Streeter Dysplasia Treatment & Management

  • Author: Twee T Do, MD; Chief Editor: Dennis P Grogan, MD   more...
 
Updated: Feb 7, 2012
 

Medical Therapy

Because amniotic band syndrome is an intrauterine phenomenon probably caused by the rupture of amniotic membranes and constriction of the developing tissue, no medical treatment exists for the condition. Avoiding certain drugs that can lead to spontaneous rupture of membranes, such as cocaine and mifepristone, may help decrease the potential risk.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Due to tight constrictions on the digits or extremities, urgent surgical treatment often is necessary for patients with vascular compromise. Surgery also is indicated for patients with syndactyly or acrosyndactyly that compromises hand function. Thumb amputation (which is rare), clubfeet, cleft lip, and cleft palate also require reconstruction, but these procedures can be performed electively at a later time and at the discretion of the physician and family.[25]

In bands identified by 3-D ultrasound to cause neurovascular compromise, early in utero fetoscopic surgery for release can be performed. Early results in animal models and in selected case series are promising.[26, 27, 28]

Early intervention for severe constriction bands after birth includes band excision with 1-2 mm of normal skin to avoid recurrence. The entire band requires excision. This is performed on a maximum of 65% of the ring (most authors recommend 50%) by Z-plasty for lesser constrictions and by V-Y plasty or W-plasty for tighter bands. A staged correction ensures adequacy of vascularity to the residual limb or digit. Additionally, debulking the fibrofatty soft tissues followed by subcutaneous tissue advancement as described by Upton[29] may further improve the cosmetic appearance of the digits after band release. For a study of the formation of phalanges and small joints through tissue engineering, see the work of Isogai and coworkers.[30]

For severely constricted bands with wide tissue excision, W-plasty is preferred to provide additional skin for closure. In band excision, intraoperative consideration should be given to possible attenuation of the neurovascular bundle and its proximity to the surface of the band. Careful dissection under magnifying loupes prevents possible damage to these vital structures.

The first part of acrosyndactyly release is separation of the digits, especially if the constricting rings are not compromising circulation. Digits are separated when infants are aged 6 months to 1 year. Dobyns reported that the number of fingers is not as important as their length, bulk, stability, spacing, and control.[31] The groin is prepared for skin graft harvest, which will be necessary for closure. Reconstruction typically is performed in a proximal-to-distal direction and requires complete removal of the sinus tracts, as these tend to be located more distally than are the normal web spaces. If the thumb is severely shortened or its function is compromised, the on-top plasty or toe-to-thumb transfer may be considered. Despite cosmetic improvements, the digits will continue to be stiff.

Intrauterine amputations do not need intervention unless they involve the thumb at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. In these cases, the on-top plasty or toe-to-thumb transfer may improve function.

In the lower extremities, teratologic clubfeet associated with deep congenital constriction bands usually require constriction band excision, Z-plasty, and posteromedial release and casting. This is typically described as a staged procedure. The band excision and Z-plasty may be performed in parts (3-stage clubfoot release) or in full (2-stage clubfoot release).[32] Performing the procedure in staged parts was previously considered necessary to avoid any vascular compromise with the clubfoot surgery, skin sloughing, and infection. Greene,[33] however, has published good results in 3 patients with 4 affected clubfeet who were treated with band excision, Z-plasty, and posteromedial release in a single full procedure with no significant complications. The benefits of a single complete procedure include ease of postoperative patient care and reduced patient exposure to general anesthetics.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

All patients with amniotic band syndrome should be monitored regularly until skeletal maturity because of the potential for recurrence of the rings and for secondary contractures that may develop and must be addressed on an individual basis.

Previous
Next

Complications

Complications from amniotic band syndrome include severe lymphatic or venous congestion at the time of birth due to tight bands. This congestion may lead to necrosis and gangrene[13] if not urgently treated with excision and release. Other potential complications include neurovascular compromise caused by release of the entire band at one sitting or lack of attention to the superficial level of the attenuated nerves and vessels.

