Benign and Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors Workup
- Author: Vinod B Shidham, MD, FRCPath; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD more...
Laboratory Studies
- Other than histologic and cytogenetic analysis, no specific laboratory tests exist for diagnosing soft tissue tumors. However, ancillary studies may be indicated as part of the general workup in patients with other systemic conditions.
Imaging Studies
- In the past 2 decades, imaging studies have contributed greatly to the management of soft tissue tumors. Although these studies cannot themselves yield a specific diagnosis (except for a few conditions, such as lipoma or liposarcoma), they are extremely useful for defining anatomic location, tumor extent, and involvement of vital structures.[7] See the images below.
A computed-tomography (CT)–guided needle biopsy of a high-grade soft tissue sarcoma arising in the left hemipelvis. The CT artifact from the needle can be seen in the upper right corner of the image as the needle enters the lesion just anterior and medial to the dome of the left hip joint. Courtesy of Howard A. Chansky, MD
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to demonstrate involvement of critical structures by tumor. This recurrent, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma in the posterior calf abuts the tibial nerve and posterior tibial vessels. An extensive reactive zone surrounds the structures. This patient was treated with below-knee amputation. Courtesy of Howard A. Chansky, MD - Imaging studies should be obtained before biopsy to ensure that a biopsy of a potentially malignant lesion is taken in a manner that will not preclude limb-salvage surgery. Imaging should also be performed before biopsy, to prevent the biopsy tract from adversely affecting the capture of anatomic detail by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The relationship of the tumor and surrounding normal structures to the planned biopsy site should be evaluated, as should the functional status of the involved limb, signs of lymph node involvement, and any other factors that could compromise optimal surgical or radiation therapy.
- Because prognosis is primarily dependent on the disease stage rather than the histologic tumor type, evaluation of local and distant extent is pivotal in the ultimate management of soft tissue sarcoma. Imaging methods commonly used for such evaluation include plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scanning, MRI, and bone scintigraphy (bone scan). Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning is being used more frequently to assess the metabolic activity and, presumably, the biologic aggressiveness of a lesion. Angiography to evaluate any vascular involvement by soft tissue tumors has essentially been replaced by MRI.
- CT scanning
- Check for presence and number of pulmonary metastases.
- Consider performing a CT scan of the liver in cases of intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors.
- MRI
- In contrast to CT scanning, MRI is not limited to the transverse (axial) plane. Coronal, sagittal, and oblique planes may be imaged.
- MRI best defines the relationship between a tumor and adjacent anatomic structures, such as compartment boundaries, nerves, vessels, and muscle.[8, 9]
- Although for most patients MRI alone suffices, the information obtained from CT scanning and MRI of the primary tumor occasionally may be complementary. Bony involvement may be better assessed with a CT scan, as may the boundary between normal muscle and fibrous lesions.
- CT scanning
Diagnostic Procedures
- Biopsy usually is indicated for a soft tissue mass arising in a patient without a history of trauma or for a mass that persists for more than 6 weeks following local trauma. All soft tissue masses larger than 5 cm, as well as any enlarging or symptomatic lesions, also should be biopsied. Small, subcutaneous lesions that persist unchanged for years may be considered for observation rather than biopsy. A high level of suspicion is necessary to ensure early treatment.
- Early tissue diagnosis is the most important component of multimodality treatment for soft tissue tumor. Proper and timely biopsy is critical. An inadequately performed biopsy may complicate patient care and result in loss of limb or life. Several biopsy techniques are available, including FNAB, core needle biopsy, incisional biopsy, and excisional biopsy. The choice of biopsy is based on the size and location of the mass and the experience of the surgeon. Excisional biopsy is indicated only for small, superficial masses (< 3-5 cm in greatest dimension), in which the probability of malignancy is low. Effective reexcision is more likely for smaller malignant lesions that initially are unintentionally treated as benign.
