Superior Labral Lesions Treatment & Management

  • Author: S Ashfaq Hasan, MD; Chief Editor: Mary Ann E Keenan, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jul 22, 2011
 

Medical Therapy

Initial treatment of suspected SLAP (superior labrum, anterior and posterior) lesions should be nonoperative. Emphasis should be on rest, which means an initial period of no throwing. Capsular stretching, especially of the posteroinferior capsule, is important. Physical therapy focusing on rotator cuff and scapula stabilizer strengthening may be helpful.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Initially, a complete diagnostic arthroscopy is performed. The rotator cuff should be carefully inspected for any partial thickness or full-thickness tears. The biceps anchor is inspected. Be aware of the potential normal variants as discussed earlier in this article (see Pathophysiology). Type III and type IV SLAP lesions are fairly obvious arthroscopically. The difficulty can sometimes come in differentiating a type I lesion from a type II as well as accurately diagnosing type II lesions and variants thereof.

Type I lesions are often associated with a meniscoid superior labrum where the lateral aspect is draped over the rim of the glenoid superiorly and the attachment is more peripheral. This particular morphology is more susceptible to developing degenerative tears, which is the pathology observed in type I lesions. Care must be taken not to assume that this meniscoid labrum represents a displaced type II lesion. A probe is placed under the superior labrum, and a firm attachment is demonstrated. In inspecting the superior labral attachment, the key factor to evaluate is if whether more than 5 mm of superior glenoid is exposed under the labrum. A superior sublabral recess is often observed and is a normal finding. However, if this recess is greater than 5 mm, the biceps anchor is highly likely to be unstable.[36, 37]

The superior labrum both anterior and posterior to the biceps root should be carefully probed. Placing the arm in approximately 70-90° of abduction and then progressively externally rotating the arm can demonstrate the peel-back sign, which is observed with type II posterior lesions as well as in combined anterior and posterior type II lesions. If more than 5 mm of the posterosuperior glenoid is uncovered or the biceps root at the level of the supraglenoid tubercle is uncovered with this maneuver, then the peel-back sign is positive and the superior labrum must be repaired. The peel-back sign is not usually observed with type II anterior SLAP lesions. A positive drive-through sign where the arthroscope can be easily passed from the superior aspect of the joint to the inferior recess without any manual distraction is observed with all 3 variants of type II SLAP lesions. This anterior pseudolaxity is usually resolved with repair of the SLAP lesion, and the drive-through sign is eliminated.

Surgical treatment of a type I lesion consists of debridement. Similarly, in a type III lesion, the bucket-handle tear of the meniscus can be debrided because the biceps anchor is intact. In a type II lesion, the biceps anchor is repaired back down to the superior labrum with suture anchors. In type IV lesions, if less than 30% of the tendon is involved and the biceps anchor is intact, then the involved labrum and tendon can be resected. If more than 30% involvement is noted in an older patient, a biceps tenodesis can be performed.[38] In the younger more active individual, suture repair of the tendon, along with suture anchor repair of the labrum, should be performed.

Various techniques have been described to repair the superior labrum arthroscopically.[39, 40] These include the use of metal staples, metal screws, bioabsorbable tacks, and a transglenoid technique. Metal staples and screws require a second surgery for removal and are no longer used. Good results have been reported with the use of bioabsorbable tacks; however, concerns over potential particulate debris and foreign body reaction have led many surgeons to use suture anchors loaded with nonabsorbable suture.

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

General anesthesia supplemented with an interscalene block is the preferred anesthetic technique for superior labral (labrum) lesions. An examination with the patient under anesthesia is conducted to assess for any capsular contracture or instability. The patient is placed in the beach-chair position.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

A standard posterior viewing portal is made. An anteroinferior portal is made just above the subscapularis tendon using an outside-in spinal needle localization technique. Similarly, an anterosuperior portal is made. The incision for this portal is just off the anterolateral corner of the acromion and enters the joint through the rotator interval laterally. Importantly, place these portals in a parallel fashion; spinal needle localization can aid in achieving this prior to incision for the portals. Cannulas are placed in both portals. The area of labral detachment is debrided, initially with a soft tissue resector, and the bone is then lightly dusted with a burr. For the surgical procedure, see the images below.