Clubfeet are teratologic in 50% of cases and do not respond well to surgical posteromedial releases alone. The constriction bands often require excision, and tendon transfers may be required later because of peroneal nerve compromise.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

The prognosis for the isolated superficial extremity bands is good (see image below). Aside from cosmetic variability, no functional deficits remain.

Image shows the lower limb of a young child born wImage shows the lower limb of a young child born with moderate bands that extend deep to the fascia but do not compromise the neurovascular system.

Deeper bands may be associated with progressive problems leading to later lymphatic and neurovascular compromise that requires surgery. For patients with acrosyndactyly, hand function is limited secondary to stiffness of the joints, but good prehension and grasp may be obtained with reconstructive procedures. Children who have had intrauterine amputations are usually well adapted to their physical limitations, and often little needs to be done. In children with a transverse deficiency proximal to the ankle joint, a prosthesis is required for full function.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Today, expecting parents are able to determine a lot about their child before birth. Obstetric ultrasound is currently the most common method to identify amniotic band syndrome in the prenatal period. When the new family is confronted with knowledge of a deformed neonate, whether the deformity is anencephaly or cleft lip and palate, controversy still exists as to the next step. Should the option for termination be offered, or should families be allowed to attempt to selectively produce the perfect child? This is an ethical debate that still has no final answer.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Twee T Do, MD  Clinical Faculty, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine; Consulting Surgeon, Pueblo Bone and Joint Clinic

Twee T Do, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Academy of Pediatrics, Colorado Medical Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Scoliosis Research Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Charles T Mehlman, DO, MPH  Professor of Pediatrics and Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Director, Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Charles T Mehlman, DO, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Fracture Association, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, American Osteopathic Association, Arthroscopy Association of North America, North American Spine Society, Ohio State Medical Association, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Scoliosis Research Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

George H Thompson, MD  Director of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, and MetroHealth Medical Center; Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

George H Thompson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Scoliosis Research Society

Disclosure: OrthoPediatrics None Consulting; Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Salary Management position; SpineForm None Consulting; SICOT None Board membership

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dennis P Grogan, MD  Clinical Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine; Chief of Staff, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children of Tampa

Dennis P Grogan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Eastern Orthopaedic Association, Irish American Orthopaedic Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Scoliosis Research Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Montgomery W. Spontaneous Amputation in Utero. Dublin J Med Sci. 1832;2:49.

  2. Simpson J. Essays on diseases of the placenta. Dublin J Med Sci. 1836;10:220.

  3. Streeter G. Focal deficiencies in fetal tissues and their relation to intrauterine amputations. Contributions Embroyol Carnegie Inst. 1930;22:1-46.

  4. Patterson TJ. Congenital ring-constrictions. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1961;14:1-31. [Medline].

  5. Torpin R. Amniochorionic Mesoblastic Fibrous Strings and Amnionic Bands: Associate Constricting Fetal Malformations or Fetal Death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1 1965;91:65-75. [Medline].

  6. Hennigan, SP, Kuo, KN. Resistant talipes equinovarus associated with congenital constriction band syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(2):240-245. [Medline].

  7. Zionts LE, Osterkamp JA, Crawford TO. Congenital annular bands in identical twins. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1984;66(3):450-3. [Medline].

  8. Ossipoff V, Hall BD. Etiologic factors in the amniotic band syndrome: a study of 24 patients. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1977;13(3D):117-32. [Medline].

  9. Ross MG. Pathogenesis of amniotic band syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2007;197(2):219-20; author reply 220. [Medline].

  10. Bouguila J, Ben Khoud N, Ghrissi A, Bellalah Z, Belghith A, Landolsi E, et al. [Amniotic band syndrome and facial malformations]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. Dec 2007;108(6):526-9. [Medline].

  11. Light TR, Ogden JA. Congenital constriction band syndrome. Pathophysiology and treatment. Yale J Biol Med. May-Jun 1993;66(3):143-55. [Medline].