- Fine-needle aspiration biopsy
- This is a cytologic technique involving the use of a fine-gauge (usually 21- to 25-gauge) needle to aspirate individual tumor cells and microfragments from the mass. The aspirated material can be examined as a cytology smear, with immediate evaluation of specimen adequacy. Depending on the initial cytomorphologic features observed during the onsite adequacy evaluation, additional passes may be performed at the same time to obtain more material for cell-block preparation (for histomorphology and immunocytochemical evaluation), cytogenetic analysis (see Table 1 and Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology), or examination using electron microscopy or microbiology cultures.[10]
- Table 1. Characteristic Cytogenetic Aberrations in Soft Tissue Tumors
Benign Soft Tissue Tumors Characteristic
Cytogenetic EventsFrequency Benign schwannoma Monosomy 22 50% Desmoid tumor Trisomy 8 25% Deletion of 5q 10% Lipoblastoma Rearrangement of 8q >25% Lipoma, solitary Rearrangement of bands 12q14-15 75% Rearrangement of 6p 10% Deletion of 13q 10% Uterine leiomyoma t(12;14)(q15;q24) 20% Deletion of 7q 15% Trisomy 12 10% Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors Characteristic
Cytogenetic EventsFrequency Clear cell sarcoma t(12;22)(q13;q12) >75% Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans Ring chromosome 17 >75% Ewing sarcoma t(11;22)(q24;q12) 95% Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma t(9;22)(q31;q12) 50% Liposarcoma, myxoid t(12;16)(q13;p11) 75% Liposarcoma, well differentiated Ring chromosome 12 80% Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma t(2;13)(q35;q14) 80% Synovial sarcoma t(X;18) 95% - With the help of relevant ancillary techniques, diagnostic accuracy with FNAB is very high, and soft tissue tumors can be graded.[11] This method is minimally invasive and relatively atraumatic.
- Published literature highlights the rarity of needle-track seeding with FNAB. Core biopsy, on the other hand, has a higher rate of needle-track seeding.
- Core needle biopsy
- This technique retrieves a thin core of tissue (approximately 1×10 mm). The procedure may be performed using various needles (most commonly a Tru-Cut needle[12] ). The core may not be representative of the entire tumor, so nonrepresentative grading is possible. FNAB samples a larger area of the tumor than does core needle biopsy.
- Concern has been expressed about possible dissemination of tumor cells beyond the confines of the primary site; however, this appears to be uncommon. Both core needle and open biopsies can result in histologic diagnosis and grading of a sarcoma in more than 90% of cases. Similar to FNAB, a biopsy may be taken of deeper lesions under image guidance (eg, CT scanning, ultrasound scanning, MRI).
- Incisional biopsy
- Open incisional biopsy is used for most soft tissue masses. A generous wedge of tissue is removed, with minimal manipulation of tissue. Several important technical factors must be considered while performing an incisional biopsy. In the case of extremity lesions, the incision should be oriented along the long axis. Any biopsy incision and tract should be oriented so that they can be resected during definitive surgery for the soft tissue mass.
- The sample obtained may be evaluated for adequacy by using intraoperative cytology or a frozen section at the time of biopsy. Meticulous hemostasis minimizes local dissemination of tumor cells.
- Excisional biopsy
- With this method, the entire lesion is removed surgically. Many sarcomas appear to be well demarcated grossly. Microscopically, however, the demarcation usually is seen to exist along a pseudocapsule with foci of infiltrating tumor. Removal of the tumor along this apparent plane may leave gross or microscopic sarcoma behind.
- Excisional biopsy may be safely performed for small, superficial tumors (< approximately 5 cm in diameter) or for those known to be benign.[13]
- Frozen section and intraoperative cytology
- Frozen section and intraoperative cytology are extremely helpful tools for the management of soft tissue tumors.[14, 15] Proper communication with a musculoskeletal oncopathologist preoperatively and intraoperatively is essential for evaluation. Frozen section can guide retrieval of adequate diagnostic material and, depending on the initial evaluation, can be an important triage mechanism to direct further pathologic workup.
- If support is available, FNAB offers most of the advantages for diagnostic biopsy that frozen sectioning does. However, open biopsy—with the help of frozen-sectioning support—may be indicated when the FNAB result is equivocal or for other clinical reasons.
