Metastatic Carcinoma 

  • Author: Howard A Chansky, MD; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jun 28, 2011
 

Background

Approximately 1.2 million patients present with cancer each year in the United States. Of these, approximately 600,000 persons have metastases to bone. In contrast, 2,700 patients per year develop primary bone sarcoma.

In addition, the age range of patients with sarcoma is different from that of individuals with carcinoma of bone; most metastatic bone lesions occur in adults older than 50 years, while most sarcomas occur in adolescents or young adults (< 30 y). Therefore, a bone-occupying mass in an adult is much more likely to be a focus of metastatic carcinoma than to be a primary sarcoma of bone; however, in a patient with a bone lesion with no documentation of metastatic disease, caution is warranted to ensure the correct diagnosis.

In females, the breasts and lungs are the most common primary disease sites; approximately 80% of cancers that spread to bone arise in these locations.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] In males, cancers of the prostate (see image below) and lungs make up 80% of the carcinomas that metastasize to bone.[6] The remaining 20% of primary disease sites in patients of both sexes are the kidney, gut, and thyroid, as well as sites of unknown origin.

Lateral view of the femur of a 70-year-old man witLateral view of the femur of a 70-year-old man with metastatic prostate carcinoma, the most common cause of osteoblastic metastases in men.

Most patients with metastatic bone disease survive for 6-48 months. In general, patients with breast and prostate carcinoma live longer than do persons with lung carcinoma.[7, 8] Patients with renal cell or thyroid carcinoma have a variable life expectancy.

The orthopedic surgeon has 2 major tasks to perform when treating patients who develop bone metastases.[9] The first task is to biopsy a bony lesion of unknown origin, which may be found during evaluation/staging studies or as a result of a patient's symptoms.

The orthopedic surgeon's second task is to manage the stabilization of impending or already completed pathologic fractures of bones in a critical area, such as an upper or lower extremity, the pelvis, or the spine. In one study of patients with breast carcinoma, 19% of the patients developed a pathologic fracture or hypercalcemia as the first sign that the carcinoma had spread to bone. Moreover, 10% of the patients suffered spinal cord compression, and 9% of them experienced bone marrow failure. It is important to develop strategies that emphasize maintenance of function, including ambulation, in these patients for the remainder of their lives and to intervene when possible before a fracture occurs. The associated morbidity and mortality rate is greater when intervention is delayed.

Next

Pathophysiology

Previously, the 2 main theories of how tumor cells metastasize and grow in bones were Paget's fertile soil hypothesis and Ewing's circulation theory. However, a substantial amount of work has more clearly defined the metastatic process to bone. Bone metastases occur in a predictable distribution. In order of frequency, the most common locations include the following:

  • Spine
  • Pelvis
  • Ribs
  • Proximal limb girdles

The red marrow theory, combined with knowledge about the cytokine stimulation of metastases, provides an excellent explanation of how this distribution occurs.

Metastases distal to the knee and elbow are extremely uncommon, but approximately 50% of these acral metastases are secondary to primary lung tumors. Carcinomas, such as those of the breast and prostate, rarely exhibit such a distinct pattern.

Bone destruction, secondary to metastases, is clearly caused by the activation of osteoclasts rather than by the direct destruction of bone by tumor cells. In 1995, Mundy and Yoneda described the cellular events necessary for the success of the metastatic process, including the attachment of tumor cells to the basement membrane, the production of proteolytic enzymes by tumor cells (such as metalloproteinases, which are enzymes that disrupt basement membranes), and the migration of tumor cells through the basement membranes into surrounding tissue, especially the arteriolar network.[10]

Once in the bloodstream, these tumor cells must be capable of surviving the intravascular killer T cells; they must also successfully attach to the basement membrane of the vessel at the distant site, break it down, and migrate into the surrounding tissues. Because these cells cannot survive further than 100 mm away from a capillary, they must also produce angiogenesis factors to stimulate capillary ingrowth.

Needless to say, something must attract these tumor cells to a specific site in the body, but that process is not as clear. Type I collagen, a byproduct of bone resorption, has been shown to be a chemotactic factor that attracts tumor cells to bone. Cell adhesion molecules, such as laminin, E-cadherin, and integrins, also have been identified as substances that facilitate the attachment of metastatic cells to basement membranes.

