Synovial Cell Sarcoma Treatment & Management
- Author: Bernardo Vargas, MD; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD more...
Adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been proposed for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas. Nevertheless, chemotherapy in the treatment of synovial cell sarcoma remains controversial.
Ladenstein et al reported improved survival rates with the use of adjuvant doxorubicin- and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Other authors have recommended combinations of doxorubicin (75 mg/m2 via continuous infusion over 3 days) and bolus ifosfamide (2.5 g/m2 daily for 4 days, or ifosfamide with liposomal daunorubicin). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may stimulate the bone marrow. Chemotherapy should be considered in patients with extremity tumors larger than 5 cm.[1, 2, 3, 7]
Some studies showed promising results in the treatment of synovial cell sarcoma xenografts with a murine monoclonal antibody. This monoclonal antibody attacks a frizzled homologue called FZD10 (a cell-surface receptor), which is present in synovial sarcoma cells and absent in normal organs. Clinical applications of these monoclonal antibodies are not yet available. An additional innovative technique could be a SYT-SSX–derived peptide vaccine.
Another controversial aspect of treatment of synovial cell sarcoma is the efficacy of chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment after surgery. Chemotherapy has not proved to provide a significant benefit in survival rates in all series. A multicenter clinical trial for the treatment of patients with soft-tissue sarcoma includes patients with stage IV sarcomas and evaluates the clinical response to treatment with topotecan and carboplatin. Information is available on the clinical trial web site.
Surgical excision is still the cornerstone of treatment for synovial cell sarcoma. A tumor-free margin of 1-3 cm is recommended. Maximal care must be taken to reduce the risk of local recurrence. Careful preoperative planning is essential. Because of the tumor's predilection for the popliteal fossa, limb salvage may not be possible, because of the proximity of the neurovascular structures.
Even with microscopically negative margins, patients could develop local recurrence. Rare local recurrence has been reported 15 years after the initial treatment. Surgical resection of isolated metastases may be possible if the tumor is well controlled. Palliative surgery may also be appropriate, particularly to alleviate pain or achieve hemorrhage control.
Because synovial cell sarcoma spreads along fascial planes, careful preoperative staging is crucial. Radiologic evaluation before treatment is very important. Imaging techniques employed in preoperative evaluation include radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT).
Synovial cell sarcoma has the ability to metastasize via the lymphatic system. Venous metastasis can occur as well. Synovial sarcoma is most likely to invade adjacent bone.
Preoperative radiation therapy is associated with an increased rate of wound problems. This neoadjuvant radiotherapy is sometimes proposed before surgery to reduce the size of the tumor.
The ideal surgical approach to synovial cell sarcoma takes into account the location of the lesion and must always include the possibility of amputation in cases of unsuccessful total resection. Thus, a radical or wide resection is indicated, depending on the location of the tumor. The mass may be tagged so that the location of any close or contaminated margins can be identified.
A primary amputation is proposed if the location and extension of the tumor do not provide adequate function of the extremity. Primary amputation is required in 20% of patients. Vascular resection and reconstruction are most often performed in the lower extremities.
Postoperative radiation therapy is usually required, particularly if the margins are close to vital neurovascular structures. The most common radiotherapy is external-beam radiation that is directed at the tumor site and that includes a margin of surrounding normal tissue. The decision about the timing of radiation therapy (ie, before or after surgery) is controversial.
The local radiation dose is usually 40-60 Gy. Vital neurologic structures, open physes, or an extreme peripheral location (hand or foot) can make external-beam radiation therapy potentially hazardous. Brachytherapy (radiation administered by a local implant) is an alternative consideration. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has also been proposed.
Follow-up involves clinical examination, MRI of the surgical site, and CT of the chest. After surgical treatment, the authors recommend MRI, CT, and a patient review every 3-6 months for the first 2 years and then every 6 months for the next 3 years. Most recurrent metastatic disease develops within the first 2 years, but late recurrence has been documented.
The surgical complications are related to the site involved but include the general complications of wound infection, wound breakdown, neurologic or vascular injury, and hematoma or seroma formation.
