eMedicine Specialties > Orthopedic Surgery > Spine
Lower Cervical Spine Fractures and Dislocations
Updated: Jul 1, 2008
Introduction
Injuries of the subaxial cervical spine (C3-7) are among the most common and potentially most devastating injuries involving the axial skeleton. Assume a cervical spine injury is present until proven otherwise in patients presenting to an emergency facility with a history of a high-speed motor vehicle accident, significant head or facial trauma, a neurologic deficit, or neck pain. While assessment of airway, breathing, and hemodynamic stability continue to be the highest priority in caring for the patient with multiple traumatic injuries, central nervous system evaluation follows closely behind. The central nervous system assessment begins in the field; the cervical spine is protected until workup proves that it is not injured.
The age distribution of patients presenting with lower cervical spine and spinal cord injuries is bimodal. Injuries in persons aged 15-24 years are usually the result of high-energy trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents, accidents resulting from sporting activities, or acts of violence. Injuries in persons older than 55 years usually result from low-energy trauma, such as falls from the standing position. The age-associated cervical spondylosis narrows the spinal canal and predisposes the cervical cord to injury at this level.
History of the Procedure
The Edwin Smith papyrus (2800 BCE) referred to spinal cord injury as a disease not to be treated. Galen, in 177 CE, reported on his experiments in animals, and he described loss of movement and sensibility below the level of cord transection until breathing stopped at higher levels. Charles-Edouard Brown-S é quard did experimental work on hemisection of the cord and described his findings in papers in 1850-1851.
Operative stabilization of the cervical spine was introduced by Hadra in 1891, when he wired the spinous processes of a child who had a fracture dislocation with progressive neurologic deterioration. This was the first surgical procedure of its kind recorded in the literature. Further refinement in the application of internal fixation was documented by Rogers in 1942 with a simple wire technique, and by Bohlman with the use of triple wire stabilization. Rogers reported successful fusions in 37 of 39 patients with 1-12 years of follow-up. Bohlman's technique involved using separate wires for fixation of the adjacent spinous processes and compression of two corticocancellous grafts against the spinous processes. Biomechanically, this was thought to provide better flexural and torsional stiffness than Rogers' simple wiring. Weiland and McAfee reported 100% fusion rates in 60 patients using this means of fixation in the subaxial cervical spine.
Roy-Camille pioneered the use of posterior cervical plates to manage a variety of injuries involving the posterior subaxial spine. Magerl, Anderson, and An have proposed variations of screw insertion techniques. Anterior spinal reconstructions evolved from the use of grafts alone (iliac crest, fibula) supported with external immobilization (halo vest), to the use of anterior instrumentation with plates and bicortical screw fixation (Caspar), to unicortical locking plates (Morscher Synthes cervical spine locking plate [CSLP] system).
Skull traction using modified ice tongs was introduced by Crutchfield in 1933. The halo device was pioneered by Nickel and Perry in the late 1950s, primarily to immobilize the cervical spine affected by polio. Its application was extended to trauma cases, providing a better means of immobilization.
Problem
The cervical spine often is injured in motor vehicle accidents and falls, resulting in bony or soft-tissue injury; however, the presence of multiple traumatic injuries may distract the examiner from the cervical spine. When evaluating the polytrauma patient, examining the cervical spine is a high priority and must take precedence in the evaluation.
The cervical spine is important to consider in positioning the head in space. The dominant motion in the lower cervical spine is flexion-extension, but the cervical spine's anatomy permits a fair amount of motion in all planes. In high-speed injuries, the head can act as a significant lever arm on the cervical spine and, depending on the mechanism, can create a wide array of injury patterns.
The lower cervical spine can suffer minor bony or ligamentous injury that nevertheless results in severe neurologic injury. However, the converse is also true: major bony or ligamentous injury to the lower cervical spine can present with only neck pain. Thus, a thorough and orderly approach to the examination is paramount. Recognizing injury to the lower cervical spine is important because of the association between these injuries and spinal cord and nerve root injury. Little room for malalignment exists in the lower cervical spine, and safe and expedient realignment is of the utmost priority.
Frequency
Cervical spine injury has been reported in 2-4.6% of patients presenting with blunt trauma. It is the most devastating musculoskeletal injury and occurs most frequently in young patients. Spinal cord injury occurs in more than 11,000 patients per year, or in 40-50 persons per million population. Injuries to the cervical spine produce neurologic damage in approximately 40% of patients. In approximately 10% of traumatic cord injuries, radiographs reveal no obvious evidence of bony abnormality.
