Acetabulum Fractures Workup

  • Author: Mihir M Thacker, MBBS, MS(Orth), DNB(Orth), FCPS(Orth), D'Ortho; Chief Editor: William L Jaffe, MD   more...
 
Updated: Feb 10, 2012
 

Laboratory Studies

  • Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels
  • Type and crossmatch blood
  • Routine evaluation of fitness for anesthesia and major surgery
Next

Imaging Studies

The complicated anatomy of the acetabulum necessitates clear-cut visualization of the fracture fragments and their relationships with each other and the rest of the pelvis if anatomic reconstruction of the acetabulum is planned. The following imaging modalities can be used:

  • Plain radiographs - Pelvis with both hips (AP view), Judet views, and, if required, inlet and outlet views of the pelvis (in cases with concomitant pelvic injury)
  • CT scanning - Plain and with 3-D reconstructions

Radiograph of the pelvis with both hips

This is an essential radiograph and may depict the following:

  • Associated pelvic ring fractures independent of the acetabular fracture passing through the iliac wing, obturator foramen, or the sacrum
  • Dislocation through or disruption of 1 or more joints in the pelvic ring
  • Bone quality
  • Rarely, a bilateral acetabular fracture, as in the image belowColumns of the acetabulum, obturator view. Columns of the acetabulum, obturator view.
  • The acetabular fracture itself

The 6 fundamental radiologic landmarks of the acetabulum are seen in this view.

  • The borders of the anterior wall (acetabulo-obturator line) and posterior wall of the acetabulum
  • The roof or the dome of the acetabulum
  • Teardrop of Köhler
  • Ilioischial line of Duverney-Parent
  • Pelvic inlet
  • Innominate line

Judet views

Obturator oblique: In this technique, the injured hip is raised to 45° and the beam is centered over a point 1 fingerbreadth below and medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. In a correctly taken obturator oblique, the anterior and posterior iliac spines are superimposed, the iliac wing is seen in section as narrow as possible, and, correspondingly, the obturator foramen is seen as large as possible. Features to be studied include the following:

  • Pelvic brim
  • Articular surface, especially the posterior lip
  • Obturator foramen and the anterior column
  • Iliac wing in section
  • Junction of the anterior and posterior columns as seen as a line just above the roof

Iliac oblique: In this technique, the uninjured hip is elevated to 45°, with the injured part resting on the table. The beam is centered 1 fingerbreadth below the level of the anterior superior iliac spine and at the midpoint of a transverse line from the anterior superior iliac spine to the midline. In a correctly positioned iliac oblique, the iliac wing is seen widely spread out and the obturator ring is as thin as possible. Features to be studied include the following:

  • Anterior lip of the acetabulum
  • Posterior column and posterior border of the iliac bone
  • The iliac wing

Radiographic analysis

Interpretation of the plain films is based on understanding the normal radiographic lines of the acetabulum and what each line represents. Disruption of any of the normal lines of the acetabulum represents a fracture involving that portion of the bone. Displacement of the articular surface is inferred by displacement of these normal lines of the acetabulum.

  • On the AP view, the inferior three fourths of the iliopectineal line represents the pelvic brim and is a landmark of the anterior column. The superior fourth of this line is formed by the tangency of the x-ray beam to the superior quadrilateral surface and the greater sciatic notch. The ilioischial line is formed by the tangency of the x-ray beam to the posterior portion of the quadrilateral surface and is, therefore, a radiographic landmark of the posterior column.
  • The teardrop and ilioischial line both result from the tangency of the x-ray beam to a portion of the quadrilateral surface. Thus, they are always superimposed in the normal acetabulum. Separation of the teardrop and the ilioischial line indicates rotation of the hemipelvis or fracture of the quadrilateral surface.
  • The roof of the acetabulum is a radiographic landmark resulting from the tangency of the x-ray beam to the subchondral bone of the superior acetabulum. Interruption of the radiographic line of the roof is indicative of a fracture involving the superior acetabulum.
  • The anterior rim is the lateral margin of the anterior wall of the acetabulum and is contiguous with the inferior margin of the superior pubic ramus. The posterior rim is the lateral margin of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. Inferiorly, the posterior rim is contiguous with the posterior horn of the acetabulum.

