Solitary Osteochondroma 

  • Author: Ian D Dickey, MD, FRCSC; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD   more...
 
Updated: Apr 29, 2011
 

Background

Osteochondroma is the most common benign bone tumor (see images below). The tumor is often diagnosed as an incidental finding. Osteochondromas account for approximately 35% of benign bone tumors and 9% of all bone tumors. Most are asymptomatic, but they can cause mechanical symptoms depending on their location and size.

Solitary osteochondroma. Anteroposterior radiograpSolitary osteochondroma. Anteroposterior radiograph of a pedunculated osteochondroma of the distal femur. Solitary osteochondroma. CT scan of the pelvis depSolitary osteochondroma. CT scan of the pelvis depicting a massive solitary osteochondroma. Solitary osteochondroma. Gross osteochondroma specSolitary osteochondroma. Gross osteochondroma specimen at the time of resection. Bone stalk and overlying membrane on cartilage cap.

As benign lesions, osteochondromas have no propensity for metastasis. In fewer than 1% of solitary osteochondromas, malignant degeneration of the cartilage cap into secondary chondrosarcoma has been described and is usually heralded by new onset of growth of the lesion, new onset of pain, or rapid growth of the lesion.[1, 2, 3]

Recent studies

Purandare et al studied the role of whole-body FDG PET-CT in evaluating sarcomatous transformation of osteochondromas in 12 patients with a diagnosis of osteocartilaginous lesions. Seven patients with histopathologic evidence of sarcomatous transformation to grade II chondrosarcoma had moderate to high FDG uptake; 1 patient with a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma had a focus of very intense uptake; and 4 patients with histopathologic or clinical diagnosis of a benign osteocartilaginous lesion had low FDG uptake. FDG uptake was also noted in an asymptomatic osteochondroma, which on histopathology revealed a grade II chondrosarcoma.[4]

Florez et al performed a retrospective study of 113 solitary osteochondromas treated from 1970 through 2002. The authors found that the most frequent location was the distal femur. Six patients had a recurrence after treatment, and in 2 patients, the lesions became malignant and developed into chondrosarcoma. They noted that relapse of the exostosis is rare, occurring in approximately 2% of resections, and that growth of an osteochondroma or the presence of pain in older patients suggests a possible malignancy.[5]

Heinritz et al reported on the clinical findings and results of molecular analyses of the EXT1 and EXT2 genes—mutations of which lead to multiple osteochondroma—in 23 patients. In 17 of the 23 patients, novel pathogenic mutations were identified (11 in the EXT1 gene; 6 in the EXT2 gene). According to the authors, findings of this study extend the mutational spectrum and understanding of the pathogenic effects of EXT1 and EXT2 mutations.[6]

Next

History of the Procedure

Historically and currently, most osteochondromas are incidental findings and are treated solely with observation. If they remain asymptomatic, they can be ignored. Lesions that create mechanical symptoms, become painful, begin to enlarge, or cause growth disturbance have historically been treated with surgical removal, and this remains the mainstay of treatment.

Previous
Next

Problem

Osteochondroma is a benign, cartilaginous neoplasm that is found in any bone that undergoes enchondral bone formation in its development. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines osteochondroma as a cartilage-capped bony projection on the external surface of a bone. It is found most commonly around the knee and the proximal humerus; however, it can occur in any bone. The osteochondroma may have a stalk, as in the first two images below, and be defined as pedunculated, or it may have a broad base of attachment and be considered sessile in nature, as in the last image below. Whether sessile or pedunculated, the medullary canal of the stalk and the bone are in continuity by definition.[7]

Solitary osteochondroma. Anteroposterior radiograpSolitary osteochondroma. Anteroposterior radiograph of a pedunculated osteochondroma of the distal femur. Solitary osteochondroma. Lateral radiograph of a pSolitary osteochondroma. Lateral radiograph of a pedunculated osteochondroma of the distal femur. Orientation is away from the growth plate, and medullary continuity is clear. Solitary osteochondroma. Lateral radiograph of a sSolitary osteochondroma. Lateral radiograph of a sessile osteochondroma of the distal femur.

Osteochondroma is a hamartoma, and patients most commonly present in the second decade of life. Osteochondromas grow until skeletal maturity; growth generally stops once the growth plates fuse.[8] Slow growth from the cap may continue over time, as described by Virchow, but this usually stops by age 30 years.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

The actual frequency of osteochondromas is unknown because many are not diagnosed. Most are found in patients younger than 20 years, as in the image below. The male-to-female ratio is 3:1.

Solitary osteochondroma. Anatomic and age distribuSolitary osteochondroma. Anatomic and age distribution of solitary osteochondromas.

