Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Infantile Scoliosis Treatment & Management

  • Author: Palaniappan Lakshmanan, MBBS, MS, AFRCS, FRCS(Tr&Orth); Chief Editor: Dennis P Grogan, MD  more...
 
Updated: Nov 02, 2015
 

Surgical Therapy

The on decision whether to operate on a patient with scoliosis depends on many factors, such as the following:

  • Time of onset of the curve (early-onset curves most often require surgery)
  • Degree and site of the curve (a thoracic curve greater than 40° or a lumbar curve greater than 60° in a child aged 10-12 years often requires surgery)
  • Response to conservative treatment with a brace
  • Rate of progression of the curve
  • Acceptability of the cosmetic appearance of the spine to parents and patient

Growing rods without fusion is preferable until combined posterior and anterior fusion can be done. Growing-rod systems (eg, pediatric Isola instrumentation) may be utilized to prevent curve progression; extensions are needed every 6 months to keep pace with the child's growth until the child has adequate trunk length, which is usually between the ages of 11 and 15 years. The child needs a definitive fusion once skeletal maturity is reached; this involves removal of implants and reinstrumentation. If there is evidence of congenital problems or thoracic insufficiency, another type of growing-rod system (eg, the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib [VEPTR]) may first be used.[24, 25, 26, 27, 28]

There is, however, an alternative in very young children in whom the curve progresses: a localizer cast can be applied.[29, 30] A localizer cast can hold the curve and prevent it from progressing further. However, application of localizer casts is a dying art, and it requires proper care and frequent change of the plaster. The localizer cast is applied to the child's trunk under general anaesthesia, with traction to the head and neck via a sling across the mandible and the occiput, and countertraction to the pelvis through another sling. The plaster jacket is applied around the trunk, making sure that there is enough room for the hip movements by stopping just below the level of the iliac wings. Superiorly, the plaster goes around the axillae, leaving the arms and the shoulders free. Serial casting has been recently shown in the literature (2012) to delay the surgery by an average of 39 months in moderate-to-severe early-onset scoliosis.[31]

If needed, in higher thoracic curves, a neck support can be included by extending the plaster. However, this is seldom required, and consideration for surgery should be given in such cases. A window is cut in the front for abdominal expansion. After the first cast, a radiograph is performed to confirm better correction of scoliosis. If satisfactory control is not obtained, casting can be tried 1 more time with proper moulding of the cast only if the treating surgeon is confident that the curve is flexible and that the original cast was not applied properly. If the child feels uncomfortable, especially from the breathing point of view, then the cast should be removed immediately.

The localizer cast needs to be changed every 3 months as the child grows in height, and also as the plaster wears off and the cast loosens. The localizer cast is not tolerated well by older children and, hence, is usually suitable for children under 5 years. Localizer casts can produce pressure sores, especially in children with underlying neurological problems. Foreign objects that find their way into the cast can also cause pressure sores in normal children as well asneurologicallyimpairedchildren.

In a retrospective study of the treatment of patients with idiopathic infantile scoliosis, 31 consecutive patients (average age, 25 mo) with a primary diagnosis of idiopathic infantile scoliosis were reviewed. Treatment modalities included bracing, serial body casting, and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR). Of the 31 patients, 17 were treated with a brace, 9 of whom had curve progression and subsequently received other treatments. Of the 8 patients who responded to brace treatment, overall improvement was 51.2%. Patients who received body casts had a mean preoperative Cobb angle of 50.4º and had an average correction of 59.0%. Patients who were treated with VEPTR had a mean preoperative Cobb angle of 90º and had an average correction of 33.8%. The study results suggest that body casting is useful in cases of smaller, flexible spinal curves, and VEPTR is a viable alternative for larger curves.[1]

Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib

VEPTR is a recent development in the management of severe scoliosis in skeletally immature patients. See images below.

Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an increase in the space available for lung (SAL) after correction of scoliosis by VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib).
Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an increase in the space available for lung (SAL) after correction of scoliosis by VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib).