- Fatty lesions are not suitable for frozen-section evaluation, because of a loss of diagnostic material during frozen sectioning and other technical difficulties. In addition, freezing compromises the final interpretation on permanent sections.
- Fine-needle aspiration biopsy
Histologic Findings
The outline below comprises the histologic classification of soft tissue tumors. The histopathologic evaluation of these lesions, with categorization into one of the groups listed below, is performed on permanent sections. Such classification may require data from various sources, including immunochemical, cytogenetic, electron microscopic, and molecular studies.
Sarcomas usually are assigned a histologic grade. Low-grade lesions rarely metastasize but can be locally aggressive; high-grade sarcomas pose a significant threat of metastasis and carry a greater risk of local recurrence. Although assigning a pathologic grade to an individual tumor is a subjective and difficult task, the grade's clinical importance in determining a treatment strategy cannot be overemphasized. An ideal biopsy, with proper sampling of the lesion, should allow a confident grade assignment.
Many grading systems exist; they generally are based on evaluation of histomorphologic features, including cellularity, cellular pleomorphism, mitotic activity, and necrosis, as well as histologic category.[16, 17, 18] A 3-grade system (grades 1, 2, 3) may be simplified further by lumping the sarcomas into low-grade (grade 1) and high-grade (grade 2) categories.
Other markers have been investigated as potential indicators of proliferation activity of soft tissue tumors. They include Ki-67, argyrophilic stain for nucleolar organizer regions (AgNOR), mast cell counts, and DNA flow cytometry.
WHO (2002) Classification of Soft Tissue Tumors
- Adipocytic tumors
- Benign
- Intermediate (locally aggressive)
- Atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma
- Malignant
- Dedifferentiated liposarcoma
- Myxoid liposarcoma
- Round cell liposarcoma
- Pleomorphic liposarcoma
- Mixed-type liposarcoma
- Liposarcoma, not otherwise specified
- Fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumors
- Benign
- Nodular fasciitis
- Proliferative fasciitis
- Proliferative myositis
- Myositis ossificans
- Fibro-osseous pseudotumor of digits
- Ischemic fasciitis
- Elastofibroma
- Fibrous hamartoma of infancy
- Myofibroma/myofibromatosis
- Fibromatosis colli
- Juvenile hyaline fibromatosis
- Inclusion body fibromatosis
- Fibroma of tendon sheath
- Desmoplastic fibroblastoma
- Mammary-type myofibroblastoma
- Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma
- Angiomyofibroblastoma
- Cellular angiofibroma
- Nuchal-type fibroma
- Gardner fibroma
- Calcifying fibrous tumor
- Giant cell angiofibroma
- Intermediate (locally aggressive)
- Superficial fibromatoses - Palmar/plantar
- Desmoid-type fibromatoses
- Lipofibromatosis
- Intermediate (rarely metastasizing)
- Solitary fibrous tumor and hemangiopericytoma - Including lipomatous hemangiopericytoma
- Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor
- Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma
- Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma
- Infantile fibrosarcoma
- Malignant
- Adult fibrosarcoma
- Myxofibrosarcoma
- Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma
- Hyalinizing spindle cell tumor
- Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma
- Benign
- So-called fibrohistiocytic tumors
- Benign
- Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath
- Diffuse-type giant cell tumor
- Deep benign fibrous histiocytoma
- Intermediate (rarely metastasizing)
- Plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor
- Giant cell tumor of soft tissues
- Malignant
- Pleomorphic 'MFH'/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma
- Giant cell 'MFH'/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma with giant cells
- Inflammatory 'MFH'/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma with prominent inflammation
- Benign
- Smooth muscle tumors
- Angioleiomyoma
- Deep leiomyoma
- Genital leiomyoma
- Leiomyosarcoma - Excluding skin
- Pericytic (perivascular) tumors
- Glomus tumor (and variants)
- Malignant glomus tumor
- Myopericytoma
- Glomus tumor (and variants)
- Skeletal muscle tumors
- Benign
- Rhabdomyoma
- Adult
- Fetal
- Genital type
- Rhabdomyoma
- Malignant
- Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma - Including spindle cell, botryoid, anaplastic
- Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma - Including solid and anaplastic
- Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma
- Benign
- Vascular tumors
- Benign
- Hemangiomas of subcutaneous and deep soft tissue
- Capillary
- Cavernous
- Arteriovenous
- Venous
