Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Infantile Scoliosis

  • Author: Palaniappan Lakshmanan, MBBS, MS, AFRCS, FRCS(Tr&Orth); Chief Editor: Dennis P Grogan, MD  more...
 
Updated: Nov 02, 2015
 

Background

The term scoliosis is derived from the Greek word skolios ("twisted") and refers to a sideward (right or left) curve in the spine. Scoliosis is not a simple curve to one side but, in fact, is a more complex, 3-dimensional deformity that often develops in childhood. See images below.

Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an increase in the space available for lung (SAL) after correction of scoliosis by VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib).
Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an increase in the space available for lung (SAL) after correction of scoliosis by VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib).

Recent studies

In a retrospective study of the treatment of patients with idiopathic infantile scoliosis, 31 consecutive patients (average age, 25 mo) with a primary diagnosis of idiopathic infantile scoliosis were reviewed. Treatment modalities included bracing, serial body casting, and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR). Of the 31 patients, 17 were treated with a brace, 9 of whom had curve progression and subsequently received other treatments. Of the 8 patients who responded to brace treatment, overall improvement was 51.2%. Patients who received body casts had a mean preoperative Cobb angle of 50.4º and had an average correction of 59.0%. Patients who were treated with VEPTR had a mean preoperative Cobb angle of 90º and had an average correction of 33.8%. The study results suggest that body casting is useful in cases of smaller, flexible spinal curves, and VEPTR is a viable alternative for larger curves.[1] Another study concluded that brace treatment can be successful.[2]

Another retrospective case series, of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with presumed infantile idiopathic scoliosis, reviewed the medical records of 54 patients. MRI revealed a neural axis abnormality in 7 (13%) of 54 patients who underwent MRI. Of these 7 patients, 5 (71.4%) required neurosurgical intervention. Tethered cord requiring surgical release was identified in 3 patients, Chiari malformation requiring surgical decompression was found in 2 patients, and a small nonoperative syrinx was found in 2 patients. The authors concluded that on the basis of these findings, close observation may be a reasonable alternative to an immediate screening MRI in patients presenting with presumed infantile idiopathic scoliosis and a curve greater than 20º.[3]

A recent study reviewed the frequency of asymmetric lung perfusion and ventilation in children with congenital or infantile thoracic scoliosis before surgical treatment and the relationship between Cobb angle and asymmetry of lung function. The authors found that asymmetric ventilation and perfusion between the right and left lungs occurred in more than half of the children with severe congenital and infantile thoracic scoliosis, but the severity of lung function asymmetry did not relate to Cobb angle measurements. Asymmetry in lung function was influenced by deformity of the chest wall in multiple dimensions and could not be ascertained by chest radiographs alone.[4]

Next

History of the Procedure

Probably the oldest mention of scoliosis is in ancient Hindu mythology (3500 to 1800 BC), in which Krishna corrects the hunchback of one of his followers. Hippocrates (460 to 377 BC) wrote about scoliosis and devices to correct it. The term infantile scoliosis was first used by Harrenstein in 1930 and by James in 1951 in describing the clinical entity idiopathic infantile scoliosis.[5, 6, 7]

Previous
Next

Problem

The term infantile scoliosis is used specifically to describe scoliosis that occurs in children younger than 3 years. Other terms for scoliosis also depend on the age of onset, such as juvenile scoliosis, which occurs in children aged 4-9 years, and adolescent scoliosis, which occurs in those aged 10-18 years. These terms, however, are now being replaced by the broader terms early-onset scoliosis and late-onset scoliosis, depending on whether the scoliosis occurs before or after 5 years of age.

In 80% of cases of scoliosis, there is no obvious cause; this is termed idiopathic scoliosis. In the remaining 20% of cases, a definite cause can be found. These cases are divided into 2 types: nonstructural (functional) and structural scoliosis, which could be part of a well-recognized syndrome (syndromic scoliosis), congenital spinal column abnormalities (congenital scoliosis), neurologic disorders, and genetic conditions.

