Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Idiopathic Scoliosis

  • Author: Charles T Mehlman, DO, MPH; Chief Editor: Jeffrey A Goldstein, MD  more...
 
Updated: Jan 29, 2016
 

Background

Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of spinal deformity confronting orthopedic surgeons.[1] Its onset can be rather insidious, its progression relentless, and its end results deadly. Proper recognition and treatment of idiopathic scoliosis help to optimize patient outcomes. Once the disease is recognized, effective ways exist to treat it.[2]

Scoliosis represents a disturbance of an otherwise well-organized 25-member intercalated series of spinal segments. It is, at times, grossly oversimplified as mere lateral deviation of the spine, when in reality, it is a complex three-dimensional (3D) deformity.[3, 4] In fact, some have used the term rotoscoliosis to help emphasize this very point. Two-dimensional (2D) imaging systems (plain radiographs) remain somewhat limiting, and scoliosis is commonly defined as greater than 10° of lateral deviation of the spine from its central axis.

In the past, terminology such as kyphoscoliosis was inappropriately used to describe certain patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Idiopathic scoliosis has a strong tendency to flatten the normal kyphosis of the thoracic spine.[5] Winter taught that idiopathic scoliosis is a hypokyphotic disease.[6, 7] In most cases, diagnoses of kyphoscoliosis were clinical misinterpretations of the rib hump associated with an otherwise hypokyphotic thoracic spine. Idiopathic scoliosis may present as a true kyphoscoliosis, but this occurs relatively rarely.

James is credited with classifying idiopathic scoliosis according to the age of the patient at the time of diagnosis.[8] In his classification system, children diagnosed when they are younger than 3 years have infantile idiopathic scoliosis, those diagnosed when they are aged 3-10 years have juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, and those diagnosed when they are older than 10 years have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

These age distinctions, though seemingly arbitrary, have prognostic significance. For instance, Robinson and McMaster reviewed 109 patients with juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and found that nearly 90% of curves progressed, and almost 70% of these patients went on to require surgery.[9] These rates are much higher than the rates associated with other categories of idiopathic scoliosis. The real challenge is to predict which curves will progress significantly and which ones will not.[10] This is discussed in greater detail later in this article.

That scoliosis remains incompletely understood despite a collective medical experience that approaches 4000 years is a sad commentary on the learning curve of medical practitioners. Nevertheless, the history of the recognition and treatment of scoliosis is rich with important lessons for the modern practitioner.

Ancient Hindu religious literature (circa 3500-1800 BCE) describes the treatment of spinal deformity rather clearly. The story is told of a woman who was "deformed in three places" and how Lord Krishna straightened her back.[11] This was accomplished by pressing down on her feet and pulling up on her chin. The orthopedic trappings of the story are unmistakable, including excellent immediate posttreatment results and no long-term follow-up.

Hippocrates (circa 400 BCE) stated, "there are many varieties of curvature of the spine even in persons who are in good health; for it takes place from natural conformation and from habit." He also stated that "lateral curvatures also occur, the proximate cause of which is the attitudes in which these patients lie."[12] The postural and muscular theory of scoliosis thus stated has persisted for thousands of years and remains firmly embraced by some.

Hippocratic scoliosis treatment methods focused primarily on spinal manipulation and traction.[13] He used an elaborate traction table called the scamnum. Medical practitioners used slight variations of the Hippocratic scamnum well into the 1500s. Another treatment approach that Hippocrates discussed involved attempting to diminish spinal deformity with a method called succussion. This involved strapping the patient (often upside down) to a ladder, which was then hoisted into the air and dropped from a height. Hippocrates thought that this method was occasionally useful, but it was largely performed by charlatans to impress the public.[14]

Ambroise Pare, the "most celebrated surgeon of the Renaissance,"[15] is recognized as the first physician to treat scoliosis with a brace. He also recognized that once a patient with scoliosis had reached maturity, bracing was not useful. Pare's orthosis consisted of a metal corset (fashioned in a village smithy setting) with many holes in it to help diminish its significant weight. The record also makes it quite clear that Pare espoused the postural theory of scoliosis.

