Scapula Fracture Treatment & Management

  • Author: Thomas P Goss, MD; Chief Editor: Mary Ann E Keenan, MD   more...
 
Updated: Nov 10, 2011
 

Medical Therapy

Medical therapy for patients with scapula fractures generally is the same as that for any trauma patient. Perform fluid resuscitation, stabilize the cardiopulmonary system, and treat life-threatening injuries prior to operative fixation of scapula fractures.

Most scapula fractures can be treated with closed treatment. More than 90% of scapula fractures have minimal displacement, primarily because of the thick, strong support provided by the surrounding soft tissues. Treatment is symptomatic. Short-term immobilization in a sling and swathe bandage is provided for comfort. Early progressive ROM exercises and use of the shoulder out of the sling (within clearly defined limits) are initiated as pain subsides. In some cases, such as intra-articular fractures, close radiographic follow-up is necessary to ensure that unacceptable displacement does not occur.

Most scapular fractures heal completely by 6 weeks, and all external support is discontinued at this time. Progressive use of the upper extremity is encouraged. Continue ROM exercises until full shoulder mobility is recovered. As motion improves, add progressive strengthening exercises. Full functional recovery takes several months. Ultimately, the prognosis for these fractures is excellent.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Operative treatment for fractures of the glenoid cavity

The approach to glenoid cavity fractures depends on the type of fracture. Anterior rim (type IA) fractures are approached anteriorly with the patient in the beach-chair position. Posterior rim (type IB) fractures and all glenoid fossa disruptions are approached at least in part posteriorly. The fragment or fragments are reduced and held rigidly with either an interfragmentary compression screw or a contoured reconstruction plate. A superior approach may be added if a large, displaced superior glenoid fragment (type III) or glenoscapular fragment (type IV) is present.[17, 18, 19]

Basic orthopedic and shoulder instruments should be available, and fixation devices should include 3.5-mm and 4.0-mm cannulated screws and 3.5-mm malleable reconstruction plates. K-wires can be used for temporary or definitive fixation of glenoid fragments, as seen in the image below. In patients with anterior rim, posterior rim, and type II glenoid cavity fractures, prepare and drape the iliac crest in case the fragment is comminuted, requiring replacement with a tricortical graft to restore glenohumeral stability.

Illustrations depicting fixation techniques availaIllustrations depicting fixation techniques available for stabilization of fractures of the glenoid cavity. (1) interfragmentary compression screw; (2) Kirschner wires; (3) construct using Kirschner wires and cerclage wires or Kirschner wires and cerclage sutures; (4) cerclage wire or suture; (5) staple; and (6) 3.5-mm malleable reconstruction plate.

Operative treatment of type II glenoid neck fractures

For type II glenoid neck fractures, the posterior approach is utilized, developing the interval between the infraspinatus and the teres minor. A superior approach may be added if the glenoid fragment is difficult to control.[17, 18, 19]

Temporary fixation can be obtained with K-wires or interfragmentary screws. Definitive fixation of the reduced fragment generally is achieved with a 3.5-mm reconstruction plate contoured along the posterior aspect of the glenoid fragment and the lateral scapular border. In some type II fractures, severe comminution of the scapular body or spine may preclude plate fixation. In these cases, K-wire or interfragmentary screw fixation can be used. The reduced glenoid fragment is secured to the adjacent osseous structures, including the acromial process and the distal clavicle, as seen in the image below. If the acromial process and distal clavicle also are severely comminuted, overhead olecranon pin traction may be considered.

Fixation of glenoid neck fractures. (A) stabilizatFixation of glenoid neck fractures. (A) stabilization with a 3.5-mm malleable reconstruction plate (note the Kirschner wire running from the acromial process to the glenoid process that can be used for either temporary or permanent fixation); (B) stabilization with 3.5-mm cannulated interfragmentary screws; and (C) stabilization with Kirschner wires (in this case, Kirschner wires passed from the acromion and clavicle into the glenoid process).

