The tibial plateau is one of the most critical loadbearing areas in the human body; fractures of the plateau affect knee alignment, stability, and motion. Early detection and appropriate treatment of these fractures are critical for minimizing patient disability and reducing the risk of documented complications, particularly posttraumatic arthritis. 
Sir Astley Cooper first described fractures of the proximal tibia in 1825. Anger treated most minimally displaced fractures with early knee traction mobilization.  Rausmusen introduced open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of tibial condylar fractures, and Sarmiento popularized functional cast bracing of most tibial condylar fractures. [3, 4]
The knee is a complex joint, exposed to forces that can exceed five times the weight of the body. The joint has enhanced mobility at the cost of stability. The proximal tibia expands from the diaphysis through a metaphyseal flare. Contact is made with the head of the fibula in the posterolateral quadrant. The surface of the tibial plateau has a medial and a lateral weightbearing portion and an intercondylar eminence, which is both nonarticular and nonweightbearing. The medial plateau is generally larger than the lateral plateau.
The intercondylar eminence provides attachment to the medial and lateral menisci and the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments.
The normal knee is in physiologic valgus alignment. Most of the load transmitted across the knee is medial to the eminence, and therefore, the knee has stronger cancellous bone.
Because the medial condyle is rounded as compared with the lateral condyle, some of the anterior articular surface of the lateral plateau is exposed, especially during extension. This causes the lateral plateau to be more susceptible to bone injury and is the reason why fractures of the lateral plateau are more common than those of the medial plateau.
There have been many classifications of tibial plateau fractures,  of which the following are probably the most historically significant.
In 1900, Muller proposed a classification system for tibial plateau fractures that categorized fractures according to the amount of articular involvement. Hohl and Luck proposed a classification of plateau fractures that included nondisplaced, local-depression, split-depression, and splitting fractures.  Hohl later expanded the classification to include comminuted fractures.  In 1981, Moore proposed a classification system for fracture-dislocation of the tibial condyle that took into consideration soft-tissue injury. 
Schatzker et al proposed a classification system of condyle fractures based on the fracture pattern and fragment anatomy. This classification system, which is widely accepted and used today, divides these fractures into the following six types  :
Type I - This is a wedge or split fracture of the lateral aspect of the plateau, usually as a result of valgus and axial forces; the wedge fragment is not compressed (depressed), because the underlying cancellous bone is strong; this pattern is usually seen in younger patients
Type II - This is a lateral wedge or split fracture associated with compression; the mechanism of injury is similar to that of a type I fracture, but the underlying bone may be osteoporotic and unable to resist depression, or the force may have been greater (see the first and second images below)
Type III - This is a pure compression fracture of the lateral plateau; as a result of an axial force, the depression is usually located laterally or centrally, but it may involve any portion of the articular surface (see the third image below)
Type IV - This is a fracture that involves the medial plateau; as a result of either varus or axial compression forces, the pattern may be either split alone or split with compression; because this fracture involves the larger and stronger medial plateau, the forces causing this type are generally greater than those associated with types I, II, or III (see the fourth image below)
Type V - This fracture includes split elements of both the medial and the lateral condyles and may include medial or lateral articular compression, usually as a result of a pure axial force occurring while the knee is in extension
Type VI - This is a complex, bicondylar fracture in which the condylar components separate from the diaphysis; depression and impaction of fracture fragments are the rule; this pattern results from high-energy trauma and diverse combinations of forces (see the fifth, sixth, and seventh images below) 
The most common mechanism resulting in a tibial plateau fracture is a valgus force with axial loading. Of these fractures, 80% are motor vehicle–related injuries, and the remainder are sports-related injuries. A bumper- or fender-related injury from a vehicle-pedestrian collision constitutes more than 25% of tibial plateau fractures. Trauma can be direct or can be related to a fall from a height, an industrial accident, or a sports injury.
Tibial plateau fractures may be either low-energy or high-energy. Low-energy fractures occur in osteoporotic bone and typically are depressed fractures. High-energy fractures occur in low-energy patients often as a result of motor vehicle–related trauma, and the most common pattern of fracture in this group is a splitting fracture.
More than 50% of patients who sustain a tibial plateau fracture are aged 50 years or older. The increased frequency of tibial plateau fractures in older females is due to the increased prevalence of osteoporosis in these individuals. Tibial plateau fractures in younger patients are commonly the result of high-energy injuries.