Anterior Cruciate Ligament Pathology Treatment & Management
- Author: John Maguire, MBBS, MSc, FRACS; Chief Editor: Thomas M DeBerardino, MD more...
The aim in treating patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is to prevent recurrent instability and associated meniscal injury. Once meniscal pathology occurs, there is a much higher incidence of osteoarthritis.
After acute injury, the major indications for surgical reconstruction are related to the degree of instability and level of activity. Activity levels can include sporting or work-related activities. Reviewing the patient profile in the history from the patient is very important in the decision-making process.
Daniel defined patients at highest risk as those who participated in more than 50 hours of high-level activity per year prior to injury and have marked instability.[8, 9] Instability was defined as having a KT-1000, manual max test of greater than 5 mm of anterior translation. In those with translation of greater than 7 mm, this was defined as marked instability. Surgical intervention can be justified in these cases, as these patients were found to be at greatest risk of requiring further surgery.
In the less active group, the decision for surgery becomes more controversial. A nonoperative management plan with extensive physical therapy and activity avoidance can be undertaken. If patients experience ongoing instability or are unwilling to modify activity levels, surgery should be considered.
In chronic cases, the major indication for surgical reconstruction is recurrent instability. Other types of surgical intervention may be required to deal with associated pathology, such as arthroscopy, partial meniscectomy, or meniscal repair. High tibial osteotomy also may be required to correct varus alignment, especially in degenerative cases and complex instabilities.
When surgery is indicated, there are many decisions to make, including the following:
Timing of surgery
Type of graft
Rehabilitation (return to activity and sport)
Early surgery is indicated in the active and professional population because it ensures future stability and negates the possibility of future giving-way episodes, protecting the menisci. Early surgery is thought by some to cause postoperative stiffness and arthrofibrosis. However, early rehabilitation negates these concerns.
Surgical contraindications are limited and include the following:
Patient reluctance to participate in the complex rehabilitation required
However, relative contraindications are common and include the following:
Patient is less than 2 weeks from injury
Low activity levels
Medical therapy is used in patients with cruciate injuries to minimize pain and swelling and to regain range of motion (ROM). Nonsteroidal medication combined with simple analgesia can be used in the acute phase for adequate pain relief.
Physical therapy is a very useful adjunct in cruciate injury. In the acute phase, efforts are concentrated on regaining ROM, reducing effusion, and maintaining strength. In chronic cases, maximizing strength (particularly of the hamstring musculature) and retraining proprioceptive function are undertaken to reduce instability episodes.
Postoperatively, the role of the physical therapist or athletic trainer is essential. Most centers concentrate on involved rehabilitation programs that aim to gain early ROM and reduce postoperative swelling. Programs then progress through isometric strengthening and co-contractions of the hamstrings and quadriceps muscles. As time progresses, closed-chain exercises are introduced. Some centers also use protected range, open-chain quadriceps exercises. The next phase involves the introduction of nonimpact strengthening and endurance activities such as swimming. The final phase includes a gradual return to functional activities with sports-specific exercises.[10, 11, 12]
The aim of surgical therapy is to reduce meniscal injury by decreasing instability episodes (see the image below). Fu stated that normal knee kinematics cannot truly be regained but that the meniscus can be protected.
Arthroscopic techniques have dominated over the past few decades. The placement of the tunnels and the approach to the tunnel drilling remain controversial. Femoral tunnel drilling should be from an anteromedial portal rather than through the tibial tunnel. The anteromedial portal allows more freedom to correctly place the femoral tunnel. This approach has a secondary advantage because it allows the fixation screws to be placed parallel to the graft in the tunnel.
Double-bundle techniques are also popular; however, they have created discussion as to their necessity. Because of its shape, the patella tendon graft usually automatically produces two bundles.
Midthird patella tendon grafts are the criterion standard, for many reasons. The fixation of the graft and its incorporation into the tunnels is of primary importance and is assured with the patella tendon graft. The bone blocks on either end of the graft heal in the tunnels, negating tunnel widening. Fixation of the bone plug at the aperture of the femoral tunnel ensures a physiological and biomechanical advantage because it negates the windscreen wiper effect as the graft enters the tunnel. An added is the “block and tackle” effect that can be used on the tibial bone block fixation, ensuring the tension in the graft at full extension can be increased threefold.