Recent evidence in the literature from 2 major centers in the United Kingdom suggests the association of neural axis anomalies with early-onset idiopathic scoliosis is only 11.1%.

The syndromes that can produce congenital scoliosis are VATER syndrome (vertebral anomalies, anorectal anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistula, and renal anomalies), VACTERL syndrome (vertebral anomalies, anorectal anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal and vascular anomalies, and cardiac and limb defects), Jarcho-Levin syndrome, Klippel-Feil syndrome, Alagille syndrome, Wildervank syndrome, Goldenhar syndrome, Marfan syndrome, and MURCS association (Müllerian, renal, cervicothoracic, and somite abnormalities).

The congenital anomalies of the vertebral spinal column include defects of segmentation (block vertebra, unilateral bar) and defects of formation (hemivertebra — fully segmented, semisegmented, incarcerated and nonsegmented, wedge vertebra). The neurologic deficits in congenital scoliosis may be secondary to the spinal deformity or may be associated with vertebral anomalies (spinal dysraphism — diastematomyelia, myelocele, myelomeningocele, meningocele). A higher incidence of idiopathic scoliosis has been reported in families of children with congenital scoliosis. Spondylocostal dysostosis (Jarcho-Levin syndrome) has a genetic etiology.[8, 9, 10, 11]

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

Infantile scoliosis is a rare condition, accounting for less than 1% of cases of idiopathic scoliosis in North America; in Europe, the rate is 4%.

Sex: Males account for 60% of the cases of early-onset scoliosis; 90% of the cases of early-onset scoliosis resolve spontaneously, but the other 10% of cases progress to a severe and disabling condition. Females constitute 90% of late-onset cases and need close monitoring to intervene at appropriate times.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Although the exact cause of idiopathic infantile scoliosis is not known, hypotheses have been proposed on the basis of epidemiologic evidence[8, 9, 10, 12, 13] :

  • One theory holds that the mechanical factors during intrauterine life are responsible for the higher incidence of plagiocephaly, developmental dysplasia of the hip, and scoliosis on the same side of the body.
  • A second hypothesis suggests multifactorial causes, including predisposing genetic factors that are either facilitated or inhibited by external factors such as defective motor development or collagen disorders, joint laxity, and nursing posture of the infant.
  • Other associations include older mothers from poorer families, breech presentation, and premature and male low-birth-weight babies.
Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Most of the curves in the spine develop during the first year of life, and strong correlation has been found between the nursing posture of the infant and development of the curve. It is less common in the United States than in Europe, where babies are nursed in the supine position. Infants have a natural tendency to turn toward the right side, and because of plasticity of the infant's axial skeleton, this can lead to development of plagiocephaly, bat ear on the right side, and curvature of the spine toward the left side.[12]

Previous
Next

Presentation

Infantile scoliosis usually is detected during the first year of life either by the parents or by the pediatrician during routine examination of the infant. Usually, a single, long, thoracic curve to the left is present; less often, a thoracic and lumbar double curve is noted. A child who is diagnosed with scoliosis requires a thorough clinical and radiologic examination to exclude any congenital, muscular, or neurologic causes.

Previous
Next

Indications

There are 3 management options for infantile scoliosis: observation, orthosis, and operative.[14] The decision when to use each of these is based on the rib-vertebral angle difference (RVAD), established by Mehta in 1972, as seen in the image below.[15] The RVAD is a useful guide in distinguishing between resolving and progressive idiopathic infantile scoliosis.

RVAD (rib-vertebral angle difference) measurement RVAD (rib-vertebral angle difference) measurement at apical vertebra: RVAD = b-a (concave - convex side).

The rib-vertebrae angle is measured by (1) drawing a line perpendicular to the middle of the upper or lower border of the apical vertebrae of the curve and then (2) measuring the angle this line makes with medial extension of another line drawn from the mid point of the head to the mid point of the neck of the rib, just medial to the beginning of the shaft of the rib. The difference between the right and the left side (concave and the convex side) is the RVAD.