Operative treatment of coracoid and acromion fractures

For coracoid fractures that require ORIF, an anterior deltoid-splitting approach is utilized. The rotator interval is opened as needed for optimal exposure of the fracture site. Cannulated 3.5-mm and 4.0-mm compression screws are useful for fixation of large fragments. If the fragment is significantly comminuted, treatment is excision and suture fixation of the conjoined tendon to the remaining coracoid process, as seen in the image below.[17, 18, 19]

Illustrations showing techniques for managing coraIllustrations showing techniques for managing coracoid fractures. (A) interfragmentary screw fixation (if the fragment is sufficiently large and noncomminuted), and (B) excision of the distal fragment (if small and/or comminuted) and suture fixation of the conjoined tendon to the remaining coracoid process.

If surgical reduction and stabilization of an acromion fracture is necessary, a tension-band construct usually is chosen for distal disruptions in which the acromial process is quite thin, whereas 3.5-mm malleable reconstruction plates usually are chosen for more proximal injuries.

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

In addition to defining the fracture type and pattern, preoperative evaluation should include identification of associated injuries and a thorough neurovascular examination of the involved extremity. Radiographic evaluation must visualize the scapular body and spine, the 3 processes (ie, acromial, coracoid, glenoid), and the 3 articulations (ie, scapulothoracic, glenohumeral, acromioclavicular).

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

General anesthesia is advised for patients undergoing fixation of scapula fractures. Nerve block techniques are available but generally are used only as supplements because of awkward positioning, extensive dissection and manipulation, and, often, prolonged operating time. With the exception of type IA fractures of the glenoid cavity (anterior rim injuries) that require an anterior exposure, the primary surgical approach is posterior. Occasionally, a superior exposure is useful.

Posterior approach

For the posterior approach, the patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position, operative side up, and the torso is stabilized with a beanbag. The upper extremity and shoulder complex are prepared and draped free. Bony landmarks are outlined with a marking pen. An incision is made over the lateral one third of the scapular spine along the posterior aspect of the acromion to its lateral tip and then distally in the midlateral line for 2.5 cm. Skin flaps are developed. The deltoid is dissected sharply off of the scapular spine and the acromion, and then split in the line of its fibers for a distance of up to 5 cm, starting at the lateral tip of the acromion. The deltoid is separated off of the underlying infraspinatus and teres minor musculotendinous units and retracted down to, but not below, the inferior margin of the teres minor.

The infraspinatus tendon is incised 2.5 cm medial to the greater tuberosity and along its superior and inferior borders. It then is dissected off of the underlying posterior glenohumeral capsule and turned back medially. After opening the capsule in a similar fashion, a Fukuda retractor is inserted into the joint. With the retractor holding the humeral head out of the way, the entire glenoid cavity can be inspected, and the surgeon has ready access to its posterior rim and the glenoid neck. The interval between the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles can be developed further, and the long head of the triceps is detached to gain access to the inferior aspect of the glenoid process and the lateral border of the scapular body. Take particular care to protect and avoid injury to the nearby suprascapular and axillary nerves.

Anterior approach

For the anterior approach, the patient is placed on the operating room table in the beach-chair position. An anterior incision is made in Langer lines, centered over the glenohumeral joint and running from the superior to the inferior margin of the humeral head. The deltoid muscle is exposed and split in the line of its fibers directly over the coracoid process. The conjoined tendon is retracted medially, whereas the deltoid muscle is retracted laterally. The subacromial bursa is removed, exposing the subscapularis tendon. The tendon is incised 2.5 cm medial to the medial border of the biceps groove and along its superior and inferior borders. The subscapularis tendon then is dissected off of the underlying anterior glenohumeral capsule-glenoid neck periosteum and turned back medially. The anterior glenohumeral capsule is incised in the same fashion (5 mm medial to the anatomic neck) and also is turned back medially.

With a humeral head retractor inserted into the glenohumeral joint and holding the humeral head out of the way, the entire glenoid cavity can be inspected, and the surgeon has ready access to its anterior rim. Take care to avoid injury to the nearby axillary nerve.

