Postradiation Sarcoma Workup

  • Author: Nagarjun Rao, MD, FRCPath; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD   more...
 
Updated: Feb 6, 2012
 

Laboratory Studies

  • No specific laboratory blood tests are used to diagnose postradiation sarcoma (PRS). Routine laboratory investigations may be ordered.
  • Cytogenetic studies on PRS tumor cells do not have much value because the tumor cells can have numerous quantitative (numerical) and qualitative abnormalities that lack specificity. However, the value of cytogenetic analysis lies in excluding other conditions that may have specific anomalies and that may present a challenge in light microscopic examination.
Next

Imaging Studies

  • Plain radiographs
    • Obtain plain radiographs in 2 planes.
    • Cortical bone destruction is the most common finding.
    • A mineralized soft-tissue mass is seen in most patients.
    • Changes such as osteopenia and sclerosis are seen in a minority of patients.
  • CT scan and MRI
    • If plain radiograph findings are normal and the patient has significant pain, these scans are useful for identifying abnormal areas in the medullary cavity, cortical bone destruction, and the presence of an extramedullary soft-tissue mass.
    • MRI is the best modality to detect soft-tissue involvement in PRS.
    • CT scan of the chest is performed to detect pulmonary metastases.
  • Technetium bone scan is performed to detect bone metastases.
Previous
Next

Procedures

  • Biopsy
    • Fine-needle aspiration biopsies or Tru-Cut core biopsies can be obtained from the lesion for histopathologic/cytopathologic confirmation of diagnosis and to type and grade the lesion.
    • In the case of a deep-seated lesion, CT-guided biopsies can be obtained.
    • The biopsy should be the final diagnostic procedure because it can distort imaging studies, especially MRI.
    • Careful preoperative planning is required before biopsy is attempted. Imaging studies aid the surgeon in selecting the best site for tissue diagnosis. Usually, the best diagnostic site is at the interface between the tumor and adjacent normal tissue; this also prevents the occurrence of fracture at the biopsy site, as biopsy in this location usually does not violate cortical bone.
    • A frozen section can be obtained to determine whether adequate representative tissue has been obtained. A definitive diagnosis usually is delayed until permanent sections are analyzed.
Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Postradiation sarcoma (PRS) in bone and soft tissue usually is a high-grade lesion, which partly accounts for the almost uniformly grim prognosis.[4, 7] In a study of 130 patients with PRS of bone and soft tissue from the Mayo Clinic, osteosarcoma was the most common type, constituting 61.5% of all cases.[10] This was followed by fibrosarcoma (23.7%), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH, 9.6%), chondrosarcoma (3.7%), and rare cases of angiosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. No difference in histologic type of PRS was demonstrated between the orthovoltage and megavoltage groups.

Among soft-tissue PRS lesions, the most common histologic type is MFH (70%), followed by osteosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), chondrosarcoma, and angiosarcoma.[20]

Grossly, these tumors are soft and fleshy, with extension into adjacent soft tissue and formation of a soft-tissue mass. Hemorrhagic/necrotic foci and matrix production (osteoid/chondroid) may be seen. Degenerative calcific changes also may be noted.

See the image below.

Light microscopic appearance of postradiation osteLight microscopic appearance of postradiation osteosarcoma; tumor is composed of pleomorphic plump spindle cells with focal presence of neoplastic osteoid (pink areas) in between tumor cells. This meningeal tumor occurred 10 years postradiation in a patient who had received radiation for a recurrent pituitary neoplasm.

Microscopically, while specific characteristics such as osteoid production (in osteosarcomas) may be seen, in general, these tumors show pleomorphic high-grade spindle cell features with marked nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic activity, and variable necrosis (see Image above).

Previous
Next

Staging

Careful staging is a prerequisite for appropriate management of postradiation sarcoma (PRS).

The marrow extent and soft-tissue involvement of PRS should be gauged using radiologic modalities, of which MRI is the best choice. Biopsies may be obtained to confirm the diagnosis and to type and grade the lesion.

