eMedicine Specialties > Orthopedic Surgery > Pediatrics

Streeter Dysplasia

Author: Twee Do, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; Director, Neuromuscular Orthopedic Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Mar 30, 2009

Introduction

History of the Procedure

Streeter dysplasia is a term used to describe a complex disorder characterized by constricting rings, acrosyndactyly, or, often, amputations of the extremities of neonates. It is analogous to constriction band or amniotic band syndrome (ABS), which was recognized as early as 300 BC. Hippocrates suggested that extrinsic pressures from a ruptured amniotic membrane lead to the formation of bands or digital amputations. In 1652, J.B. van Helmont reported on intrauterine amputations, which he attributed to the pregnant mothers having looked upon maimed soldiers. Montgomery1 in 1832 and Simpson2 in 1836 subsequently described series of amniotic band–associated deformities and discussed the differences between agenesis- and amniotic band–induced amputations.

Image shows the lower limb of a young child born ...

Image shows the lower limb of a young child born with moderate bands that extend deep to the fascia but do not compromise the neurovascular system.

Image shows the lower limb of a young child born ...

Image shows the lower limb of a young child born with moderate bands that extend deep to the fascia but do not compromise the neurovascular system.


The term "Streeter dysplasia" did not come into use until 1930, when George Streeter postulated a germ plasm defect as one plausible etiology.3 At that time, his theory was well accepted because of the associated anomalies, which occurred far from the site of the constriction bands. In 1960, Patterson used histology to show how constriction bands looked like normal skin creases. He hypothesized that the same lack of mesodermal development occurs in the area of the band, thereby making the bands simply abnormal creases.4

Patterson's theory was later refuted by Richard Torpin, who examined many placentae and infants with the disorder.5 In 1965, he reintroduced the idea originally held by Hippocrates. He proposed that maternal trauma led to rupture of the amniotic membrane, which then formed into strands. These encircling strands cause extrinsic compression on the head or limb, leading to the formation of bands, vascular occlusion, and, eventually, amputations. Currently, this is the most widely supported hypothesis; therefore, this disorder would be more accurately termed ABS.

Problem

Depending on the severity of the constriction, the defect could be as minimal as a merely cosmetic band. Deeper bands may cause lymphatic obstruction leading to edema and vascular compromise that necessitates immediate release. Pressure from the bands may potentially cause abnormalities distal to the constriction, such as hemihypertrophy, anterolateral bowing, pseudarthrosis, leg-length discrepancy, and resistant teratologic clubfeet. These conditions may lead to limited function and difficulty with ambulation.6

Constriction bands across the head and face may lead to facial clefts. If the cleft extends into the cranium, encephaloceles may result. Bands that cross the body may compromise the chest (thoracoschisis or extrathoracic heart) or abdomen (gastroschisis).

Frequency

The estimated frequency of amniotic band syndrome in the United States is 1 per 3000 pregnancies (if the potential miscarriages that occur from severe banding early in gestation are considered). More common statistics show an incidence of 1 case per 10,000-15,000 population. One of the few epidemiologic studies is a 1988 study from Atlanta that cites the incidence as 1.16 cases per 10,000 population. No sex predilection is recognized.

The incidence overseas is similar to that in the United States. The birth defect registry of Western Australia cites an incidence of 1.15 per 10,000 population.

Etiology

Two main lines of thought exist regarding the etiology of amniotic band syndrome, attributing the condition to intrinsic and extrinsic causes. Streeter proposed that a disruptive event occurs during blastogenesis, leading to an intrinsic germ plasm defect.3 This causes the soft tissue to slough. External healing of the slough leads to the constricting rings and the resultant localized developmental defects. Cases of ABS in which the amnion is intact support this theory, as do the frequently associated renal abnormalities (37% of cases) and occasional cardiac abnormalities.

Ainhum, a predominantly African syndrome in which progressive circumferential ulceration leads to eventual amputation of digits, is an inherited disease, thus further lending support to an intrinsic developmental defect as a cause of digit amputation. Streeter aggressively defended this theory for more than 35 years. For his long and avid support, many surgeons still describe this disorder as Streeter dysplasia.