Specific complications associated with this tumor are local recurrence and distant metastases. The risk of local recurrence is directly proportional to the adequacy of surgical clearance. Therefore, a wide excision is mandatory to reduce this risk. Essential neurologic structures may make a wide clearance impossible, especially in the popliteal fossa. Accordingly, it may be necessary to consider nerve grafting, later muscle transfers, or both in order to allow the wide margin required.
Outcome and Prognosis
Synovial cell sarcoma has been reported to be particularly likely to metastasize. Many factors modify patient outcome,[11, 23, 28, 14] such as tumor size, anatomic localization, and histologic grade. Nevertheless, histologic criteria such as nuclear grade, measures of mitotic count, and amount of necrosis are subjective and sometimes difficult to compare.
Synovial cell sarcoma has survival rates of 50-60% at 5 years and 40-50% at 10 years. However, advances in oncologic therapy, particularly the development of monoclonal antibodies, may improve survival rates (see Future and Controversies).
A slight improvement in survival rate has been reported with the use of chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy.[7, 2, 3] Recurrence has been reported up to 69 months after treatment and suggests a worse prognosis with low survival rates. Distant metastases at presentation suggests a bad prognosis (2-year survival rate of 25%).
Campbell et al described prognostic factors that correlated with a better prognosis, including the following :
Biphasic histologic pattern
Patients with SYT/SSX2 fusion genes
Location in the hand or foot
Size < 5 cm
Age < 50 years
Negative resection margins
Crowson et al conducted a retrospective review of medical records to determine clinical and pathologic factors affecting survival in primary synovial cell sarcoma of the head and neck. Their study included 28 patients who underwent surgery for the removal of the primary lesion, of whom nine received adjuvant radiation therapy, two received chemotherapy, and 14 received postoperative chemoradiation therapy.
The investigators found that the presence of metastases on initial presentation and tumor size exceeding 4 cm were factors associated with decreased survival. They concluded that adding chemotherapy to postoperative radiotherapy does not increase survival or disease control.
Eilber FC, Dry SM. Diagnosis and management of synovial sarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar 15. 97(4):314-20. [Medline].
Spira AI, Ettinger DS. The use of chemotherapy in soft-tissue sarcomas. Oncologist. 2002. 7(4):348-59. [Medline].
Siehl JM, Thiel E, Schmittel A, Hütter G, Deckert PM, Szelényi H, et al. Ifosfamide/liposomal daunorubicin is a well tolerated and active first-line chemotherapy regimen in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: results of a phase II study. Cancer. 2005 Aug 1. 104(3):611-7. [Medline].
Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Pisters PW, Pollock RE, Patel SR, Benjamin RS, et al. Prognostic factors for patients with localized soft-tissue sarcoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy: an analysis of 1225 patients. Cancer. 2003 May 15. 97(10):2530-43. [Medline].
Ladanyi M, Antonescu CR, Leung DH, Woodruff JM, Kawai A, Healey JH, et al. Impact of SYT-SSX fusion type on the clinical behavior of synovial sarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 243 patients. Cancer Res. 2002 Jan 1. 62(1):135-40. [Medline].
Deshmukh R, Mankin HJ, Singer S. Synovial sarcoma: the importance of size and location for survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Feb. 155-61. [Medline].
Ladenstein R, Treuner J, Koscielniak E, d'Oleire F, Keim M, Gadner H, et al. Synovial sarcoma of childhood and adolescence. Report of the German CWS-81 study. Cancer. 1993 Jun 1. 71(11):3647-55. [Medline].
Knösel T, Heretsch S, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Richter P, Katenkamp K, Katenkamp D, et al. TLE1 is a robust diagnostic biomarker for synovial sarcomas and correlates with t(X;18): analysis of 319 cases. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Apr. 46(6):1170-6. [Medline].
Antonescu CR, Kawai A, Leung DH, Lonardo F, Woodruff JM, Healey JH, et al. Strong association of SYT-SSX fusion type and morphologic epithelial differentiation in synovial sarcoma. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2000 Mar. 9(1):1-8. [Medline].
Guillou L, Coindre J, Gallagher G, Terrier P, Gebhard S, de Saint Aubain Somerhausen N, et al. Detection of the synovial sarcoma translocation t(X;18) (SYT;SSX) in paraffin-embedded tissues using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: a reliable and powerful diagnostic tool for pathologists. A molecular analysis of 221 mesenchymal tumors fixed in different fixatives. Hum Pathol. 2001 Jan. 32(1):105-12. [Medline].