Taking a core of bone with a special coring drill provides a suitable bone graft for the defects in the patella and tibia from where the graft was taken. This decreases the kneeling problem that has been a complication of patella tendon grafts and, hence, an argument for hamstring grafts.
A Cochrane study compared the outcomes of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon (PT) or hamstring tendon (HT) autografts in ACL-deficient patients. After a minimum 2- year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were noted between the 2 techniques for functional assessment, return to activity, Tegner and Lysholm scores, and subjective measures of outcome.
Whereas PT reconstructions resulted in a more statically stable knee, they were also associated with more anterior knee problems, a statistically significant loss of extension ROM, and a trend towards loss of knee extension strength; a trend towards loss of flexion ROM and a statistically significant loss of knee flexion strength were noted in HT reconstructions.
Quadruple hamstring grafts have become popular as an alternative graft, mainly because of the ease of threading them in the tunnels. However, these grafts have two major problems. Their incorporation into bone is not reliable, as evidenced by tunnel widening and a higher failure rate. In elite athletes, recurrent hamstring tears are more likely, although some healing of the tendons occurs after grafting.
Quadriceps tendon grafts have not achieved universal acceptance but have the advantages of a bone block at one end and lower graft morbidity.
Allografts, prosthetic ligaments, and xenografts have all been tried but do not have the advantages of autografts.
Multiple surgical procedures have been described for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and can be broken down into the following three types:
Intra-articular procedures are more commonly undertaken and usually performed arthroscopically. These procedures involve using harvested donor tissue and inserting and fixing it at the site of the old ACL.
Extra-articular procedures involve transferring tissue insertions in an attempt to stop rotatory instability. Operations such as the Ellison iliotibial band (ITB) transfer have been shown to provide short-term reductions in instability patterns. Reid stated that at 2 years, good results had been obtained in 70% of cases, but by 10 years, good results were found in only 20% of cases. Extra-articular procedures may be considered for patients who are skeletally immature or who are older and considered to be low-demand
When combined with intra-articular procedures, extra-articular procedures have been found to be of no added benefit. Current recommendations limit their use.
Tissues used in intra-articular procedures
PT (see the first image below), HT (see the second image below), and quadriceps tendon are the most commonly used donor grafts. Current literature suggests that little difference exists in long-term outcomes among the different tissues used. Graft positioning is far more important.
Many papers suggest that there is some mild increase in the incidence of patellofemoral pain with the use of the PT. Patella fracture also has been described.
Increased laxity also has been suggested to occur with hamstring grafts. To date, the length of follow-up is shorter for hamstring grafts, so continued reports are required.
Allografts (Achilles tendon or PT) are expensive and have the risk of disease transmission. Allograft tissues can be useful in revision cases and in multiple ligament reconstruction.
Synthetic grafts (ligament augmentation device [LAD] or Gore-Tex grafts) have been shown to fail and have poor long-term results. Currently, these grafts are not recommended.
Fixation can be undertaken with a number of devices. These include screws, staples, endoscopically inserted buttons, and transtunnel fixation devices. Little difference in outcome has been found in the literature regarding fixation type. Accurate placement of graft tunnels is far more important. The most common error is to place the femoral tunnel too anterior.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Timing of surgery
Shelbourne and DeHaven suggested that surgery performed within 3 weeks from injury can lead to an increase in arthrofibrosis and subsequent poor results.[11, 17] Noyes demonstrated that meniscal repairs performed within 8 weeks of injury do better than those with a longer delay. Results also are improved if repairs are combined with cruciate reconstruction. Thus, the optimal time for repair would seem to be 3-8 weeks from injury.
On the basis of the senior authors' experience, performing surgery before the third postinjury week does not affect the outcome.
The results of one study noted that increased time to surgery is strongly associated with a higher risk of medial meniscus injury and decreased repair rate. Whereas female patients experienced a lower risk of cartilage injury, increasing age and increasing time to surgery (>12 months) in male patients realized a greater risk.