The lack of family history or predictable recurrences in families of children born with ABS negates the theory of an inherent or genetic component to the condition. Zionts and coworkers7 were able to demonstrate variable findings of the syndrome in monozygotic twins who each were affected by amniotic bands. These and other sporadic findings are more consistent with the current thought that external compression is the etiologic root of this syndrome.8

In 1965, Richard Torpin reintroduced the extrinsic theory for ABS.5 In his study of fetuses and placentae, he noted the lack of a complete amniotic lining in the placentae of neonates with ABS. Strands of amnion were also visible around constricting rings of the digits, and binding strands were visible at the tips of limbs with acrosyndactyly. He proposed that intrauterine trauma led to premature rupture of the membranes, and strands of residual membranes could encircle the digits or might even be swallowed. The presence of severed but otherwise fully developed limbs in newborn infants further validates this extrinsic band compression theory.

Pathophysiology

The developing embryo sits within 2 cavities: the amnion and the chorion. As development occurs, the amnion presses against the extracoelomic space, eventually obliterating it and bringing the amnion up to and supported by the chorion. This phenomenon occurs on or about the 12th week of gestation. Incomplete obliteration of the extracoelomic space renders the amnion fragile and subject to spontaneous or traumatic rupture.9 After the rupture, a transient oligohydramnios occurs due to extravasation of amniotic fluid. Until the chorion adjusts to the permeability, the developing fetus has very little room in which to move. This may contribute to the severity of clubfeet deformities seen with ABS.

This decrease in space also allows the resultant floating amniotic bands to easily ensnare a developing body part. Early in gestation, the encircling bands may result in spontaneous abortions. If the constriction occurs after development is nearly complete, only fissures, acrosyndactylization, and/or intrauterine amputation are noted on the extremities as typical manifestations. If the amniotic bands are swallowed while still partially attached to the placenta, the tether may lead to bizarre facial clefts and palate deficiencies.10

Presentation

Children born with amniotic band syndrome are usually full term or a few weeks premature; in most cases, the pregnancies were uncomplicated. In Light and Ogden's series, the average gestation was 37.5 weeks, with an average birth weight of 3.0 kg.11 Although the condition is quite variable in presentation, the most common clinical findings in ABS appear on the extremities and include amputation followed by constriction bands and then acrosyndactyly. Other associated findings include encephalocele, cleft lip or palate, renal abnormalities, cardiac defects, hemihypertrophy, anterolateral bowing of the tibia, tibial pseudarthrosis,12,13  and leg-length discrepancy.

On the extremities, the distal portion is most often involved, especially the longer central digits of the hand (middle, long, and index fingers). The hands are affected in almost 90% of cases.14 In rare cases, the thumb or small finger is involved, presumably because of their shorter lengths. The same rule holds true for the feet, where constriction bands most commonly involve the hallux. Mild band pressure causes only indentations at the base of the phalanx, usually distal to the metacarpophalangeal joints. Progressive constriction is the result of the maceration of the indentation and subsequent healing by scar tissue formation. If the compression from the band is severe, lymphatic and vascular compromise may ensue, and the child presents at birth with a swollen engorged digit or limb that may require immediate surgical release.

More commonly, the digit has been amputated in utero. Acrosyndactyly occurs after digital separation is complete, but the fingers get twisted by bands and eventually coalesce. The peripheral digits are brought forward, and residual sinus tracts are usually present in the remnant web space where a probe can be placed—so-called fenestrated syndactyly.

Extremity deformities in ABS are classified into Patterson's 4 types, as follows:

  • Type I involves simple ring constriction.
  • Type II involves ring constriction accompanied by fusion of the distal bony parts, with or without lymphedema.
  • Type III involves ring constrictions accompanied by fusion of soft tissue parts.
  • Type IV demonstrates intrauterine amputations.

Clubfoot is seen in up to 25% of cases. This is a mix of paralytic and idiopathic deformities. In 50% of clubfoot cases, a tight band is found around the peroneal nerve, which causes muscle imbalance and clubfoot.15,16 In the other 50%, no bands are visible anywhere on the limb. The deformity is thought to arise from lack of space due to oligohydramnios. The clubfoot deformity is typically rigid. Clinically significant limb-length discrepancy may also be present, and patients need to be sequentially monitored, even following correction of bands and the clubfoot. Other less common findings include craniofacial abnormalities, which may occur in up to 5% of ABS cases; acquired raised limb bands; and anterolateral bowing of the tibia with pseudarthrosis.