The apical vertebra is the vertebra at the curve of the apex. If there are the same number of vertebrae between the superior and the inferior end vertebrae, there will be 2 apical vertebrae.

For scoliosis curves with an RVAD of less than 20°, observation every 4-6 months is sufficient. If the RVAD is more than 20° or if it is not flexible clinically (ie, curve cannot be corrected even slightly with different postures, especially lateral bending), then it is considered to be progressive until proven otherwise.

Normally, there are interobserver and intraobserver variations with these radiographic parameters. Corona et al in 2012 found that even though variations are present in the radiographic parameters of RVAD, Cobb angle, and the space available for lung (SAL), these radiographic parameters are useful tools for planning management options. According to the authors, even though these parameters are not devoid of variability, they are not skewed enough and that the RVAD and the Cobb angle are highly reliable to accurately and reliably suggest the best course of treatment.

Management with orthosis is necessary when the curve is considered to be progressive or if a compensatory curve has developed.[16] Various types of orthosis are available for children younger than 3 years. The most commonly used orthoses are the hinged Risser jacket; the plaster spinal jacket (Cotrel EDF [elongation, derotation, flexion] type) applied under anesthesia; the Milwaukee brace; and the Boston brace. The brace should be used for 23.5 hours a day and should be removed only for exercises and swimming. It needs to be used until skeletal maturity is attained, because curves usually do not progress after skeletal maturity; however, curves may progress in spite of using a brace.[17, 18]

Spinal deformity in scoliosis progresses during periods of peak growth velocity. The first spinal growth peak occurs at 2 years of age, and the second peak occurs during the prepubescent period.

Operation is usually an option only for children in older age groups (ie, around age 10 years), and segmental posterior wiring to 2 L-rods without fusion is preferable until combined posterior and anterior fusion can be done. These procedures, however, have been associated with complications in 50% of patients.

Because of advances in instrumentation, pedicle screw instrumentation can be performed for children with further growth potential.[19] In these patients, a growing rod is used, which is associated with fewer complications than surgical fixation using L-rods. The disadvantage associated with the growing rod is that every 6 months the posterior aspect has to be opened to lengthen the rod, which increases the risk of infection; however, if the curve is severe or increases despite the use of orthosis, a short anterior and posterior fusion is recommended to prevent crankshaft phenomenon.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

The spine is made up of 33 individual vertebrae that form a column. The spine is divided into 5 regions, starting from the top:

  • Cervical - 7 vertebrae
  • Thoracic - 12 vertebrae
  • Lumbar - 5 vertebrae
  • Sacrum - 5 vertebrae
  • Coccyx - 4 vertebrae

The sacrum and coccyx are fused in the adult. The spine provides a protective function for the spinal cord; bears and distributes the weight of the body; provides an area for attachment of ligaments and muscles; and is the site for production of red blood cells. Together, all the vertebrae form a flexible structure providing mobility for the body to bend forward or sideward.

Each vertebra has a cushionlike fibrous structure called a disk, which acts like a shock absorber during movements of the spine. The disk is made up of a soft, jellylike central nucleus pulposus surrounded by a ring of fibrous tissue called an anulus, which is actually a strong ligament between 2 adjacent vertebrae.

Developmentally, the spine of the fetus is C-shaped, with concavity in the front (kyphotic) of the thoracic region; this is called the primary curve. Two secondary curves develop after birth, with concavity occurring anteriorly (lordosis); one of the secondary curves develops in the cervical region as the infant starts to hold up the neck, and the second curve develops in the lumbar region when the child starts to walk. Normally, there are no sideward (scoliosis) curves, so that the spine looks straight when viewed from behind or from the front.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Palaniappan Lakshmanan, MBBS, MS, AFRCS, FRCS(Tr&Orth) Consultant Spinal Surgeon, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sunderland Royal Hospital, UK

Palaniappan Lakshmanan, MBBS, MS, AFRCS, FRCS(Tr&Orth) is a member of the following medical societies: British Orthopaedic Association, AOSpine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Sashin Ahuja, MBBS, FRCS, MSc, MS Consultant Spinal Surgeon, Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Of Wales, Cardiff, UK