Meniscal pathology can affect long-term outcome. Meniscal repair should be utilized whenever possible. The repair is best combined with ACL reconstruction. Partial meniscectomy leads to early degeneration of the knee. Various studies demonstrate that following meniscectomy, more rapid degeneration of the knee occurs. Patients need to be aware of this prior to undergoing surgery.
Other ligament injury
ACL injury often is associated with other ligament pathology. The medial collateral ligament (MCL), in particular, often is injured. The current recommendation is to treat the MCL injury nonoperatively in a brace, controlling valgus force but allowing ROM. Time spent in the brace varies with the grade of injury. AFter adequate healing, ACL surgery can be performed. If the MCL remains lax, thus failing nonoperative management, the two procedures can be combined in a single operative session.
After a 3-year follow-up, the data from one study showed that patients with combined lesions of the ACL and MCL who had undergone an arthroscopic double-bundle ACL reconstruction showed a significantly greater mean medial joint opening (1.7 mm) as compared with uninjured knees (0.9 mm). However, no significant difference was noted between anteroposterior laxity and other clinical parameters. Because the data showed that residual valgus laxity did not affect anteroposterior laxity significantly, these results suggest that no additional surgical procedure is necessary for the MCL in combined lesions.
Preoperative activity level has been shown to be associated with ongoing instability and further injury. Highly active individuals should undergo early reconstruction.
In the skeletally immature individual, concern exists regarding ACL reconstruction. Transphyseal drilling has been reported to cause growth arrest. Arnoczky suggested in his laboratory studies that small tunnels less than 6 mm in diameter that cross the physis at right angles and are filled with soft-tissue grafts cause few problems.
Fowler also demonstrated no such problems with his series, when using soft-tissue grafts less than 6 mm in diameter, placed over the top on the femur and centrally on the tibia. Other options include the use of the "over the top" positioned graft, which does not cross the physis, or extra-articular procedures.
One study sought to determine the volume of injury to the physis during double-bundle ACL reconstruction in children. Using computer-generated three-dimensional (3D) models, drill-holes of 6, 7, 8, and 9 mm in diameter were placed to simulate tunnels in the femur; computer-aided software was used to calculate the total physial volume and the volume of physis that was removed by creation of the tunnels.
The results found that the volume of physial damage caused by posterolateral drill holes was greater than that produced by anteromedial drill holes in all subjects, which leads to the conclusion that double-bundle techniques substantially increase the volume of injury to the physis and may increase the risk of abnormal growth in the distal femoral physis.
A number of considerations regarding surgery in general are necessary and include the following.
The literature at present shows little difference between the commonly used autografts of the PT (see the image below) and those of the hamstrings. These autografts are better options than an allograft, as the graft scaffold fills with native cells more completely and quickly. Synthetic grafts have shown poor results with high failure rates, and significant complications.
Graft positioning is where most technical mistakes are made (see the first image below). The femoral tunnel commonly is placed too far anteriorly (see the second image below), leading to an isometry problem. Likewise, the tibial tunnel often is made too far forward, which can lead to notch impingement of the graft.
Fixation types commonly used include intra-articular interference screws (see the image below), endoscopic buttons, post screws, and transfixing devices. Interference screws are the criterion standard, offering good biomechanical fixation. The graft weakens over subsequent months as incorporation is occurring.
Fixation can be a problem in the first few weeks following reconstruction. Concern has been raised by certain authors that button-type devices may allow windscreen wiper effects to occur. This allows the tunnels to enlarge. Using shorter button fixation loops may reduce the incidence of this phenomenon. This same problem also has been shown with interference screws. The outcome does not seem to be affected by this occurrence. Time will tell as to whether such problems are real and to what degree they may affect results.
Graft tensioning is a controversial issue. Most authors suggest that the graft should be tensioned in full extension to approximately 20-40 newtons (N). This should prevent overconstraining the graft. Arneja et al did a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials that evaluated graft tension in ACL reconstruction and outcomes. They found a trend of 80 N as the most effective tension with hamstring-polyester graft, but they found no clear tension trend for semitendinosus-gracilis or PT grafts.
