Femoral Osteotomy 

  • Author: Austin T Fragomen, MD; Chief Editor: William L Jaffe, MD   more...
 
Updated: Mar 21, 2011
 

Background

Proximal femoral osteotomy is currently commonly used for adults in the treatment of hip fracture nonunions and malunions and in cases of congenital and acquired hip deformities, as in the images below.

Painful nonunion of a peritrochanteric fracture inPainful nonunion of a peritrochanteric fracture in varus position with shortening and broken hardware. Repair of nonunion with a 95° blade plate with resRepair of nonunion with a 95° blade plate with restoration of normal alignment and equalization of limb length.
Next

History of the Procedure

Proximal femoral osteotomy was a technique used in adults in the early part of the 20th century for the treatment of hip dysplasia and osteoarthritis. Varus- and valgus-producing osteotomies were aimed at maximizing joint congruity and redistributing the weightbearing load across the femoral head to a less affected area. Historically, the best results were obtained in patients with long-standing deformities, including Perthes osteonecrosis, coxa vara, and developmental dysplasia.

Modern periacetabular osteotomies[1] and joint arthroplasty techniques have narrowed the indications for this once common procedure. Proximal femoral osteotomy continues to find application in adults for the treatment of hip fracture nonunions and malunions and in cases of congenital and acquired hip deformities.[2, 3]

Previous
Next

Problem

In young patients with symptomatic hip disease, total joint arthroplasty has traditionally been a suboptimal solution. Problems with accelerated bearing wear and premature implant loosening leading to early revision surgery are well documented in this patient population. Intertrochanteric osteotomy has some use in providing temporary relief of pain in this challenging group of patients.[4] While newer bearing materials with improved wear properties may improve the longevity of total joints in young patients, data to support this position are yet lacking.

Patients with deformity of the proximal femur typically develop arthritis over time because of abnormal joint wear from malalignment. Deformities typically include a varus or valgus neck-shaft angle, rotational malalignments, and leg-length discrepancy in any combination. These deformities can be acquired, as in the case of proximal femur fracture malunions and nonunions, or developmental, as in the cases of fibrous dysplasia, coxa vara, and developmental dysplasia.

Regardless of the etiology, these patients with femoral deformity are at an increased risk for the development of pain and arthritis in the affected hip. Once arthritis has begun, the problem is further aggravated by the mechanical malalignment from the femoral deformity. Standard hip replacement techniques and prostheses are usually unsuitable for deformed proximal femora, thus increasing the complexity of the procedure, surgical risks, and possibly the longevity of the reconstructed joint.

The benefits of early proximal femoral osteotomy to correct the deformity are two-fold. One, in the deformed hip prior to the onset of arthritic changes, the realignment often reduces symptoms, prevents further joint degeneration. In the deformed hip with arthritic changes, restoration of normal alignment can often decreases pain and improves function. Moreover, if the relief of symptoms is incomplete and the patient later requires hip replacement surgery, then the arthroplasty procedure is simplified by restoration of the anatomy.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

Proximal femoral osteotomy is commonly used in the treatment of nonunions of hip fractures. Both femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture nonunions respond positively to valgus-producing realignment osteotomies. Malunions of hip fractures, including intertrochanteric type and unreduced slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), are other common indications for osteotomy. Infrequently, proximal femoral osteotomy is performed in adults for the treatment of hip arthritis and osteonecrosis.

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Femoral osteotomy can be used to treat the following conditions.

Femoral neck nonunion

In femoral neck nonunion, the fracture fails to heal despite an adequate blood supply. Weightbearing forces across a vertically oriented fracture line produce shear stresses at the fracture site that favor the production of fibrous tissue. Valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy reorients the fracture site into a more horizontal position. Axial loading in this situation encourages osteogenesis and fracture union.[5]

This severe vertical fracture line through the femThis severe vertical fracture line through the femoral neck is a high risk for nonunion with simple pinning fixation. The fracture is stabilized with a screw, and then The fracture is stabilized with a screw, and then a 95° blade is inserted. Proximal femoral osteotomy is created and a wedge removed. Final image showing a valgus-producing osteotomy wFinal image showing a valgus-producing osteotomy with improved orientation of the femoral neck fracture.