Etiology
Motor vehicle accidents, falls, and accidents resulting from recreational activities are the leading causes of injuries to the lower cervical spine. Motorcycle accidents account for approximately 20% of motor vehicle accidents leading to spinal cord injuries. The incidence of falls leading to injury is higher in older persons (those aged 65 y and older).
Pathophysiology
Various mechanisms may be responsible for ligamentous and bony failure in the subaxial cervical spine. The importance of the position of the head and neck at the time of impact and the direction of force causing injury cannot be overemphasized. Clinical examination and critical review of the imaging studies help to determine the type of failure and, therefore, the reconstruction required.
Conceptually, the cervical spine may be viewed as being composed of 2 columns. An anterior load-bearing structure consists of all structures anterior to and including the posterior longitudinal ligament. The posterior column includes the pedicles, laminae, facet joints, spinous processes, and the posterior ligament complexes (ligamentum flavum, interspinous ligaments, and supraspinous ligaments). Tension is resisted by the posterior column, which fails under extreme flexion or distraction and which may be associated with concomitant injury to the anterior column.
Allen and colleagues introduced a comprehensive classification system of injuries.[1 ]This classification system includes 3 common mechanisms: compression-flexion, distraction-flexion, and compression-extension. Vertical compression injury results in the burst-type injury with anterior column failure. Less common modes of insult are the distraction-extension and lateral flexion subtypes. These are classified further into stages of progressive injury.
Presentation
Fracture or dislocation of the cervical spine should be suspected in any patient involved in a high-velocity injury. Successful treatment starts with appropriate transportation of the patient from the scene of the accident to the trauma center. Airway, breathing, and circulation should always be the highest priority. Immobilization of the cervical spine with sandbags or a cervical collar and placement of the patient on a long spine board help to prevent secondary injury. Transfers and intubation should be accomplished under strict spine precautions.
An initial history should be taken, and mental status and consciousness level should be assessed. Important points to note are whether the patient was thrown from the vehicle, whether the patient hit his or her head, and whether any indication of paralysis was present at the time of the accident. Voluntary actions, neurologic function, and regions of pain also should be noted. The patient should be inspected thoroughly for lacerations or abrasions on the scalp, face, neck, or shoulders as clues to the mechanism of injury. The back of the neck should be palpated for any tenderness, step-off, or hematoma.
A thorough neurologic examination should be performed as soon as possible to detect any evidence of cord damage. It should follow the standards established by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). Motor strength is graded 0-5 in all major myotomes.
A systematic sensory examination is performed to detect light touch, pinprick, and proprioception in all key dermatomes of the trunk and extremities. Deep tendon reflexes are recorded. These include the biceps (C5), triceps (C7), and brachioradialis (C6) for the upper extremities, along with the patella (L4) and Achilles (S1) for the lower extremities. The presence of pathologic reflexes also should be noted. Clonus is a sustained, repetitive, involuntary contraction of a major muscle group, usually seen in the Achilles and recorded as the number of "beats" or contractions sustained. The Hoffman sign is seen in the hands with forced passive flexion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint of the long finger causing a reflex contraction of the flexors of the index finger and thumb. The Babinski sign is seen when the toes exhibit an upward motion as opposed to a downward motion in response to a stroking stimulus on the bottom of the foot.
Particular emphasis should be placed on the examination of the sacral roots and reflexes. These are extremely important for two reasons. First, detection of sacral sparing indicates an incomplete spinal cord injury. Second, return of the sacral reflexes indicates the passing of spinal shock. Anal sphincter tone and perianal sensation are good tests of sacral root function. The bulbocavernosus reflex and anal wink are good tests of the sacral reflex arc.
Repeating examinations serially is crucial to determine the end of spinal shock, which usually occurs in 24 hours. Serial examinations also help to determine whether an incomplete lesion is improving or worsening. This better helps to define the best treatment pathway.
Indications
The primary indications for surgical intervention in subaxial cervical injuries include malalignment of the spine, with or without neurologic deficits, and progressive neurologic deterioration in the face of persistent compression from bone or disk fragments. While malalignment can be managed initially with cervical tong traction, definitive surgical stabilization, with or without decompression, generally is required.