VEPTR usually is indicated in patients with thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS).[32] Apart from having a spinal deformity, patients may have a deformity of the thoracic cage, such as fused ribs or a hypoplastic thorax. VEPTR helps rebuild the chest wall and correct the spinal deformity, thereby allowing the lungs to expand to achieve normal functioning. There are a number of types of VEPTR devices, such as the following:

  • Cradle-to-cradle — Used in cases of fixed or missing ribs, severe scoliosis, and hypoplastic thorax
  • Cradle-to-lumbar lamina hook — Used when scoliosis involves the lumbar region or when lower ribs are absent
  • Cradle-to-S-hook — Attaches upper ribs to the pelvis and is useful in cases in which lower ribs are absent and lumbar bones are weak

Pediatric Isola spine system

The Isola system, as seen in the image below, consists of screws with washers that are applied posteriorly to anteriorly; horizontal to the frontal plane of the vertebral body; and parallel to the apex of the curvature. Screws may be applied through the staples. Closed-top end screws are placed first. A rod is then contoured along the curvature and is cut to size, so that it extends about 1 cm beyond the end screws. The rod is passed between the 2 end screws, and open-end screws with staples are then placed in the remaining intervening vertebrae, using the contoured rod as a guide for positioning the screws. Caps are placed on the intermediate screws, and the rod is rotated approximately 180° to obtain both a coronal correction and a sagittal correction.[33]

Postoperative scoliogram after correction with the Postoperative scoliogram after correction with the pediatric Isola system.

Further correction can be accomplished by opening the vertebral spaces with a Cobb elevator after tightening 1 of the intermediate screws. At this stage, further correction can also be accomplished by applying distraction between the screw connector bodies. The disk space that is created can now be filled completely with bone graft material. Vertebral screws are compressed centrally, starting from the top of the screw to the bottom, and then to the top of the next screw. The final compression is applied across the apical vertebrae.

Rods are inserted to prevent progression of the curve, and the rods are extended every 6 months to keep pace with the child's growth. Hooks are used as anchors on the upper part of the curve, and pedicle screws are used in the lower part of the curve. At the apex of the curve, the muscle is not dissected, so as to maintain the blood supply to the bone at the apex.

Next

Preoperative Details

See the list below:

  • Improve the general condition of the child by providing appropriate nutrition and making sure the child is capable of undergoing general anaesthesia
  • Treat any infections appropriately
  • Require flu prophylaxis for any child with lung problems
  • Require pneumonia prophylaxis for any child on a ventilator
Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Operative details for VEPTR

See the list below:

  • The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position.
  • Two incisions are made: a large J-shaped incision medial to the border of the scapula and curving anteriorly, and a small incision made distally so as to apply the distal end of the prosthesis to the spine.
  • The prosthesis is applied over the rib cage and beneath the skin and muscle.
  • After the proximal and distal ends are attached, the device is distracted with the aid of expansion pliers.

Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring (somatosensory evoked potentials) has been found to be useful in these cases. If somatosensory evoked potentials change intraoperatively, then decreasing the VEPTR expansion may resolve the issue. Spinal cord monitoring can decrease the incidence of neurologic complications following excessive surgical correction.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

The surgical wounds need to be protected with padding to prevent injury. The prosthesis needs to be expanded every 4-6 months as the child grows. Expansion requires that a small incision be made at the site of distraction. When the child stops growing, the device can be removed, and other definitive procedures, such as rib spreading, may be necessary.

Previous
Next

Complications

The risks associated with anesthesia include bleeding; pneumonia; wound complications (eg, poor healing, infection); device-related problems, such as allergic reaction to metal, or bending, breaking, or loosening of the device; and neurologic deficit due to stretching of the spinal cord from expansion. Crankshaft phenomenon is a complication following isolated posterior fusion surgeries, in which the unfused anterior vertebral bodies continue to grow and cause lordosis and scoliosis. Crankshaft phenomenon is seen when the spine is skeletally immature, and typically occurs during the 2 peak growth velocity periods (ie, from 0-5 years of age and from 10-15 years of age).[34]

  • Paralysis: Paralysis is the most feared complication of surgery for scoliosis. A survey conducted by the Scoliosis Research Society determined that the incidence of acute neurologic complications resulting from the treatment of scoliosis to be 0.72%. [35] In infantile scoliosis, because neural axis involvement is significant, the risk of neurologic injury is greater if not recognized preoperatively.
  • Infection: Infection is a risk with all surgical procedures; antibiotic prophylaxis is essential.
  • Pseudoarthrosis: Pseudoarthrosis is a failure of the spine to fuse and is more common in adults than in adolescents.
  • Decompensation: Decompensation occurs because of overcorrection of the spinal curve, in which the curvature of the spine loses its flexibility, causing the patient to lean to 1 side.
  • Flat-back syndrome: Flat-back syndrome is seen less often now because of technical improvements since the Harrington rod. In this condition, patients have decreased lumbar lordosis and need to hyperextend their hips to stand or need to adopt a flexed-hip-and-knee gait, leading to increased back fatigue.
  • Low-back pain: There is a risk of low-back pain, especially after lower distal level fusion. This may result from unfused levels of the spine or degeneration of the fused spine.
  • Rod fractures: Rod fractures can happen in 15% of the cases. [36] The preoperative magnitude of scoliosis or kyphosis is not associated with the risk of rod fractures. However, the risk factors for rod fractures are prior fracture, single rods, stainless steel rods, small-diameter rods, proximity to tandem connectors, short tandem connectors, and preoperative ambulation. Repeat fractures are common, especially with single rods. Rod replacement, with larger-diameter rods if appropriate, may be a preferred strategy over connecting the broken rods as fractures signal fatigue of the rod.