Nicholas Andry was a French pediatrician who hated the brutal barber surgeons of his day.[16] . At the age of 83 (a year before his death) he wrote a short book entitled Orthopaedia. Thus, in 1741 this name combined the root words for "straight" (orthos) and "child" (pais) to create the name still used for the broad musculoskeletal field, orthopedics.

Andry believed that scoliosis was caused by asymmetric muscle tightness and, thus, helped foster the French belief in "convulsive muscular contraction" as the cause of spinal deformity.[14] Andry stated, "It is well worth while to remark that the crookedness of the spine does not always proceed from a fault of the spine itself, but is sometimes owing to muscles of the forepart of the body being too short, whereby the spine is rendered crooked, just in the same manner as a bow is made more crooked by tying its cord tighter."[17] Andry used rest, suspension, postural approaches, and padded corsets in his treatment of scoliosis.

Jacques Mathieu Delpech was a successful and skilled surgeon, yet he focused a great deal of his attention on nonsurgical approaches to orthopedic problems. The highlight of this focus was his orthopedic institute at Montpellier, in the south of France. This facility included elaborate gardens, a heated winter gymnasium, and an outdoor gymnasium for the treatment of various musculoskeletal problems.

For the treatment of scoliosis, Delpech devised graded exercises for strengthening muscles of the trunk in the belief that the deformity was due to a weak axial musculature. This belief was almost certainly due to the influence of Andry. Delpech also used stretching and traction techniques but did not believe in braces. His patients usually stayed for 1 or 2 years at the institute, and they would wear uniforms while they performed their exercises. Similar elaborate efforts to treat scoliosis still exist in the physical therapy outpatient setting.[18] Delpech's life and that of his institute came to an abrupt end in 1832 when a disgruntled patient shot him to death as he was riding back to Montpellier in an open carriage.[12]

An important event of the 1800s was the advent of surgical treatment of scoliosis by the French orthopedic surgeon Jules Guerin. He was very enthusiastic about subcutaneous tenotomy and myotomy and first reported their use in his scoliosis patients in 1839. When he later published the results of treatment of 1349 patients with this technique, tremendous controversy was ignited.[12] Guerin's harshest critic was Joseph Malgaigne, who described Guerin's work as "some orthopedic illusion."[12] This led to one of the most famous orthopedic lawsuits in history: Guerin versus Malgaigne. This defamation trial ended in Malgaigne's favor and helped to establish an important precedent for open criticism of scientific papers.

Another important tool in the treatment of scoliosis was the plaster body jacket (ie, body cast). The American orthopedic surgeon Lewis Sayre popularized its use in the mid-1800s. Sayre's technique involved a large tripod that allowed the patient to be suspended while the corrective plaster cast was applied. Sayre was said to be "a brusque, forceful and therefore controversial personality" but also "an eloquent speaker" who toured internationally demonstrating his casting techniques.[14] He also used a "jury mast" extension from some of his casts in order to provide constant head traction—a clear predecessor to halo traction.

The early 1900s saw what was arguably the most important advance in scoliosis treatment in more than 3000 years: posterior spinal fusion. Russell Hibbs first performed his "fusion operation" for tuberculous spinal deformity in 1911, but by 1914 he also was applying his technique to patients with scoliosis.[19] The Hibbs approach focused on achieving maximum deformity correction via a variety of plaster jackets before surgery. Hibbs's 1924 description of his own technique is eloquent:

The dissection is carried farther and farther forward upon each vertebra in turn, until the spinous processes, the posterior surfaces of the laminae, and the base of the transverse processes are bared...[and] with a bone gouge, a substantial piece of bone is elevated from the adjacent edges of each lamina, of half its thickness and of half its width. The free end of the piece from above is turned down to make contact with the lamina below, and the free end of the piece from the lamina below is turned up to make contact with the lamina above...Each spinous process is then partially divided with bone forceps and broken down, forcing the tip to come into contact with the bare bone of the vertebra below.

