Prolactinoma Treatment & Management

  • Author: Venkatesh Babu Segu, MD, MBBS, DM; Chief Editor: George T Griffing, MD   more...
 
Updated: Apr 14, 2011
 

Medical Care

Treatment is indicated if mass effects from the tumor and/or significant effects from hyperprolactinemia are present.[3]

Although the natural history of prolactinomas is unclear, most microprolactinomas (up to 95%) do not progress to macroadenomas, as determined after a 4- to 6-year observation period. Hence, if a patient with a microprolactinoma has minimal symptoms, the patient can be monitored closely with serial estimations of serum PRL levels combined with imaging studies at yearly intervals. However, if a patient with a microprolactinoma has significant effects from the hyperprolactinemia, treatment is indicated.

Any patient with macroprolactinoma needs treatment, because the tumor has already shown a propensity to grow. Such treatment includes the following:

Medical treatment

Bromocriptine (BEC) is generally considered to be the agent of choice in the treatment of prolactinoma because of its long track record and safety. As a DA agonist, it decreases the synthesis and secretion of PRL.[14] It also decreases the rate of tumor cell division and the growth of individual cells.

Typically, BEC is administered at an initial dose of 1.25 mg nightly with food and is gradually increased to 2.5 mg bid in 1-2 weeks, as tolerated. Doses larger than 7.5 mg/d are seldom needed except in the treatment of macroadenomas.

Common adverse effects include nausea, nasal stuffiness, and dizziness associated with orthostatic hypotension. Others include vasospasm in the peripheral circulation and exacerbation or unmasking of depression and psychosis.

In patients who are intolerant to even small doses of BEC, one alternative is to administer the same daily dose intravaginally, a method that has almost equal efficacy.

Normalization of PRL levels occurs in 85-90% of all patients with prolactinomas.

In microprolactinomas, PRL levels return to normal within days to a few weeks of starting treatment in almost all patients who can tolerate appropriate doses of BEC. If PRL levels normalize, gonadal function also typically has a near-total recovery. Menses return to normal within a few months. Sometimes, pregnancy can occur before the resumption of menstruation; therefore, the couple must be advised to use barrier methods of contraception until normal menses have returned.

In macroprolactinomas, BEC treatment results in some reduction of tumor size in up to 80-85% of the patients. Significant VF improvements have been noted to occur in as few as 1-3 days, and significant changes on imaging findings occur as soon as 2 weeks after starting treatment.

In contrast to patients with microadenomas, resolution of hyperprolactinemia is often incomplete in patients with macroadenomas. However, the extent of reduction in tumor size is not well correlated with the changes in serum PRL levels. Nevertheless, reductions in PRL levels always precede tumor shrinkage, and patients who do not show a drop in PRL do not have any tumor shrinkage.

A reduction in tumor size is often accompanied by improvement in pituitary function. Examples include improved serum testosterone levels and an increased sperm count.

Once normalization of PRL levels is achieved and sustained, the dose of BEC is gradually tapered to approximately 2.5 mg/d. If PRL levels and tumor size are stable on the above dose, consider tapering BEC to the lowest dose possible. The patient should be evaluated periodically with monitoring of symptoms, PRL levels, and radiological changes.

Other medical treatments are available for patients who do not respond to BEC or for those who cannot tolerate the drug.

A long-acting, nonergot DA agonist, cabergoline is available in the United States. It is usually better tolerated than BEC, and its efficacy profiles are somewhat superior to those of BEC. It offers the convenience of twice-a-week administration, with a usual starting dose of 0.25 mg biweekly to a maximum dose of 1 mg biweekly. Some studies have shown efficacy even with once-a-week dosing. Cabergoline appears to be more effective in lowering prolactin levels and restoring ovulation. Up to 70% of patients who do not respond to BEC respond to cabergoline.[15] The only problem is cost. Side effects are somewhat fewer than with BEC and include headache, nausea, postural hypotension, and fatigue.[16]

Quinagolide is a nonergot DA agonist that has a long duration of action but is not yet available for use in the United States. It can be administered once daily. Efficacy and tolerance are comparable to that of BEC.