- Intramuscular
- Synovial
- Epithelioid hemangioma
- Angiomatosis
- Lymphangioma
- Hemangiomas of subcutaneous and deep soft tissue
- Intermediate (locally aggressive)
- Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma
- Intermediate (rarely metastasizing)
- Retiform hemangioendothelioma
- Papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma
- Composite hemangioendothelioma
- Kaposi sarcoma
- Malignant
- Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma
- Angiosarcoma of soft tissue
- Benign
- Chondro-osseous tumors
- Benign
- Soft tissue chondroma
- Malignant
- Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma
- Extraskeletal osteosarcoma
- Benign
- Tumors of uncertain differentiation
- Benign
- Intramuscular myxoma - Including cellular variant
- Juxta-articular myxoma
- Deep ("aggressive") angiomyxoma
- Pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor
- Ectopic hamartomatous thymoma
- Intermediate (rarely metastasizing)
- Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma
- Ossifying fibromyxoid tumor - Including atypical/malignant
- Mixed tumor
- Myoepithelioma/parachordoma
- Malignant
- Synovial sarcoma
- Epithelioid sarcoma
- Alveolar soft-part sarcoma
- Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue
- Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma - "Chordoid" type
- Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)/extraskeletal Ewing tumor
- Peripheral PNET
- Extraskeletal Ewing tumor
- Desmoplastic small round cell tumor
- Extra-renal rhabdoid tumor
- Malignant mesenchymoma
- Neoplasms with perivascular epithelioid cell differentiation (PEComa)
- Clear cell myomelanocytic tumor
- Intimal sarcoma
- Benign
As part of this 2002 WHO classification, soft tissue tumors are divided into the following 4 categories.
- Benign - These usually do not recur locally, and if they do, the recurrence is nondestructive and almost always readily curable by complete local excision. Morphologically benign lesions, which are extremely rare, may give rise to distant metastases, which cannot be predicted on the basis of routine, contemporary histologic evaluation. This is best documented in rare, cutaneous benign fibrous histiocytoma.
- Intermediate (locally aggressive) - These tumors show an infiltrative and locally destructive growth pattern. However, although they may recur locally, they do not metastasize. They usually require excision with a wide margin of normal tissue for better local control. The example in this category is desmoid (fibromatosis).
- Intermediate (rarely metastasizing) - These tumors are often locally aggressive, but in some cases, they also have a tendency to produce distant metastases (usually in a lymph node or lung). This risk is low (< 2%), but histomorphologically, it is not reproducibly predictable. The classic examples in this group are plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor and angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma.
- Malignant - Soft tissue sarcomas are locally destructive with the potential to recur. The risk of distant metastasis is significant. (Depending on histologic type and grade, the potential ranges from 20% to almost 100%). Histologically low-grade sarcomas have a lower chance of metastasis (only 2-10%).[19] However, the recurrences of such tumors may advance in grade and attain a higher risk of metastatic potential similar to that associated with myxofibrosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma.
This terminology should not be confused with the grading system mentioned above, in which grade 2 may be regarded as intermediate.
Staging
Histologic grading is an important prognostic factor in sarcomas. Therefore, the usual tumor, node, metastases (TNM) classification scheme is modified into a grading, tumor, node, metastases (GTNM) staging system for soft tissue tumors (see Table 2, below). This system, which is clinically very useful, stratifies patients into groups with distinct prognostic patterns.
Size of the tumor also is of prognostic significance. The risk of metastasis and death is higher with larger primary sarcomas. According to the current American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) system, tumors of 5 cm or less in greatest dimension are designated as T1, and those exceeding 5 cm are categorized as T2. Although they are not a part of the AJCC system, tumors larger than 10 cm have a worse prognosis than do those larger than 5 cm.[20]
Site is another important prognostic factor. Superficially located tumors (those situated entirely superficial to the deep or muscular fascia) have a relatively better prognosis than that characterizing deeper sarcomas. Alternative staging systems incorporate site into their classification strategy.