Once at the distant site, destruction of the host bone must be accomplished. Tumor cells are also able to up-regulate osteoclasts through the production of RANK ligand, a potent stimulator of osteoclastic activity. This substance recruits and activates osteoclasts in order to destroy trabecular and cortical bone. RANK ligand and other chemotactic factors, as noted above, up-regulate osteoclasts for the degradation of bone, producing pockets or holes in the bone in which the tumor cells to grow.

Another important substance that stimulates bone resorption is parathyroid hormone – related peptide (PTHrP). This substance is expressed by breast carcinoma cells, as well as by oat cell tumors of the lung, and is a potent stimulant of osteoclasts. In 1996, Guise and colleagues reported elevated PTHrP levels in the bone marrow plasma (as compared with serum plasma levels) in rats with tumors.[11]

An interesting concept, reported in 1995 by Mundy and Yoneda, is that myeloma cells are especially adapted to producing bone destruction through direct stimulation of osteoclasts.[10] During the resorption process, the osteoclasts release interleukin-6, which is a major regulatory factor in the growth of myeloma cells. Additional myeloma cells further stimulate increased osteoclastic production in a continuous feedback mechanism. This enhances survival of the tumor cells and further destruction of the bone.

The process by which bone metastases develop appears to be the following:

  • Cells from the primary site must, through the process of neovascularization or through migration to the nearest blood vessel, attach to the basement membrane of the vessel wall and produce proteolytic enzymes that disrupt the basement membrane.
  • The cells then migrate through the basement membrane and float away in the bloodstream to a distant site. If they survive the journey to the distant site, the tumor cells attach to the basement membrane of the vessel wall using proteolytic enzymes (integrins/cadherins). After disrupting the receptor site basement membrane, they migrate into the substance of the distal host tissue. Producing the chemotactic factors noted above, as well as RANK ligand, these cells stimulate osteoclast activity to produce bone resorption.
  • A feedback relationship, such as that present in myeloma cells, then produces continued osteoclast stimulation for bone resorption and tumor cell growth, providing for continued growth and survival of the metastatic cells. This, in turn, progressively destroys cancellous and cortical bone at the distant osseous site.

This osteoclastic bone resorption can be modified by bisphosphonates; these substances are presently being used in the management of metastatic breast carcinoma and multiple myeloma.[9] Future research and modification of RANK ligand will produce additional substances that can further arrest or retard bone destruction by metastatic disease.

Other intriguing research is being conducted in the area of angiogenesis inhibition. Presently, such efforts are being directed at patients with GI tumors. Additional research in the areas of combined large vessel embolization and microscopic angiogenesis inhibition needs to be done.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

See Background.

Mortality/Morbidity

In general, once skeletal metastases are present, patient survival is dramatically shortened. For example, the 5-year overall survival rate for people with prostate cancer is 93%, but once skeletal metastases are present, the average survival time is only 29 months. However, patients are surviving and remaining active for longer periods as treatment protocols improve. These factors make the orthopedic surgeon's task in prophylactic or reconstructive surgery more challenging. In addition, perioperative complications are greater in this population.

  • The perioperative mortality rate is approximately 8%.
  • The perioperative infection rate is approximately 4% and increases in previously irradiated sites.

Age

Most patients with skeletal metastases are older than 50 years.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Howard A Chansky, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center

Howard A Chansky, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

John Eady, MD  Chief, Orthopaedic Surgery, Dorn VA Hospital, Columbia, SC 29209

John Eady, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, and Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Lynn A Crosby, MD, FACS  Chief of Shoulder Division, Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State University School of Medicine

Lynn A Crosby, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Sports Medicine, American College of Surgeons, American Fracture Association, American Medical Association, American Medical Tennis Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Arthroscopy Association of North America, Mid-America Orthopaedic Association, and Orthopaedic Research Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Harris Gellman, MD  Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center; Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami, Leonard M Miller School of Medicine

Harris Gellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Arkansas Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Keene JS, Sellinger DS, McBeath AA, et al. Metastatic breast cancer in the femur. A search for the lesion at risk of fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 1986;(203):282-8. [Medline].

  2. Quattrocchi CC, Piciucchi S, Sammarra M, et al. Bone metastases in breast cancer: higher prevalence of osteosclerotic lesions. Radiol Med (Torino). Oct 2007;112(7):1049-59. [Medline].