Superior approach

The superior approach can be added to the anterior or posterior exposure if a displaced, difficult to control or stabilize superior glenoid fragment, or a glenoid process fragment is present. Either incision is extended over the superior aspect of the shoulder. Soft-tissue flaps are developed and retracted, exposing the superior aspect of the distal clavicle, the AC joint, the acromion, and the trapezius muscle. In the interval between the clavicle and the acromion, the trapezius muscle and the underlying supraspinatus tendon are split in the line of their fibers, bringing one down upon the superior aspect of the glenoid process. Take care to protect and avoid injury to the suprascapular nerve and vessels that lie medial to the coracoid process.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Postoperative management partially depends on the degree of stability achieved at surgery. Complete immobilization in a sling and swathe is used for the first 24-48 hours. After that, progressive ROM exercises and functional use of the shoulder out of the sling (within clearly defined limits) are initiated if fixation is satisfactory. If surgical fixation was not rigid, immobilization in a sling and swathe, abduction brace, or overhead olecranon pin traction may be required for 7-14 days.

Radiographs are taken every 2 weeks to ensure maintained reduction. By 6 weeks, healing usually is sufficient to permit discontinuation of the sling and to allow progressive functional use of the extremity.

Physical therapy is continued until ROM and strength are maximized. Initial emphasis is on regaining ROM. As ROM progresses, strengthening exercises are added. Light use of the shoulder is encouraged through postoperative week 12. Heavy physical use of the shoulder, such as athletic activity, is prohibited for 4-6 months. Patients are encouraged to work diligently on their rehabilitation programs, as final motion and strength may not be achieved for 6 months to 1 year.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

After discharge from the hospital, patients should be seen for follow-up every 2 weeks for the first 6 weeks. Radiographs are taken to ensure maintained reduction. Evaluate the patient's ROM and update his/her rehabilitation program as needed. Patients should be seen at 12 weeks for evaluation of motion and progression of functional use of the shoulder. Final motion and strength may not be achieved until 6 months to 1 year.

Previous
Next

Complications

The most significant complications associated with scapular fractures are those that result from accompanying injuries to adjacent and distant osseous and soft-tissue structures. On average, there are 3.9 additional injuries, with the ipsilateral shoulder girdle, upper extremity, lung, and chest wall being affected most commonly. Pulmonary injuries, such as hemopneumothorax or pulmonary contusion, occur in 15-55% of cases. Cerebral contusions occur in 10-40% of cases, with central neurologic deficits in 5% of cases. Splenectomy is required in 8% of patients, and the mortality rate is 2%.

Complications related to the scapular fractures themselves are relatively uncommon. Nonunion is rare. Malunion can occur in a variety of forms, depending on the particular fracture type. Malunion of a scapular body fracture generally is well tolerated, although painful scapulothoracic crepitus has been described. Fractures of the glenoid cavity can result in symptomatic glenohumeral degenerative joint disease and instability. Angulated fractures of the glenoid neck can result in shoulder instability. Fractures of the glenoid neck with translational displacement can lead to altered mechanics of the surrounding soft tissues, giving rise to glenohumeral pain and dysfunction.

Complications can result directly from surgical management. Neurovascular injury, infection (superficial and deep), and loss of fixation all can result from poor surgical technique. An improper physical therapy rehabilitation program may lead to unnecessary postoperative shoulder stiffness. Finally, poor patient compliance can contribute to shoulder stiffness and possible hardware failure.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Because of the low incidence of scapula fractures, little outcome data exists. Hardegger et al reported 79% good-to-excellent results associated with 5 displaced glenoid neck fractures treated surgically (6.5-year follow-up).[1] Kavanaugh et al at the Mayo Clinic reviewed 10 displaced glenoid cavity fractures treated with ORIF and found it to be a useful and safe technique that can restore excellent function of the shoulder.[12]

Nonoperative treatment can sometimes result in malunion, leading to poor range of motion, chronic pain, and poor cosmesis. Cole et al report that surgical reconstruction of malunited scapula neck or body fractures can yield good functional and cosmetic outcomes.[20]