Anterior column trauma may result from axial loading injuries in combination with flexion, extension, or rotational moments. Typically, the burst fracture or teardrop variant occurs with translation of bony fragments into the spinal canal.[2 ]Direct trauma to the cord may result in incomplete or complete spinal cord injury syndromes. Most frequently, anterior spinal cord injury is accompanied by loss of motor function and pain and temperature sensations, along with preservation of proprioception and vibratory sensation.
Central cord syndrome refers to the clinical picture of greater upper-extremity involvement than lower-extremity motor deficits. Return of function follows a distinct pattern of lower-extremity improvement, followed by upper proximal muscle improvement, followed finally by distal upper extremity function, which may recover incompletely. Brown-Séquard syndrome is typically a hemisection of the spinal cord, with loss of ipsilateral motor function below the level of involvement; contralateral pain; and temperature loss. This is typically seen with penetrating injuries, such as gunshot wounds.
Posterior injury may result in unilateral or bilateral facet fracture, dislocation, or both. Isolated spinous process injury is usually a stable injury and does not require surgical attention. Unilateral facet dislocations may be the most difficult to reduce by closed means, and open reduction and stabilization are often necessary.[3 ]Radiculopathies with or without cord damage may be seen with the unilateral facet injury. Bilateral facet dislocations have the highest incidence of spinal cord injury, with both incomplete and complete syndromes appearing.
Relevant Anatomy
The subaxial cervical spine can conveniently be divided into anterior and posterior columns. The anterior column consists of the typical cervical vertebral body sandwiched between supporting disks. The anterior surface is reinforced further by the anterior longitudinal ligament, and the posterior body by the posterior longitudinal ligament, both of which run from the axis to the sacrum. Articulations include the disk-vertebral body, uncovertebral joints, and zygapophyseal joints. The disk is thicker anteriorly, contributing to the normal cervical lordosis, and the uncovertebral joints located in the posterior aspect of the body define the lateral extent of most surgical exposures. The zygapophyseal or facet joints are oriented 45 º to the axial plane, allowing a sliding motion, as the joint capsule is weakest posteriorly. Supporting ligamentum flavum, posterior and interspinous ligaments also strengthen the posterior column.[4 ]
In the neuroanatomy of the cervical spine, the cord is enlarged, with lateral extension of the gray matter consisting of the anterior horn cells. The lateral dimension spans 13-14 mm, while the anterior-posterior extent measures 7 mm. An additional 1 mm is necessary for the cerebrospinal fluid anteriorly and posteriorly, as well as 1 mm for the dura. A total of 11 mm is needed for the cervical spinal cord. Exiting at each vertebral level is the spinal nerve root, which is the result of the union of the anterior and posterior nerve root. Interconnections are present between the sympathetic nervous system and the nerve root proper. Since the numbering of the cervical roots commences above the atlas, 8 cervical roots exist, with C8 exiting between the seventh cervical vertebra and the first thoracic level.
The vascular anatomy consists of a larger anterior spinal artery located in the central sulcus of the cord and paired posterior spinal arteries located on the dorsum of the cord. The anterior two thirds of the cord is generally accepted to be supplied by the anterior spinal artery, and the posterior one third is generally accepted to be supplied by the posterior arteries.
Contraindications
Reduction of subaxial malalignment must be undertaken with caution in the presence of certain concomitant disk herniations. Those that displace posteriorly and inferiorly have been reported to cause worsening neurologic deficits with both open and closed reductions. In the awake and cooperative patient, cautious reduction can be performed while performing serial neurologic examinations. In the case of intoxication or closed head injury, in which examination may be impeded, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may prove prudent to avoid catastrophic neurologic injury. If such a disk herniation is identified prior to reduction, it can be removed anteriorly, and reduction then can be performed safely. This has been described in both unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations.
Workup
Laboratory Studies
- Routine lab studies for trauma patients are included for those with subaxial cervical spine trauma. A complete blood count, urinalysis, and serum electrolyte levels and chemistries are obtained as the individual case dictates.
- A blood type and screen or crossmatch for packed or whole blood may be necessary, depending on the concomitant injuries and vital sign assessment.
- When spinal cord injury is present, neurologic impairment may impede evaluation of other injuries, including intra-abdominal trauma to solid organs. Liver and renal function testing may be of benefit in these situations.