A CT scan of the chest is obtained to detect pulmonary metastases. A technetium bone scan is performed to detect bone metastases.

Based on the results of imaging and histopathologic/cytopathologic studies, the lesion may be staged. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) staging systems generally are used.

  • The AJCC staging system is based on the TNM staging system and uses the following categories:
    • Size and extension of primary tumor (T)
    • Involvement of lymph nodes (N)
    • Presence of metastases (M)
    • Type and grade of sarcoma (G)
  • Definitions of the TNMG staging system are as follows:
    • T - Primary tumor
      • T1 - Tumor smaller than 5 cm
      • T2 - Tumor 5 cm or larger
    • N - Regional lymph nodes
      • N0 - No histologically verified regional node metastasis
      • N1 - Histologically verified regional node metastasis
    • M - Distant metastasis
      • M0 - No distant metastasis
      • M1 - Distant metastasis
    • G - Histologic grade of malignancy
      • G1 - Well differentiated
      • G2 - Moderately well differentiated
      • G3 - Poorly differentiated
      • G4 – Undifferentiated
  • The MSTS staging system classifies tumors as follows:
    • Stage IA - Low grade, intracompartmental
    • Stage IB - Low grade, extracompartmental
    • Stage IIA - High grade, intracompartmental
    • Stage IIB - High grade, extracompartmental
    • Stage III - Systemic or regional metastases
  • In the MSTS staging system, the margins are classified as follows:
    • Intralesional - Margin through tumor tissue
    • Marginal - Margin through reactive zone around tumor consisting of edema, inflammatory cells, fibrous tissue, and tumor cell satellites
    • Wide - Margin through normal tissue outside reactive zone
    • Radical – Removal of entire compartment containing tumor
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Nagarjun Rao, MD, FRCPath  Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin

Nagarjun Rao, MD, FRCPath is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Royal College of Pathologists, and United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Donald A Hackbarth Jr, MD, FACS  Professor of Clinical Orthopedic Surgery, Division Chief, Musculoskeletal Oncology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin

Donald A Hackbarth Jr, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association of Tissue Banks, American College of Surgeons, Children's Oncology Group, Christian Medical & Dental Society, Clinical Orthopaedic Society, and Wisconsin Medical Society

Disclosure: Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Honoraria Board membership

Stuart Wong, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Froedert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Vivek Panikkar, MBBS, MS, MCh, FRCS  Consulting Surgeon, Departments of Trauma and Orthopedics, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, UK

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Vinod B Shidham, MD, FRCPath  Professor, Vice-chair-AP, and Director of Cytopathology, Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Karmanos Cancer Center & Detroit Medical Center; Co-Editor-in-Chief and Executive Editor, CytoJournal

Vinod B Shidham, MD, FRCPath is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society of Cytopathology, College of American Pathologists, International Academy of Cytology, Royal College of Pathologists, and United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Sean P Scully, MD, PhD  Professor, Department of Orthopedics, University of Miami

Sean P Scully, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, and Society of Surgical Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Harris Gellman, MD  Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center; Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami, Leonard M Miller School of Medicine

Harris Gellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Arkansas Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Cahan WG. Radiation-induced sarcoma--50 years later. Cancer. Jan 1 1998;82(1):6-7. [Medline].

  2. Smith LM, Cox RS, Donaldson SS. Second cancers in long-term survivors of Ewing's sarcoma. Clin Orthop. Jan 1992;(274):275-81. [Medline].

  3. Cahan WG, Woodard HQ, Higinbotham NL, et al. Sarcoma arising in irradiated bone: report of eleven cases. 1948. Cancer. Jan 1 1998;82(1):8-34. [Medline].

  4. Debeer P, Van de Meulebroucke B, Stuyck J, Sciot R, Samson I. Postradiation soft tissue sarcoma of the shoulder: a case report. Acta Orthop Belg. Aug 2007;73(4):521-4. [Medline].

  5. Nicolas MM, Nayar R, Yeldandi A, De Frias DV. Pulmonary metastasis of a postradiation breast epithelioid angiosarcoma mimicking adenocarcinoma. A case report. Acta Cytol. Nov-Dec 2006;50(6):672-6. [Medline].