Intertrochanteric nonunion

Intertrochanteric hip fractures typically do not disturb the blood supply to the femoral head and tend to heal predictably. Nonunions of this common fracture pattern are usually the result of a combination of varus malalignment and inadequate stability of fixation. Treatment is aimed at correcting the varus neck-shaft angle to a neutral or slight valgus orientation and improving the stability at the fracture site often with a fixed-angle device.[4]

Painful nonunion of a peritrochanteric fracture inPainful nonunion of a peritrochanteric fracture in varus position with shortening and broken hardware. Repair of nonunion with a 95° blade plate with resRepair of nonunion with a 95° blade plate with restoration of normal alignment and equalization of limb length. Osteonecrosis localized to a small area of the weiOsteonecrosis localized to a small area of the weightbearing portion of the femoral head.

Intertrochanteric malunion

When the fracture collapses into varus angulation and then goes on to bony union, a malunion results. The hallmark of this malunion is a varus neck-shaft angle with shortening of the ipsilateral femur, shortening of the abductor musculature or lever arm, and often trochanteric-pelvic abutment and a Trendelenburg gait with poor hip motion. This patient is at an increased risk for the development of hip arthritis. Intertrochanteric osteotomy serves to realign the hip joint, restore normal abductor mechanics, and reestablish equal leg lengths.

SCFE malunion

SCFE is a common fracture variant seen in the adolescent population.[6] In many cases, in situ pinning of the displaced fracture is indicated, because this reduces the risk of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. If a displaced slipped epiphysis heals in situ, a fracture malunion can result. After remodeling, this malunion is characterized by coxa vara, femoral shortening, and retroversion of the femoral neck with a significant loss of hip motion. A valgus-producing proximal femoral osteotomy can correct the varus and reestablish normal rotation, both of which reorient the femoral head in the acetabulum, offering possible protection from the development of arthritis. This procedure also equalizes limb length and abductor tension, thereby normalizing gait.

Fibrous dysplasia

A shepherd's crook deformity of the proximal femur has long been associated with fibrous dysplasia. Repeated microfractures of the femoral neck lead to progressive displacement and healing of the femur in varus. Significant shortening of the femur, trochanteric-pelvic abutment, and shortening of the abductor lever arm occur concomitantly. Rotational deformity may also be present.[7]

Patients report limb shortening, hip stiffness, and an inability to abduct the lower extremity, which can be particularly troublesome for women of childbearing age. Pain may be present as well. These patients are at risk for progression of the deformity, fracture of the femoral neck, and joint degeneration. Valgus-producing proximal femoral osteotomy serves to prevent progression of the deformity and the development of a fracture, reestablish a more normal femoral head–acetabular relationship, lengthen the extremity, tension the abductors, and greatly improve hip abduction.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip

Adults with hip dysplasia often have both acetabular and femoral deformity. The femoral neck assumes a valgus and anteverted orientation, while the acetabulum is shallow with varying degrees of uncovering of the femoral head, ranging from mild to subluxed to a frank dislocation. In select patients, surgery is indicated to improve femoral head coverage or better reduce the hip joint. A varus-producing proximal femoral osteotomy with derotation of the anteverted neck improves femoral head orientation. Often, this is combined with a periacetabular osteotomy to improve superolateral and anterior head coverage.[8, 9, 10]

Osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis

The goal of the femoral osteotomy procedure is to alter the contact point across the articular cartilage during weight bearing. When arthritic change occurs without deformity, then a valgus-extension osteotomy moves the contact point of weight bearing forces to a new location on the femoral head, alleviating the pressure across the degenerated area of articular cartilage. This area of damaged cartilage has been shown to undergo a reparative process through which new collagen is created.

Proximal femoral osteotomy was performed and the hProximal femoral osteotomy was performed and the head was positioned into more valgus. In so doing, the affected portion of the femoral head is rotated away from the weightbearing area. External fixation was selected in this example. Follow-up radiographs demonstrate a well-healed osFollow-up radiographs demonstrate a well-healed osteotomy with maintenance of the valgus positioning.
Previous
Next

Presentation

Adults present with deformity about the hip from any number of etiologies, including hip fracture nonunion or malunion, including SCFE, congenital coxa vara, shepherd's crook deformity from fibrous dysplasia, excessive femoral anteversion, developmental dysplasia of the hip, congenital or acquired femoral shortening, and soft tissue contractures about the hip.