Imaging Studies
- The cross table lateral radiograph is the criterion standard for evaluating subaxial cervical alignment. This must include visualization of the cervical-thoracic junction. A swimmer's view may be necessary to complete the evaluation of this area, but if body habitus precludes adequate visualization, a CT scan of the area is mandatory to exclude neck injury. Additional views include the anteroposterior (AP) and open mouth odontoid radiographs.[5 ]
- While a CT scan is helpful in imaging the cervicothoracic junction, it is extremely beneficial in identifying posterior column injuries such as lamina or facet fractures.[6 ]
- MRI is particularly useful in demonstrating injuries to the neural elements, especially the spinal cord. Traumatic disk herniations are well delineated on MRI, but the routine use of this study may not contribute to the treatment regimen chosen for these injuries. If the neurologic level of injury does not match the area of injury identified by standard radiographs, this is another indication for MRI. Some have found MRI of the cervical spine to be helpful in determining ligamentous injury, but its application to justifying surgical intervention is not clear from available literature.
- There is controversy on the management of unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations, because neurologic deterioration has been reported after closed reduction. Eismont suggested that the mechanism of this neurologic decline is cord compression at the time of reduction by large, associated disk herniations.[7 ]He recommended MRI evaluation prior to reduction, and if a large disk herniation is found, he proposed anterior removal prior to reduction as a means of avoiding a catastrophic event. This, however, remains debatable, as some surgeons believe delay in reduction in a neurologically incomplete or deteriorating patient is contraindicated and that reduction should be performed urgently.
- If the patient is neurologically intact and alert, it seems reasonable to perform MRI scanning if not otherwise contraindicated. Each clinical situation must be assessed individually. In the patient with multiple injuries, including life-threatening injuries that need stabilization in the operating room, reduction could be performed without the delay necessary to obtain an MRI scan.
- Magnetic resonance angiography may be indicated when associated vertebral artery injury is suspected. This may occur in the severely degenerative cervical spine or when fractures through the foramina transversarium are present.
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Medical management involves treating the multiple traumas and, more specifically, treating concomitant neurologic injury. The use of steroids for neurologic injury has become standard to prevent secondary causes of spinal cord damage, such as release of toxic peroxidases, and to minimize associated local edema. Steroids are thought to help stabilize neural membranes, to prevent uncontrolled intracellular calcium influx, to decrease lysosomal enzyme action, and to diminish swelling and inflammation.
According to 3 National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) reports, the recommended management for patients with spinal cord injury presenting within 3 hours of injury is a loading dose of methylprednisolone of 30 mg/kg over an hour intravenously, followed by 5.4 mg/kg/h for the next 23 hours. If the patient presents more than 3 hours but less than 8 hours postinjury, the 5.4 mg/kg/h is extended for 48 hours following the same loading dose. Steroid treatment does not seem to be beneficial if begun more than 8 hours postinjury or after nerve root trauma.[8,9,10,11,12 ]
The Spine Focus Panel, in a recent review of the literature, continues to recommend the steroid protocol based on its modest neuroprotective effects, favorable risk-to-benefit ratio, and lack of alternative therapies. However, the use of steroids in penetrating injuries, especially gunshot wounds, has not proven to be beneficial.[13 ]
Prospective studies also have assessed the effect of lazaroids and gangliosides on ultimate neurologic outcome, and no significant lasting effects have been documented. Their effectiveness has been shown in the mild and partial injury groups and not in complete cord injury.[14 ]Other modalities of treatment have included hypothermia, calcium-channel blockers, and naloxone, but these treatments have failed to show helpful effects.
The use of histamine 2 (H2) blockers (eg, famotidine [Pepcid], ranitidine [Zantac]) generally is recommended, to prevent stress ulceration from spinal cord injury and for prophylaxis when following the steroid protocols.
Prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism is of particular concern in the neurologically compromised patient. Rates for DVT in complete injuries range from 30-90%; DVT warrants medical and/or mechanical treatment. This may include low-molecular-weight heparin, oral warfarin (Coumadin), intermittent compression devices for the lower extremities, or vena cava filters.
Surgical Therapy
The initial surgical management focuses on the specific injury encountered, which can be classified as involving (1) the anterior column or vertebral body primarily; (2) the posterior column with pedicle, facet, or lamina injury; or (3) both columns. Spinal realignment generally is emphasized. This begins with application of cervical tongs and serially increasing traction until normal spinal alignment is achieved and bony compression is reduced. Gardner-Wells tongs have been the criterion standard for years because they are easy to apply and can withstand great weight until reduction is obtained. MRI-compatible tongs or halos can also be used and have the advantage of allowing urgent MRI when appropriate.