In most cases, the fracture can be classified properly from plain films alone. Plain films are usually best for assessing the congruence between the femoral head and the roof of the acetabulum.

Roof-arc angles

These are used to assess the size of the intact portion of acetabulum.[21, 22, 23, 24]

The technique is as follows:

  • The roof-arc angles are made on the AP, obturator, and iliac oblique radiographic views. A vertical line is drawn to the geometric center of the acetabulum. Another line is drawn through the point where the fracture line intersects the radiographic roof of the acetabulum and again to the geometric center of the acetabulum. The angle drawn in this way represents the medial, anterior, or posterior roof arc as seen on the AP, obturator oblique, or iliac oblique view, respectively. The roof-arc measurements roughly describe the position and orientation of the acetabular fracture and, therefore, the intact portion of superior acetabular articular surface.
  • A similar determination can be made from the CT scan. The CT scan of the superior acetabular articular surface from the vertex to 10 mm inferior to the vertex is equivalent to an area described by all 3 roof-arc measurements of 45°. At 10 mm below the acetabular vertex, the subchondral bone appears as a ring or arc.

Interpretation and clinical application

  • If nonoperative treatment is to be considered, the head should remain congruous with the roof of the acetabulum on the 3 views of the pelvis with the patient out of traction, and all roof-arc measurements should be more than 45°, or there should be no displaced fracture lines involving the superior acetabular articular surface in the superior 10 mm of the acetabulum on CT scan. Vrahas et al, in a cadaveric study, concluded that fractures that have a medial roof-arc angle of 45° or less, an anterior roof-arc angle of 25° or less, or a posterior roof-arc angle of 70° or less across the weightbearing portion of the acetabulum should be treated operatively.[19]
  • Roof-arc measurements are rarely used. This technique is most applicable to the anterior column and less applicable to the posterior column. Roof-arc measurements are particularly helpful in evaluating the anterior column component of a T-shaped fracture. If the anterior column component is low (< 10 mm of the acetabular vertex), only the posterior portion of the fracture needs to be addressed surgically.

CT scanning of acetabular fractures

Use of CT scanning for acetabular fractures has revolutionized the imaging of a particularly difficult area and, with 3-D reconstruction, has facilitated enormously the visualization of the fracture anatomy, the degree of comminution, and associated fracture patterns; it has also helped in the preoperative planning of the surgical reconstruction.[25, 26, 27, 28, 29] Salient features are as follows:

  • It is important to have sections taken at 2- or 3-mm intervals, as incarcerated fragments may be missed if sections are taken at 5-mm intervals.
  • Three-dimensional CT is an invaluable tool for demonstrating the overall fracture orientation in displaced fractures, and for deciding the choice of operative approach to the fracture. Because of smoothening artifacts, however, it may not depict minimally displaced fractures.
  • Special views are available that enable selective study of the details of the acetabular fracture after computer subtraction of the femoral head from the image. These provide unrestricted access for visualization of the fracture.
  • Axial images are more sensitive than plain radiographs for demonstrating the following:
    • Location and extent of the acetabular fracture
    • Degree of comminution, rotation of the fragments, and impaction of the weightbearing dome and the posterior wall
    • Intra-articular/incarcerated fragments, as in the image belowIncarcerated fragment best seen on axial cuts of tIncarcerated fragment best seen on axial cuts of the CT scan.
    • Injury to the femoral head, as in the image above
    • Minimally displaced iliac wing fractures and quadrilateral plate fractures that may have been missed on plain films
    • Pelvic hematoma
    • Sacroiliac joint integrity
    • Rarely, a dislocation that is missed on a plain radiograph
  • Postoperatively, CT scanning is an invaluable investigative tool whenever joint penetration by a fixation device is suspected, as in the image below. Intra-articular screw as seen on the axial cut of Intra-articular screw as seen on the axial cut of the CT scan.
Previous
Next

Other Tests

  • Doppler ultrasound or venography may be performed in cases in which deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is suspected.
Previous
Proceed to Treatment & Management
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Mihir M Thacker, MBBS, MS(Orth), DNB(Orth), FCPS(Orth), D'Ortho  Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University; Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children; Orthopedic Oncologist, Helen F Graham Cancer Center and Christiana Care Health Services

