Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Muscular Dystrophy Treatment & Management

  • Author: Twee T Do, MD; Chief Editor: Jeffrey D Thomson, MD  more...
 
Updated: Dec 18, 2015
 

Approach Considerations

The indications for any operative intervention in patients with muscular dystrophy (MD) include making a diagnosis by means of muscle biopsy (see Workup) or prolonging the patient's function and/or ability to ambulate by specific procedures. Other indicated procedures include tendo Achillis and iliopsoas tenotomies for ease of fit into braces, tibialis posterior tendon transfers or tenotomies for more rigid equinovarus deformities of the foot, and segmental spinal stabilization for rapidly developing scoliosis (see Surgical Therapy below).

In patients with muscular dystrophy, some relative contraindications to surgery include obesity, rapidly progressive muscle weakness, poor cardiopulmonary status, and a patient's lack of motivation for participating in postoperative rehabilitation programs.

The ability of advancing technology and molecular biology with fetal blood detection of affected fetuses as early as the first trimester opens the door to many ethical issues. One such issue is whether pregnancy termination should be available as an option when a muscle disease is detected that may be fatal in the third decade of life.

Next

Medical Therapy

Steroids

Since Duchenne's time, multiple drug regimens have been tried in treatment of the muscle weakness. Of all the drugs that have come and gone, the only one with some proven benefit is prednisone. The beneficial effects were initially thought to be mediated through the suppression of cytotoxic T-cell expression from the necrotic muscles. In the early 1970s, Drachman et al[33] treated 14 boys who had Duchenne MD with steroids and noted some benefits; however, because this was an uncontrolled study, the steroid therapeutic approach did not become a widely accepted treatment protocol.

In 1989, Mendell et al[34] performed a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of 103 male patients with Duchenne MD who ranged from age 5-15 years. Over a period of 6 months, the patients were given prednisone at a dosage of 1.5 mg/kg/day, prednisone at a dosage of 0.75 mg/kg/day, or placebo. The researchers, who followed the expected course outlined by natural history, noted definite improvement in muscle strength in the steroid-treated boys at 1, 2, and 3 months compared with the control subjects receiving placebo.

The benefit of the dose-dependent steroid in this study,[34] however, was short-lived. The children's gained strength leveled off after the third month, and then they again began to lose strength. In addition, the adverse effects of the higher-dose steroids, such as rapid weight gain, myopathy, osteoporosis, and growth retardation, offset the beneficial effects of temporary minimal increases in strength.

As a result, deflazacort, an oxazoline derivative of prednisolone, has been the new therapeutic drug of choice.[35, 36] Deflazacort reportedly has more bone-sparing and carbohydrate-sparing properties with less weight-gain effects and improves strength and function. Because of the limited side effects and the beneficial properties of muscle sparing and delayed scoliosis progression, deflazacort is being used despite patients' permanent wheelchair status.

Clinical investigations are exploring the possibility of limited courses of steroid bursts (which have shown lasting benefits <18 months) and other immunosuppressive drugs, such as azathioprine and cyclosporine. Although the glucocorticoid drugs delay the cytotoxic damage of MD to the necrosing muscle cells, these drugs cannot and do not make, or stimulate the synthesis of, the dystrophin and DAG proteins that are deficient, which is the root cause of the disease.

Other agents

Another potential therapy is creatine monohydrate supplementation. Creatine is a natural compound occurring in meats and is also endogenously produced by the liver and kidneys. Creatine supplementation has been shown to enhance athletic performance of healthy individuals in up to 10%.[37, 38] Studies looking at creatine use in neuromuscular disorders have been popularized since late 1997, with the publication of the first human study by Tarnopolksy et al showing an increase in high-intensity power output with use.[39] Several other human clinical trials of creatine supplementation have been conducted since that time with similar results.[40, 41, 42]

A meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials using creatine monohydrate supplementation in neuromuscular disorders versus placebo was performed.[43] It found that short- and intermediate-term treatment with 0.03-0.04 g/kg/d of creatine monohydrate supplementation resulted in modest but significant increase in mean maximum voluntary contraction of 9.2 N higher than placebo. There is also an increase in fat free muscle mass. Globally, 44% of patients felt better in the creatine treated group compared with 10% in the placebo group.