In the postoperative period, Hibbs typically allowed 2 weeks of bedrest for wound healing, followed by a final traction plaster jacket. The patient would continue to be confined to bed while wearing the corrective cast for another 6 weeks. Following this, the patient would wear a removable brace during the day for an additional 6-12 months. It was clear to Hibbs that with his technique, he could at least partially correct and, more important than this, prevent progression of the curves he was treating.

By 1941, such spinal fusion operations for idiopathic scoliosis were common enough that Shands (of the Alfred I duPont Institute) and his fellow researchers could assess more than 400 cases.[20] Hibbs-type fusion procedures were performed in all cases, but most surgeons (60%) used supplemental bone graft (often from the tibia). An approximately 25% final curve correction was achieved, and an overall 28% pseudarthrosis rate was noted.[20]

It would be another 20 years before Paul Harrington would introduce the spinal instrumentation system that would further refine scoliosis surgery.[21] Although Harrington's original concept was instrumentation without fusion, persons such as John Moe would convince him of the value of spinal fusion in concert with Harrington rods.[22]

Further refinement in surgical technique and instrumentation has led to the greater than 50% correction and single-digit pseudarthrosis rates to which contemporary orthopedists have become accustomed.

For patient education resources, see the Bone Health Center and Back, Ribs, Neck, and Head Center, as well as Scoliosis.

Next

Anatomy

The anatomy relevant to idiopathic scoliosis is that of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Key points regarding developmental anatomy of the spine are outlined below. The anatomy specifically relevant to anterior and posterior surgical approaches to the spine is discussed further elswhere (see Treatment, Surgical Therapy).

Developmental anatomy

Significant growth, development, and differentiation occur as a single-cell zygote progresses to become an approximately 100 trillion–cell adult human. Identifiable spine development has begun by week 3 of gestation. First, the neural tube forms. Later, paired somites appear (at 4.5 weeks' gestation), and spinal nerves are present by gestational week 6. A discernible cartilage model of the spine is present by gestational week 7.

The bone and cartilage of the spine are mesodermal derivatives, as are significant portions of the cardiovascular and urogenital systems. This explains the frequent coexistence of congenital spine anomalies with congenital cardiac and kidney defects. Thus, gestational weeks 3-7 are very important in the development of all of these major body systems.

Postnatal spinal growth also must be understood and appreciated. Dimeglio has shown that the majority of spinal canal diameter (about 90%) has been achieved by age 5 years.[23] By age 10 years, approximately 80% of sitting height has also been achieved.[24] During adolescence, radiographic evidence of ossification of the growth cartilage of the vertebral bodies occurs. Prior to this, these completely cartilaginous growth plates remained nestled between their respective vertebral bodies and intervertebral disks.

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Much has been written regarding the potential influence of melatonin on the development of idiopathic scoliosis.[25, 26] This has largely originated from studies in which the pineal gland was removed in chickens and scoliosis developed. These same studies suggested that the melatonin deficiency following pinealectomy might be the underlying reason for the development of scoliosis.

Bagnall et al studied pinealectomized chickens to which they administered therapeutic doses of melatonin.[27] They were unable to demonstrate any ability of the melatonin to prevent the development of scoliosis. It is fair to say that no final answer is yet available.

Some authors have suggested that a posterior column lesion within the central nervous system might be present in patients who have idiopathic scoliosis.[28, 29] Such central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction was hypothesized to be manifested as decreased vibratory sensation.

McInnes et al later pointed out that the vibration device used in earlier studies (a Bio-Thesiometer) did not demonstrate sufficient reliability characteristics to allow valid conclusions.[30] This line of research might be attractive to those who feel that a postural disturbance is the root cause of scoliosis.

Previous
Next

Etiology

The precise etiology of idiopathic scoliosis remains unknown, but several intriguing research avenues exist.