Mihir M Thacker, MBBS, MS(Orth), DNB(Orth), FCPS(Orth), D'Ortho is a member of the following medical societies: Children's Oncology Group, Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society ASAMI-North America, Medical Council of India, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Nirmal Tejwani, MD, MPA  Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases; Chief of Orthopedic Trauma, Bellevue Hospital

Nirmal Tejwani, MD, MPA is a member of the following medical societies: AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association

Disclosure: Stryker Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Zimmer Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Biomet Royalty Other

Chandrashekhar Thakkar, MBBS  Professor of Orthopedics, Lokmanya tilak Municipal Medical College, University of Mumbai, India

Chandrashekhar Thakkar, MBBS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, AO Foundation, Orthopaedic Research Society, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Orthopaedics Overseas, and Trauma Association of Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

B Sonny Bal, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

B Sonny Bal, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

James J McCarthy, MD, FAAOS, FAAP  Director, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

James J McCarthy, MD, FAAOS, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Orthopaedic Association, Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society ASAMI-North America, Orthopaedics Overseas, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, Pennsylvania Medical Society, Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Society, and Philadelphia County Medical Society

Disclosure: Fixes-4-kids Ownership interest Consulting; Lippincott Williams and WIcins Royalty Editing textbook; OERHOPEDICS Royalty Editor

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

William L Jaffe, MD  Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine; Vice Chairman, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases

William L Jaffe, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, Eastern Orthopaedic Association, and New York Academy of Medicine

Disclosure: Stryker Orthopaedics Consulting fee Speaking and teaching

References

  1. Dean DB, Moed BR. Late salvage of failed open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. J Orthop Trauma. Mar 2009;23(3):180-5. [Medline].

  2. Collinge C, Archdeacon M, Sagi HC. Quality of radiographic reduction and perioperative complications for transverse acetabular fractures treated by the Kocher-Langenbeck approach: prone versus lateral position. J Orthop Trauma. Sep 2011;25(9):538-42. [Medline].

  3. Mehin R, Jones B, Zhu Q, Broekhuyse H. A biomechanical study of conventional acetabular internal fracture fixation versus locking plate fixation. Can J Surg. Jun 2009;52(3):221-8. [Medline].

  4. Boraiah S, Ragsdale M, Achor T, Zelicof S, Asprinio DE. Open reduction internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty of selected acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. Apr 2009;23(4):243-8. [Medline].

  5. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: Classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964;46A:1615-38.

  6. Letournel E. Fractures of the Acetabulum. 2nd ed. New York. Springer-Verlag;1993.

  7. Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop. Sep 1980;(151):81-106. [Medline].

  8. Milenkovic S, Saveski J, Radenkovic M, Vidic G, Trajkovska N. Surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures. Srp Arh Celok Lek. Jul-Aug 2011;139(7-8):496-500. [Medline].

  9. Hadley NA, Brown TD, Weinstein SL. The effects of contact pressure elevations and aseptic necrosis on the long-term outcome of congenital hip dislocation. J Orthop Res. Jul 1990;8(4):504-13. [Medline].

  10. Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Nov 1996;78(11):1632-45. [Medline].

  11. Dakin GJ, Eberhardt AW, Alonso JE, et al. Acetabular fracture patterns: associations with motor vehicle crash information. J Trauma. Dec 1999;47(6):1063-71. [Medline].

  12. Peltier LF. Complications associated with fractures of the Pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1962;44B:550-561.

  13. Reed MH. Pelvic fractures in children. J Can Assoc Radiol. Dec 1976;27(4):255-61. [Medline].

  14. Mears DC, Velyvis JH. Acute total hip arthroplasty for selected displaced acetabular fractures: two to twelve-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 2002;84-A(1):1-9. [Medline].

  15. Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP. Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop. Feb 2003;173-86. [Medline].

  16. Porter SE, Schroeder AC, Dzugan SS, Graves ML, Zhang L, Russell GV. Acetabular fracture patterns and their associated injuries. J Orthop Trauma. Mar 2008;22(3):165-70. [Medline].