These effects were reliably seen in patients with dystrophinopathies and type II myotonic myopathy.[43] No consistent changes were noted in patients with type I myotonic dystrophy, and none were noted in those with metabolic myopathies. Although there were no serious side effects noted in most patients, high-dose creatine treatment can impair ADL and increase muscle pain in glycogen storage disease type V (McArdle disease).

PTC124 (PTC Therapeutics, Inc, South Plainfield, NJ) is an oxadiazole compound that, when taken orally, can override nonsense stop translation signals induced by the dystrophin gene mutation; the protein produced is thus the full-length protein.[44, 45] PTC124 is currently in phase II clinical trials for patients with Duchenne MD and cystic fibrosis.

An open-label, phase 2, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety and efficacy of intravenously administered AVI-4658 phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PMO) in patients with Duchenne MD.[46] Using data from 19 ambulant patients aged 5-15 years with amenable deletions in Duchenne MD, the investigators noted that AVI-4658 was well tolerated with no serious drug-related adverse events; AVI-4658 induced exon 51 skipping in all cohorts and new dystrophin protein expression in a significant dose-dependent, but variable, manner in boys (dose 2 mg/kg) onwards.

Although the early clinical results of AVI-4658 are biochemically promising for dystrophin production without significant adverse effects, functional ambulatory changes have not been as consistently correlated. These results suggest that AVI-4658 may be a potential disease-modifying drug for Duchenne MD.[46]

Gene therapy

Another novel method of treatment under intense investigation is somatic gene therapy, wherein healthy immature myoblasts are introduced into the diseased muscles, which then fuse and stimulate production of enough dystrophin to reverse the degeneration that occurs in the affected muscles.[47]

However, although somatic gene therapy has been achieved successfully in the X-linked muscular dystrophic mouse (murine MDX) model with the fusion of the donor and host muscle cells, which expressed some dystrophin, the benefit may not translate into human males.[47] The mice cannot demonstrate muscle strength, and the laboratory-raised mice were not able to mount a rejection response that may occur in humans. Other investigations have been conducted on the canine MDX model, which more closely approximates the human condition.[48, 49]

Human trials of gene therapy began in 1990. The first was an uncontrolled trial of 8 patients who were injected with myoblasts from family donors.[50] Strength testing and staining for dystrophin was performed after several months. Early results demonstrated no improvement in patients' muscle strength or dystrophin staining. Later studies showed an increase in the expression of dystrophin proteins. However, the clinical results remain unchanged. These preliminary results, although disappointing, do not dampen the promise of gene therapy. Most supporters believe that these failures were merely the result of a lack of expertise, as with once-novel techniques such as organ transplantation.

Other molecular approaches to therapy include recombinant versions of the dystrophin gene using viral or nonviral vectors and antisense oligonucleotides.[51, 52] In the viral vector therapeutic approach, adenosine-associated virus leads the way.[53] In nonviral gene therapy, plasmid-mediated gene delivery, antisense-mediated exon skipping, and oligonucleotide-mediated gene editing has moved from successful trials in the lab to the clinic. In approximately 10-20% of the preclinical cases[52] , it is possible to chemically persuade the translational machinery to read through a premature stop codon, as noted with the dystrophin mutation, and lead to production of a more functional full-length protein.

In spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), the molecular genetic basis is the loss of function of the survival motor neuron gene SMN1. The SMN2 gene, a near identical copy, has been detected as a possible target for therapy. Drugs such as valproic acid,[54] phenylbutyrate, sodium butyrate, M344 (a benzamide and histone deacetylase [HDAC] inhibitor), and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) can stimulate SMN2 and elevate levels of the protein. In phase II clinical trials and individual experimental curative approaches, patients show promising results. Phase III control drug trials are pending.

Previous
Next

Surgical Therapy

The orthopedic problems in children with MD are as follows:

  • Progressive weakness with loss of ambulatory status
  • Soft-tissue contractures
  • Spinal deformities

The role of the orthopedic surgeon is to correct the deformities and to help maintain the dystrophic child's ambulatory status for as long as possible, usually 1 to 3.5 years.[55, 56] The modalities available to obtain these goals have been well outlined by Drennan[57]  and include the following:

  • Functional testing
  • Physical therapy
  • Use of orthoses
  • Fracture management
  • Soft-tissue, bone, and spinal surgeries
  • Use of a wheelchair when indicated
  • Genetic and/or psychological testing

Nonoperative measures

Functional testing, as its name implies, refers to frequent evaluation of the involved muscle's range of motion and strength. This modality provides therapists with goals for patients' individualized therapy programs. Regular therapy sessions are necessary because the therapist also works with patients for gait training and transfer techniques. The use of all adaptive equipment is considered necessary by the orthopedist to maintain the patient's ambulatory status.