A primary muscle disorder has been postulated as a possible etiology of idiopathic scoliosis. The contractile proteins of platelets resemble those of skeletal muscle, and calmodulin is an important mediator of calcium-induced contractility. Kindsfater et al studied the level of platelet calmodulin in 27 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.[31] Using a direct measurement technique, they showed that patients with a progressive curve (>10° progression) had statistically higher platelet calmodulin levels (3.83 ng/μg vs 0.60 ng/μg).[31] If these data are reproduced in larger studies, they hold the potential to allow clinicians to identify patients at higher risk of curve progression.

An elastic fiber system defect (abnormal fibrillin metabolism) has been offered as one potential etiologic explanation for idiopathic scoliosis.[32] Such abnormal connective tissue has not been found universally in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. No clear cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Further research in this area is clearly warranted.

Disorganized skeletal growth, probably with its root cause at a gene locus or group of loci, has been discussed as a possible etiologic explanation for idiopathic scoliosis. This theory is simply that a rather localized primary growth dysplasia leads to a cascading Hueter-Volkmann effect on a much larger portion of the spine.[33] The Hueter-Volkmann principle states that compressive forces tend to stunt skeletal growth and that distractive forces tend to accelerate skeletal growth. A possible, yet unproven, association with such a growth disturbance is the osteopenia that has been identified in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.[34]

Aronsson conducted a series of experiments exploring this mechanical modulation of growth. Using two different animal models (rats and calves), he showed that the force exerted by external ring fixators were quite capable of producing vertebral segment wedging akin to that seen in human idiopathic scoliosis.[35, 36] Correlation of his laboratory information with the clinical setting has drawn attention to the fact that wedging occurs both from the vertebral bodies themselves and from the disk spaces, with more thoracic wedging coming from the vertebral bodies.[37] The asymmetric mechanical forces have also been associated with elevated synthetic activity in the convex side of scoliotic curves.[38]

Bylski-Austrow and Wall led a group of Cincinnati Children's Hospital researchers who further analyzed the mechanical modulation of spinal growth. Using a porcine model, they successfully induced growth changes by means of an endoscopically implanted spinal staple.[39, 40, 41] Within the context of 8 weeks' follow-up, they were able to create 35-40° of scoliotic curvature in growing pigs. Histologic analysis of vertebral specimens revealed increased paraphyseal density and disorganized chondrocyte development in the region of the staple blades.

Genetic roots of the disease referred to as idiopathic scoliosis have been rather strongly suggested by several avenues of research. An X-linked inheritance pattern (with variable penetrance and heterogeneity) has been suggested by several authors.[42] Studies of twins with scoliosis have pointed in a similar direction.[43, 44] . More than 90% of monozygotic twins and more than 60% of dizygotic twins demonstrate concordance regarding their idiopathic scoliosis.[43] Some evidence has also directed attention to portions of chromosomes 6, 10, and 18 as possible scoliosis-related loci.[45]

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Scoliosis is almost always discussed in terms of its prevalence (ie, the total number of existing cases within a defined population at risk). Rates may vary quite significantly based on what particular definition of scoliosis is used and what patient population is being studied. Several important studies are included below.

Stirling et al studied almost 16,000 patients aged 6-14 years in England and found the point prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle >10°) to be 0.5% (76 of 15,799 patients).[46] The prevalence of scoliosis was highest (1.2%) in patients aged 12-14 years.[46] Data such as these have helped reiterate the idea that the focus of screening efforts should be on children in this age group. When smaller Cobb angle measurements have been accepted (eg, 6° or greater), a significantly higher scoliotic rate may be identified, such as the 4.5% rate reported by Rogala et al.[47] Other studies using the 10° definition of scoliosis have placed the overall prevalence in the 1.9-3.0% range.[48]

Scoliosis has been suggested to develop more frequently in children born to mothers who are aged 27 years or older.[49] One might hypothesize that gene fragility might be involved (eg, higher rate of infants with Down syndrome born to older mothers). The precise explanation as to why this might be the case has not been elucidated. In addition to this, no other authors have duplicated these results.