  12. Tanguy AF, Dalens BJ, Boisgard S. Congenital constricting band with pseudarthrosis of the tibia and fibula. A case report. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1995;77A(8):1251-4. [Medline].

  13. Zych, GA, Ballard, A. Constriction band causing pseudarthrosis and impending gangrene of the leg. A case report with successful treatment. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1983;65A(3):410-2. [Medline].

  14. Light TR. Growth and Development of the Hand. In: Carter PR, ed. Reconstruction of the Child's Hand. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febilger;1991:122.

  15. Iba K, Wada T, Yamashita T. Pre-operative findings of acrosyndactyly and sharpening of distal portion of the phalanx related to post-operative finger tip pain in constriction band syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. Dec 19 2011;[Medline].

  16. Allington NJ, Kumar SJ, Guille JT. Clubfeet associated with congenital constriction bands of the ipsilateral lower extremity. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1995;15(5):599-603. [Medline].

  17. Gomez, VR. Clubfeet in congenital annular constricting bands. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1996;323:155-162. [Medline].

  18. Donnenfeld AE, Dunn LK, Rose NC. Discordant amniotic band sequence in monozygotic twins. Am J Med Genet. Apr 1985;20(4):685-94. [Medline].

  19. Paladini D, Foglia S, Sglavo G. Congenital constriction band of the upper arm: the role of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis, counseling and multidisciplinary consultation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. May 2004;23(5):520-2. [Medline].

  20. Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Phillips J. In utero lysis of amniotic bands. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1997;10(5):316-20. [Medline].

  21. Inubashiri E, Hanaoka U, Kanenishi K, Yamashiro C, Tanaka H, Yanagihara T, et al. 3D and 4D sonographic imaging of amniotic band syndrome in early pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. Nov-Dec 2008;36(9):573-5. [Medline].

  22. Chen CP. Prenatal diagnosis of atypical facial clefting should alert amniotic band syndrome and prompt a search for associated amniotic bands and other structural anomalies. Genet Couns. 2007;18(2):255-7. [Medline].

  23. Das D, Das G, Gayen S, Konar A. Median facial cleft in amniotic band syndrome. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. Apr 2011;18(2):192-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  24. Lee SH, Lee MJ, Kim MJ, Son GH, Namgung R. Fetal MR imaging of constriction band syndrome involving the skull and brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Nov-Dec 2011;35(6):685-7. [Medline].

  25. Coyle S, Karp JM, Shirakura A. Oral rehabilitation of a child with amniotic band syndrome. J Dent Child (Chic). Jan-Apr 2008;75(1):74-9. [Medline].

  26. Crombleholme TM, Dirkes K, Whitney TM, et al. Amniotic band syndrome in fetal lambs. I: Fetoscopic release and morphometric outcome. J Pediatr Surg. Jul 1995;30(7):974-8. [Medline].

  27. Ronderos-Dumit D, Briceno F, Navarro H. Endoscopic release of limb constriction rings in utero. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006;21(3):255-8. [Medline].

  28. Soldado F, Aguirre M, Peiró JL, Fontecha CG, Esteves M, Velez R, et al. Fetal surgery of extremity amniotic bands: an experimental model of in utero limb salvage in fetal lamb. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 2009;29(1):98-102. [Medline].

  29. Upton J, Tan C. Correction of constriction rings. J Hand Surg [Am]. Sep 1991;16(5):947-53. [Medline].

  30. Isogai N, Landis W, Kim TH. Formation of phalanges and small joints by tissue-engineering. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1999;81(3):306-16. [Medline].

  31. Dobyns JH. Congenital ring syndrome. In: Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone;1988:505.

  32. Dal Monte A, Soncini G, Calderoni P. The treatment of congenital constricting bands by Ombredanne's two stage operation. Review of 13 cases. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. Sep 1983;9(3):351-5. [Medline].

  33. Greene, WB. One stage release of congenital constriction bands. JBJS. 1993;75(A):650-655. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Image shows the lower limb of a young child born with moderate bands that extend deep to the fascia but do not compromise the neurovascular system.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.