If the injury primarily involves the anterior column, a Smith-Robinson or standard anterior approach to the spine is used to allow anterior decompression and reconstruction with either allograft or autograft iliac crest or fibula, followed by stabilization with anterior locking plates.
The posterior approach is indicated when the pathoanatomy involves the posterior elements and is the basic midline approach with muscle retraction off the cervical spine to the lateral aspect of the facet joints bilaterally.
Occasionally, a dual approach is necessary to remove an offending disk fragment anteriorly prior to reduction, followed by posterior stabilization with anterior reconstruction. These global injuries are usually quite unstable, and they benefit from both anterior and posterior reconstruction.
Preoperative Details
In-hospital care of the patient with a cervical spine injury should be meticulous in the preoperative period. These patients are at risk for pulmonary problems secondary to concomitant injuries and to immobilization. Gastrointestinal bleeding has been reported in up to 40% of patients and is most common around 10 days following injury. This can be aggravated by corticosteroid use and can be treated with H2 blockers and early enteral feedings. These patients are also at risk for developing DVT secondary to immobilization. Incidence of DVT has been reported to be as high as 95%, and DVTs are clinically relevant in up to 35% of people. Some form of anticoagulation and compression boots should be used. Skin breakdown due to immobilization is also a problem and should be treated aggressively with pressure relief and wound care.
The above preoperative problems and their association with immobilization have contributed to controversy in the timing of surgical intervention. Proponents exist for both early and late surgical intervention.[15 ]Studies exist showing worsening after surgical intervention within the first 5 days after injury. These studies reported increased mortality rates and neurologic deterioration, concluding that a 1-2 week delay in operative intervention is best. However, other studies have shown that neurologic damage is affected not only by the degree of cord compression but also by its duration. These studies have led to recommendations for urgent decompression.
Most surgeons now advocate early intervention, recognizing that patients are better candidates for surgery in this early window of opportunity before other complications occur. The best reasons for early surgical intervention are to avoid preoperative systemic problems, to provide rapid decompression of the injured cord, and to return to mobilization. One other important scenario is in the patient who exhibits progressive neurologic worsening: prompt surgical decompression is generally agreed to be absolutely necessary.
Intraoperative Details
When the patient is taken to the operating room, certain issues must be addressed. If the patient has been in traction or a halo for reduction of the spine, this must be maintained in the transfer to the operating table and while on the operating table. This sometimes requires an awake patient and/or nasal intubation, with meticulous handling of the cervical spine during the entire process. Thus, the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and nursing staff must all be working in concert to ensure the patient's safety.
The operative approach obviously dictates whether the patient is prone or supine, and in some instances, both are needed for the combined approach. Whatever the position of the patient, the hips, knees, shoulders, hands, and feet should all be well padded to prevent pressure sores and peripheral nerve palsies. The Stryker frame and Jackson frame are operating beds designed with a pulley to facilitate traction of the cervical spine. They also are designed with removable pads for patient positioning, and some are equipped with a turning frame to allow the patient to be spun safely from the supine to the prone position and back.
The indications for spinal cord monitoring are also somewhat controversial among surgeons. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) offer a safe, noninvasive, and continuous technique for assessing the functional integrity of the spinal cord. Several reports suggest that changes in evoked potentials are predictive of neurologic change in the patient. When a signal deformity is detected, it can be checked with a wake-up test to ensure its accuracy. However, the delayed nature of the change makes these tests of limited efficacy in preventing intraoperative injury. A major problem with the technique is that multiple false-positive and false-negative results have been reported. In addition, monitoring is only as good as the skill of the personnel performing it. In summary, SSEPs and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) may have some benefit in the neurologically intact patient in whom significant intraoperative manipulation of the spinal column is anticipated.
Postoperative Details
Postoperatively, patients usually are maintained in some sort of cervical orthosis, depending on the quality of fixation obtained. Fixation techniques have improved dramatically in recent years. Before, most patients were placed in a halo postoperatively; now, patients are placed in only a rigid or soft collar for comfort. The patient should be mobilized out of bed as soon as possible to prevent pulmonary and DVT complications. A return to independence should be approached aggressively, with the help of a comprehensive team that includes a physical therapist, social service personnel, and family. In patients with spinal cord injury and neurologic deficit, extensive physical and emotional rehabilitation should be instituted immediately following surgery to ensure the best physical and psychological outcome for the future.[16 ]
Postoperative management of bowel and bladder dysfunction should include instruction in intermittent catheterizations, as well as the use of alternate-day suppositories and a high-fiber diet to assist with bowel function and avoid impaction.