GTNM staging system definitions are as follows:
- G - Tumor grade
- G1 - Well differentiated
- G2 - Moderately differentiated
- G3 - Poorly differentiated
- T - Primary tumor
- T1 - Tumor less than 5 cm in greatest diameter
- T2 - Tumor more than 5 cm in greatest diameter
- N - Regional lymph node involvement
- N0 - No known metastasis to lymph nodes
- N1 - Verified metastasis to lymph nodes
- M - Distant metastasis
- M0 - No known distant metastasis
- M1 - Known distant metastasis
Table 2. AJCC GTNM Classification and Stage Grouping of Soft Tissue Sarcomas (Open Table in a new window)
| Stage Groupings | Tumor Grade | Primary Tumor | Regional Lymph Node Involvement | Distant Metastasis |
| Stage IA | G1 | T1 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IB | G1 | T2 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage II A | G2 | T1 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IIB | G2 | T2 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IIIA | G3 | T1 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IIIB | G3 | T2 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IVA | Any G | Any T | N1 | M0 |
| Stage IVB | Any G | Any T | Any N | M1 |
Conrad EU, Bradford L, Chansky HA. Pediatric soft-tissue sarcomas. Orthop Clin North Am. Jul 1996;27(3):655-64. [Medline].
Ludwig JA. Personalized therapy of sarcomas: integration of biomarkers for improved diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection. Curr Oncol Rep. Jul 2008;10(4):329-37. [Medline].
Ordóñez JL, Martins AS, Osuna D, Madoz-Gúrpide J, de Alava E. Targeting sarcomas: therapeutic targets and their rational. Semin Diagn Pathol. Nov 2008;25(4):304-16. [Medline].
Enneking WF. Staging of musculoskeletal neoplasms. In: Uhthoff HK, ed. Current Concepts of Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Heidelberg:. Springer-Verlag;1984.
Potter DA, Glenn J, Kinsella T. Patterns of recurrence in patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. Mar 1985;3(3):353-66. [Medline].
Gustafson P. Soft tissue sarcoma. Epidemiology and prognosis in 508 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. Jun 1994;259:1-31. [Medline].
Gay F, Pierucci F, Zimmerman V, Lecocq-Teixeira S, Teixeira P, Baumann C, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of peripheral soft-tissue tumors: Feasibility study and preliminary results. Diagn Interv Imaging. Jan 2012;93(1):37-46. [Medline].
Bland KI, McCoy DM, Kinard RE. Application of magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography as an adjunct to the surgical management of soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Surg. May 1987;205(5):473-81. [Medline].
Chang AE, Matory YL, Dwyer AJ. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in the evaluation of soft tissue tumors of the extremities. Ann Surg. Apr 1987;205(4):340-8. [Medline].
Dal Cin P. Soft tissue tumors: an overview. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. January 2003;[Full Text].
Costa MJ, Campman SC, Davis RL. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sarcoma: retrospective review of diagnostic utility and specificity. Diagn Cytopathol. Jul 1996;15(1):23-32. [Medline].
Ball AB, Fisher C, Pittam M. Diagnosis of soft tissue tumours by Tru-Cut biopsy. Br J Surg. Jul 1990;77(7):756-8. [Medline].
Geer RJ, Woodruff J, Casper ES. Management of small soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremity in adults. Arch Surg. Nov 1992;127(11):1285-9. [Medline].
Shidham V, Gupta D, Galindo LM. Intraoperative scrape cytology: comparison with frozen sections, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Diagn Cytopathol. Aug 2000;23(2):134-9. [Medline].
Shidham VB, Dravid NV, Grover S. Role of scrape cytology in rapid intraoperative diagnosis. Value and limitations. Acta Cytol. Jul-Aug 1984;28(4):477-82. [Medline].
Coindre JM, Nguyen BB, Bonichon F. Histopathologic grading in spindle cell soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer. Jun 1 1988;61(11):2305-9. [Medline].
Costa J, Wesley RA, Glatstein E. The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinicohistopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases. Cancer. Feb 1 1984;53(3):530-41. [Medline].