Sashin Ahuja, MBBS, FRCS, MSc, MS is a member of the following medical societies: British Association of Spine Surgeons, British Scoliosis Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jeetender Pal Peehal, MBBS, MS, MRCS Knee Research Fellow, Positional MRI Centre, Woodend Hospital, UK

Jeetender Pal Peehal, MBBS, MS, MRCS is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

George H Thompson, MD Director of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, and MetroHealth Medical Center; Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

George H Thompson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Orthopaedic Association, Scoliosis Research Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Received none from OrthoPediatrics for consulting; Received salary from Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics for management position; Received none from SpineForm for consulting; Received none from SICOT for board membership.

Chief Editor

Dennis P Grogan, MD Clinical Professor (Retired), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine; Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children of Tampa

Dennis P Grogan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, Scoliosis Research Society, Irish American Orthopaedic Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Eastern Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Mininder S Kocher, MD, MPH Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School/Harvard School of Public Health; Associate Director, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston

Mininder S Kocher, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Sports Medicine, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, American Association for the History of Medicine, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society

Disclosure: Received consulting fee from Smith & Nephew Endoscopy for consulting; Received consulting fee from EBI Biomet for consulting; Received consulting fee from OrthoPediatrics for consulting; Received stock from Pivot Medical for consulting; Received consulting fee from pediped for consulting; Received royalty from WB Saunders for none; Received stock from Fixes-4-Kids for consulting.

References
  1. Smith JR, Samdani AF, Pahys J, Ranade A, Asghar J, Cahill P, et al. The role of bracing, casting, and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib for the treatment of infantile idiopathic scoliosis: a single-institution experience with 31 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Jul. 11(1):3-8. [Medline].

  2. Weiss HR. Brace treatment in infantile/juvenile patients with progressive scoliosis is worthwhile. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012. 176:383-6. [Medline].

  3. Pahys JM, Samdani AF, Betz RR. Intraspinal anomalies in infantile idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and role of magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 20. 34(12):E434-8. [Medline].

  4. Redding G, Song K, Inscore S, Effmann E, Campbell R. Lung function asymmetry in children with congenital and infantile scoliosis. Spine J. 2008 Jul-Aug. 8(4):639-44. [Medline].

  5. Harrenstein RJ. Die Skoliose bei Sauglingen und ihre Behandlung. Z Orthop Chir. 1930. 52:1-40.

  6. Kumar K. Spinal deformity and axial traction. Spine. 1996 Mar 1. 21(5):653-5. [Medline].

  7. James JI. Two curve patterns in idiopathic structural scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1951. 33-B:399-406. [Medline].

  8. Browne D. Congenital postural scoliosis. Br Med J. 1965 Sep 4. 5461:565-6. [Medline].

  9. Dunn PM. Congenital postural scoliosis. Arch Dis Child. 1973 Aug. 48(8):654. [Medline].

  10. Wynne-Davies R. Familial (idiopathic) scoliosis. A family survey. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968 Feb. 50(1):24-30. [Medline].

  11. Lincoln TL. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Am J Orthop. 2007 Nov. 36(11):586-90. [Medline].

  12. McMaster MJ. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis: can it be prevented?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Nov. 65(5):612-7. [Medline].

  13. Wynne-Davies R. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Causative factors, particularly in the first six months of life. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975 May. 57(2):138-41. [Medline].

  14. Cunin V. Early-onset scoliosis: current treatment. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb. 101 (1 Suppl):S109-18. [Medline].

  15. Mehta MH. The rib-vertebra angle in the early diagnosis between resolving and progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 May. 54(2):230-43. [Medline].

  16. El-Hawary R, Chukwunyerenwa C. Update on evaluation and treatment of scoliosis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014 Dec. 61 (6):1223-41. [Medline].

  17. Mehta MH. Growth as a corrective force in the early treatment of progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005. 87(9):1237-1247. [Medline].