A thorough examination is crucial before undertaking any osteotomy procedure to correct a deformity, as deformities commonly lie in multiple planes. Hip, knee, and ankle are examined, looking for deformity and joint range of motion. Hip joint contractures may be resolved through the osteotomy. Rotational profile of the lower extremity, including hip internal and external rotation and thigh foot axis, is documented. Limb length discrepancy is measured using blocks and later with radiographs.

Previous incisions, skin quality, and any signs of previous sepsis should be carefully sought.

Previous
Next

Indications

The bases for performing a proximal femoral osteotomy can vary. In the presence of deformity, the goal is to correct the deformity and in so doing, realign the hip and lower extremity. This may include frontal, sagittal, and rotational corrections and perhaps even lengthening through the osteotomy.[11] Indications for proximal femoral osteotomy in adults include the following:

  • Nonunion of a femoral neck fracture
  • Nonunion or malunion of an intertrochanteric hip fracture deformity
    • Rotational deformities, as in the case of severe femoral anteversion, SCFE, and developmental dysplasia of the hip
    • Frontal plane (varus/valgus) deformities, as in the case of congenital coxa vara, varus fracture malunion, and shepherd's crook deformity from fibrous dysplasia
    • Sagittal deformities, including flexion and extension deformity, either bony as in fracture malunion or nonbony, as in hip flexion contracture of achondroplasia
    • Significant shortening or bone loss of the distal femur requiring a proximal lengthening
  • Combinations of the above indications, as in intertrochanteric fracture malunion with varus, external rotation, and shortening deformity
  • Simultaneous femoral osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty
  • Hip osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis in the young, active patient
Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

Proximal femoral osteotomy is a joint-sparing procedure that relies on maintaining the biological integrity of the femoral head. Preserving the blood supply to the femoral head is of the utmost importance. In adults, the medial femoral circumflex artery is the predominant nutrient vessel supplying the femoral head. Proximal femoral osteotomy is performed via a lateral approach, reducing the chance of injury to this vessel.

Other relevant anatomy includes knowledge of the normal anatomy of the femur. Normal neck-shaft angle ranges from 124-136° The center of the femoral head lies at a similar height as the tip of the greater trochanter. A line connecting these 2 points makes an angle of 90° (range 85-95°) with the mechanical axis of the femur.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

Contraindications for femoral osteotomy include:

  • The presence of infection may preclude the use of internal fixation; however, external fixation may be a viable option in such cases.
  • Limitations of hip motion can make realignment unsuccessful without soft tissue releases or compensation through the osteotomy.
  • Advanced osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis is a relative contraindication.
  • Inflammatory arthritis can also be a contraindication.
Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Austin T Fragomen, MD  Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Assistant Attending, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, and Fellowship Director, Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Service, Hospital for Special Surgery

Austin T Fragomen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America

Disclosure: Biomet Grant/research funds None; Smith and Nephew Grant/research funds None; SBi Honoraria Consulting

Coauthor(s)

S Robert Rozbruch, MD  Associate Professor of Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Director, Institute for Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction; Chief, Limb Lengthening and Deformity Service Hospital for Special Surgery

S Robert Rozbruch, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: small bone innovations Consulting fee Speaking and teaching

Specialty Editor Board

Steven I Rabin, MD  Clinical Associate Professor, Loyola University Medical Center; Chair, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dreyer Medical Clinic

Steven I Rabin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Fracture Association, AO Foundation, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

B Sonny Bal, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine

B Sonny Bal, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

William L Jaffe, MD  Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine; Vice Chairman, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases

William L Jaffe, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, Eastern Orthopaedic Association, and New York Academy of Medicine

Disclosure: Stryker Orthopaedics Consulting fee Speaking and teaching

References
  1. Hadjicostas PT, Thielemann FW. The use of trochanteric slide osteotomy in the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures. Injury. Jul 1 2008;[Medline].