The graft is placed in such a position to ensure that it is isometric. This ensures minimal translation of the graft with flexion and extension. If the correct footprints are used, this should be adequate. Interestingly, the real ACL is not isometric, and therefore, this is a problem with reconstruction and graft protection.
Notchplasty and impingement
Some surgeons perform notchplasty to ensure adequate visualization and reduce graft impingement. If a large notchplasty is required, many surgeons would suggest that the graft position may have been incorrect. Performing a large notchplasty can also make accurate positioning difficult.
Augmentation of the ACL grafts described has been found to be of no benefit in routine cases. Graft augmentation may be of value in complex ligament injuries when more than the ACL is injured.
Surgery in patients who are skeletally immature must be viewed with caution. The authors prefer to wait until skeletal maturity occurs because of the risk of physeal growth arrest.
If activity levels cannot be modified or if the individual competes at an elite level, the authors proceed with surgery. In these cases, the authors tend to use a hamstring graft. Arnoczky has demonstrated that no growth arrest occurs when the physis is crossed with a hamstring graft of less than 6 mm in diameter. This topic, however, remains controversial.
Most surgical cases are performed arthroscopically. The patient is placed supine on the operating table, and a tourniquet is applied. The leg is positioned with footrests and side supports, such that the leg remains in 70-90° of flexion. An arthroscopy is performed to identify any meniscal pathology and to clear the remnant ACL from the femoral notch.
The graft is harvested at the next stage. The two most commonly used grafts are the PT (with bony blocks at either end) and the hamstrings (semitendinosus and gracilis). Bushnell et al found that a 20 mL injection of 0.25% bupivacaine into the hamstring donor site through an arthroscopic shaver sleeve significantly reduces postoperative pain levels. Grafts then are fashioned so that they can be passed through tunnels in the femur and tibia.
The femoral tunnel commonly is prepared first. The tunnel is placed posterolaterally at the junction of the roof and sidewall (1- to 2-o'clock position [left knee]). The tunnel is enlarged to allow passage of the graft. The tibial tunnel then is prepared. The drill hole emerges at a point one third to one half the distance between the medial and lateral tibial spines, at a point just anterior to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).
When using the transtibial technique, the surgeon performs the tibial tunnel first. The femur is then drilled via the tibial tunnel. Correct position is essential to allow correct femoral preparation. The graft is then passed through the tibial tunnel into the femoral tunnel. Fixation can then be performed in a number of ways.
Jarvela et al compared tunnel enlargement with double-bundle (35 patients) and single-bundle (25 patients) ACL reconstruction. There was no significant difference in tunnel enlargement on the femoral side, but tunnel enlargement on the tibial side was greater with single-bundle reconstruction.
The last phase involves assessment of the notch to ensure that the graft does not impinge on the anterior aspect of the femoral notch. Wounds then are closed in routine fashion.
In the early postoperative period, the major considerations relate to pain management, wound healing, prevention of neurovascular complications, prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and rehabilitation.
Pain is best managed with a number of interventions. These include adequate infiltration of local analgesia; cold therapy using ice; and administration of anti-inflammatory medications, oral analgesia, and simple narcotics in sparing doses.
Adequate assessment is required to monitor the development of compartment syndrome and neurological or vascular complications. DVT in the postoperative phase also is well documented, but rare. Prophylaxis may be required in high-risk patients, including those taking the oral contraceptive pill. The authors have a low threshold for investigating those with clinical signs or symptoms and those at risk. Early mobilization is one way of aiding prevention. Infection occurs in approximately 0.5% of cases. Although infection is rare, measures such as antibiotic prophylaxis are recommended.
Early rehabilitation and physical therapy has been one of the greater advances in the postoperative management of ACL surgery. Shelbourne has coined the term, accelerated rehabilitation. The authors concentrate on early ROM and mobilization. Patients then proceed through a lengthy protocol, which concentrates on isometric contraction, co-contraction of hamstrings and quadriceps, closed-chain exercises, and finally, functional return to activity. The entire program takes approximately 6-9 months before patients may return to full sporting activity.