Myhre-Jensen O, Kaae S, Madsen EH. Histopathological grading in soft-tissue tumours. Relation to survival in 261 surgically treated patients. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand [A]. Mar 1983;91(2):145-50. [Medline].
Wunder JS, Healey JH, Davis AM. A comparison of staging systems for localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. Jun 15 2000;88(12):2721-30. [Medline].
Suit HD, Mankin HJ, Wood WC. Treatment of the patient with stage M0 soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. May 1988;6(5):854-62. [Medline].
Casper ES, Gaynor JJ, Harrison LB. Preoperative and postoperative adjuvant combination chemotherapy for adults with high grade soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. Mar 15 1994;73(6):1644-51. [Medline].
Elias AD, Antman KH. Adjuvant chemotherapy for soft-tissue sarcoma: a critical appraisal. Semin Surg Oncol. 1988;4(1):59-65. [Medline].
Wardelmann E, Chemnitz JM, Wendtner CM. Targeted therapy of soft tissue sarcomas. Onkologie. 2012;35 Suppl 1:21-7. [Medline].
Rosenberg SA, Tepper J, Glatstein E. The treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: prospective randomized evaluations of (1) limb-sparing surgery plus radiation therapy compared with amputation and (2) the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. Sep 1982;196(3):305-15. [Medline].
Alektiar KM, Brennan MF, Singer S. Local control comparison of adjuvant brachytherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy in primary high-grade sarcoma of the extremity. Cancer. Jan 24 2011;[Medline].
Rosenberg SA, Tepper J, Glatstein E. Prospective randomized evaluation of adjuvant chemotherapy in adults with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Cancer. Aug 1 1983;52(3):424-34. [Medline].
Chang AE, Kinsella T, Glatstein E. Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity. J Clin Oncol. Sep 1988;6(9):1491-500. [Medline].
Huth JF, Eilber FR. Patterns of metastatic spread following resection of extremity soft- tissue sarcomas and strategies for treatment. Semin Surg Oncol. 1988;4(1):20-6. [Medline].
Fong Y, Coit DG, Woodruff JM. Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients. Ann Surg. Jan 1993;217(1):72-7. [Medline].
Kushner BH, Meyers PA. How effective is dose-intensive/myeloablative therapy against Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor metastatic to bone or bone marrow? The Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience and a literature review. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1 2001;19(3):870-80. [Medline].
Chou YS, Liu CY, Chen WM, Chen TH, Chen PC, Wu HT, et al. Follow-up after primary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of extremities: Impact of frequency of follow-up imaging on disease-specific survival. J Surg Oncol. Feb 1 2012;[Medline].
Stotter AT, A'Hern RP, Fisher C. The influence of local recurrence of extremity soft tissue sarcoma on metastasis and survival. Cancer. Mar 1 1990;65(5):1119-29. [Medline].
Jensen OM, Hogh J, Ostgaard SE. Histopathological grading of soft tissue tumours. Prognostic significance in a prospective study of 278 consecutive cases. J Pathol. Jan 1991;163(1):19-24. [Medline].
Marcus SG, Merino MJ, Glatstein E. Long-term outcome in 87 patients with low-grade soft-tissue sarcoma. Arch Surg. Dec 1993;128(12):1336-43. [Medline].
Bell RS, O'Sullivan B, Liu FF, et al. The surgical margin in soft-tissue sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1989;71(3):370-5. [Medline].
Herbert SH, Corn BW, Solin LJ. Limb-preserving treatment for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The significance of surgical margins. Cancer. Aug 15 1993;72(4):1230-8. [Medline].
Markhede G, Angervall L, Stener B. A multivariate analysis of the prognosis after surgical treatment of malignant soft-tissue tumors. Cancer. Apr 15 1982;49(8):1721-33. [Medline].
Gustafson P, Rooser B, Rydholm A. Is local recurrence of minor importance for metastases in soft tissue sarcoma?. Cancer. Apr 15 1991;67(8):2083-6. [Medline].