  6. Hanasono MM, Osborne MP, Dielubanza EJ, Peters SB, Gayle LB. Radiation-induced angiosarcoma after mastectomy and TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. Feb 2005;54(2):211-4. [Medline].

  7. Fang Z, Matsumoto S, Ae K, Kawaguchi N, Yoshikawa H, Ueda T. Postradiation soft tissue sarcoma: a multiinstitutional analysis of 14 cases in Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9(3):242-6. [Medline].

  8. Fangman WL, Cook JL. Postradiation sarcoma: case report and review of the potential complications of therapeutic ionizing radiation. Dermatol Surg. Aug 2005;31(8 Pt 1):966-72. [Medline].

  9. Mullah-Ali A, Ramsay JA, Bourgeois JM, Hodson I, Macdonald P, Midia M, et al. Paraspinal synovial sarcoma as an unusual postradiation complication in pediatric abdominal neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Jul 2008;30(7):553-7. [Medline].

  10. Inoue YZ, Frassica FJ, Sim FH, et al. Clinicopathologic features and treatment of postirradiation sarcoma of bone and soft tissue. J Surg Oncol. Sep 2000;75(1):42-50. [Medline].

  11. Neuhaus SJ, Pinnock N, Giblin V, Fisher C, Thway K, Thomas JM, et al. Treatment and outcome of radiation-induced soft-tissue sarcomas at a specialist institution. Eur J Surg Oncol. Dec 27 2008;[Medline].

  12. Bjerkehagen B, Smeland S, Walberg L, Skjeldal S, Hall KS, Nesland JM, et al. Radiation-induced sarcoma: 25-year experience from the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(8):1475-82. [Medline].

  13. Amendola BE, Amendola MA, McClatchey KD, et al. Radiation-associated sarcoma: a review of 23 patients with postradiation sarcoma over a 50-year period. Am J Clin Oncol. Oct 1989;12(5):411-5. [Medline].

  14. Taghian A, de Vathaire F, Terrier P, et al. Long-term risk of sarcoma following radiation treatment for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jul 1991;21(2):361-7. [Medline].

  15. Strauss PG, Schmidt J, Pedersen L, et al. Amplification of endogenous proviral MuLV sequences in radiation- induced osteosarcomas. Int J Cancer. Apr 15 1988;41(4):616-21. [Medline].

  16. Pitcher ME, Davidson TI, Fisher C, et al. Post irradiation sarcoma of soft tissue and bone. Eur J Surg Oncol. Feb 1994;20(1):53-6. [Medline].

  17. Smith J. Radiation-induced sarcoma of bone: clinical and radiographic findings in 43 patients irradiated for soft tissue neoplasms. Clin Radiol. Mar 1982;33(2):205-21. [Medline].

  18. Papalas JA, Wylie JD, Vollmer RT. Osteosarcoma after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Ann Diagn Pathol. Jun 2011;15(3):194-7. [Medline].

  19. Weaver J, Billings SD. Postradiation cutaneous vascular tumors of the breast: a review. Semin Diagn Pathol. Aug 2009;26(3):141-9. [Medline].

  20. Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. General considerations. In: Soft Tissue Tumors. 3rd ed. St. Louis:. Mosby;1995.

  21. Brown J, Byers T, Thompson K, et al. A cancer journal for clinicians: nutrition during and after cancer treatment. In: A Guide for Informed Choices by Cancer Survivors. Vol 51. 2001.

  22. Kalra S, Grimer RJ, Spooner D, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu A. Radiation-induced sarcomas of bone: factors that affect outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jun 2007;89(6):808-13. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Light microscopic appearance of postradiation osteosarcoma; tumor is composed of pleomorphic plump spindle cells with focal presence of neoplastic osteoid (pink areas) in between tumor cells. This meningeal tumor occurred 10 years postradiation in a patient who had received radiation for a recurrent pituitary neoplasm.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.