Area of labral detachment is debrided to expose a Area of labral detachment is debrided to expose a bony bed. The awl for the anchor is introduced through the anterosuperior portal Bioabsorbable anchor double-loaded with nonabsorbaBioabsorbable anchor double-loaded with nonabsorbable number 2 suture is then implanted One limb of each suture is passed through the labrOne limb of each suture is passed through the labrum. Various suture passing techniques can be used to accomplish this. In a 1-anchor repair, 1 suture can passed through In a 1-anchor repair, 1 suture can passed through the labrum posterior to the biceps and the other anterior to the biceps and tied down. Multiple anchors should be used if necessary.

The instrumentation for anchor placement can then be introduced either though the cannula in the anterosuperior portal or percutaneously through the musculotendinous junction of the supraspinatus. The authors prefer percutaneous placement of the anchors. A bioabsorbable anchor loaded with 2 nonabsorbable sutures is then placed.

The number of suture anchors used depends on the extent of the tear. Initially, the more posterior limb of one suture pair is then retrieved into and out of the anteroinferior cannula. A variety of techniques exist to pass this suture through the labrum. The authors prefer to initially pass a looped 2-0 Prolene suture through the labrum using a curved suture passer. The 2 free ends of the Prolene suture are retrieved out of the anterosuperior cannula. The looped end of the suture, which now resides in the anteroinferior cannula, is used to shuttle the limb of the anchor suture through the labrum. An arthroscopic knot is tied after both limbs of the anchor suture have been retrieved into the anterosuperior cannula.

The second suture is then passed through the labrum in a similar fashion, and an arthroscopic knot is tied. At this time, the need for additional anchors is assessed and they are placed as necessary.

Ensure that the posterosuperior labrum is adequately stabilized in order to neutralize the peel-back forces. In introducing a posterosuperior anchor, using a posterolateral portal is usually necessary because the posterosuperior glenoid has a steep angle that makes instrumentation from the more anterior portal difficult. This posterolateral portal can be made without a cannula by passing the sheath for the anchor instruments directly through the rotator cuff at the musculotendinous junction.

Single-portal SLAP (superior labrum, anterior and posterior) lesion repair is described by Daluga and Daluga.[41]

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

The patient is kept in a sling for 3 weeks. Codman is initiated at week 2. Passive range-of-motion exercises, including elevation and external rotation by the side, are also initiated at week 2. No external rotation in abduction is allowed for the first 3 weeks because of the peel-back mechanism. Range-of-motion exercises, including passive posterior capsule and internal rotation stretching, are progressed during weeks 3-6.

At 6 weeks, progressive strengthening of the rotator cuff, scapula stabilizers, biceps, and the deltoid is initiated. Throwing athletes are allowed to begin an interval throwing program at 4 months. At 6 months, throwing from a mound is allowed. Pitchers may resume throwing at full velocity at 7 months postoperatively. Throughout the rehabilitation, as well as after, the patient should continue stretching the posteroinferior capsule daily. A recurrence of the capsular contracture can once again put the shoulder at risk for developing a SLAP (superior labrum, anterior and posterior) lesion.

For nonathletes, the initial 4 months of rehabilitation is identical to that of throwers. At the 4-month mark, they can usually resume full activities.

Previous
Next

Complications

Neurologic injury is the most common complication reported after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. These complications can be minimized by careful attention to patient positioning as well as a thorough knowledge of the neurovascular anatomy of the shoulder. When placing the patient in the beach-chair position, ensure that the head and neck are in a neutral position. Either hyperflexion or hyperextension could potentially lead to a neurologic injury.

When making the Neviaser portal, care must be taken to avoid too acute an angle or placing the portal too medial to avoid injury to the suprascapular nerve. When placing the suture anchors, ensure that the anchors are well seated below the subchondral bone. If the anchors are too prominent, they may cause a chondral injury. The sutures should be tugged on to ensure that the anchors are well seated. Anchor migration, apart from compromising the repair, can result in significant chondral injury.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

In general, good results have been reported with arthroscopic superior labral lesions repairs. Morgan et al reported on their results in 102 patients.[6] About 83% of their patients had excellent results, and 14% had good results. All pitchers returned to pitching, 84% at preinjury level.