  3. Alarmo EL, Kallioniemi A. Bone morphogenetic proteins in breast cancer - dual role in tumourigenesis?. Endocr Relat Cancer. Mar 24 2010;[Medline].

  4. Doot RK, Muzi M, Peterson LM, Schubert EK, Gralow JR, Specht JM, et al. Kinetic analysis of 18F-fluoride PET images of breast cancer bone metastases. J Nucl Med. Apr 2010;51(4):521-7. [Medline].

  5. Hung JJ, Jeng WJ, Hsu WH, Wu KJ, Chou TY, Hsieh CC, et al. Prognostic factors of postrecurrence survival in completely resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer with distant metastasis. Thorax. Mar 2010;65(3):241-5. [Medline].

  6. Edwards J. Src kinase inhibitors: an emerging therapeutic treatment option for prostate cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. Apr 5 2010;[Medline].

  7. Yazawa Y, Frassica FJ, Chao EY, et al. Metastatic bone disease. A study of the surgical treatment of 166 pathologic humeral and femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 1990;(251):213-9. [Medline].

  8. Hirbe AC, Morgan EA, Weilbaecher KN. The CXCR4/SDF-1 Chemokine Axis: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Bone Metastases?. Curr Pharm Des. Feb 18 2010;[Medline].

  9. British Association of Surgical Oncology Guidelines. The management of metastatic bone disease in the United Kingdom. The Breast Specialty Group of the British Association of Surgical Oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol. Feb 1999;25(1):3-23. [Medline].

  10. Mundy GR, Yoneda T. Facilitation and suppression of bone metastasis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Mar 1995;(312):34-44. [Medline].

  11. Guise TA, Yin JJ, Taylor SD, Kumagai Y, Dallas M, Boyce BF, et al. Evidence for a causal role of parathyroid hormone-related protein in the pathogenesis of human breast cancer-mediated osteolysis. J Clin Invest. Oct 1 1996;98(7):1544-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  12. Mirels H. Metastatic disease in long bones. A proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Dec 1989;(249):256-64. [Medline].

  13. Hipp JA, Springfield DS, Hayes WC. Predicting pathologic fracture risk in the management of metastatic bone defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Mar 1995;(312):120-35. [Medline].

  14. Kawaguchi M, Tateishi U, Shizukuishi K, Suzuki A, Inoue T. (18)F-fluoride uptake in bone metastasis: morphologic and metabolic analysis on integrated PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. Mar 24 2010;[Medline].

  15. Harrington KD. Orthopedic surgical management of skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer. Oct 15 1997;80(8 Suppl):1614-27. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  16. Zaikova O, Fosså SD, Bruland OS, Giercksky KE, Sandstad B, Skjeldal S. Radiotherapy or surgery for spine metastases?. Acta Orthop. May 2011;82(3):365-71. [Medline].

  17. Orita Y, Sugitani I, Matsuura M, Ushijima M, Tsukahara K, Fujimoto Y, et al. Prognostic factors and the therapeutic strategy for patients with bone metastasis from differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. Mar 2010;147(3):424-31. [Medline].

  18. Harrington KD. Orthopaedic management of extremity and pelvic lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Mar 1995;(312):136-47. [Medline].

  19. Clayer MT, Tang X. Low risk of cardiac events during intramedullary instrumentation of lung cancer metastases. Acta Orthop. Aug 2007;78(4):547-50. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  20. Camnasio F, Scotti C, Peretti GM, et al. Prosthetic joint replacement for long bone metastases: analysis of 154 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Oct 9 2007;[Medline].

  21. Frankel BM, Jones T, Wang C. Segmental polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation in patients with bone softening caused by osteoporosis and metastatic tumor involvement: a clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery. Sep 2007;61(3):531-7; discussion 537-8. [Medline].

  22. Forauer AR, Kent E, Cwikiel W, et al. Selective palliative transcatheter embolization of bony metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(7):1012-8. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Lateral view of the femur of a 70-year-old man with metastatic prostate carcinoma, the most common cause of osteoblastic metastases in men.
Radiograph of a patient with severe rest- and activity-related pain at the time of presentation.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.