A drug approved for the treatment of Parkinson disease, pergolide is a DA agonist with a long duration of action. Daily doses of 50-150 mcg are nearly as effective as treatment with BEC. Tolerance is comparable to that with BEC. Some patients who do not respond to BEC tend to respond to pergolide, and vice versa. Rare cases of valvular heart disease have been reported in users of pergolide, much like the lesions noted with the use of fenfluramine or in patients with carcinoid tumors. The use of pergolide is therefore not generally recommended in patients with prolactinoma for this reason.

Pergolide was withdrawn from the US market  on March 29, 2007, because of heart valve damage resulting in cardiac valve regurgitation. It is important not to abruptly stop pergolide. Health care professionals should assess patients’ need for DA agonist therapy and consider alternative treatment. If continued treatment with a DA agonist is needed, another such agent should be substituted for pergolide. For more information, see FDA MedWatch Product Safety Alert and Medscape Alerts: Pergolide Withdrawn From US Market.

A study of patients with prolactinoma demonstrated that attempting dopamine agonist withdrawal in patients who have been treated for 2 years is practical and safe if normalization of prolactin levels and evidence of tumor reduction are observed.[17]

Pharmacologic resistance to DA agonists refers to a failure to respond to such agents in terms of a normalization of PRL levels and a reduction in the size of prolactinoma by at least 50%. DA agonist resistance results primarily from a reduction in D2 receptors on tumor cells.[18]

In some patients with prolactinoma who have adequately responded to medical treatment, withdrawing medical treatment after about 24 months may be possible. Although no clear predictive criteria for such successful withdrawal exist, evidence indicates that the recurrence of hyperprolactinemia is generally lower in patients with microadenomas than in those with macroadenomas. Hyperprolactinemia is more likely to recur in patients with tumor remnant on pituitary MRI than it is in patients with no such remnant. In very large adenomas, regrowth of tumor is often seen after the withdrawal of medical treatment. In any case, if medical treatment is withdrawn, close clinical, biochemical, and radiologic monitoring is warranted to look for evidence of tumor recurrence.

Radiation treatment

Radiation treatment (XRT) has a limited role in the treatment of prolactinomas. Following conventional XRT, PRL levels normalize in only approximately 25% of patients. The major complication of this treatment is hypopituitarism, which occurs in 12.5-80% of patients. Other complications include optic nerve damage and neurologic dysfunction (see Complications).[19]

Because of the excellent results produced by medical treatment, with or without surgery, XRT is seldom used. XRT is considered only in select cases, ie, when there is rapid tumor regrowth despite medical and surgical treatment.

Pregnancy and prolactinoma [20]

During pregnancy, a physiologic doubling occurs in the volume of a normal pituitary gland. Moreover, prolactin levels increase by 10-fold during this period.

When a woman with prolactinoma presents with infertility and is proceeding with medical treatment for hyperprolactinemia, the patient is advised to use mechanical (barrier) methods of contraception until her menstrual cycles resume and the first few cycles have occurred, so that accurate dating of pregnancy can be performed. BEC is the preferred medical treatment in this situation because of its long safety record. The drug can be discontinued after the first skipped period; despite BEC's safety record, this precaution is taken to prevent unwanted fetal exposure to the agent. To date, however, increased rates of spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, or teratogenic effects have not been reported with BEC therapy.[21]

Clinical experience with cabergoline-induced pregnancies in approximately 600 patients suggests no excess risk of miscarriage or fetal malformation.[17]

Most women with microprolactinomas do not show significant increases in tumor size during pregnancy. Tumor progression rates of 1-5% have been reported in these patients. In contrast, women with macroadenomas show significant tumor enlargement (15-35%) during gestation, secondary to the hormonal stimulation of lactotrophs.

The treatment of pregnant women with prolactinomas must be tailored to the individual patient. In women with microadenomas, as well as in the subgroup of women who have intrasellar macroadenomas without significant suprasellar or parasellar extension, BEC can usually be safely discontinued upon conception, and the patient can be monitored clinically for symptoms of tumor enlargement. Periodic monitoring of PRL levels and VFs is not usually required in these patients.