Close attention to skin breakdown should include frequent turning of the patient and, as mentioned above, prompt mobilization.
Follow-up
Patients must be monitored closely for the first 4 weeks postoperatively to ensure maintenance of spinal alignment and the absence of evidence of neurologic deterioration. Independence should be encouraged, and attempts to regain preinjury activity levels should begin. Between 2 and 3 months of healing usually is expected, and radiographic signs of osseous healing should be noted in this time frame. Some patients may require up to 6 months to achieve preinjury activity levels; others, based on concomitant injuries and age, may never reach this status. Aggressive therapy should continue during this entire period. Once the injury is healed and the patient is functioning at maximal levels, return to full activity is begun.
During the follow-up period, any deterioration in neurologic function should prompt further investigation, including MRI for posttraumatic syrinx or other intrinsic or extrinsic compressive lesions.
Complications
Complications secondary to lower cervical spine fractures and dislocations can be divided into 2 major categories: (1) fracture/dislocation-associated problems and (2) spinal cord injury or medical-related problems, including pulmonary problems (eg, pneumonia, atelectasis, pulmonary embolus), gastrointestinal problems (eg, stress ulcers), urologic problems, skin problems (eg, decubiti), DVT, and psychological problems (eg, depression). Autonomic dysreflexia is a syndrome of generalized sympathetic discharge resulting in severe headache, nausea, chills, anxiety, and sweating. Blood pressure may become dangerously high, usually as a result of bladder distention or fecal impaction. Prompt removal of the inciting stimulus and treatment of the highbloodpressure are emergency measures necessary to avoid catastrophic stroke. This is a potentially lethal condition if unrecognized.
Failure to achieve realignment of the spine is among the first problems that can be encountered in dealing with this group of injuries. While reduction of bilateral facet dislocations tends to be accomplished easily with cervical tongs and traction, unilateral jumped facets may be more problematic. If a reasonable attempt at reduction has been performed (50 lb) or neurologic deficit is persistent or worsening, open reduction and stabilization usually can be accomplished through a posterior approach.
A unilateral root injury is more typical with these injuries. Simple inline traction does not address the rotational component of this injury, and a manipulative reduction with the patient awake can be performed once sufficient traction and flexion have disengaged the locked facet. Closed reductions are successful in about 50% of cases; the remainder require open reduction, which can be achieved easily by grasping the spinous processes and lifting and rotating the facet into place.
Because unreduced dislocations are associated with a high incidence of instability, pain, and stiffness, reduction should be performed by either closed or open means. Simple wiring or lateral mass plate fixation can maintain stability while healing occurs. Supplementing the fixation with bone grafting for arthrodesis does not always seem to be necessary, as pointed out by Levine and Roy-Camille, with plating techniques.[17 ]
Outcome and Prognosis
The clinical outcome after lower cervical spinal injury generally is related to the level and severity of associated spinal cord injury. Incomplete spinal cord injuries, as defined by objective motor or sensory preservation below the level of trauma, have the potential for recovery. In general, the sooner the evidence of return, the better the overall prognosis, although recovery may continue for a year or more.
The level of injury also determines the overall functional status of the patient.
- The patient with C3-4 cord level injury must use a sip-and-puff (mouth) or chin/head control for mobilization in a wheelchair.
- Patients with C5 level injuries, as defined by greater than three-fifths strength in the respective muscle group, are able to assist with upper body dressing, can feed themselves with assistive devices, and can operate a power wheelchair.
- Some grooming and assistance with bowel and bladder programs are within the realm of capabilities of the quadriplegic patient with C6 level injuries. These patients are able to feed themselves with hand or tenodesis splints and can transfer to and from wheelchairs or toilets with some assistance.
- Patients with injuries at the C7 level can transfer independently to the bed, car, or toilet; can use manual or power wheelchairs; and can dress independently using assistive devices.
- Patients with injuries at the C8 level or below should be independent in all transfers and be able to use a manual wheelchair and assist in some homemaking activities.