Drennan also recommends that a home program be taught to dystrophic patients, with stretching exercises for the lower extremities performed twice a day on a firm surface to minimize contractures.[57] Occasionally, serial casting may be necessary to manage significant flexion contractures at the knee or equinus contracture at the ankle. The goal for patients with MD is continued mobility despite the use of a cast to prevent rapid loss of strength and bone mineral density. Even with initial loss of muscle strength for weightbearing, flexible soft-tissue and rigid ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) or ischial supportive knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) can help the patient maintain standing balance for additional months to years.

Operative approaches to contractures and deformities

Significant upper-extremity contractures rarely occur in patients with MD. Occasionally, tightness of the long flexors may become problematic with hand function in operating an automatic wheelchair, but historically this has been treated with a nighttime orthosis.

In patients with MD, lower-extremity contractures start with equinus deformities. Initially, the contractures are supple and can occur in children as young as 6 years. Patients may be treated with various types of procedures to lengthen the tendo Achillis, including Vulpius tendon lengthening (which avoids overlengthening the already weakened muscle), percutaneous Hoke-Miller triple cut (which limits the incision and, thus, the postoperative immobilization), Warren-White lengthening, or standard z-lengthening.

Occasionally, when an associated varus deformity is present as a result of overpull of the unaffected tibialis posterior muscle, a posterior tibial tendon transfer through the interosseous membrane or a split-posterior tibial tendon transfer may also be indicated. In cases of severe contractures at the foot and ankle, posterior tibial lengthening or tenotomy may be necessary to achieve a plantigrade position.

Hip and knee contractures develop later in MD. Once patients become wheelchair-bound, hip and knee flexion contractures are more rapidly progressive. The abduction contracture was initially thought to be useful in obtaining stability with a wider base gait, but it also makes it difficult for patients to fit in standard wheelchairs or to be comfortable in bed. Various tenotomies are available, including the Yount (resection of the iliotibial band [ITB] distally at the knee),[58] modified Souter-Strathclyde (resection of the ITB proximally), and complete resection of the ITB from the hip to the knee.

Transfer of the iliopsoas has also been tried with limited success; this is no longer a procedure of choice in patients with MDs. Posterior capsulotomy of the knee can allow for maintenance of flexible extremities for bracing, although this is not routinely performed. KAFOs with locked knees may extend the ambulatory status of weakened patients by 1 to 3 years.[56, 16] The locked knees, however, are not well tolerated, as they cause children to feel as if they are going to fall. This is a worse condition than buckling because of weakness at the quadriceps. Postoperatively, all patients are given some type of orthosis.

The surgical approaches to contractures in dystrophic patients, especially those with Duchenne MD, can be summarized into the following three broad categories:

  • Ambulatory
  • Rehabilitative
  • Palliative

Within the ambulatory group, the approach can be aggressive, so that all contractures are addressed at the start, before patients lose ambulatory status or within the first month of their losing ambulatory status. The rehabilitative approach indicates that surgery is used only to correct deformities that may limit physical therapy and orthosis wear. The palliative approach, as its name implies, is used to treat only problems of immediate concern for the patient's comfort, such as difficulty with shoe wearing, ulcerations, and problematic positioning in wheelchairs. Early aggressive surgical releases can prolong the patient's ambulatory status as long as 3.5 years.[55, 56]

Scoliosis is another common problem in patients with muscular dystrophy. It is more common in Duchenne MD than in other forms, with an incidence of 75-90%.[55, 56, 22] The scoliosis develops early and tends to be rapidly progressive, especially when patients become nonambulatory. The curve is usually thoracolumbar or lumbar with associated pelvic obliquity, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar hyperlordosis. The abnormal sagittal alignment may cause problems with seating systems, even modified systems, and the rapid progression of the scoliosis requires frequent wheelchair adjustments. Braces are not effective in progressive paralytic or neuromuscular curves, and surgery is often indicated.[59]

Advances in pulmonary care and cardiac drugs may negate the absolute need for scoliosis surgery in Duchenne MD, allowing patients to live into adulthood. A 10-year retrospective study showed that 44 of 123 nonambulatory patients aged 17 or older were managed satisfactorily without surgery.[26] Although this is only a single report, it gives much hope for many dystrophic patients with scoliosis.