Osteochondromas can occur in any bone that undergoes enchondral bone formation, but they are most common around the knee.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Although the exact etiology of these growths is not known, a peripheral portion of the physis is thought to herniate from the growth plate.[9] This herniation may be idiopathic or may be the result of trauma or a perichondrial ring deficiency. Whatever the cause, the result is an abnormal extension of metaplastic cartilage that responds to the factors that stimulate the growth plate and thus results in exostosis growth.

This island of cartilage organizes into a structure similar to the epiphysis (see Workup, Histologic Findings, below). As this metaplastic cartilage is stimulated, enchondral bone formation occurs, developing a bony stalk. The histology of the cartilage cap reflects the classic, defined zones observed in the growth plate—namely, a zone of proliferation, columniation, hypertrophy, calcification, and ossification.

This theory is thought to explain the classic finding of the osteochondroma associated with a growth plate and growing away from the physis while maintaining its medullary continuity. The theory is also thought to explain the clinical behavior of the exostosis growing only until skeletal maturity.

Genetic karyotyping has suggested that reproducible genetic abnormalities are associated with these benign growths and that they may actually represent a true neoplastic process, not a reactive one.[10, 11] This research is in the early stages, and further investigation is necessary.[12, 13, 14, 15]

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Osteochondromas are located adjacent to growth plates and develop away from the growth plate with time because they are essentially isolated growth plates. They are affected by, and respond to, various growth factors and hormones in the same manner as epiphyseal growth plates; thus, growth of an osteochondroma should cease at skeletal maturity.

Previous
Next

Presentation

Osteochondromas are the most common benign bone tumors. They represent 35% of all benign tumors and 9% of all bone tumors. Most are diagnosed in patients younger than 20 years. A marked predilection for males exists; the male-to-female ratio is 3:1.[16]

Although they can be located almost anywhere in the skeleton, almost half of osteochondromas are found around the knee, in either the distal femur or the proximal tibia.[17] See image below for age and anatomic distribution.

Solitary osteochondroma. Anatomic and age distribuSolitary osteochondroma. Anatomic and age distribution of solitary osteochondromas.

Osteochondromas are most commonly diagnosed incidentally on radiographs obtained for other reasons. The second most common presentation is a mass, which may or may not be associated with pain. Most of these lesions do not need to be treated, and asymptomatic lesions can be safely ignored. When painful, however, they need to be evaluated properly.

Pain is usually caused by a direct, mechanical, mass effect of the osteochondroma on the overlying soft tissue. This can result in an associated sac or bursitis over the exostosis. Irritation of surrounding tendons, muscles, or nerves can result in pain.[18, 19] Pain can also result from fracture of the stalk of the osteochondroma from direct trauma. The bony cap of the stalk may infarct or undergo ischemic necrosis.

Previous
Next

Indications

Asymptomatic lesions require no treatment and can be monitored initially with radiographs and subsequently by clinical examination. Further investigation is indicated if the patient presents with a painful lesion or develops pain or an increase in size of a preexisting lesion. Such changes may represent either a new mechanical symptom or malignant degeneration. MRI is very useful for investigating these changes. The most common causes of pain are bursa formation, impingement, fracture of the stalk, and malignant degeneration.[20, 21, 22]

Excision is the treatment of choice for symptomatic lesions. As with all lesions of muscle and bone, the physician must be confident of the diagnosis and well versed in the care of tumors, should the lesion in fact be malignant. If the surgeon has any doubt about the diagnosis of the lesion or the management of a potential malignancy, patient referral is the most appropriate course of action.

In excising the lesion, it is important to avoid leaving any remnants of cartilage from the cap or any perichondrium, because this can allow recurrence. The reported rate of local recurrence is less than 2-5%.[23] The risk of recurrence is thought by some to be higher in the skeletally immature; therefore, resection might best be delayed until skeletal maturity is reached. Great care must be exercised with lesions close to the physeal plate in the immature patient, because of the risk of growth plate arrest and subsequent deformity.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

Osteochondromas can occur in many different locations in the body. Thus, a complete understanding of local anatomy is paramount to ensure that local structures are not harmed during surgical resection. Because these lesions arise from the metaphysis, particular care must be taken to avoid damage to the growth plate in the skeletally immature patient.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

No frank contraindications to removal exist, but the surgeon should be aware that a large osteochondroma may in fact be a chondrosarcoma and should exercise appropriate caution. Removal by a surgeon who is not well versed in dealing with orthopedic malignancies may be a relative contraindication.

Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Ian D Dickey, MD, FRCSC  Adjunct Professor, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Maine; Consulting Staff, Adult Reconstruction, Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Orthopedics, Eastern Maine Medical Center

Ian D Dickey, MD, FRCSC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, British Columbia Medical Association, Canadian Medical Association, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Stryker Orthopaedics Consulting fee Consulting; Cadence Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Specialty Editor Board

Lynn A Crosby, MD, FACS  Chief of Shoulder Division, Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State University School of Medicine

Lynn A Crosby, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Sports Medicine, American College of Surgeons, American Fracture Association, American Medical Association, American Medical Tennis Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Arthroscopy Association of North America, Mid-America Orthopaedic Association, and Orthopaedic Research Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Sean P Scully, MD, PhD  Professor, Department of Orthopedics, University of Miami

Sean P Scully, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, and Society of Surgical Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Harris Gellman, MD  Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center; Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine

Harris Gellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Medical Acupuncture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Arkansas Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Garrison RC, Unni KK, McLeod RA, Pritchard DJ, Dahlin DC. Chondrosarcoma arising in osteochondroma. Cancer. May 1 1982;49(9):1890-7. [Medline].

  2. Staals EL, Bacchini P, Mercuri M, Bertoni F. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas arising in preexisting osteochondromas. J Bone Joint Surg Am. May 2007;89(5):987-93. [Medline].

  3. Akahane T, Shimizu T, Isobe K, Yoshimura Y, Kato H. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma arising in a solitary osteochondroma with leiomyosarcomatous component: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Jan 12 2008;[Medline].

  4. Purandare NC, Rangarajan V, Agarwal M, Sharma AR, Shah S, Arora A, et al. Integrated PET/CT in evaluating sarcomatous transformation in osteochondromas. Clin Nucl Med. Jun 2009;34(6):350-4. [Medline].

  5. Florez B, Mönckeberg J, Castillo G, Beguiristain J. Solitary osteochondroma long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. Mar 2008;17(2):91-4. [Medline].

  6. Heinritz W, Hüffmeier U, Strenge S, Miterski B, Zweier C, Leinung S, et al. New mutations of EXT1 and EXT2 genes in German patients with Multiple Osteochondromas. Ann Hum Genet. May 2009;73:283-91. [Medline].

  7. Mavrogenis AF, Papagelopoulos PJ, Soucacos PN. Skeletal osteochondromas revisited. Orthopedics. Oct 2008;31(10):[Medline].

  8. Nogier A, De Pinieux G, Hottya G, Anract P. Case reports: enlargement of a calcaneal osteochondroma after skeletal maturity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jun 2006;447:260-6. [Medline].

  9. D'Ambrosia R, Ferguson AB Jr. The formation of osteochondroma by epiphyseal cartilage transplantation. Clin Orthop. Nov-Dec 1968;61:103-15. [Medline].

  10. Hameetman L, Szuhai K, Yavas A, Knijnenburg J, van Duin M, van Dekken H, et al. The role of EXT1 in nonhereditary osteochondroma: identification of homozygous deletions. J Natl Cancer Inst. Mar 7 2007;99(5):396-406. [Medline].

  11. Hecht JT, Hogue D, Strong LC, et al. Hereditary multiple exostosis and chondrosarcoma: linkage to chromosome II and loss of heterozygosity for EXT-linked markers on chromosomes II and 8. Am J Hum Genet. May 1995;56(5):1125-31. [Medline].

  12. Coughlan B, Feliz A, Ishida T, Czerniak B, Dorfman HD. p53 expression and DNA ploidy of cartilage lesions. Hum Pathol. Jun 1995;26(6):620-4. [Medline].

  13. Legeai-Mallet L, Margaritte-Jeannin P, Lemdani M, et al. An extension of the admixture test for the study of genetic heterogeneity in hereditary multiple exostoses. Hum Genet. Mar 1997;99(3):298-302. [Medline].

  14. Legeai-Mallet L, Munnich A, Maroteaux P, et al. Incomplete penetrance and expressivity skewing in hereditary multiple exostoses. Clin Genet. Jul 1997;52(1):12-6. [Medline].

  15. Park KJ, Shin KH, Ku JL. Germline mutations in the EXT1 and EXT2 genes in Korean patients with hereditary multiple exostoses. J Hum Genet. 1999;44(4):230-4. [Medline].

  16. Kitsoulis P, Galani V, Stefanaki K, Paraskevas G, Karatzias G, Agnantis NJ, et al. Osteochondromas: review of the clinical, radiological and pathological features. In Vivo. Sep-Oct 2008;22(5):633-46. [Medline].

  17. Galasso O, Mariconda M, Milano C. An enlarging distal tibia osteochondroma in the adult patient. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Mar-Apr 2009;99(2):157-61. [Medline].

  18. Coenen L, Biltjes I. High radial nerve palsy caused by a humeral exostosis: a case report. J Hand Surg [Am]. Jul 1992;17(4):668-9. [Medline].

  19. Mnif H, Koubaa M, Zrig M, Zammel N, Abid A. Peroneal nerve palsy resulting from fibular head osteochondroma. Orthopedics. Jul 2009;32(7):528. [Medline].