Until more data are available, it is reasonable to predict a good-to-excellent functional result if surgical management restores normal or near-normal anatomy, articular congruity, and glenohumeral stability; if surgery provides secure fixation; and if a well-structured and intensive rehabilitation program is implemented.[21, 22, 23]

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Recognizing the exact indications for operative treatment of scapula fractures is a major issue for the future. The authors have presented guidelines for when to consider surgery. However, more data are needed to further define and support these recommendations. As surgical techniques advance, the indications for surgical intervention may expand.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Thomas P Goss, MD  Chief of Shoulder Surgery, Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Health Care

Thomas P Goss, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, Massachusetts Medical Society, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Robert V Cantu, MD  Division Leader, Orthopedic Trauma, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Darthmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Lynn A Crosby, MD, FACS  Chief of Shoulder Division, Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State University School of Medicine

Lynn A Crosby, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Sports Medicine, American College of Surgeons, American Fracture Association, American Medical Association, American Medical Tennis Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Arthroscopy Association of North America, Mid-America Orthopaedic Association, and Orthopaedic Research Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Pekka A Mooar, MD  Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine

Pekka A Mooar, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Mary Ann E Keenan, MD  Professor, Vice Chair for Graduate Medical Education, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Chief of Neuro-Orthopedics Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Mary Ann E Keenan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Hardegger FH, Simpson LA, Weber BG. The operative treatment of scapular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. Nov 1984;66(5):725-31. [Medline].

  2. Tadros AM, Lunsjo K, Czechowski J, Abu-Zidan FM. Multiple-region scapular fractures had more severe chest injury than single-region fractures: a prospective study of 107 blunt trauma patients. J Trauma. Oct 2007;63(4):889-93. [Medline].

  3. Baldwin KD, Ohman-Strickland P, Mehta S, Hume E. Scapula fractures: a marker for concomitant injury? A retrospective review of data in the national trauma database. J Trauma. Aug 2008;65(2):430-5. [Medline].

  4. Herrera DA, Anavian J, Tarkin IS, Armitage BA, Schroder LK, Cole PA. Delayed operative management of fractures of the scapula. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 2009;91(5):619-26. [Medline].

  5. Coimbra R, Conroy C, Tominaga GT, Bansal V, Schwartz A. Causes of scapula fractures differ from other shoulder injuries in occupants seriously injured during motor vehicle crashes. Injury. Feb 2010;41(2):151-5. [Medline].

  6. Ada JR, Miller ME. Scapular fractures. Analysis of 113 cases. Clin Orthop. Aug 1991;(269):174-80. [Medline].

  7. Goss TP. Scapular Fractures and Dislocations: Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Jan 1995;3(1):22-33. [Medline].

  8. Ideberg R. Unusual glenoid fractures: a report on 92 cases. 1987;58:191-2.

  9. Goss TP. Fractures of the glenoid cavity. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. Feb 1992;74(2):299-305. [Medline].

  10. DePalma AF. Surgery of the Shoulder. 3rd ed. 1983.

  11. Soslowsky LJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, Mow VC. Articular geometry of the glenohumeral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Dec 1992;181-90. [Medline].

  12. Kavanagh BF, Bradway JK, Cofield RH. Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular fractures of the glenoid fossa. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 1993;75(4):479-84. [Medline].

  13. Nordqvist A, Petersson C. Fracture of the body, neck, or spine of the scapula. A long-term follow- up study. Clin Orthop. Oct 1992;(283):139-44. [Medline].

  14. Goss TP. Double disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(2):99-106. [Medline].

  15. Herscovici D Jr, Fiennes AG, Allgower M. The floating shoulder: ipsilateral clavicle and scapular neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. May 1992;74(3):362-4. [Medline].

  16. Armitage BM, Wijdicks CA, Tarkin IS, Schroder LK, Marek DJ, Zlowodzki M, et al. Mapping of scapular fractures with three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 2009;91(9):2222-8. [Medline].

  17. Burke CS, Roberts CS, Nyland JA, Radmacher PG, Acland RD, Voor MJ. Scapular thickness--implications for fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Sep-Oct 2006;15(5):645-8. [Medline].