Pagnani et al reported that 12 of 13 overhead athletes were able to return to full preinjury level of activity after an arthroscopic SLAP (superior labrum, anterior and posterior) repair.[42] Field and Savoie,[43] as well as Burkhart et al,[17] reported similar findings. In Field and Savoie's study, all of the athletes were able to return to sports activities without limitation.

Kim et al evaluated their results in 34 individuals who underwent arthroscopic suture anchor repair of an isolated SLAP tear.[24] Approximately 94% had a satisfactory result as determined by using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. Thirty-one (91%) of the patients regained their preinjury level of function. However, they did note poorer outcomes in overhead athletes as compared with those not participating in overhead athletic activities.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

The etiology of shoulder pain and dysfunction, the dead arm syndrome, in throwing athletes is somewhat controversial. Jobe et al proposed that repetitive throwing stretches out the anterior capsuloligamentous structures, allowing anterosuperior migration during throwing with resultant subacromial impingement. They advocated open anterior capsulolabral reconstruction and reported a 50% return to pitching in 12 pitchers.[44]

Jobe[25] and Walch[45] described the concept of internal impingement. This refers to a spectrum of injury that involves the rotator cuff, posterosuperior labrum, and even bone. The underlying pathology was thought to be stretching out of the anterior capsuloligamentous structures. In a normal shoulder, tightening of the anterior capsule such as occurs when the arm is placed in the abducted and externally rotated position results in obligate posterior translation of the humeral head. In the situation with lax anterior capsuloligamentous structures, this obligate posterior translation was postulated to not occur, leading to abnormal contact between the rotator cuff and posterior labrum because the head does not clear posteriorly. Anterior capsulolabral reconstruction was advocated as treatment. Results of this treatment have been mixed, with approximately 50% return to throwing.

Burkhart and Morgan advocated type II SLAP (superior labrum, anterior and posterior) lesions as the underlying cause of the dead arm syndrome. In a group of 53 throwing athletes, they reported a success rate of 87% in returning the patients to their preinjury activity level after arthroscopic SLAP repair.[17]

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

S Ashfaq Hasan, MD  Assistant Professor, Director, Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

S Ashfaq Hasan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Lynn A Crosby, MD, FACS  Chief of Shoulder Division, Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State University School of Medicine

Lynn A Crosby, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Sports Medicine, American College of Surgeons, American Fracture Association, American Medical Association, American Medical Tennis Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Arthroscopy Association of North America, Mid-America Orthopaedic Association, and Orthopaedic Research Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Pekka A Mooar, MD  Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine

Pekka A Mooar, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Mary Ann E Keenan, MD  Professor, Vice Chair for Graduate Medical Education, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Chief of Neuro-Orthopedics Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Mary Ann E Keenan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Keener JD, Brophy RH. Superior labral tears of the shoulder: pathogenesis, evaluation, and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Oct 2009;17(10):627-37. [Medline].

  2. Andrews JR, Carson WG Jr, McLeod WD. Glenoid labrum tears related to the long head of the biceps. Am J Sports Med. Sep-Oct 1985;13(5):337-41. [Medline].

  3. Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, et al. SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 1990;6(4):274-9. [Medline].

  4. Nam EK, Snyder SJ. The diagnosis and treatment of superior labrum, anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions. Am J Sports Med. Sep-Oct 2003;31(5):798-810. [Medline].

  5. Chang D, Mohana-Borges A, Borso M, Chung CB. SLAP lesions: Anatomy, clinical presentation, MR imaging diagnosis and characterization. Eur J Radiol. May 20 2008;[Medline].

  6. Morgan CD, Burkhart SS, Palmeri M, Gillespie M. Type II SLAP lesions: three subtypes and their relationships to superior instability and rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. Sep 1998;14(6):553-65. [Medline].

  7. Maffet MW, Gartsman GM, Moseley B. Superior labrum-biceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. Jan-Feb 1995;23(1):93-8. [Medline].

  8. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD. The peel-back mechanism: its role in producing and extending posteriortype II SLAP lesions and its effect on SLAP repair rehabilitation. Arthroscopy. Sep 1998;14(6):637-40. [Medline].