The life expectancy of patients with cervical spinal cord injuries has increased with better management of urinary complications. Urinary complications are no longer among the most common causes of death after the first year after injury.
Future and Controversies
Restoration of spinal cord function after injury remains a major challenge to those treating paralyzed victims. While prevention and treatment of secondary cord damage continues to be a primary objective, the ability to reverse established cord dysfunction is a major goal. Attempts to reestablish neural recovery have focused on modification of the injured tissue through implantation of acellular guiding prosthesis, fetal tissue, and glial cells.
The activation of intrinsic neural capacities through gene therapy or by delivering a host of neurotropic substances such as nerve growth factor or brain-derived neurotrophic factors is being explored experimentally. The use of stem cells and trials using olfactory glial cells remain on the horizon. Olfactory glial cells are the only neurons able to replicate in adult life. They are capable of crossing scar tissue as well as bridging the gap between the peripheral nervous system and the central nervous system.
Potassium channel blockade has been used in the clinical arena and has been successful in helping up to one third of patients with chronic spinal cord injuries. The drug 4-aminopyridine has been most effective in patients with incomplete cord injuries.[18 ] It is believed to work through blockage of the fast A-type potassium channels that increase the safety factor of conduction across demyelinated or thinly remyelinated internodes or by increasing influx of calcium at presynaptic terminals, which improves neural transmission.
The timing of surgical interventions remains controversial, with advocates of emergent decompression and stabilization versus those contending that delaying surgical management by 5 days can minimize neurologic deterioration. Controlled prospective studies are needed to resolve this ongoing controversy. However, it is generally accepted that abrupt neurologic deterioration in the face of persistent compression warrants immediate surgical intervention.
Multimedia
Media file 1: Cross-sectional anatomy of the cervical cord.
Media file 2: Normal anatomy of the lower cervical spine.
Media file 3: Lateral film of a C5 burst/teardrop fracture.
Media file 4: Sagittal CT scan of C5 burst fracture.
Media file 5: Axial CT scan of C5 burst fracture.
Media file 6: Reduction of C5 burst fracture after tongs traction.
Media file 7: Postoperative image of C5 burst fracture; note anterior and posterior fixation.
Media file 8: Postoperative image of C5 burst fracture.
Media file 9: Standard lateral cervical spine of an 80-year-old patient after a motor vehicle accident; patient has no neurologic deficits and no neck pain.
Media file 10: Swimmer's view of the same 80-year-old patient as in Image 9; note the C7-T1 fracture/dislocation.
Media file 11: Axial CT scan of C7-T1 fracture/dislocation.
Media file 12: Sagittal CT of C7-T1 fracture/dislocation.
Media file 13: MRI of C7-T1 fracture/dislocation.
Media file 14: Reduction of C7-T1 fracture/dislocation.
Media file 15: Postoperative anteroposterior view of C7-T1 fracture/dislocation.
Media file 16: Postoperative lateral view of C7-T1 fracture/dislocation.
References
Allen BL, Ferguson RL, Lehmann TR et al. A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine. 1982;7:1-27.
Toh E, Nomura T, Watanabe M, Mochida J. Surgical treatment for injuries of the middle and lower cervical spine. Int Orthop. Feb 2006;30(1):54-8. [Medline].
Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Aarabi B, Harris MB, Hurbert RJ, Rampersaud YR, et al. Clinical outcomes of 90 isolated unilateral facet fractures, subluxations, and dislocations treated surgically and nonoperatively. Spine. Dec 15 2007;32(26):3007-13. [Medline].
Milligram MA, Rand N. Cervical Spine Anatomy. Spine State of the Art Reviews. 2000;14(3):521-532.
Platzer P, Hauswirth N, Jaindl M, Chatwani S, Vecsei V, Gaebler C. Delayed or missed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries. J Trauma. Jul 2006;61(1):150-5. [Medline].
Antevil JL, Sise MJ, Sack DI, Kidder B, Hopper A, Brown CV. Spiral computed tomography for the initial evaluation of spine trauma: A new standard of care?. J Trauma. Aug 2006;61(2):382-7. [Medline].
Eismont FJ, Arena MJ, Green BA. Extrusion of an Intervertebral Disc associated with Traumatic Subluxation or Dislocation of Cervical Facets. J Bone Joint Surg AM. 1991;73:1555-1560.