A return to full activity prior to 6 months is not recommended. Arnoczky has demonstrated in his studies on graft incorporation that the graft weakens following surgery. The graft then undergoes a number of phases before reaching revascularization and ligamentization. This process takes up to 2 years.[24, 25] Graft strength is good, however, at around 6-9 months after surgery.
The techniques of rehabilitation depend on the principles of graft protection and return rapidly to muscle and proprioceptive control. Early graft protection depends on closed chain isometric exercise and, in some cases, early bracing. One needs to realize that full graft incorporation and revascularization is complete 6 months after surgery. Therefore, a graduated program has plenty of time.
Other complications include patella fracture (in grafts harvested from this site) and arthrofibrosis. Timing of surgery should be delayed until the knee has returned to a settled state. Our studies have found the timing is not a problem in relation to arthrofibrosis, but other authors have suggested a concern in surgery prior to 2-3 weeks postinjury.
The major complications associated with ACL surgery are as follows:
Complex regional pain syndrome
Infection, neurovascular injury, and DVT have been described previously. Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) occurs, but it is rare. CRPS must be recognized early and treated aggressively. Skin mottling, abnormal pain response, hypersensitivity, limb atrophy, abnormal sympathetic response, and regional osteopenia are all features that must be considered. Early motion, adequate analgesia, neurotrophics, regional guanethidine blocks, and sympathectomy may be required.
ACL surgical failure was well described by Fu et al, who listed the following four major subgroups:
Arthritis or pain
A number of considerations exist regarding development of arthritis and pain. Bone bruising occurs in up to 70% of cases. This phenomenon has been detected only with the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and long-term effects are unknown. There may be an association with ongoing pain and poor results. Meniscal injury leads to the development of early arthritis. Those with meniscal injury can expect less favorable results than those in whom the meniscus is untouched.
ACL surgery cannot restore the true mechanics of the knee. Incidence of arthritis increases in active individuals, despite surgery. Long term, this development leads to pain and decreased function. Some would suggest that the best protection and long-term results, with reduced arthritis and minimal pain, can be achieved only by sedentary activity. Unfortunately, few patients follow this program. Therefore, awareness that failure can occur despite a technically well-performed operation is required.
In some series, arthrofibrosis has been identified as being related to early surgical intervention or surgery to the MCL. In the authors' experience, arthrofibrosis has not been related to timing of intervention, but this should be considered. Other causes of reduced extension can include graft impingement, associated with an anterior tibial tunnel and/or the presence of a cyclops lesion.
A loss of flexion can be associated with anterior femoral tunnel placement. This can also lead to recurrent instability, as the graft is nonfunctional. This is the most commonly performed error in ACL surgery. Proper tunnel placement in the tibia and femur and adequate debridement of tissue around the tibial tunnel can reduce the occurrence of these problems.
Extensor dysfunction and ongoing patellofemoral pain can be reduced with adequate rehabilitation. In those individuals with preoperative symptoms, hamstring grafts may be more appropriate. An increased incidence of problems when the PT is used has been suggested in the literature. Patella fracture can occur in association with patella tendon harvesting; however, incidence of this problem is low.
Ongoing instability can be related to a number of problems. Poor technique, graft or fixation failure, further injury, varus alignment, and combined ligament laxity (eg, posterolateral corner injury) all have been listed as causes.
Accurate assessment of alignment, correct diagnosis of the ligaments involved, proper surgical technique, and functional rehabilitation can limit the incidence of these problems.
Medical follow-up is undertaken at 7-10 days to ensure wound healing and to assess for presence of postoperative complications. Subsequent reviews occur in relation to upgrades in activity levels during the rehabilitation process. These generally are at 6 weeks and 3 months. A final review is undertaken at 6 months, before a return to full activity may take place.
Physical therapy review is more involved. Patients are seen in the perioperative period to begin ROM exercises and reduce swelling. Strengthening programs then begin as previously described. ACL classes with group activity sessions are used in the authors' center and are found to be useful in motivating some patients. A graded program is used, and assessment is required before progressing to the next activity level.
