Fibrous Cortical Defect 

  • Author: Bernardo Vargas, MD; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jul 13, 2011
 

Background

Phemister provided the first description of fibrous cortical defect (FCD) in 1929. Sontag and Pyle reported a radiologic description in 1941, and in 1942, Jaffe and Lichtenstein described clinical and anatomic aspects and the natural history.[1, 2] See radiographs below.

Plain radiograph demonstrating multiple fibrous coPlain radiograph demonstrating multiple fibrous cortical defects in multiple bones. Plain radiograph of fibrous cortical defect of thePlain radiograph of fibrous cortical defect of the proximal tibia. Lateral radiograph demonstrating a solitary fibrouLateral radiograph demonstrating a solitary fibrous cortical defect in the proximal tibia.

Also called nonossifying or nonosteogenic fibroma, this benign tumor probably is the most frequent bony lesion in children, occurring in up to 30-40% of children.[3] The condition is most common in adolescents. Fibrous cortical defect is a term coined to describe the smaller variety of nonossifying fibromas.[4] However, no histologic difference exists between the lesions. When the lesion is large enough to encroach upon the medullary canal, the term nonossifying fibroma (NOF) is used. In this article, the terms FCD and NOF are interchangeable. The authors believe that these should be considered the same entity. These lesions are, in fact, developmental abnormalities, as opposed to benign neoplasms.

FCD usually is an incidental finding on radiographs. Always benign, these lesions may result in pathologic fracture, although pathologic fracture is a rare first presentation.[5] FCD can exist in multiple sites. FCD may be difficult to diagnose in the presence of pain or swelling of soft tissues. Fractures and impending fractures are indications for surgical intervention. Association with other bone lesions such as aneurysmal bone cyst is rare.[2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Next

Problem

Fibrous cortical defect (FCD) may present with a pathologic fracture, but this is an unusual presentation. FCD also can be confused with a more aggressive lesion. Therefore, biopsy may be necessary.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

This lesion constitutes 5% of benign tumoral lesions of bone. The true incidence is more likely to be on the order of 30% or more, but because fibrous cortical defect (FCD) is asymptomatic in most patients, most lesions are never identified. Sontag and Pyle identified this lesion in 54% of boys and 22% of girls in a series of 200 healthy children.[3, 10] These lesions occur in multiple sites in approximately 50% of patients. This lesion is rare in children younger than 2 years and is most common in adolescents.

Previous
Next

Etiology

The etiology of fibrous cortical defect (FCD) remains obscure. FCD is a proliferation of benign fibrous tissue, possibly as a result of periosteal injury or secondary to abnormalities at the epiphyseal plate. Others postulate that FCD is related to the normal cutback phenomenon seen in maturing physeal plates. Progression of this lesion introduces abnormal tissue into the metaphyseal cortex.

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

The average duration of fibrous cortical defect (FCD) varies from 29-52 months, followed by spontaneous resolution. FCD may be present during childhood, but lesions tend to disappear in adolescence.

Previous
Next

Presentation

FCD is encountered frequently in children and adolescents and is usually asymptomatic.[3, 10, 11]Pain is rare and, if present, is usually associated with a fracture. Fibrous cortical defect (FCD) typically is localized in long bones. The most common sites are the femur and tibia. On rare occasions, it may be encountered in the vertebrae, clavicle, or bones of the upper limbs. The association of multiple FCDs with café au lait spots, multiple nevi, mental retardation, hypogonadism, and ocular and cardiovascular abnormalities is called Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome.

FCD lesions have a typical and relatively distinct radiographic appearance. The lesion is radiolucent and is located eccentrically, usually in the distal metaphysis of a long bone. The cortex is thin, with sclerotic or scalloped margins. Lesions can be uniloculated or multiloculated. The longitudinal axis of FCD tends to be parallel to the axis of involved bone.

Previous
Next

Indications

The characteristic location and appearance are usually suggestive of a benign lesion and are often pathognomonic for fibrous cortical defect (FCD); thus, no further action is necessary unless a pathologic fracture has occurred or risk of fracture is high.

The following considerations should be kept in mind:

  • Does the lesion involve more than 50% of the transverse diameter of the bone? Prophylactic surgery may be indicated, as the risk of fracture is higher in this circumstance.
  • Is the lesion becoming larger and more symptomatic? A more aggressive therapy may be considered.
  • Is the location of the lesion particularly associated with high risk for pathologic fracture (eg, femoral neck)? Localization around the femoral neck is associated with an increased risk of pathologic fracture, producing avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Therefore, stabilization may be indicated.