  17. Matta JM, Mehne DK, Roffi R. Fractures of the acetabulum. Early results of a prospective study. Clin Orthop. Apr 1986;(205):241-50. [Medline].

  18. Olson SA, Bay BK, Chapman MW, Sharkey NA. Biomechanical consequences of fracture and repair of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Aug 1995;77(8):1184-92. [Medline].

  19. Vrahas MS, Widding KK, Thomas KA. The effects of simulated transverse, anterior column, and posterior column fractures of the acetabulum on the stability of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1999;81(7):966-74. [Medline].

  20. Thacker M. Post-operative management of acetabular fractures. Indian J Orthopaedics. 2002;36(1):29-30.

  21. Olson SA, Matta JM. The computerized tomography subchondral arc: a new method of assessing acetabular articular continuity after fracture (a preliminary report). J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(5):402-13. [Medline].

  22. Matta J. Operative indications and choice of surgical approach for fractures of the acetabulum. Tech Orthop. 1986;1:13-22.

  23. Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P. Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop. Apr 1986;(205):230-40. [Medline].

  24. Øvre S, Madsen JE, Røise O. Acetabular fracture displacement, roof arc angles and 2 years outcome. Injury. Aug 2008;39(8):922-31. [Medline].

  25. Brumback RJ, Holt ES, McBride MS, et al. Acetabular depression fracture accompanying posterior fracture dislocation of the hip. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4(1):42-8. [Medline].

  26. Harley JD, Mack LA, Winquist RA. CT of acetabular fractures: comparison with conventional radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Mar 1982;138(3):413-7. [Medline].

  27. Tile M. Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. Baltimore. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;1984.

  28. Borrelli J Jr, Peelle M, McFarland E, Evanoff B, Ricci WM. Computer-reconstructed radiographs are as good as plain radiographs for assessment of acetabular fractures. Am J Orthop. Sep 2008;37(9):455-9; discussion 460. [Medline].

  29. Moed BR, Ajibade DA, Israel H. Computed tomography as a predictor of hip stability status in posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. J Orthop Trauma. Jan 2009;23(1):7-15. [Medline].

  30. Johnson EE, Kay RM, Dorey FJ. Heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following operative treatment of acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop. Aug 1994;(305):88-95. [Medline].

  31. Mears DC, Rubash HE. Extensile exposure of the pelvis. Contemp Orthop. 1983;6:21.

  32. Mears DC, Rubash HE, eds. Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures. New Jersey. Slack Inc;1986.

  33. Ebraheim NA, Patil V, Liu J, Haman SP. Sliding trochanteric osteotomy in acetabular fractures: a review of 30 cases. Injury. Oct 2007;38(10):1177-82. [Medline].

  34. Helfet DL, Schmeling GJ. Management of complex acetabular fractures through single nonextensile exposures. Clin Orthop. Aug 1994;(305):58-68. [Medline].

  35. Routt ML Jr, Swiontkowski MF. Operative treatment of complex acetabular fractures. Combined anterior and posterior exposures during the same procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1990;72(6):897-904. [Medline].

  36. Schmidt CC, Gruen GS. Non-extensile surgical approaches for two-column acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jul 1993;75(4):556-61. [Medline].

  37. Harris AM, Althausen P, Kellam JF, Bosse MJ. Simultaneous anterior and posterior approaches for complex acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. Aug 2008;22(7):494-7. [Medline].

  38. Bosse MJ, Poka A, Reinert CM, et al. Preoperative angiographic assessment of the superior gluteal artery in acetabular fractures requiring extensile surgical exposures. J Orthop Trauma. 1988;2(4):303-7. [Medline].

  39. Juliano PJ, Bosse MJ, Edwards KJ. The superior gluteal artery in complex acetabular procedures. A cadaveric angiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Feb 1994;76(2):244-8. [Medline].

  40. Reinert CM, Bosse MJ, Poka A, et al. A modified extensile exposure for the treatment of complex or malunited acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1988;70(3):329-37. [Medline].

  41. Clement B. Master Techniques in Orthopedic Surgery: The Hip. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;1998.

  42. Ganorkar S, Thacker M, Thakkar CJ. Implant selection and placement in acetabular fractures. Indian J Orthopaedics. 2002;36(1):29-30.