The technique of choice for scoliosis when the curve measures 20° or more in patients who are nonambulatory is a posterior spinal fusion from T2 to the sacrum. The indication for earlier operative stabilization of the spine in these patients is due to the rapidly deteriorating cardiopulmonary function.[29] The FVC is at its maximum in children younger than 10 years. After this point, the FVC rapidly declines, and anesthetic complications rise dramatically in those patients with an FVC less than 30%.

Spinal fusion is extended to the pelvis, with complete obliteration of the facet joints to ensure arthrodesis. The instrumentation used has often consisted of a Luque rod with segmental sublaminar wires to the L5 level, with bone arthrodesis extending into the sacrum. Currently, however, this method is being employed less frequently; most spine surgeons are now using pedicle screws with extension of the instrumentation to the pelvis.[60, 61]

Occasionally, instrumentation and fusion are extended only to L5 because of the diffuse osteopenia in the sacrum, early surgery and low magnitude curves, or because of the possible complications of instrument failure. The literature has cited a high incidence of failure and revision with fusion short of the sacrum; therefore, spinal fusions in patients with MD are extended to the pelvis, especially if done after the curve magnitude is over 30º.[62, 63, 64]

Preoperative considerations

Before any operative is undertaken, the patient's overall status of any patient must be considered; this is of particular importance in patients with muscle weakness, such as those with MD. For example, posterior spinal fusion to the pelvis straightens the scoliosis and allows better upright sitting balance. However, in patients with low vital capacity (<30%), the risks of pulmonary complications are much higher, and these risks may tip the scale in favor of not operating on the scoliosis.

Other examples include equinus contractures in patients who are very weak; tendon lengthening itself is necessarily a weakening procedure on the involved muscle. If the patient has to maintain a rigid equinus foot position for stability of gait and the tendon is lengthened by surgery, the patient will not be able to ambulate.

Preoperatively, patients should undergo a detailed cardiac assessment, a pulmonary evaluation with pulmonary function tests (including arterial blood gas analysis), and a hematologic workup. Because of potential cardiomyopathy, intraoperative monitoring is an essential component of administering anesthetics.

Intraoperative blood loss is usually substantial in patients with MD as a result of their muscle dysfunction, which causes ineffective vessel constriction. Another potential complication of anesthesia is malignant hyperthermia, which is more common in patients with muscle diseases than in patients with other disease entities; this risk is diminished with the use of nitrous oxide, intravenous narcotics, sedatives, and nondepolarizing muscle relaxants.

After scoliosis surgery, patients may need additional pulmonary support and an extended stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Preoperative tracheostomy is usually not any more effective in early mobilization of dystrophic patients; if necessary, this procedure is performed only after the patient's condition has been stabilized and after a mold has been obtained for a hard brace with chest and abdominal cutouts.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Twee T Do, MD Clinical Faculty, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine; Attending Surgeon, Advanced Orthopedics

Twee T Do, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Academy of Pediatrics, Colorado Medical Society, Scoliosis Research Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

George H Thompson, MD Director of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, and MetroHealth Medical Center; Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

George H Thompson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Orthopaedic Association, Scoliosis Research Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Received none from OrthoPediatrics for consulting; Received salary from Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics for management position; Received none from SpineForm for consulting; Received none from SICOT for board membership.

Chief Editor

Jeffrey D Thomson, MD Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut School of Medicine; Director of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Associate Director of Clinical Affairs for the Department of Surgical Subspecialties, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center; President, Connecticut Children's Specialty Group

Jeffrey D Thomson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Charles T Mehlman, DO, MPH Professor of Pediatrics and Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Director, Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Charles T Mehlman, DO, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Fracture Association, Scoliosis Research Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, American Osteopathic Association, Arthroscopy Association of North America, North American Spine Society, Ohio State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Conte G, Gioja L. Scrofola del sistema muscolare. Annali Clinici dell'Ospedale degli Incurabili di Napoli. 1836. 2:66-79.

