eMedicine Specialties > Orthopedic Surgery > Pediatrics
Genu Valgum, Pediatrics: Follow-up
Updated: Jul 19, 2007
Outcome and Prognosis
Provided the aforementioned criteria are met (ie, sufficient growth remaining, careful analysis and preoperative planning, proper staple selection and insertion, periodic follow-up), the results of guided growth are uniformly gratifying. The parents and the surgeon must be patient, however, because growth is a slow process. The immediate satisfaction (carpentry) of osteotomies is supplanted by delayed gratification (gardening). The success of this technique is predicated on skillful harnessing of the inherent power of the growth plate. Even a sick physis can respond, given enough time; this is why the procedure works even in patients with skeletal dysplasias and vitamin D–resistant rickets.
Patient and family satisfaction are excellent; this is not surprising in light of the fact that, in comparison to osteotomy, guided growth is minimally invasive, relatively painless, cost effective, and less risky. Minimal down time is associated with the procedure, and educational and recreational activities are only temporarily interrupted. Consequently, previous arbitrary guidelines pertaining to minimum age and diagnoses have been abandoned. In this author's opinion, guided growth with the 8-plate has become the treatment of choice for most angular deformities of the knee. Osteotomy can still be performed if guided growth is unsuccessful (or vice versa).
Future and Controversies
Since stapling was introduced in the 1950s, its popularity has waxed and waned. Some of the failures and criticisms were a direct result of poor technique (wrong staples, periosteal elevation). By the 1970s, this technique had been abandoned by many; even recent review articles and book chapters pertaining to correction of angular deformities or limb length inequality dismiss stapling as a risky, unpredictable, or outmoded technique. The problem is that osteotomies, whether secured by cast or internal or external fixation, are not without occasional serious consequences.
Percutaneous epiphysiodesis, recently popularized, offers the theoretical advantages of a smaller scar and no hardware to retrieve. However, it is not reversible; therefore, the timing must be perfect to avoid overcorrection. This technique, therefore, is limited to use in adolescent patients, in whom the surgeon strives to achieve a neutral mechanical axis at maturity. Determination of bone age is known to be inexact, with an error of ± 1 year. This variation represents a significant source of error in determining the optimal age for permanent epiphysiodesis.
Despite many successes with staples, and in response to its drawbacks of hardware rigidity, migration, and breakage, the author has devised a preferable method for guided growth. This involves the use of a nonlocking 2-hole titanium 8-plate (Orthofix; McKinney, Tex). Applying a single plate per physis, the directional control afforded allows the correction of frontal-, sagittal-, or oblique-plane deformities. This is performed in an outpatient setting, allowing safe and gradual correction of complex, multilevel, and bilateral deformities by harnessing the power of the growth plate. The same device may be used on both large (170 kg) and small (13 kg) patients with diverse pathology. Osteotomy may be reserved for mature patients or those who require additional length or rotational correction.
More on Genu Valgum, Pediatrics |
| Overview: Genu Valgum, Pediatrics |
| Workup: Genu Valgum, Pediatrics |
| Treatment: Genu Valgum, Pediatrics |
Follow-up: Genu Valgum, Pediatrics |
| Multimedia: Genu Valgum, Pediatrics |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Blair VP 3rd, Walker SJ, Sheridan JJ, Schoenecker PL. Epiphysiodesis: a problem of timing. J Pediatr Orthop. Aug 1982;2(3):281-4. [Medline].
Blount WP, Clarke GR. The classic. Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling. A preliminary report. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, July, 1949. Clin Orthop. 1971;77:4-17. [Medline].
Boakes JL, Stevens PM, Moseley RF. Treatment of genu valgus deformity in congenital absence of the fibula. J Pediatr Orthop. Nov-Dec 1991;11(6):721-4. [Medline].
Bowen JR, Johnson WJ. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis. Clin Orthop. Nov 1984;(190):170-3. [Medline].
Bylski-Austrow DI, Wall EJ, Rupert MP, et al. Growth plate forces in the adolescent human knee: a radiographic and mechanicalstudy of epiphyseal staples. J Pediatr Orthop. Nov-Dec 2001;21(6):817-23. [Medline].
Gabriel KR, Crawford AH, Roy DR, et al. Percutaneous epiphyseodesis. J Pediatr Orthop. May-Jun 1994;14(3):358-62. [Medline].
Goff CW. Histologic arrangements from biopsies of epiphyseal plates of children before and after stapling. Correlated with roentgenographic studies. Am J Orthop. May 1967;9(5):87-9. [Medline].
Healy WL, Anglen JO, Wasilewski SA, Krackow KA. Distal femoral varus osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 1988;70(1):102-9. [Medline].
Horton GA, Olney BW. Epiphysiodesis of the lower extremity: results of the percutaneous technique. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 1996;16(2):180-2. [Medline].
Kramer A, Stevens PM. Anterior femoral stapling. J Pediatr Orthop. Nov-Dec 2001;21(6):804-7. [Medline].
Liotta FJ, Ambrose TA 2nd, Eilert RE. Fluoroscopic technique versus Phemister technique for epiphysiodesis. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 1992;12(2):248-51. [Medline].
Little DG, Nigo L, Aiona MD. Deficiencies of current methods for the timing of epiphysiodesis. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 1996;16(2):173-9. [Medline].
Métaizeau JP, Wong-Chung J, Bertrand H, Pasquier P. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS). J Pediatr Orthop. May-Jun 1998;18(3):363-9. [Medline].
Mielke CH, Stevens PM. Hemiepiphyseal stapling for knee deformities in children younger than 10 years: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 1996;16(4):423-9. [Medline].
Phemister D. Operative arrestment of longitudinal growth of bones in the treatment of bones in the treatment of deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1933;15:1-15.
Salenius P, Vankka E. The development of the tibiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1975;57(2):259-61. [Medline].
Stevens PM, Arms D. Postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 2000;20(2):166-72. [Medline].
Stevens PM, Maguire M, Dales MD, Robins AJ. Physeal stapling for idiopathic genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1999;19(5):645-9. [Medline].
Stevens PM, MacWilliams B, Mohr RA. Gait analysis of stapling for genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 2004;24(1):70-4. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
physiologic genu valgum, pathologic genu valgum, adolescent idiopathic genu valgum, knock-knee deformity, osteotomy, hemiphyseal stapling, vitamin D resistant rickets, vitamin D-resistant rickets, guided growth, 8-plate
Follow-up: Genu Valgum, Pediatrics