  43. Gay SB, Sistrom C, Wang GJ, et al. Percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures with CT guidance: preliminary results of a new technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 1992;158(4):819-22. [Medline].

  44. Parker PJ, Copeland C. Percutaneous fluoroscopic screw fixation of acetabular fractures. Injury. Nov-Dec 1997;28(9-10):597-600. [Medline].

  45. Starr AJ, Jones AL, Reinert CM, Borer DS. Preliminary results and complications following limited open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. Injury. May 2001;32 Suppl 1:SA45-50. [Medline].

  46. Starr AJ, Reinert CM, Jones AL. Percutaneous fixation of the columns of the acetabulum: a new technique. J Orthop Trauma. Jan 1998;12(1):51-8. [Medline].

  47. Kazemi N, Archdeacon MT. Immediate full weightbearing after percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabulum fractures. J Orthop Trauma. Feb 2012;26(2):73-9. [Medline].

  48. Heeg M, Visser JD, Oostvogel HJ. Injuries of the acetabular triradiate cartilage and sacroiliac joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jan 1988;70(1):34-7. [Medline].

  49. Bucholz RW, Ezaki M, Ogden JA. Injury to the acetabular triradiate physeal cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 1982;64(4):600-9. [Medline].

  50. Dora C, Zurbach J, Hersche O, Ganz R. Pathomorphologic characteristics of posttraumatic acetabular dysplasia. J Orthop Trauma. Sep-Oct 2000;14(7):483-9. [Medline].

  51. Weber M, Berry DJ, Harmsen WS. Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 1998;80(9):1295-305. [Medline].

  52. Bellabarba C, Berger RA, Bentley CD, et al. Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 2001;83-A(6):868-76. [Medline].

  53. Bartlett CS, DiFelice GS, Buly RL. Cardiac arrest as a result of intraabdominal extravasation of fluid during arthroscopic removal of a loose body from the hip joint of a patient with an acetabular fracture. J Orthop Trauma. May 1998;12(4):294-9. [Medline].

  54. Haidukewych GJ, Scaduto J, Herscovici D Jr, et al. Iatrogenic nerve injury in acetabular fracture surgery: a comparison of monitored and unmonitored procedures. J Orthop Trauma. May 2002;16(5):297-301. [Medline].

  55. Helfet DL, Anand N, Malkani AL, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of motor pathways during operative fixation of acute acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. Jan 1997;11(1):2-6. [Medline].

  56. Middlebrooks ES, Sims SH, Kellam JF, Bosse MJ. Incidence of sciatic nerve injury in operatively treated acetabular fractures without somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J Orthop Trauma. Jul 1997;11(5):327-9. [Medline].

  57. Johnson EE, Eckardt JJ, Letournel E. Extrinsic femoral artery occlusion following internal fixation of an acetabular fracture. A case report. Clin Orthop. Apr 1987;(217):209-13. [Medline].

  58. Probe R, Reeve R, Lindsey RW. Femoral artery thrombosis after open reduction of an acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop. Oct 1992;(283):258-60. [Medline].

  59. Burd TA, Lowry KJ, Anglen JO. Indomethacin compared with localized irradiation for the prevention of heterotopic ossification following surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 2001;83-A(12):1783-8. [Medline].

  60. Kendoff D, Gardner MJ, Citak M, Kfuri M Jr, Thumes B, Krettek C. Value of 3D fluoroscopic imaging of acetabular fractures comparison to 2D fluoroscopy and CT imaging. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Aug 7 2007;[Medline].

  61. Moed BR, Karges DE. Prophylactic indomethacin for the prevention of heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture surgery in high-risk patients. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(1):34-9. [Medline].

  62. Johnson EE, Matta JM, Mast JW, Letournel E. Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures 21-120 days following injury. Clin Orthop. Aug 1994;(305):20-30. [Medline].

  63. Shim VB, Böshme J, Vaitl P, Josten C, Anderson IA. An efficient and accurate prediction of the stability of percutaneous fixation of acetabular fractures with finite element simulation. J Biomech Eng. Sep 2011;133(9):094501. [Medline].