Tsutsumi S, Ueta T, Shiba K, Yamamoto S, Takagishi K. Effects of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study of high-dose methylprednisolone therapy on acute cervical spinal cord injury-results in spinal injuries center. Spine. Dec 15 2006;31(26):2992-6; discussion 2997. [Medline].
Bracken MB, Holford TR. Neurological and functional status 1 year after acute spinal cord injury: estimates of functional recovery in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study II from results modeled in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study III. J Neurosurg. Apr 2002;96(3 Suppl):259-66. [Medline].
Young W, Bracken MB. The Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Neurotrauma. Mar 1992;9 Suppl 1:S397-405. [Medline].
Young W, Bracken MB. The Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Neurotrauma. Mar 1992;9 Suppl 1:S397-405. [Medline].
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Hellenbrand KG, Collins WF, Leo LS, Freeman DF, et al. Methylprednisolone and neurological function 1 year after spinal cord injury. Results of the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Neurosurg. Nov 1985;63(5):704-13. [Medline].
Fehlings MG. Summary statement: the use of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. Spine. Dec 15 2001;26(24 Suppl):S55. [Medline].
Fehlings MG, Bracken MB. Summary Statement: The Sygen(R) (GM-1 Ganglioside) Clinical Trial in Acute Spinal Cord Injury. Spine. Dec 15 2001;26(24 Suppl):S99-S100. [Medline].
Sapkas GS, Papadakis SA. Neurological outcome following early versus delayed lower cervical spine surgery. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). Aug 2007;15(2):183-6. [Medline].
Apple DF. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation. In: Garfin SR, Vaccaro AR, eds. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Spine. Vol 2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons;2002:239-244.
Levine AM. Facet fractures and dislocations. In: Lampert R, ed. Spine Trauma. WB Saunders Co;1998:331-365.
Segal JL, Pathak MS, Hernandez JP, et al. Safety and efficacy of 4-aminopyridine in humans with spinal cord injury: a long-term, controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy. Jun 1999;19(6):713-23. [Medline].
Fehlings MG, Sekhon LHS. Restoration of spinal cord function. In: Garfin SR, Vaccaro AR, eds. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Spine. Vol 2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons;2002:483-488.
Rang M. Spine Fractures and Traumatic Paraplegia. The Story of Orthopaedics. 2000;411-422.
Vaccaro AR, Zlotolow DA, Blam OG. The Lower Cervical Spine in Spinal Cord Injury. Spine State of the Art Reviews. 1999;13(3):489-506.
Keywords
compression fractures, burst fractures, teardrop fractures, unilateral facet fracture dislocations, unilateral jumped facet, bilateral facet fracture dislocations, jumped facets, lamina fractures, spinous process fractures, clay shoveler's fracture
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author
J Allan Goodrich, MD, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Georgia
J Allan Goodrich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Coauthor(s)
Thad Riddle, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cartersville Medical Center
Thad Riddle, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, and AO Foundation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Medical Editor
K Daniel Riew, MD, Mildred B Simon Distinguished Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Professor of Neurologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; Chief, Cervical Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital
K Daniel Riew, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, AO Foundation, Cervical Spine Research Society, North American Spine Society, and Scoliosis Research Society
Disclosure: Medtronic Grant/research funds None; Medtronic Royalty Medtronic Vertex; Biomet Royalty Maxan anterior cervical plate; Osprey Royalty Interbody Graft; Osprey Ownership interest Consulting; SpineMedica Consulting fee Consulting
Pharmacy Editor
Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment
Managing Editor
William O Shaffer, MD, Professor, Vice-Chairman and Residency Program Director, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kentucky at Lexington
William O Shaffer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, Kentucky Medical Association, Kentucky Orthopaedic Society, North American Spine Society, Southern Medical Association, and Southern Orthopaedic Association
Disclosure: DePuySpine 1997-2007 (not presently) Royalty Consulting; DePuySpine 2002-2007 (closed) Grant/research funds SacroPelvic Instrumentation Biomechanical Study; DePuyBiologics 2005-2008 (closed) Grant/research funds Healos study just closed; No present Industry grants or funds. None None
CME Editor
Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital
Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, American College of International Physicians, and American College of Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Chief Editor
Mary Ann E Keenan, MD, Professor, Vice Chair for Graduate Medical Education, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Chief of Neuro-Orthopedics Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Mary Ann E Keenan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
© 1994-
by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)