The complications associated with casting are an increase in the peak inspiratory pressure, which can result in increased respiratory complications as shown by Dhawale et al in 2013.[37] Subclavian thrombosis after casting has also been reported in the literature recently.[38]

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

More favorable outcomes have been associated with male sex, a left-sided curve, a low initial curve measurement, an RVAD of less than 20° in the initial radiograph, and the onset of scoliosis in the first year of life.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Palaniappan Lakshmanan, MBBS, MS, AFRCS, FRCS(Tr&Orth) Consultant Spinal Surgeon, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sunderland Royal Hospital, UK

Palaniappan Lakshmanan, MBBS, MS, AFRCS, FRCS(Tr&Orth) is a member of the following medical societies: British Orthopaedic Association, AOSpine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Sashin Ahuja, MBBS, FRCS, MSc, MS Consultant Spinal Surgeon, Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Of Wales, Cardiff, UK

Sashin Ahuja, MBBS, FRCS, MSc, MS is a member of the following medical societies: British Association of Spine Surgeons, British Scoliosis Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jeetender Pal Peehal, MBBS, MS, MRCS Knee Research Fellow, Positional MRI Centre, Woodend Hospital, UK

Jeetender Pal Peehal, MBBS, MS, MRCS is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

George H Thompson, MD Director of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, and MetroHealth Medical Center; Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

George H Thompson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Orthopaedic Association, Scoliosis Research Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Received none from OrthoPediatrics for consulting; Received salary from Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics for management position; Received none from SpineForm for consulting; Received none from SICOT for board membership.

Chief Editor

Dennis P Grogan, MD Clinical Professor (Retired), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine; Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children of Tampa

Dennis P Grogan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, Scoliosis Research Society, Irish American Orthopaedic Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Eastern Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Mininder S Kocher, MD, MPH Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School/Harvard School of Public Health; Associate Director, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston

Mininder S Kocher, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Sports Medicine, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, American Association for the History of Medicine, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society

Disclosure: Received consulting fee from Smith & Nephew Endoscopy for consulting; Received consulting fee from EBI Biomet for consulting; Received consulting fee from OrthoPediatrics for consulting; Received stock from Pivot Medical for consulting; Received consulting fee from pediped for consulting; Received royalty from WB Saunders for none; Received stock from Fixes-4-Kids for consulting.

References
  1. Smith JR, Samdani AF, Pahys J, Ranade A, Asghar J, Cahill P, et al. The role of bracing, casting, and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib for the treatment of infantile idiopathic scoliosis: a single-institution experience with 31 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Jul. 11(1):3-8. [Medline].

  2. Weiss HR. Brace treatment in infantile/juvenile patients with progressive scoliosis is worthwhile. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012. 176:383-6. [Medline].

  3. Pahys JM, Samdani AF, Betz RR. Intraspinal anomalies in infantile idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and role of magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 20. 34(12):E434-8. [Medline].

  4. Redding G, Song K, Inscore S, Effmann E, Campbell R. Lung function asymmetry in children with congenital and infantile scoliosis. Spine J. 2008 Jul-Aug. 8(4):639-44. [Medline].

  5. Harrenstein RJ. Die Skoliose bei Sauglingen und ihre Behandlung. Z Orthop Chir. 1930. 52:1-40.

  6. Kumar K. Spinal deformity and axial traction. Spine. 1996 Mar 1. 21(5):653-5. [Medline].

  7. James JI. Two curve patterns in idiopathic structural scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1951. 33-B:399-406. [Medline].

  8. Browne D. Congenital postural scoliosis. Br Med J. 1965 Sep 4. 5461:565-6. [Medline].

  9. Dunn PM. Congenital postural scoliosis. Arch Dis Child. 1973 Aug. 48(8):654. [Medline].

  10. Wynne-Davies R. Familial (idiopathic) scoliosis. A family survey. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968 Feb. 50(1):24-30. [Medline].

  11. Lincoln TL. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Am J Orthop. 2007 Nov. 36(11):586-90. [Medline].

  12. McMaster MJ. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis: can it be prevented?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Nov. 65(5):612-7. [Medline].