  64. Wright R, Barrett K, Christie MJ, Johnson KD. Acetabular fractures: long-term follow-up of open reduction and internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma. Oct 1994;8(5):397-403. [Medline].

  65. Mayo KA. Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the acetabulum. Results in 163 fractures. Clin Orthop. Aug 1994;(305):31-7. [Medline].

  66. Pennal GF, Davidson J, Garside H, Plewes J. Results of treatment of acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop. Sep 1980;(151):115-23. [Medline].

  67. Ragnarsson B, Mjoberg B. Arthrosis after surgically treated acetabular fractures. A retrospective study of 60 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. Oct 1992;63(5):511-4. [Medline].

  68. Brown GA, Firoozbakhsh K, Gehlert RJ. Three-dimensional CT modeling versus traditional radiology techniques in treatment of acetabular fractures. Iowa Orthop J. 2001;21:20-4. [Medline].

  69. Citak M, Gardner MJ, Kendoff D, Tarte S, Krettek C, Nolte LP, et al. Virtual 3D planning of acetabular fracture reduction. J Orthop Res. Apr 2008;26(4):547-52. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Posterior wall fracture with a posterior dislocation of the hip.
Posterior wall fracture preoperative obturator view.
Three-dimensional (3-D) CT scan showing a posterior wall fracture.
Anterior wall fracture.
Anterior wall fracture: Three-dimensional reconstruction.
Transverse fracture.
Posterior lip with posterior column injury, anteroposterior view.
Posterior wall with posterior column fracture, 3-D reconstruction.
Transverse with posterior lip fracture.
T-shaped fracture (break in the margins of the obturator foramen).
T-shaped fracture, obturator view.
Both-column fracture, 3-D reconstruction, anteroposterior view.
Both-column fracture, 3-D reconstruction, iliac view.
Both-column fracture, 3-D reconstruction, obturator view.
The Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur osteosynthesefragen–Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO-ASIF) classification.
Columns of the acetabulum, anteroposterior view. The white area is the anterior column, the red area is the posterior column, and the purple area is the tie beam (inferior pubic ramus).
Columns of the acetabulum, iliac view.
Columns of the acetabulum, obturator view.
Bilateral acetabular fractures with posterior dislocations.
Incarcerated fragment best seen on axial cuts of the CT scan.
Transverse fracture, iliac view. Also note the impaction fracture on the femoral head.
Incision for the Kocher-Langenbeck approach.
Kocher-Langenbeck approach.
Trochanteric osteotomy to increase the exposure during a Kocher-Langenbeck approach.
Ilioinguinal approach: Femoral vessels and the iliopsoas looped with catheters. The 3 windows of the ilioinguinal approach: Lateral to the iliopsoas, between the iliopsoas and the vessels, and between the vessels and the spermatic cord. (The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is seen traversing lateral to the iliopsoas toward the anterior superior iliac spine.)
Ilioinguinal approach: Anterior column plate.
The triradiate approach.
Fixation of posterior wall fracture: Bone model showing the direction of screws and application of neutralization/buttress plate.
Posterior wall fracture: Postoperative anteroposterior (AP) view.
Posterior lip fracture: Postoperative iliac view.
Posterior wall fracture: Postoperative obturator view.
Transverse fracture.
T-shaped fracture (note the use of the anterior-to-posterior lag screw to hold the posterior column).
Both-column fracture.
Quadrilateral surface comminution: Use of a T-plate.
Use of femoral distractor during surgery.
Total hip replacement in posttraumatic arthritis after an acetabular fracture.
Intra-articular screw as seen on the axial cut of the CT scan.
Table. Relative Frequency of Acetabular Fracture Types in Various Studies
Fracture type Letournel,[6] %



(n = 567)



Matta,[10] %



(n = 255)



Dakin et al,[11] %



(n = 85)



Both columns27.933.314.1
Transverse with posterior wall20.623.535.3
Posterior wall22.48.612.9
T-shaped5.312.23.5
Transverse3.73.58.2
Anterior column3.94.71.2
Anterior column with posterior hemitransverse8.85.93.5
Posterior column with posterior wall3.53.918.8
Posterior column2.33.11.2
Anterior wall1.61.21.2
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.