatric acetabular fractures
Pediatric acetabular fractures are classified as follows:
Type A - Small fragments are typically seen with dislocations
Type B - Linear fractures with a stable hip, these fractures generally occur with pelvic fractures and are the only type in which the force exerted is not through the femoral head but through the pelvis; type B fractures are also generally stable and often do not require any specific treatment
Type C - Linear fractures with hip instability
Type D - These are central fracture dislocations, and they have the poorest prognosis, even after operative treatment; a variant is the Walther fracture, which is a fracture through the acetabulum and ischium, which displaces medially
Pediatric acetabular fractures are important, in that the triradiate cartilage remains open until the age of approximately 12 years. Therefore, if the acetabulum is injured before its closure, growth arrest may result, leading to a shallow acetabulum and progressive subluxation of the hip.  Conversely, in patients older than 12 years, the chance of significant growth disturbance is minimal.
Bucholz et al recognized two main types of physeal disturbances with triradiate cartilage injuries, as follows  :
Type I or II Salter-Harris injuries - These have a good prognosis for continued acetabular growth
Type IV Salter-Harris (crush) injuries - These have a poor prognosis, with premature closure of the triradiate cartilage because of formation of a medial osseous bridge
Dora et al monitored 10 patients with posttraumatic acetabular dysplasia and reported that all 10 patients demonstrated marked retroversion averaging 27°, whereas the contralateral acetabuli showed 23° of anteversion; the average center-edge angle was 9.5°.  The hip joint typically was in a lateral and caudal position, and a significant posterolateral deficiency was present.
The exact incidence of acetabular fractures in various parts of the world is not known. Studies at level I trauma centers have shown an admission rate for pelvic and acetabular fractures of 0.5-7.5% (see Table 1 below).
Table 1. Relative Frequency of Acetabular Fracture Types in Various Studies (Open Table in a new window)
(n = 567)
(n = 255)
Dakin et al,
(n = 85)
|Transverse with posterior wall||20.6||23.5||35.3|
|Anterior column with posterior hemitransverse||8.8||5.9||3.5|
|Posterior column with posterior wall||3.5||3.9||18.8|
Peltier reported an incidence of 24% acetabular fractures in his series of adult pelvic fractures.  Reed documented that approximately 5-10% of pediatric pelvic injuries involve the acetabulum. 
Factors in the injury pattern affecting prognosis include the following:
Force of energy - High-energy versus low-energy trauma
Location - Instability allowed with superior-roof, posterior-wall, and column fractures
Degree of articular comminution of both the acetabulum and the femoral head
Degree of initial displacement
Treatment factors affecting the prognosis are the quality of the reduction, which ideally restores congruity, and the quality of fixation, which ideally restores stability. 
The prognosis can also be affected by complications such as the following:
Avascular necrosis (AVN)
Metal in the joint
Studies have confirmed the positive association between the accuracy of reduction and a better long-term result. [10, 15] However, many series have shown that even when these goals are achieved, posttraumatic arthritis still occurs in as many as 30% of patients. [4, 10, 16, 17, 18] Contributing factors may include the following:
Osteochondral defects in either the acetabulum or the femoral head
Chondrolysis due to articular trauma at the time of injury
AVN of the femoral head or the acetabulum
Once symptomatic posttraumatic arthritis has developed, options for salvage generally are limited to total hip arthroplasty and arthrodesis.
What would you like to print?