  18. Lantry JM, Roberts CS, Giannoudis PV. Operative treatment of scapular fractures: a systematic review. Injury. Mar 2008;39(3):271-83. [Medline].

  19. Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Zelle BA, Kregor PJ, Cole PA. Treatment of scapula fractures: systematic review of 520 fractures in 22 case series. J Orthop Trauma. Mar 2006;20(3):230-3. [Medline].

  20. Cole PA, Talbot M, Schroder LK, Anavian J. Extra-articular Malunions of the Scapula: A Comparison of Functional Outcome Before and After Reconstruction. J Orthop Trauma. Nov 2011;25(11):649-56. [Medline].

  21. Anavian J, Wijdicks CA, Schroder LK, Vang S, Cole PA. Surgery for scapula process fractures: good outcome in 26 patients. Acta Orthop. Jun 2009;80(3):344-50. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  22. Gosens T, Speigner B, Minekus J. Fracture of the scapular body: functional outcome after conservative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. May-Jun 2009;18(3):443-8. [Medline].

  23. Schofer MD, Sehrt AC, Timmesfeld N, Störmer S, Kortmann HR. Fractures of the scapula: long-term results after conservative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Nov 2009;129(11):1511-9. [Medline].

  24. Butters KP. The scapula. In: The Shoulder. Vol 1. 1990:335-66.

  25. Goss TP. Fractures of the glenoid neck. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3:42-52.

  26. Goss TP. Glenoid fractures: Open reduction internal fixation. In: Master Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery. 1998:3-17.

  27. Goss TP. The scapula: coracoid, acromial, and avulsion fractures. Am J Orthop. Feb 1996;25(2):106-15. [Medline].

  28. Miller ME, Ada JR. Fractures of the scapula, clavicle, and glenoid. In: Skeletal Trauma: Fractures, Dislocations, Ligamentous Injuries. Vol 2. 1992:1291-1310.

Previous
Next
 
(Click Image to enlarge.) Classification of glenoid cavity fractures: IA - Anterior rim fracture; IB - Posterior rim fracture; II - Fracture line through the glenoid fossa exiting at the lateral border of the scapula; III - Fracture line through the glenoid fossa exiting at the superior border of the scapula; IV - Fracture line through the glenoid fossa exiting at the medial border of the scapula; VA - Combination of types II and IV; VB - Combination of types III and IV; VC - Combination of types II, III, and IV; VI - Comminuted fracture
Classification of glenoid neck fractures. Type I includes all minimally displaced fractures. Type II includes all significantly displaced fractures (translational displacement greater than or equal to 1 cm; angulatory displacement greater than or equal to 40°)
Superior shoulder suspensory complex. (A) anteroposterior view of the bony/soft tissue ring and the superior and inferior bony struts; and (B) lateral view of the bony/soft tissue ring.
Fixation of acromion fractures. (A) tension band construct; and (B) plate-screw fixation (most appropriate for proximal fractures).
(Click Image to enlarge.) Scapular anatomy. Muscle origin and insertion.
Illustrations depicting fixation techniques available for stabilization of fractures of the glenoid cavity. (1) interfragmentary compression screw; (2) Kirschner wires; (3) construct using Kirschner wires and cerclage wires or Kirschner wires and cerclage sutures; (4) cerclage wire or suture; (5) staple; and (6) 3.5-mm malleable reconstruction plate.
Fixation of glenoid neck fractures. (A) stabilization with a 3.5-mm malleable reconstruction plate (note the Kirschner wire running from the acromial process to the glenoid process that can be used for either temporary or permanent fixation); (B) stabilization with 3.5-mm cannulated interfragmentary screws; and (C) stabilization with Kirschner wires (in this case, Kirschner wires passed from the acromion and clavicle into the glenoid process).
Illustrations showing techniques for managing coracoid fractures. (A) interfragmentary screw fixation (if the fragment is sufficiently large and noncomminuted), and (B) excision of the distal fragment (if small and/or comminuted) and suture fixation of the conjoined tendon to the remaining coracoid process.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.