  20. Karasick D, Schweitzer ME, Eschelman DJ. Symptomatic osteochondromas: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 1997;168(6):1507-12. [Medline].

  21. Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH. Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. Sep-Oct 2000;20(5):1407-34. [Medline].

  22. El-Khoury GY, Bassett GS. Symptomatic bursa formation with osteochondromas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Nov 1979;133(5):895-8. [Medline].

  23. Day FN, Ruggieri C, Britton C. Recurrent osteochondroma. J Foot Ankle Surg. Mar-Apr 1998;37(2):162-4; discussion 173. [Medline].

  24. Robbin MR, Murphey MD. Benign chondroid neoplasms of bone. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2000;4(1):45-58. [Medline].

  25. Hudson TM, Springfield DS, Spanier SS, et al. Benign exostoses and exostotic chondrosarcomas: evaluation of cartilage thickness by CT. Radiology. Sep 1984;152(3):595-9. [Medline].

  26. Lange RH, Lange TA, Rao BK. Correlative radiographic, scintigraphic, and histological evaluation of exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 1984;66(9):1454-9. [Medline].

  27. Robinson D, Hasharoni A, Oganesian A, et al. Role of FGF9 and FGF receptor 3 in osteochondroma formation. Orthopedics. Aug 2001;24(8):783-7. [Medline].

  28. Ohnishi T, Horii E, Shukuki K, Hattori T. Surgical treatment for osteochondromas in pediatric digits. J Hand Surg Am. Mar 2011;36(3):432-8. [Medline].

  29. Fageir MM, Edwards MR, Addison AK. The surgical management of osteochondroma on the ventral surface of the scapula. J Pediatr Orthop B. Sep 1 2009;[Medline].

  30. Humbert ET, Mehlman C, Crawford AH. Two cases of osteochondroma recurrence after surgical resection. Am J Orthop. Jan 2001;30(1):62-4. [Medline].

  31. Chin KR, Kharrazi FD, Miller BS, Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC. Osteochondromas of the distal aspect of the tibia or fibula. Natural history and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 2000;82(9):1269-78. [Medline].

  32. Fogel GR, McElfresh EC, Peterson HA, Wicklund PT. Management of deformities of the forearm in multiple hereditary osteochondromas. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1984;66(5):670-80. [Medline].

  33. Govender S, Parbhoo AH. Osteochondroma with compression of the spinal cord. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jul 1999;81(4):667-9. [Medline].

  34. Peterson HA. Multiple hereditary osteochondromata. Clin Orthop. Feb 1989;(239):222-30. [Medline].

  35. Porter DE, Benson MK, Hosney GA. The hip in hereditary multiple exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Sep 2001;83(7):988-95. [Medline].

  36. Snearly WN, Peterson HA. Management of ankle deformities in multiple hereditary osteochondromata. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 1989;9(4):427-32. [Medline].

  37. Wuyts W, Ramlakhan S, Van Hul W. Refinement of the multiple exostoses locus (EXT2) to a 3-cM interval on chromosome 11. Am J Hum Genet. Aug 1995;57(2):382-7. [Medline].

  38. Wicklund CL, Pauli RM, Johnston D. Natural history study of hereditary multiple exostoses. Am J Med Genet. Jan 2 1995;55(1):43-6. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Solitary osteochondroma. Anteroposterior radiograph of a pedunculated osteochondroma of the distal femur.
Solitary osteochondroma. Lateral radiograph of a pedunculated osteochondroma of the distal femur. Orientation is away from the growth plate, and medullary continuity is clear.
Solitary osteochondroma. Lateral radiograph of a sessile osteochondroma of the distal femur.
Solitary osteochondroma. Anatomic and age distribution of solitary osteochondromas.
Solitary osteochondroma. CT scan of the pelvis depicting a massive solitary osteochondroma.
Solitary osteochondroma. Anteroposterior radiograph of sessile osteochondroma of the humerus.
Solitary osteochondroma. CT scan of the same sessile osteochondroma of the humerus as in Image 6.
Solitary osteochondroma. MRI of sessile osteochondroma of the femur demonstrating the thickness of the cartilage cap.
Solitary osteochondroma. Gross osteochondroma specimen at the time of resection. Bone stalk and overlying membrane on cartilage cap.
Solitary osteochondroma. Cut surface of surgical osteochondroma specimen. Cartilage cap and underlying bone with medullary continuity.
Solitary osteochondroma. Histology of cut osteochondroma specimen. Cartilage cap and orientation of enchondral bone formation.
Solitary osteochondroma. High-power view of benign cartilage cells arranged in vertical growth plate pattern.
Solitary osteochondroma. Radiograph demonstrating the deformation of the distal tibiofibular joint in a patient with a solitary osteochondroma.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.