Indications

Indications for intervention depend on the medical stability of the child and on the neurovascular status of the limb. Anencephaly usually is incompatible with life, but the other deformities can be triaged for correction and reconstruction. Of all the deformities, only the tight constriction bands with gross lymphedema, vascular compromise, or both necessitate immediate surgical release.

Clubfeet should be manipulated and put in casts early, as is the case for all idiopathic clubfeet. The paralytic feet in ABS, however, usually are severe and do not respond well to conventional treatment. Surgical correction is also associated with a high incidence of recurrence and complications due to neurovascular injury from proximal bands over the peroneal nerve.

Cleft lip and palate require reconstruction, but this is optimal when the child is aged approximately 3-6 months, depending on the severity of the cleft and the infant's ability to feed.

Relevant Anatomy

The anatomy relevant to surgery depends on the area of the body affected. Most bands are superficial, and only the skin and subcutaneous tissue are involved. However, the neurovascular bundle may be displaced near areas of banding. Therefore, take this into consideration with dissection for excision in order to avoid devascularization or denervation of the involved body segments.

Contraindications

Mild bands that only cosmetically affect the superficial skin, similar to the creases found in the Michelin tire baby syndrome (circumferential-ringed creases with specific histologic findings and/or karyotype abnormalities), do not require any intervention. As growth occurs, progressive constriction and edema may necessitate band excision and Z-plasty, but in general, excision is not indicated for superficial bands due to the potential complications of wound infections and neurovascular compromise.

More on Streeter Dysplasia

Overview: Streeter Dysplasia
Workup: Streeter Dysplasia
Treatment: Streeter Dysplasia
Follow-up: Streeter Dysplasia
Multimedia: Streeter Dysplasia
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Montgomery W. Spontaneous Amputation in Utero. Dublin J Med Sci. 1832;2:49.

  2. Simpson J. Essays on diseases of the placenta. Dublin J Med Sci. 1836;10:220.

  3. Streeter G. Focal deficiencies in fetal tissues and their relation to intrauterine amputations. Contributions Embroyol Carnegie Inst. 1930;22:1-46.

  4. Patterson TJ. Congenital ring-constrictions. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1961;14:1-31. [Medline].

  5. Torpin R. Amniochorionic Mesoblastic Fibrous Strings and Amnionic Bands: Associate Constricting Fetal Malformations or Fetal Death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1 1965;91:65-75. [Medline].

  6. Hennigan, SP, Kuo, KN. Resistant talipes equinovarus associated with congenital constriction band syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(2):240-245. [Medline].

  7. Zionts LE, Osterkamp JA, Crawford TO. Congenital annular bands in identical twins. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1984;66(3):450-3. [Medline].

  8. Ossipoff V, Hall BD. Etiologic factors in the amniotic band syndrome: a study of 24 patients. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1977;13(3D):117-32. [Medline].

  9. Ross MG. Pathogenesis of amniotic band syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2007;197(2):219-20; author reply 220. [Medline].

  10. Bouguila J, Ben Khoud N, Ghrissi A, Bellalah Z, Belghith A, Landolsi E, et al. [Amniotic band syndrome and facial malformations]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. Dec 2007;108(6):526-9. [Medline].

  11. Light TR, Ogden JA. Congenital constriction band syndrome. Pathophysiology and treatment. Yale J Biol Med. May-Jun 1993;66(3):143-55. [Medline].

  12. Tanguy AF, Dalens BJ, Boisgard S. Congenital constricting band with pseudarthrosis of the tibia and fibula. A case report. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1995;77A(8):1251-4. [Medline].

  13. Zych, GA, Ballard, A. Constriction band causing pseudarthrosis and impending gangrene of the leg. A case report with successful treatment. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1983;65A(3):410-2. [Medline].

  14. Light TR. Growth and Development of the Hand. In: Carter PR, ed. Reconstruction of the Child's Hand. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febilger;1991:122.