  2. Meryon E. On granular and fatty degeneration of the voluntary muscles. Medico-Chirurgical Trans. 1852. 35:73-4.

  3. Duchenne GBA. Recherches sur la paralysie musculaire pseudo-hypertrophique ou paralysie myo-sclerosique. Arch Gen Med. 1868. 11:5-25.

  4. Yanagisawa A, Bouchet C, Quijano-Roy S, Vuillaumier-Barrot S, Clarke N, Odent S, et al. POMT2 intragenic deletions and splicing abnormalities causing congenital muscular dystrophy with mental retardation. Eur J Med Genet. 2008 Dec 27. [Medline].

  5. Hoffman EP, Brown RH, Kunkel LM. Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell. 1987 Dec 24. 51(6):919-28. [Medline].

  6. Waite A, Tinsley CL, Locke M, Blake DJ. The neurobiology of the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex. Ann Med. 2009 Jan 26. 1-16. [Medline].

  7. Banks GB, Chamberlain JS, Froehner SC. Truncated dystrophins can influence neuromuscular synapse structure. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2009 Jan 8. [Medline].

  8. Bushby K. Genetics and the muscular dystrophies. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000 Nov. 42(11):780-4. [Medline].

  9. González-Herrera L, Gamas-Trujillo PA, García-Escalante MG, Castillo-Zapata I, Pinto-Escalante D. [Identifying deletions in the dystrophin gene and detecting carriers in families with Duchenne's/Becker's muscular dystrophy]. Rev Neurol. 2009 Jan 16-31. 48(2):66-70. [Medline].

  10. Dickey RP, Ziter FA, Smith RA. Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. J Pediatr. 1984 Apr. 104(4):555-9. [Medline].

  11. Miller RG, Layzer RB, Mellenthin MA, et al. Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy with autosomal dominant transmission. Neurology. 1985 Aug. 35(8):1230-3. [Medline].

  12. Dobrowski JM, Zajtchuk JT, LaPiana FG, Hensley SD Jr. Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy: clinical and histopathologic correlations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986 Sep. 95(2):131-42. [Medline].

  13. Dubowitz V. Muscle Disorders in Childhood. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders. 1995: 34-132.

  14. Emery AE. Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. In: Oxford Monographs on Medical Genetics Series #24. 2nd ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press;. 1993.

  15. Emery AE. Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular diseases--a world survey. Neuromuscul Disord. 1991. 1(1):19-29. [Medline].

  16. Shapiro F, Specht L. The diagnosis and orthopaedic treatment of inherited muscular diseases of childhood. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Mar. 75(3):439-54. [Medline].

  17. Pratt MF, Meyers PK. Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy: recent ultrastructural evidence for mitochondrial abnormalities. Laryngoscope. 1986 Apr. 96(4):368-73. [Medline].

  18. Donders J, Taneja C. Neurobehavioral Characteristics of Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Child Neuropsychol. 2009 Jan 22. 1-10. [Medline].

  19. Prosser EJ, Murphy EG, Thompson MW. Intelligence and the gene for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Arch Dis Child. 1969 Apr. 44(234):221-30. [Medline].

  20. Leibowitz D, Dubowitz V. Intellect and behaviour in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1981 Oct. 23(5):577-90. [Medline].

  21. Pane M, Lombardo ME, Alfieri P, D'Amico A, Bianco F, Vasco G, et al. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Cognitive Function in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Phenotype-Genotype Correlation. J Pediatr. 2012 May 4. [Medline].

  22. Thompson GH, Berenson FR. Other neuromuscular disorders. In: Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL, Winter RB, eds. Lovell and Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;. 2000: 540-51.

  23. Sussman MD. Advantage of early spinal stabilization and fusion in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984 Sep. 4(5):532-7. [Medline].

  24. Weimann RL, Gibson DA, Moseley CF. Surgical stabilization of the spine in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Spine. 1983 Oct. 8(7):776-80. [Medline].

  25. Almenrader N, Patel D. Spinal fusion surgery in children with non-idiopathic scoliosis: is there a need for routine postoperative ventilation?. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Dec. 97(6):851-7. [Medline].