Agarwal V, Greenebaum E, Wersto R. DNA ploidy of spindle cell soft-tissue tumors and its relationship to histology and clinical outcome. Arch Pathol Lab Med. Jun 1991;115(6):558-62. [Medline].
Swanson SA, Brooks JJ. Proliferation markers Ki-67 and p105 in soft-tissue lesions. Correlation with DNA flow cytometric characteristics. Am J Pathol. Dec 1990;137(6):1491-500. [Medline].
Ueda T, Aozasa K, Tsujimoto M. Prognostic significance of Ki-67 reactivity in soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer. Apr 15 1989;63(8):1607-11. [Medline].
Kroese MC, Rutgers DH, Wils IS. The relevance of the DNA index and proliferation rate in the grading of benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. Cancer. Apr 15 1990;65(8):1782-8. [Medline].
Cance WG, Brennan MF, Dudas ME. Altered expression of the retinoblastoma gene product in human sarcomas. N Engl J Med. Nov 22 1990;323(21):1457-62. [Medline].
Drobnjak M, Latres E, Pollack D. Prognostic implications of p53 nuclear overexpression and high proliferation index of Ki-67 in adult soft-tissue sarcomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. Apr 6 1994;86(7):549-54. [Medline].
Kawai A, Noguchi M, Beppu Y. Nuclear immunoreaction of p53 protein in soft tissue sarcomas. A possible prognostic factor. Cancer. May 15 1994;73(10):2499-505. [Medline].
Mankin HJ, Mankin CJ, Simon MA. The hazards of the biopsy, revisited. Members of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am. May 1996;78(5):656-63. [Medline].
Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Recommendations for the reporting of soft tissue sarcomas. Mod Pathol. Dec 1998;11(12):1257-61. [Medline].
Barth RJ, Merino MJ, Solomon D. A prospective study of the value of core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of soft tissue masses. Surgery. Sep 1992;112(3):536-43. [Medline].
Bennert KW, Abdul-Karim FW. Fine needle aspiration cytology vs. needle core biopsy of soft tissue tumors. A comparison. Acta Cytol. May-Jun 1994;38(3):381-4. [Medline].
Boddaert A, Trojani M, Contesso G, et al. Soft tissue sarcomas of adults: study of pathological variables and definition of a histopathological grading system. In: van Oosterom AT, van Unnik JAM, eds. Management of Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcomas. New York, NY: Raven Press;1986.
Cantin J, McNeer GP, Chu FC. The problem of local recurrence after treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg. Jul 1968;168(1):47-53. [Medline].
Enneking WF, Maale GE. The effect of inadvertent tumor contamination of wounds during the surgical resection of musculoskeletal neoplasms. Cancer. Oct 1 1988;62(7):1251-6. [Medline].
Enneking WF, McAuliffe JA. Adjunctive preoperative radiation therapy in treatment of soft tissue sarcomas: a preliminary report. Cancer Treat Symp. 1985;3:37.
Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. Soft Tissue Tumors. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo:. Mosby;1995.
Epstein HD. Fine-needle aspiration of soft tissue lesions. Pathology (Phila). 1996;4(2):463-92. [Medline].
Giuliano AE, Eilber FR. The rationale for planned reoperation after unplanned total excision of soft-tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. Oct 1985;3(10):1344-8. [Medline].
Greenberg DB. Psychological aspects of patient management. In: Simon MA, Springfield D, eds. Surgery for Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors. Philadelphia, Pa:. Lippincott-Raven;1998:67-75.
Hashimoto H, Daimaru Y, Takeshita S. Prognostic significance of histologic parameters of soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer. Dec 15 1992;70(12):2816-22. [Medline].
Indelicato DJ, Meadows K, Gibbs CP Jr, Morris CG, Scarborough MT, Zlotecki RA. Effectiveness and Morbidity Associated with Reirradiation in Conservative Salvage Management of Recurrent Soft-Tissue Sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Aug 14 2008;[Medline].
Lawrence W, Donegan WL, Natarajan N. Adult soft tissue sarcomas. A pattern of care survey of the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg. Apr 1987;205(4):349-59. [Medline].
Meyers PA, Heller G, Healey J. Chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1992;10(1):5-15. [Medline].