  2. Barr RJ, Santore RF. Osteotomies about the hip-Adults. Chapman's Orthopaedic Surgery 3rd ed. 2001;2723-28.

  3. Papagelopoulos PJ, Trousdale RT, Lewallen DG. Total hip arthroplasty with femoral osteotomy for proximal femoral deformity. Clin Orthop. 1996;322:151-62. [Medline].

  4. Bartonicek J, Skala-Rosenbaum J, Dousa P. Valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy for nonunion of trochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:606-12. [Medline].

  5. Hammer AJ. Nonunion of subcapital femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:73-7. [Medline].

  6. Roshan A, Ram S. The neglected femoral neck fracture in young adults: review of a challenging problem. Clin Med Res. May 2008;6(1):33-9. [Medline].

  7. Yang L, Jing Y, Hong D, Chong-Qi T. Valgus osteotomy combined with intramedullary nail for Shepherd's crook deformity in fibrous dysplasia: 14 femurs with a minimum of 4 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Apr 2010;130(4):497-502. [Medline].

  8. Firth GB, Robertson AJ, Schepers A, Fatti L. Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Open Reduction as a Risk Factor for Substantial Osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jun 8 2010;[Medline].

  9. Eastwood DM, de Gheldere A. Clinical examination for developmental dysplasia of the hip in neonates: how to stay out of trouble. BMJ. May 12 2010;340:c1965. [Medline].

  10. Varner KE, Incavo SJ, Haynes RJ, Dickson JH. Surgical Treatment of Developmental Hip Dislocation in Children Aged 1 to 3 Years: A Mean 18-Year, 9-Month Follow-Up Study. Orthopedics. Mar 10 2010;162-166. [Medline].

  11. Barker KL, Lamb SE, Simpson HR. Recovery of muscle strength and power after limb-lengthening surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Mar 2010;91(3):384-8. [Medline].

  12. Paley D. Principles of Deformity Correction. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2002;1-18.

  13. Kim HK, da Cunha AM, Browne R, Kim HT, Herring JA. How much varus is optimal with proximal femoral osteotomy to preserve the femoral head in legg-calve-perthes disease?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Feb 2011;93(4):341-7. [Medline].

  14. Haverkamp D, Marti RK. Intertrochanteric osteotomy combined with acetabular shelfplasty in young patients with severe deformity of the femoral head and secondary osteoarthritis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:25-31. [Medline].

  15. Paliobeis CP, Kanellopoulos AD, Babis GC, Magnissalis EA, Catling JC, Papagelopoulos PJ, et al. Intrinsic passive stiffness of 2 constructs of varus proximal femoral osteotomy: external fixator or blade plate. J Pediatr Orthop. Jun 2010;30(4):351-6. [Medline].

  16. McGrory BJ, Estok DM 2nd, Harris WH. Follow-up of intertrochanteric osteotomy of the hip during a 25-year period. Orthopedics. 1998;21:651-3. [Medline].

  17. Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Yoon KS, et al. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A five-year minimum follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:530-5. [Medline].

  18. Mehra A, Hemmady MV, Hodgkinson JP. Trochanteric non-union--does it influence the rate of revision following primary total hip replacement? A minimum of 15 years follow-up. Surgeon. Apr 2008;6(2):79-82. [Medline].

  19. Seki T, Hasegawa Y, Masui T, Yamaguchi J, Kanoh T, Ishiguro N, et al. Quality of life following femoral osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Sci. Mar 2008;13(2):116-21. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
This severe vertical fracture line through the femoral neck is a high risk for nonunion with simple pinning fixation.
The fracture is stabilized with a screw, and then a 95° blade is inserted. Proximal femoral osteotomy is created and a wedge removed.
Final image showing a valgus-producing osteotomy with improved orientation of the femoral neck fracture.
Painful nonunion of a peritrochanteric fracture in varus position with shortening and broken hardware.
Repair of nonunion with a 95° blade plate with restoration of normal alignment and equalization of limb length.
Osteonecrosis localized to a small area of the weightbearing portion of the femoral head.
Proximal femoral osteotomy was performed and the head was positioned into more valgus. In so doing, the affected portion of the femoral head is rotated away from the weightbearing area. External fixation was selected in this example.
Follow-up radiographs demonstrate a well-healed osteotomy with maintenance of the valgus positioning.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.