As mentioned previously, most patients with idiopathic scoliosis are female, and the vast majority of research has focused on females. One of the only articles written on idiopathic scoliosis in males is that by Karol et al, from the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital. These authors showed that boys with scoliosis are at risk for curve progression for a longer period than girls. They also suggested that efforts to screen for boys with scoliosis should be performed a little later than similar screenings for girls.[50]

Previous
Next

Prognosis

Clinical outcomes following treatment of idiopathic scoliosis are strongly linked to curve magnitude.[51] Unrealistic presurgical expectations have been shown to correlate with a decreased likelihood of postsurgical satisfaction.[52] More long-term follow-up studies of surgically treated patients with scoliosis are becoming available. This section outlines some of these data.

One study reported that conservative treatment may result in decreased self-concept in adolescent patients with mild-to-moderate scoliosis, particularly in patients with Cobb angles of 40-50°. Comparatively, the study reported that surgically treating these patients resulted in a significant increase in self-concept.[53]

A large cohort (nearly 2000 subjects) of patients with idiopathic scoliosis in Montreal, Canada, referred to as the St Justine Cohort Study, was monitored for 10-20 years. These patients were compared to a population-based control group drawn from the general Quebec population. Compared to the general population and regardless of whether their scoliosis was treated surgically or nonsurgically, patients with scoliosis were found to have a higher self-reported rate of arthritis and poorer perceptions of their overall health, body image, and ability to participate in vigorous activities.[54, 55]

A subset of the cohort (700-1500 patients) was analyzed further regarding low back pain.[56, 57] These Canadian researchers found a higher overall rate of significant back pain reported within the last year (75% of patients with scoliosis versus 56% of control subjects).[56] Patients with scoliosis who were treated surgically also reported a high rate (73%) of back pain within the last year, but it did not correlate with the distal extent of the spinal fusion. The St Justine authors went on to state that their study "does not provide any evidence that extending the level of fusion down even as far as L4 will increase the prevalence of back pain in adulthood."[57]

Asher et al performed a retrospective study to determine implant/fusion survivorship without reoperation and the risk factors influencing such survival in 207 patients. Of the 207 patients followed, 19 (9.2%) required reoperation, with 16 of those being for indications related to posterior spine instrumentation. Survival of the implant/fusion without reoperation for spine instrumentation-related indications was 96% at 5 years, 91.6% at 10 years, 87.1% at 15 years, and 73.7% at 16 years. The need for reoperation was significantly influenced by two implant variables: transverse connector design and the lower instrumented vertebra anchors used.[58]

Luhman et al reviewed the prevalence of and indications for reoperations in 1057 spinal fusions for idiopathic scoliosis. Of the 1057 fusions, 41 (3.9%) required reoperation: 11 anterior, 25 posterior, and five circumferential. In addition, 47 other procedures were needed: 20 revision spinal fusions (for pseudarthroses, uninstrumented curve progression, or junctional kyphosis); 16 because of infections (five acute, 11 chronic); seven for implant removal because of pain and/or prominence (four complete, three partial); two (4%) revisions for loosened implants; and two elective thoracoplasties.[59]

Yaszay et al measured the effects of different surgical approaches for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on pulmonary function over a 2-year period in 61 patients. They evaluated the patients for vital capacity (VC) and peak flow (PF) before surgery and after surgery at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. They found that scoliosis approaches that penetrated the chest wall resulted in a significant decline in postoperative pulmonary function. Return of pulmonary function did not occur until 3 months after posterior fusion with thoracoplasty; until 3 months after open anterior fusion; and until 1 year after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.[60]

After a 10-year follow-up, the data from another study noted that patients who experienced intraoperative chest wall violation during their spinal fusion demonstrated a significant decrease in percent-predicted forced VC and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) values. However, those who underwent posterior-only procedures showed significant improvements in forced VC and FEV1 absolute values without any change in percent-predicted values; no changes were noted in percent-predicted values at 5 and 10 years in either group. These results suggest that procedures sparing the chest wall may result in better long-term pulmonary function.[61]