Hunt JA, Callaghan JT. Polymer-hydroxyapatite composite versus polymer interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a large animal model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Jul. 16(7):655-60. [Medline].
Spalazzi JP, Dagher E, Doty SB, Guo XE, Rodeo SA, Lu HH. In vivo evaluation of a multiphased scaffold designed for orthopaedic interface tissue engineering and soft tissue-to-bone integration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Jul. 86(1):1-12. [Medline].
Altman GH, Horan RL, Weitzel P, Richmond JC. The use of long-term bioresorbable scaffolds for anterior cruciate ligament repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008 Apr. 16(4):177-87. [Medline].
Kimura Y, Hokugo A, Takamoto T, Tabata Y, Kurosawa H. Regeneration of anterior cruciate ligament by biodegradable scaffold combined with local controlled release of basic fibroblast growth factor and collagen wrapping. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2008 Mar. 14(1):47-57. [Medline].
Sasaki K, Kuroda R, Ishida K, Kubo S, Matsumoto T, Mifune Y, et al. Enhancement of tendon-bone osteointegration of anterior cruciate ligament graft using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug. 36(8):1519-27. [Medline].
Casteleyn PP, Handelberg F. Non-operative management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 May. 78(3):446-51. [Medline].
Farshad-Amacker NA, Potter HG. MRI of knee ligament injury and reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Oct. 38(4):757-73. [Medline].
Daniel DM, Fithian DC. Indications for ACL surgery. Arthroscopy. 1994 Aug. 10(4):434-41. [Medline].
Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE. Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Sep-Oct. 22(5):632-44. [Medline].
Gerber JP, Marcus RL, Dibble LE, Greis PE, Burks RT, LaStayo PC. Effects of early progressive eccentric exercise on muscle size and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 1-year follow-up study of a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2009 Jan. 89(1):51-9. [Medline].
Shelbourne KD, Nitz P. Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1990 May-Jun. 18(3):292-9. [Medline].
Swenson TM, Harner CD. Knee ligament and meniscal injuries. Current concepts. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995 Jul. 26(3):529-46. [Medline].
Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, et al. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy. 2011 Mar. 27(3):380-90. [Medline].
Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7. 9:CD005960. [Medline].
Reid JS, Hanks GA, Kalenak A. The Ellison iliotibial-band transfer for a torn anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Oct. 74(9):1392-402. [Medline].
Leys T, Salmon L, Waller A, Linklater J, Pinczewski L. Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Mar. 40(3):595-605. [Medline].
Shelbourne KD, Wilckens JH, Mollabashy A. Arthrofibrosis in acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The effect of timing of reconstruction and rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med. 1991 Jul-Aug. 19(4):332-6. [Medline].
Chhadia AM, Inacio MC, Maletis GB, Csintalan RP, Davis BR, Funahashi TT. Are meniscus and cartilage injuries related to time to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Sep. 39(9):1894-9. [Medline].
Zaffagnini S, Bonanzinga T, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Giordano G, Bruni D, Bignozzi S, et al. Does chronic medial collateral ligament laxity influence the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: a prospective evaluation with a minimum three-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Aug. 93(8):1060-4. [Medline].
Shea KG, Grimm NL, Belzer JS. Volumetric Injury of the Distal Femoral Physis During Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction in Children: A Three-Dimensional Study with Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jun 1. 93(11):1033-8. [Medline].
Arneja S, McConkey MO, Mulpuri K, Chin P, Gilbart MK, Regan WD, et al. Graft tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2009 Feb. 25(2):200-7. [Medline].
Bushnell BD, Sakryd G, Noonan TJ. Hamstring donor-site block: evaluation of pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010 Jul. 26(7):894-900. [Medline].
Järvelä T, Moisala AS, Paakkala T, Paakkala A. Tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2008 Dec. 24(12):1349-57. [Medline].
Arnoczky S. Biology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Smith and Nephew Winter Meeting Gold Coast:. 1997.
Scheffler SU, Unterhauser FN, Weiler A. Graft remodeling and ligamentization after cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Sep. 16(9):834-42. [Medline].