  15. Allington NJ, Kumar SJ, Guille JT. Clubfeet associated with congenital constriction bands of the ipsilateral lower extremity. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1995;15(5):599-603. [Medline].

  16. Gomez, VR. Clubfeet in congenital annular constricting bands. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1996;323:155-162. [Medline].

  17. Donnenfeld AE, Dunn LK, Rose NC. Discordant amniotic band sequence in monozygotic twins. Am J Med Genet. Apr 1985;20(4):685-94. [Medline].

  18. Paladini D, Foglia S, Sglavo G. Congenital constriction band of the upper arm: the role of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis, counseling and multidisciplinary consultation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. May 2004;23(5):520-2. [Medline].

  19. Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Phillips J. In utero lysis of amniotic bands. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1997;10(5):316-20. [Medline].

  20. Inubashiri E, Hanaoka U, Kanenishi K, Yamashiro C, Tanaka H, Yanagihara T, et al. 3D and 4D sonographic imaging of amniotic band syndrome in early pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. Nov-Dec 2008;36(9):573-5. [Medline].

  21. Chen CP. Prenatal diagnosis of atypical facial clefting should alert amniotic band syndrome and prompt a search for associated amniotic bands and other structural anomalies. Genet Couns. 2007;18(2):255-7. [Medline].

  22. Coyle S, Karp JM, Shirakura A. Oral rehabilitation of a child with amniotic band syndrome. J Dent Child (Chic). Jan-Apr 2008;75(1):74-9. [Medline].

  23. Crombleholme TM, Dirkes K, Whitney TM, et al. Amniotic band syndrome in fetal lambs. I: Fetoscopic release and morphometric outcome. J Pediatr Surg. Jul 1995;30(7):974-8. [Medline].

  24. Ronderos-Dumit D, Briceno F, Navarro H. Endoscopic release of limb constriction rings in utero. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006;21(3):255-8. [Medline].

  25. Soldado F, Aguirre M, Peiró JL, Fontecha CG, Esteves M, Velez R, et al. Fetal surgery of extremity amniotic bands: an experimental model of in utero limb salvage in fetal lamb. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 2009;29(1):98-102. [Medline].

  26. Upton J, Tan C. Correction of constriction rings. J Hand Surg [Am]. Sep 1991;16(5):947-53. [Medline].

  27. Isogai N, Landis W, Kim TH. Formation of phalanges and small joints by tissue-engineering. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1999;81(3):306-16. [Medline].

  28. Dobyns JH. Congenital ring syndrome. In: Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone;1988:505.

  29. Dal Monte A, Soncini G, Calderoni P. The treatment of congenital constricting bands by Ombredanne''s two stage operation. Review of 13 cases. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. Sep 1983;9(3):351-5. [Medline].

  30. Greene, WB. One stage release of congenital constriction bands. JBJS. 1993;75(A):650-655. [Medline].

Further Reading

Related eMedicine topics

Anencephaly


Cleft Lip

Cleft Palate

Clubfoot

Keywords

Streeter dysplasia, congenital constriction band syndrome, amniotic band syndrome, ABS, constricting rings, acrosyndactyly, intrauterine amputation, digital amputations, ADAM complex, limb body wall syndrome, pseudo-ainhum, pseudoainhum, hemihypertrophy, anterolateral bowing, pseudarthrosis, leg-length discrepancy, teratologic clubfeet

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Twee Do, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; Director, Neuromuscular Orthopedic Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Twee Do, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and American Academy of Pediatrics
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Charles T Mehlman, DO, MPH, Director, Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Associate Professor, Division of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Charles T Mehlman, DO, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Fracture Association, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, American Osteopathic Association, Arthroscopy Association of North America, North American Spine Society, Ohio State Medical Association, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Scoliosis Research Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

George H Thompson, MD, Director, Pediatric Orthopedics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital
George H Thompson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Scoliosis Research Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital
Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, American College of International Physicians, and American College of Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dennis P Grogan, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine; Chief of Staff, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children of Tampa
Dennis P Grogan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Eastern Orthopaedic Association, Irish American Orthopaedic Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Scoliosis Research Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.