In women with larger macroadenomas, a definitive, individualized plan is made only after thorough discussions with the patient. Options include the following:

  • Discontinuation of BEC at conception and careful monitoring of PRL levels and VFs, with or without MRI scan evidence of tumor enlargement
  • Prepregnancy transsphenoidal surgery with debulking of the tumor, with the resultant risk of complications (see Complications)
  • Continuation of BEC throughout gestation, with the theoretical risk to the fetus
Next

Surgical Care

Transsphenoidal pituitary adenomectomy is the preferred surgical treatment in patients with microprolactinoma and in most patients with macroprolactinoma.[22] A transcranial approach is used only in patients with large extrapituitary extension. A transcranial pituitary tumor resection is more hazardous, being associated with higher mortality and morbidity rates.

A combination of surgery followed by postoperative medical treatment with BEC or one of the other agents is used in patients with incomplete resolution of elevated PRL levels and in persons with residual tumors seen on follow-up imaging studies.

In surgical series of patients with microadenomas, normalization of PRL levels is reported in approximately 70-75% of patients. Recurrence rates of approximately 17% are reported. This surgery is associated with low mortality and morbidity rates (approximately 0.3% and 0.4%, respectively).

Data from a tertiary center indicate an initial cure rate of approximately 90% and a recurrence rate of 16% for microprolactinomas.[23] However, results vary with the experience of the neurosurgeon and the duration of follow-up. Complications include hypopituitarism, bleeding, cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, and diabetes insipidus (see Complications).

In patients with macroprolactinomas, normalization of the PRL level occurs initially in approximately 30% of patients, and the recurrence rate is about 15-20%. Mortality and morbidity rates are less than 1% and 6%, respectively.

  • Indications for surgery
    • Women who have a microadenoma, desire pregnancy, and cannot tolerate BEC should undergo surgical treatment.
    • Patients who do not wish to take BEC or one of the other drugs long-term should be considered for surgical treatment.
    • Patients who do not respond to medical treatment or those who show progression after an initial response to medical treatment should receive surgical treatment.
Previous
Next

Consultations

Neurosurgeon

Previous
Proceed to Medication
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Venkatesh Babu Segu, MD, MBBS, DM  Endocrinologist, Medical Specialists Centers of Indiana, Munster

Venkatesh Babu Segu, MD, MBBS, DM is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Diabetes Association, and Endocrine Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Robert A Gabbay, MD, PhD  Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Laurence M Demers Career Development Professor, Penn State College of Medicine; Director, Diabetes Program, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center; Executive Director, Penn State Institute for Diabetes and Obesity

Robert A Gabbay, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Diabetes Association, and Endocrine Society

Disclosure: Novo Nordisk Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Merck Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Yoram Shenker, MD  Chief of Endocrinology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Madison; Interim Chief, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Wisconsin at Madison

Yoram Shenker, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Heart Association, Central Society for Clinical Research, and Endocrine Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mark Cooper, MBBS, PhD, FRACP  Head, Diabetes & Metabolism Division, Baker Heart Research Institute, Professor of Medicine, Monash University

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

George T Griffing, MD  Professor of Medicine, St Louis University School of Medicine

George T Griffing, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Medical Practice Executives, American College of Physician Executives, American College of Physicians, American Diabetes Association, American Federation for Medical Research, American Heart Association, Central Society for Clinical Research, Endocrine Society, International Society for Clinical Densitometry, and Southern Society for Clinical Investigation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Chahal HS, Stals K, Unterländer M, Balding DJ, Thomas MG, Kumar AV, et al. AIP mutation in pituitary adenomas in the 18th century and today. N Engl J Med. Jan 6 2011;364(1):43-50. [Medline].

  2. Schlechte J, Dolan K, Sherman B, et al. The natural history of untreated hyperprolactinemia: a prospective analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Feb 1989;68(2):412-8. [Medline].

  3. Serri O. Progress in the management of hyperprolactinemia. N Engl J Med. Oct 6 1994;331(14):942-4. [Medline].

  4. Molitch ME. Prolactinoma. In: Melmed S, ed. The Pituitary. Boston, Mass: Blackwell Scientific; 1995:443-7.

  5. Zadrozna-Sliwka B, Bolanowski M, Jawiarczyk A, et al. The role of cyclase activating (CAP) and cyclase inhibiting (CIP) parathormone fractions in the assessment of bone metabolism disturbances in women with hyperprolactinemia of various origin. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. Feb 2008;29(1):178-84. [Medline].