  18. Jarvis J, Garbedian S, Swamy G. Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: the effectiveness of part-time bracing. Spine. 2008 May 1. 33(10):1074-8. [Medline].

  19. Fujimori T, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Newton PO. Safety of pedicle screws and spinal instrumentation for pediatric patients: comparative analysis between 0- and 5-year-old, 5- and 10-year-old, and 10- and 15-year-old patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 1. 39 (7):541-9. [Medline].

  20. Corona J, Sanders JO, Luhmann SJ, Diab M, Vitale MG. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. June 2012. 94 (12):e86. [Medline].

  21. Grivas TB, Burwell GR, Vasiliadis ES, Webb JK. A segmental radiological study of the spine and rib--cage in children with progressive infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2006 Oct 18. 1:17. [Medline].

  22. Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct. 16(10):1587-92. [Medline].

  23. Alotaibi S, Harder J, Spier S. Bronchial obstruction secondary to idiopathic scoliosis in a child: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2008 May 22. 2:171. [Medline].

  24. Akbarnia BA., Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine. 2005. 30(17 Suppl):S46-57. [Medline].

  25. Bridwell KH. Spinal instrumentation in the management of adolescent scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Feb. 64-72. [Medline].

  26. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J. A new technic for segmental spinal osteosynthesis using the posterior approach [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1984. 70(6):489-94. [Medline].

  27. Dwyer AF, Newton NC, Sherwood AA. An anterior approach to scoliosis. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969 Jan-Feb. 62:192-202. [Medline].

  28. Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis: correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. June 1962. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Feb. 84-A(2):316. [Medline].

  29. D'Astous JL, Sanders JO. Casting and traction treatment methods for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Oct. 38(4):477-84, v. [Medline].

  30. Morin C, Kulkarni S. ED plaster-of-Paris jacket for infantile scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2014 Jul. 23 Suppl 4:S412-8. [Medline].

  31. Fletcher ND, McClung A, Rathjen KE, Denning JR, Browne R, Johnston CE 3rd. Serial casting as a delay tactic in the treatment of moderate-to-severe early-onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. Oct-Nov 2012. 32(7):664-671. [Medline].

  32. Motoyama EK, Deeney VF, Fine GF, et al. Effects on lung function of multiple expansion thoracoplasty in children with thoracic insufficiency syndrome: a longitudinal study. Spine. 2006. 31(3):284-90. [Medline].

  33. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, Manna B, Cooper A. Safety and efficacy of Isola instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: two- to 12-year follow-up. Spine. 2004 Sep 15. 29(18):2013-23. [Medline].

  34. Kesling KL, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, Schwender JD, Transfeldt EE, et al. The crankshaft phenomenon after posterior spinal arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis: a review of 54 patients. Spine. 2003 Feb 1. 28(3):267-71. [Medline].

  35. MacEwen GD, Bunnell WP, Sriram K. Acute neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis. A report of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975. 57(3):404-408. [Medline].

  36. Yang JS, Sponseller PD, Thompson GH, et al. Growing Rod Fractures: Risk Factors and Opportunities for Prevention. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15. 36(20):1639-1644. [Medline].

  37. Dhawale AA, Shah SA, Reichard S, Holmes L Jr, Brislin R, Rogers K, et al. Casting for infantile scoliosis: the pitfall of increased peak inspiratory pressure. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan 2013. 33(1):63-67.

  38. Badlani N, Korenblit A, Hammerberg K. Subclavian vein thrombosis after application of body cast. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan 2013. 33(1):e1-3. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
RVAD (rib-vertebral angle difference) measurement at apical vertebra: RVAD = b-a (concave - convex side).
Preoperative scoliogram showing the Cobb angle.
Postoperative scoliogram after correction with the pediatric Isola system.
Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an increase in the space available for lung (SAL) after correction of scoliosis by VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib).
Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an increase in the space available for lung (SAL) after correction of scoliosis by VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib).
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.