Montag A. Management of surgical specimen. In: Simon MA, Springfield D, eds. Surgery for Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors. Philadelphia, Pa:. Lippincott-Raven;1998:67-75.
Pacelli F, Tortorelli AP, Rosa F, Papa V, Bossola M, Sanchez AM, et al. Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: prognostic factors and therapeutic approaches. Tumori. Jul-Aug 2008;94(4):497-504. [Medline].
Pezzi CM, Pollock RE, Evans HL. Preoperative chemotherapy for soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Ann Surg. Apr 1990;211(4):476-81. [Medline].
Pinkerton CR, Groot LJ, Barrett A. Rapid VAC high dose melphalan regimen, a novel chemotherapy approach in childhood soft tissue sarcomas. Br J Cancer. 1991;64:381-385. [Medline].
Praemer A, Furner S, Rice DP. Neoplasms of bone and connective tissue. In: Musculoskeletal conditions in the United States. Park Ridge, Ill:. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons;1992:55.
Rooser B, Attewell R, Berg NO. Prognostication in soft tissue sarcoma. A model with four risk factors. Cancer. Feb 15 1988;61(4):817-23. [Medline].
Roth JA Jr, Roth JA. Resection of sarcomatous pulmonary metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1993;2:673.
Rydholm A, Gustafson P, Rooser B. Limb-sparing surgery without radiotherapy based on anatomic location of soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. Oct 1991;9(10):1757-65. [Medline].
Scoggins CR, Pisters PW. Diagnosis and management of soft tissue sarcomas. Adv Surg. 2008;42:219-28. [Medline].
Tanabe KK, Pollock RE, Ellis LM. Influence of surgical margins on outcome in patients with preoperatively irradiated extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer. Mar 15 1994;73(6):1652-9. [Medline].
Tepper JE, Suit HD. Radiation therapy of soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer. May 1 1985;55(9 Suppl):2273-7. [Medline].
Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM. Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system. Int J Cancer. Jan 15 1984;33(1):37-42. [Medline].
Tsujimoto M, Aozasa K, Ueda T. Multivariate analysis for histologic prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer. Sep 1 1988;62(5):994-8. [Medline].
Willén H, Akerman M, Carlén B. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumours; a review of 22 years experience. Cytopathology. Aug 1995;6(4):236-47. [Medline].
Zalupski MM, Ryan JR, Hussein ME, et al. Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1993;2:621.
| Benign Soft Tissue Tumors | Characteristic Cytogenetic Events | Frequency |
| Benign schwannoma | Monosomy 22 | 50% |
| Desmoid tumor | Trisomy 8 | 25% |
| Deletion of 5q | 10% | |
| Lipoblastoma | Rearrangement of 8q | >25% |
| Lipoma, solitary | Rearrangement of bands 12q14-15 | 75% |
| Rearrangement of 6p | 10% | |
| Deletion of 13q | 10% | |
| Uterine leiomyoma | t(12;14)(q15;q24) | 20% |
| Deletion of 7q | 15% | |
| Trisomy 12 | 10% | |
| Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors | Characteristic Cytogenetic Events | Frequency |
| Clear cell sarcoma | t(12;22)(q13;q12) | >75% |
| Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans | Ring chromosome 17 | >75% |
| Ewing sarcoma | t(11;22)(q24;q12) | 95% |
| Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma | t(9;22)(q31;q12) | 50% |
| Liposarcoma, myxoid | t(12;16)(q13;p11) | 75% |
| Liposarcoma, well differentiated | Ring chromosome 12 | 80% |
| Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma | t(2;13)(q35;q14) | 80% |
| Synovial sarcoma | t(X;18) | 95% |
| Stage Groupings | Tumor Grade | Primary Tumor | Regional Lymph Node Involvement | Distant Metastasis |
| Stage IA | G1 | T1 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IB | G1 | T2 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage II A | G2 | T1 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IIB | G2 | T2 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IIIA | G3 | T1 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IIIB | G3 | T2 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IVA | Any G | Any T | N1 | M0 |
| Stage IVB | Any G | Any T | Any N | M1 |