  6. Mancini T, Casanueva FF, Giustina A. Hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. Mar 2008;37(1):67-99, viii. [Medline].

  7. Fernandez A, Karavitaki N, Wass JA. Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). Jul 24 2009;[Medline].

  8. Carter JN, Tyson JE, Tolis G, et al. Prolactin-screening tumors and hypogonadism in 22 men. N Engl J Med. Oct 19 1978;299(16):847-52. [Medline].

  9. Schlechte JA. Clinical practice. Prolactinoma. N Engl J Med. Nov 20 2003;349(21):2035-41. [Medline].

  10. Hoffer ZS, Roth RL, Mathews M. Evidence for the partial dopamine-receptor agonist aripiprazole as a first-line treatment of psychosis in patients with iatrogenic or tumorogenic hyperprolactinemia. Psychosomatics. Jul-Aug 2009;50(4):317-24. [Medline].

  11. Honbo KS, van Herle AJ, Kellett KA. Serum prolactin levels in untreated primary hypothyroidism. Am J Med. May 1978;64(5):782-7. [Medline].

  12. Frantz AG. Endocrine diagnosis of prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors. In: Black PM, Zervas NT, Ridgway EC, et al, eds. Secretory Tumors of the Pituitary Gland. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1984:45-53.

  13. Frieze TW, Mong DP, Koops MK. "Hook effect" in prolactinomas: case report and review of literature. Endocr Pract. Jul-Aug 2002;8(4):296-303. [Medline].

  14. Rivera JL, Lal S, Ettigi P, et al. Effect of acute and chronic neuroleptic therapy on serum prolactin levels in men and women of different age groups. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). May 1976;5(3):273-82. [Medline].

  15. Colao A, Di Sarno A, Sarnacchiaro F, et al. Prolactinomas resistant to standard dopamine agonists respond to chronic cabergoline treatment. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(3):876-83. [Full Text].

  16. Webster J, Piscitelli G, Polli A, et al. A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. Cabergoline Comparative Study Group. N Engl J Med. Oct 6 1994;331(14):904-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  17. Schlechte JA. Update in pituitary 2010. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jan 2011;96(1):1-8. [Medline].

  18. Molitch ME. Pharmacologic resistance in prolactinoma patients. Pituitary. 2005;8(1):43-52. [Medline].

  19. Swords F, Monson J, Besser GM, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery: a safe and effective salvage treatment for pituitary tumors not controlled despite conventional radiotherapy. Eur J Endocrinol. Sep 22 2009;[Medline].

  20. Foyouzi N, Frisbaek Y, Norwitz ER. Pituitary gland and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Dec 2004;31(4):873-92, xi. [Medline].

  21. Raymond JP, Goldstein E, Konopka P, et al. Follow-up of children born of bromocriptine-treated mothers. Horm Res. 1985;22(3):239-46. [Medline].

  22. Kreutzer J, Buslei R, Wallaschofski H, et al. Operative treatment of prolactinomas: indications and results in a current consecutive series of 212 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. Jan 2008;158(1):11-8. [Medline].

  23. Tyrrell JB, Lamborn KR, Hannegan LT, et al. Transsphenoidal microsurgical therapy of prolactinomas: initial outcomes and long-term results. Neurosurgery. Feb 1999;44(2):254-61; discussion 261-3. [Medline].

  24. Kars M, Pereira AM, Smit JW, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with macroprolactinomas initially treated with dopamine agonists. Eur J Intern Med. Jul 2009;20(4):387-93. [Medline].

  25. van der Klaauw AA, Kars M, Biermasz NR, et al. Disease specific impairments in quality of life during long-term follow-up of patients with different pituitary adenomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). Apr 29 2008;[Medline].

  26. Zhang F, Chen J, Lu Y, et al. Manifestation, management and outcome of subclinical pituitary adenoma apoplexy. J Clin Neurosci. Oct 2009;16(10):1273-5. [Medline].

  27. Vaneckova M, Seidl Z, Hana V, et al. Macroprolactinomas: retrospective follow up study in the MR imaging and correlation with clinical symptomatology. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. Dec 2007;28(6):841-5. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.