Kawai A, Woodruff J, Healey JH, Brennan MF, Antonescu CR, Ladanyi M. SYT-SSX gene fusion as a determinant of morphology and prognosis in synovial sarcoma. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15. 338(3):153-60. [Medline].
Kawaguchi S, Wada T, Ida K, Sato Y, Nagoya S, Tsukahara T, et al. Phase I vaccination trial of SYT-SSX junction peptide in patients with disseminated synovial sarcoma. J Transl Med. 2005 Jan 12. 3(1):1. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Thompson RC Jr, Garg A, Goswitz J, Cheng EY, Clohisy DR, Dusenbery K. Synovial sarcoma. Large size predicts poor outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Apr. 18-24. [Medline].
Al-Daraji W, Lasota J, Foss R, Miettinen M. Synovial sarcoma involving the head: analysis of 36 cases with predilection to the parotid and temporal regions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Oct. 33(10):1494-503. [Medline].
Bridge JA. Cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 1993. 75(4):606-14. [Medline].
Ten Heuvel SE, Hoekstra HJ, Suurmeijer AJ. Diagnostic accuracy of FISH and RT-PCR in 50 routinely processed synovial sarcomas. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2008 May. 16(3):246-50. [Medline].
Kind M, Stock N, Coindre JM. Histology and imaging of soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Oct. 72(1):6-15. [Medline].
Lessnick SL, Dei Tos AP, Sorensen PH, Dileo P, Baker LH, Ferrari S, et al. Small round cell sarcomas. Semin Oncol. 2009 Aug. 36(4):338-46. [Medline].
Bergh P, Meis-Kindblom JM, Gherlinzoni F, Berlin O, Bacchini P, Bertoni F, et al. Synovial sarcoma: identification of low and high risk groups. Cancer. 1999 Jun 15. 85(12):2596-607. [Medline].
Fukukawa C, Hanaoka H, Nagayama S, Tsunoda T, Toguchida J, Endo K, et al. Radioimmunotherapy of human synovial sarcoma using a monoclonal antibody against FZD10. Cancer Sci. 2008 Feb. 99(2):432-40. [Medline].
Sakabe T, Murata H, Konishi E, Takeshita H, Ueda H, Matsui T, et al. Evaluation of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for synovial sarcoma arising from the extremities. Med Sci Monit. 2008 Jun. 14(6):CR305-310. [Medline].
Mazeron JJ, Suit HD. Lymph nodes as sites of metastases from sarcomas of soft tissue. Cancer. 1987 Oct 15. 60(8):1800-8. [Medline].
Ghert MA, Abudu A, Driver N, Davis AM, Griffin AM, Pearce D, et al. The indications for and the prognostic significance of amputation as the primary surgical procedure for localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Jan. 12(1):10-7. [Medline].
Pisters PW, Harrison LB, Leung DH, Woodruff JM, Casper ES, Brennan MF. Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Mar. 14(3):859-68. [Medline].
Moreno Martín-Retortillo L, Andrés Moreno MM, Cañete Nieto A, Castel Sánchez V. Synovial sarcoma in children. A single centre experience. Clin Transl Oncol. 2007 Jul. 9(7):468-70. [Medline].
Stefanovski PD, Bidoli E, De Paoli A, Buonadonna A, Boz G, Libra M, et al. Prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcomas: a study of 395 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002 Mar. 28(2):153-64. [Medline].
Spillane AJ, A'Hern R, Judson IR, Fisher C, Thomas JM. Synovial sarcoma: a clinicopathologic, staging, and prognostic assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Nov 15. 18(22):3794-803. [Medline].
Campbell C, Gallagher J, Dickinson I. Synovial sarcoma--towards a simplified approach to prognosis. ANZ J Surg. 2004 Sep. 74(9):727-31. [Medline].
Crowson MG, Lalich I, Keeney MG, Garcia JJ, Price DL. Clinicopathologic factors and adjuvant treatment effects on survival in adult head and neck synovial cell sarcoma. Head Neck. 2014 Jan 15. [Medline].