  9. Vangsness CT Jr, Jorgenson SS, Watson T, Johnson DL. The origin of the long head of the biceps from the scapula and glenoidlabrum. An anatomical study of 100 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Nov 1994;76(6):951-4. [Medline].

  10. Cooper DE, Arnoczky SP, O'Brien SJ. Anatomy, histology, and vascularity of the glenoid labrum. An anatomicalstudy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 1992;74(1):46-52. [Medline].

  11. DePalma AF, Callery G, Bennett GA. Variational anatomy and degenerative lesions of the shoulder joint. AAOS Instructional Course Lectures. 1949;6:255-281.

  12. Rodosky MW, Harner CD, Fu FH. The role of the long head of the biceps muscle and superior glenoid labrumin anterior stability of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. Jan-Feb 1994;22(1):121-30. [Medline].

  13. Pagnani MJ, Deng XH, Warren RF, et al. Effect of lesions of the superior portion of the glenoid labrum onglenohumeral translation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1995;77(7):1003-10. [Medline].

  14. Pradhan RL, Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y. Superior labral strain during the throwing motion. A cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 2001;29(4):488-92. [Medline].

  15. Kuhn JE, Lindholm SR, Huston LJ, et al. Failure of the biceps superior labral complex: a cadaveric biomechanical investigation comparing the late cocking and early deceleration positions of throwing. Arthroscopy. Apr 2003;19(4):373-9. [Medline].

  16. Mihata T, McGarry MH, Tibone JE, Fitzpatrick MJ, Kinoshita M, Lee TQ. Biomechanical assessment of Type II superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions associated with anterior shoulder capsular laxity as seen in throwers: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. Aug 2008;36(8):1604-10. [Medline].

  17. Burkhart SS, Morgan C. SLAP lesions in the overhead athlete. Orthop Clin North Am. Jul 2001;32(3):431-41, viii. [Medline].

  18. Ben Kibler W, Sciascia AD, Hester P, Dome D, Jacobs C. Clinical utility of traditional and new tests in the diagnosis of biceps tendon injuries and superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. Sep 2009;37(9):1840-7. [Medline].

  19. Gobezie R, Zurakowski D, Lavery K, Millett PJ, Cole BJ, Warner JJ. Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis and treatment of SLAP tears using the Snyder classification. Am J Sports Med. Jul 2008;36(7):1373-9. [Medline].

  20. O'Brien SJ, Pagnani MJ, Fealy S, et al. The active compression test: a new and effective test for diagnosinglabral tears and acromioclavicular joint abnormality. Am J Sports Med. Sep-Oct 1998;26(5):610-3. [Medline].

  21. Stetson WB, Templin K. The crank test, the O'Brien test, and routine magnetic resonance imaging scans in the diagnosis of labral tears. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 2002;30(6):806-9. [Medline].

  22. Green RA, Taylor NF, Mirkovic M, Perrott M. An evaluation of the anatomic basis of the O'Brien active compression test for superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Jan-Feb 2008;17(1):165-71. [Medline].

  23. Kibler WB. Specificity and sensitivity of the anterior slide test in throwing athletes with superior glenoid labral tears. Arthroscopy. Jun 1995;11(3):296-300. [Medline].

  24. Kim SH, Ha KI, Han KY. Biceps load test: a clinical test for superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in shoulders with recurrent anterior dislocations. Am J Sports Med. May-Jun 1999;27(3):300-3. [Medline].

  25. Jobe CM. Posterior superior glenoid impingement: expanded spectrum. Arthroscopy. Oct 1995;11(5):530-6. [Medline].

  26. McCaughey R, Green RA, Taylor NF. The anatomical basis of the resisted supination external rotation test for superior labral anterior to posterior lesions. Clin Anat. Sep 2009;22(6):665-70. [Medline].

  27. Dessaur WA, Magarey ME. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for superior labral anterior posterior lesions: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. Jun 2008;38(6):341-52. [Medline].

  28. Tibone JE, Jobe FW, Kerlan RK, et al. Shoulder impingement syndrome in athletes treated by an anterior acromioplasty. Clin Orthop. Sep 1985;(198):134-40. [Medline].

  29. Beltran J, Bencardino J, Mellado J, et al. MR arthrography of the shoulder: variants and pitfalls. Radiographics. Nov-Dec 1997;17(6):1403-12; discussion 1412-5. [Medline].