  26. Kinali M, Messina S, Mercuri E, et al. Management of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a large 10-year retrospective study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jun. 48(6):513-8. [Medline].

  27. Birnkrant DJ. New challenges in the management of prolonged survivors of pediatric neuromuscular diseases: a pulmonologist's perspective. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Dec. 41(12):1113-7. [Full Text].

  28. Miller RG, Chalmers AC, Dao H, et al. The effect of spine fusion on respiratory function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology. 1991 Jan. 41(1):38-40. [Medline].

  29. Miller F, Moseley CF, Koreska J, Levison H. Pulmonary function and scoliosis in Duchenne dystrophy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988 Mar-Apr. 8(2):133-7. [Medline].

  30. Thrush PT, Allen HD, Viollet L, Mendell JR. Re-examination of the electrocardiogram in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and correlation with its dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jan 15. 103(2):262-5. [Medline].

  31. Chamberlain JS, Gibbs RA, Ranier JE. Deletion screening of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus via multiplex DNA amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Dec 9. 16(23):11141-56. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  32. Miyazaki D, Yoshida K, Fukushima K, Nakamura A, Suzuki K, Sato T, et al. Characterization of deletion breakpoints in patients with dystrophinopathy carrying a deletion of exons 45-55 of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) gene. J Hum Genet. 2009 Jan 9. [Medline].

  33. Drachman DB, Toyka KV, Myer E. Prednisone in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Lancet. 1974 Dec 14. 2(7894):1409-12. [Medline].

  34. Mendell JR, Moxley RT, Griggs RC, et al. Randomized, double-blind six-month trial of prednisone in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jun 15. 320(24):1592-7. [Medline].

  35. McAdam LC, Mayo AL, Alman BA, Biggar WD. The Canadian experience with long-term deflazacort treatment in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Acta Myol. 2012 May. 31 (1):16-20. [Medline].

  36. Lebel DE, Corston JA, McAdam LC, Biggar WD, Alman BA. Glucocorticoid treatment for the prevention of scoliosis in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 19. 95 (12):1057-61. [Medline].

  37. Casey A, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Howell S, Hultman E, Greenhaff PL. Creatine ingestion favorably affects performance and muscle metabolism during maximal exercise in humans. Am J Physiol. 1996 Jul. 271(1 Pt 1):E31-7. [Medline].

  38. Tarnopolsky MA, MacLennan DP. Creatine monohydrate supplementation enhances high-intensity exercise performance in males and females. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2000 Dec. 10(4):452-63. [Medline].

  39. Tarnopolsky MA, Roy BD, MacDonald JR. A randomized, controlled trial of creatine monohydrate in patients with mitochondrial cytopathies. Muscle Nerve. 1997 Dec. 20(12):1502-9. [Medline].

  40. Chung YL, Alexanderson H, Pipitone N, Morrison C, Dastmalchi M, Ståhl-Hallengren C, et al. Creatine supplements in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies who are clinically weak after conventional pharmacologic treatment: Six-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 May 15. 57(4):694-702. [Medline].

  41. Klopstock T, Querner V, Schmidt F, Gekeler F, Walter M, Hartard M, et al. A placebo-controlled crossover trial of creatine in mitochondrial diseases. Neurology. 2000 Dec 12. 55(11):1748-51. [Medline].

  42. Louis M, Lebacq J, Poortmans JR, Belpaire-Dethiou MC, Devogelaer JP, Van Hecke P, et al. Beneficial effects of creatine supplementation in dystrophic patients. Muscle Nerve. 2003 May. 27(5):604-10. [Medline].

  43. Kley RA, Tarnopolsky MA, Vorgerd M. Creatine for treating muscle disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16. 2:CD004760. [Medline].

  44. Hamed SA. Drug evaluation: PTC-124--a potential treatment of cystic fibrosis and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. IDrugs. 2006 Nov. 9(11):783-9. [Medline].

  45. PTC Therapeutics, Inc. PTC124 FAQs: frequently asked questions about PTC124. Available at: http://www.ptcbio.com/2.4_faqs.aspx. Accessed: March 19, 2007. [Full Text].