  13. Wynne-Davies R. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Causative factors, particularly in the first six months of life. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975 May. 57(2):138-41. [Medline].

  14. Cunin V. Early-onset scoliosis: current treatment. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb. 101 (1 Suppl):S109-18. [Medline].

  15. Mehta MH. The rib-vertebra angle in the early diagnosis between resolving and progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 May. 54(2):230-43. [Medline].

  16. El-Hawary R, Chukwunyerenwa C. Update on evaluation and treatment of scoliosis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014 Dec. 61 (6):1223-41. [Medline].

  17. Mehta MH. Growth as a corrective force in the early treatment of progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005. 87(9):1237-1247. [Medline].

  18. Jarvis J, Garbedian S, Swamy G. Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: the effectiveness of part-time bracing. Spine. 2008 May 1. 33(10):1074-8. [Medline].

  19. Fujimori T, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Newton PO. Safety of pedicle screws and spinal instrumentation for pediatric patients: comparative analysis between 0- and 5-year-old, 5- and 10-year-old, and 10- and 15-year-old patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 1. 39 (7):541-9. [Medline].

  20. Corona J, Sanders JO, Luhmann SJ, Diab M, Vitale MG. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. June 2012. 94 (12):e86. [Medline].

  21. Grivas TB, Burwell GR, Vasiliadis ES, Webb JK. A segmental radiological study of the spine and rib--cage in children with progressive infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2006 Oct 18. 1:17. [Medline].

  22. Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct. 16(10):1587-92. [Medline].

  23. Alotaibi S, Harder J, Spier S. Bronchial obstruction secondary to idiopathic scoliosis in a child: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2008 May 22. 2:171. [Medline].

  24. Akbarnia BA., Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine. 2005. 30(17 Suppl):S46-57. [Medline].

  25. Bridwell KH. Spinal instrumentation in the management of adolescent scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Feb. 64-72. [Medline].

  26. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J. A new technic for segmental spinal osteosynthesis using the posterior approach [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1984. 70(6):489-94. [Medline].

  27. Dwyer AF, Newton NC, Sherwood AA. An anterior approach to scoliosis. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969 Jan-Feb. 62:192-202. [Medline].

  28. Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis: correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. June 1962. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Feb. 84-A(2):316. [Medline].

  29. D'Astous JL, Sanders JO. Casting and traction treatment methods for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Oct. 38(4):477-84, v. [Medline].

  30. Morin C, Kulkarni S. ED plaster-of-Paris jacket for infantile scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2014 Jul. 23 Suppl 4:S412-8. [Medline].

  31. Fletcher ND, McClung A, Rathjen KE, Denning JR, Browne R, Johnston CE 3rd. Serial casting as a delay tactic in the treatment of moderate-to-severe early-onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. Oct-Nov 2012. 32(7):664-671. [Medline].

  32. Motoyama EK, Deeney VF, Fine GF, et al. Effects on lung function of multiple expansion thoracoplasty in children with thoracic insufficiency syndrome: a longitudinal study. Spine. 2006. 31(3):284-90. [Medline].

  33. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, Manna B, Cooper A. Safety and efficacy of Isola instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: two- to 12-year follow-up. Spine. 2004 Sep 15. 29(18):2013-23. [Medline].

  34. Kesling KL, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, Schwender JD, Transfeldt EE, et al. The crankshaft phenomenon after posterior spinal arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis: a review of 54 patients. Spine. 2003 Feb 1. 28(3):267-71. [Medline].

  35. MacEwen GD, Bunnell WP, Sriram K. Acute neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis. A report of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975. 57(3):404-408. [Medline].

  36. Yang JS, Sponseller PD, Thompson GH, et al. Growing Rod Fractures: Risk Factors and Opportunities for Prevention. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15. 36(20):1639-1644. [Medline].

  37. Dhawale AA, Shah SA, Reichard S, Holmes L Jr, Brislin R, Rogers K, et al. Casting for infantile scoliosis: the pitfall of increased peak inspiratory pressure. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan 2013. 33(1):63-67.

  38. Badlani N, Korenblit A, Hammerberg K. Subclavian vein thrombosis after application of body cast. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan 2013. 33(1):e1-3. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
RVAD (rib-vertebral angle difference) measurement at apical vertebra: RVAD = b-a (concave - convex side).
Preoperative scoliogram showing the Cobb angle.
Postoperative scoliogram after correction with the pediatric Isola system.
Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an increase in the space available for lung (SAL) after correction of scoliosis by VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib).
Preoperative and postoperative radiographs show an increase in the space available for lung (SAL) after correction of scoliosis by VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib).
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.