  30. Dinauer PA, Flemming DJ, Murphy KP, Doukas WC. Diagnosis of superior labral lesions: comparison of noncontrast MRI with indirect MR arthrography in unexercised shoulders. Skeletal Radiol. Mar 2007;36(3):195-202. [Medline].

  31. Connell DA, Potter HG, Wickiewicz TL. Noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging of superior labral lesions. 102 cases confirmed at arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med. Mar-Apr 1999;27(2):208-13. [Medline].

  32. Jee WH, McCauley TR, Katz LD, et al. Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions of the glenoid labrum:reliability and accuracy of MR arthrography for diagnosis. Radiology. Jan 2001;218(1):127-32. [Medline].

  33. Holzapfel K, Waldt S, Bruegel M, Paul J, Heinrich P, Imhoff AB, et al. Inter- and intraobserver variability of MR arthrography in the detection and classification of superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions: evaluation in 78 cases with arthroscopic correlation. Eur Radiol. Mar 2010;20(3):666-73. [Medline].

  34. Oh DK, Yoon YC, Kwon JW, Choi SH, Jung JY, Bae S, et al. Comparison of indirect isotropic MR arthrography and conventional MR arthrography of labral lesions and rotator cuff tears: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 2009;192(2):473-9. [Medline].

  35. Kim YJ, Choi JA, Oh JH, Hwang SI, Hong SH, Kang HS. Superior Labral Anteroposterior Tears: Accuracy and Interobserver Reliability of Multidetector CT Arthrography for Diagnosis. Radiology. Jul 2011;260(1):207-15. [Medline].

  36. Coleman SH, Cohen DB, Drakos MC, Allen AA, Williams RJ, O'brien SJ, et al. Arthroscopic repair of type II superior labral anterior posterior lesions with and without acromioplasty: a clinical analysis of 50 patients. Am J Sports Med. May 2007;35(5):749-53. [Medline].

  37. Lim MH, Chan BK, Low CO. arthroscopic management of superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) and associated lesions: clinical features and functional outcome. Ann Acad Med Singapore. Jan 2008;37(1):44-8. [Medline].

  38. Neri BR, Vollmer EA, Kvitne RS. Isolated type II superior labral anterior posterior lesions: age-related outcome of arthroscopic fixation. Am J Sports Med. May 2009;37(5):937-42. [Medline].

  39. Kim SH, Ha KI, Kim SH, Choi HJ. Results of arthroscopic treatment of superior labral lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 2002;84-A(6):981-5. [Medline].

  40. Yoneda M, Hirooka A, Saito S, et al. Arthroscopic stapling for detached superior glenoid labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Sep 1991;73(5):746-50. [Medline].

  41. Daluga DJ, Daluga AT. Single-portal SLAP lesion repair. Arthroscopy. Mar 2007;23(3):321.e1-4. [Medline].

  42. Pagnani MJ, Speer KP, Altchek DW, et al. Arthroscopic fixation of superior labral lesions using a biodegradable implant: a preliminary report. Arthroscopy. Apr 1995;11(2):194-8. [Medline].

  43. Field LD, Savoie FH. Arthroscopic suture repair of superior labral detachment lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1993;21(6):783-90; discussion 790. [Medline].

  44. Jobe FW, Giangarra CE, Kvitne RS, Glousman RE. Anterior capsulolabral reconstruction of the shoulder in athletes inoverhand sports. Am J Sports Med. Sep-Oct 1991;19(5):428-34. [Medline].

  45. Walch G, Boileau P, Noel E. Impingement of the deep surface of the supraspinatus tendon on the posterosuperior glenoid rim. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992;1:232-45.

Previous
Next
 
Superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion types.
Area of labral detachment is debrided to expose a bony bed. The awl for the anchor is introduced through the anterosuperior portal
Bioabsorbable anchor double-loaded with nonabsorbable number 2 suture is then implanted
One limb of each suture is passed through the labrum. Various suture passing techniques can be used to accomplish this.
In a 1-anchor repair, 1 suture can passed through the labrum posterior to the biceps and the other anterior to the biceps and tied down. Multiple anchors should be used if necessary.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.