In the pediatric population, casting usually is the most appropriate treatment after pathologic fracture to avoid injuring the physes during surgery.[3] FCD may heal spontaneously following fracture. If, after casting and union of the fracture, the lesion does not regress, curettage and grafting are indicated. In unstable fractures or in adolescents, curettage (with or without grafting) and internal fixation are appropriate.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

See Intraoperative details.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

When fibrous cortical defect (FCD) is near an open physis, surgery should be avoided if possible. With time, the FCD will migrate away from the physis, and risk of damage to the growth plate will be minimized.

Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Bernardo Vargas, MD  Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Pediatric Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Howard A Chansky, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center

Howard A Chansky, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Sean P Scully, MD, PhD  Professor, Department of Orthopedics, University of Miami

Sean P Scully, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, and Society of Surgical Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Harris Gellman, MD  Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center; Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami, Leonard M Miller School of Medicine

Harris Gellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Arkansas Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Sontag L, Pyle S. The appearance and nature of cyst-like areas in the distal metaphyses of children. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1941;46:185-188.

  2. Jaffe H., Liechtenstein L. Non-osteogenic fibroma of the bone. Am J Pathol. 1942;18:205-221.

  3. Mallet JF, Rigault P, Padovani JP, Touzet P, Nezelof C. Non-ossifying fibroma in children: a surgical condition ?. Chir Pediatr. 1980;21:179-89. [Medline].

  4. Arata M, Peterson H, Dahlin D. Pathological fractures through Non-Ossifying Fibromas. Review of the Mayo Clinic experience. J Bone J Surg. 1981;63A:980 - 988.

  5. Sakamoto A, Tanaka K, Yoshida T, Iwamoto Y. Nonossifying fibroma accompanied by pathological fracture in a 12-year-old runner. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. Jul 2008;38(7):434-8. [Medline].

  6. Campanacci M, Laus M, Boriani S. Multiple non-ossifying fibromata with extraskeletal anomalies: a new syndrome?. J Bone J Surg. 1983;65B:627-632. [Medline].

  7. Hoeffel C, Panuel M,, Plenat F, Mainard L, Hoeffel JC. Pathological fracture in non-ossifying fibroma with histological features simulating aneurysmal bone cyst. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(4):669-71. [Medline].

  8. Peuchmaur M, Forest M, Tomeno B, Abelanet R. Multifocal nonosteogenic fibroma: report of a case with ultrastructural findings. Hum Pathol. Jul 1985;16(7):751-3. [Medline].

  9. Skrede O. Non-osteogenic fibroma of bone. Acta Orthop Scand1970;41(4):362-80. [Medline].

  10. Faure C, Laurent JM, Schmit P, Sirinelli D. Multiple and large non-ossifying fibromas in children with neurofibromatosis. Ann Radiol (Paris). 1986;29(3-4):369-73. [Medline].

  11. Hetts SW, Hilchey SD, Wilson R, Franc B. Case 110: Nonossifying fibroma. Radiology. Apr 2007;243(1):288-92. [Medline].

  12. Huzjan R, Vukelic-Markovic M, Brkljacic B, Ivanac G. The value of ultrasound in diagnosis and follow-up of fibrous cortical defect. Ultraschall Med. Oct 2005;26(5):420-3. [Medline].

  13. Loberant N, Samovsky M, Papura S. Gray-scale and Doppler characteristics of fibrous cortical defects in a child. J Clin Ultrasound. Sep 2003;31(7):369-74. [Medline].

  14. von Falck C, Rosenthal H, Gratz KF, Galanski M. Nonossifying fibroma can mimic residual lymphoma in FDG PET: additional value of combined PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. Aug 2007;32(8):640-2. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Plain radiograph demonstrating multiple fibrous cortical defects in multiple bones.
Plain radiograph of fibrous cortical defect of the proximal tibia.
Lateral radiograph demonstrating a solitary fibrous cortical defect in the proximal tibia.
CT scan of the fibrous cortical defect shown in the plain radiographs in Images 2-3; note the cortical location and the sclerotic rim around the central lucency.
Methylene diphosphonate technetium bone scan of the fibrous cortical defect in Images 2-4; uptake is minimally increased at the site of the lesion.
Histologic section of a fibrous cortical defect demonstrating a bland fibrous stroma in the absence of nuclear atypia or mitoses; a few giant cells are scattered within the stroma.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.