  46. Cirak S, Arechavala-Gomeza V, Guglieri M, et al. Exon skipping and dystrophin restoration in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy after systemic phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer treatment: an open-label, phase 2, dose-escalation study. Lancet. 2011 Aug 13. 378(9791):595-605. [Medline].

  47. Ragot T, Vincent N, Chafey P, et al. Efficient adenovirus-mediated transfer of a human minidystrophin gene to skeletal muscle of mdx mice. Nature. 1993 Feb 18. 361(6413):647-50. [Medline].

  48. Wang Z, Allen JM, Riddell SR. Immunity to adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer in a random-bred canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Hum Gene Ther. 2007 Jan. 18(1):18-26. [Medline].

  49. Howell J, Lochmuller H, O'Hara A. High level dystrophin expression with adenovirus-mediated dystrophin minigene transfer to skeletal muscle of dystrophic dogs: prolongation of expression with immunosuppresion. Hum Gene Ther. 1998 Mar 20. 9(5):629-34. [Medline].

  50. Griggs RC, Karparti G, eds. Myoblast Transfer Therapy (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers;. 1990.

  51. Rando TA. Non-viral gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Progress and challenges. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Feb. 1772(2):263-71. [Medline].

  52. Wells DJ. Therapeutic restoration of dystrophin expression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2006. 27(5-7):387-98. [Medline].

  53. Judge LM, Chamberlain JS. Gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: AAV leads the way. Acta Myol. 2005 Dec. 24(3):184-93. [Medline].

  54. Gurpur PB, Liu J, Burkin DJ, Kaufman SJ. Valproic Acid Activates the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway in Muscle and Ameliorates Pathology in a Mouse Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Am J Pathol. 2009 Jan 29. [Medline].

  55. Brooke MH, Fenichel GM, Griggs RC, et al. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: patterns of clinical progression and effects of supportive therapy. Neurology. 1989 Apr. 39(4):475-81. [Medline].

  56. Heckmatt JZ, Dubowitz V, Hyde SA, et al. Prolongation of walking in Duchenne muscular dystrophy with lightweight orthoses: review of 57 cases. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1985 Apr. 27(2):149-54. [Medline].

  57. Drennan J. Neuromuscular disorders. In: Lowell WW, Morrissy RT, Winter RB, eds. Lovell and Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa:. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 1990:381.

  58. Yount CC. The role of tensor fascia femoris in certain deformities of the lower extremities. J Bone Joint Surg. 1926. 8:171-93.

  59. Suk KS, Lee BH, Lee HM, Moon SH, Choi YC, Shin DE, et al. Functional outcomes in Duchenne muscular dystrophy scoliosis: comparison of the differences between surgical and nonsurgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Mar 5. 96 (5):409-15. [Medline].

  60. Brooks JT, Sponseller PD. What's New in the Management of Neuromuscular Scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Apr 13. [Medline].

  61. Jain A, Hassanzadeh H, Strike SA, Menga EN, Sponseller PD, Kebaish KM. Pelvic Fixation in Adult and Pediatric Spine Surgery: Historical Perspective, Indications, and Techniques: AAOS Exhibit Selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 16. 97 (18):1521-8. [Medline].

  62. Gaine WJ, Lim J, Stephenson W. Progression of scoliosis after spinal fusion in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 May. 86(4):550-5. [Medline].

  63. Sengupta DK, Mehdian SH, McConnel JR. Pelvic or lumbar fixation for the surgical management of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Spine. 2002 Sep 15. 27(18):2072-9. [Medline].

  64. Mubarak SJ, Morin WD, Leach J. Spinal fusion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy-fixation and fusion to the sacropelvis?. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993 Nov-Dec. 13(6):752-7. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Schematic of the sarcomere with labeled molecular components that are known to cause limb-girdle muscular dystrophy or myofibrillar myopathy. Mutations in actin and nebulin cause the congenital myopathy nemaline rod myopathy, and the mutations in myosin cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Image courtesy of Dr F. Schoeni-Affoher, University of Friberg, Switzerland.
Gomori trichrome–stained section in patient with myofibrillar myopathy. Note the abnormal accumulations of blue-red material in several muscle fibers.
Left: The photomicrograph is a muscle biopsy with normal emerin immunostaining. Right: The micrograph is from a patient with X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Note the absence of nuclear staining as well as the hypertrophied and atrophied muscle fibers.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.