Regarding possible prognostication related to curve progression, Wei-Jun et al suggest that body weight in adolescent males may be an important parameter. Abnormal pubertal growth was noted in idiopathic scoliosis patients compared with healthy controls, with longitudinal growth being similar but body weight being significantly lower in the male adolescent scoliosis subjects.[62]

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Charles T Mehlman, DO, MPH Professor of Pediatrics and Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Director, Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Charles T Mehlman, DO, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Fracture Association, Scoliosis Research Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, American Osteopathic Association, Arthroscopy Association of North America, North American Spine Society, Ohio State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

William O Shaffer, MD Orthopedic Spine Surgeon, Northwest Iowa Bone, Joint, and Sports Surgeons

William O Shaffer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, Kentucky Medical Association, North American Spine Society, Kentucky Orthopaedic Society, International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, Southern Medical Association, Southern Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Received royalty from DePuySpine 1997-2007 (not presently) for consulting; Received grant/research funds from DePuySpine 2002-2007 (closed) for sacropelvic instrumentation biomechanical study; Received grant/research funds from DePuyBiologics 2005-2008 (closed) for healos study just closed; Received consulting fee from DePuySpine 2009 for design of offset modification of expedium.

Chief Editor

Jeffrey A Goldstein, MD Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine; Director of Spine Service, Director of Spine Fellowship, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center

Jeffrey A Goldstein, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, North American Spine Society, Scoliosis Research Society, Cervical Spine Research Society, International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, AOSpine, Society of Lateral Access Surgery, International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery, Lumbar Spine Research Society

Disclosure: Received consulting fee from Medtronic for consulting; Received consulting fee from NuVasive for consulting; Received royalty from Nuvasive for consulting; Received consulting fee from K2M for consulting; Received ownership interest from NuVasive for none.

References
  1. Lonstein JE. Idiopathic scoliosis. Lonstein JE, Bradford DS, Winter RB, Ogilvie J, eds. Moe's Textbook of Scoliosis and Other Spinal Deformities. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995. 219-56.

  2. Helenius I, Remes V, Lamberg T, Schlenzka D, Poussa M. Long-term health-related quality of life after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun. 90(6):1231-9. [Medline].

  3. Asher MA, Burton DC. A concept of idiopathic scoliosis deformities as imperfect torsion(s). Clin Orthop. 1999 Jul. (364):11-25. [Medline].

  4. Charles YP, Diméglio A, Marcoul M, Bourgin JF, Marcoul A, Bozonnat MC. Influence of idiopathic scoliosis on three-dimensional thoracic growth. Spine. 2008 May 15. 33(11):1209-18. [Medline].

  5. Clement JL, Chau E, Kimkpe C, Vallade MJ. Restoration of thoracic kyphosis by posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparative radiographic analysis of two methods of reduction. Spine. 2008 Jun 15. 33(14):1579-87. [Medline].

  6. Winter RB. The idiopathic double thoracic curve pattern. Its recognition and surgical management. Spine. 1989 Dec. 14(12):1287-92. [Medline].

  7. Winter RB, Lovell WW, Moe JH. Excessive thoracic lordosis and loss of pulmonary function in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Oct. 57(7):972-7. [Medline].

  8. JAMES JI. Idiopathic scoliosis; the prognosis, diagnosis, and operative indications related to curve patterns and the age at onset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954 Feb. 36-B (1):36-49. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  9. Robinson CM, McMaster MJ. Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Curve patterns and prognosis in one hundred and nine patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Aug. 78(8):1140-8. [Medline].

  10. Peterson LE, Nachemson AL. Prediction of progression of the curve in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of moderate severity. Logistic regression analysis based on data from The Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jun. 77(6):823-7. [Medline].

  11. Kumar K. Spinal deformity and axial traction. Spine. 1996 Mar 1. 21(5):653-5. [Medline].

  12. Peltier LF. Orthopaedics: A History and Iconography. San Francisco: Norman Publishing; 1993.

  13. Marketos SG, Skiadas P. Hippocrates. The father of spine surgery. Spine. 1999 Jul 1. 24(13):1381-7. [Medline].

  14. LeVay D. The History of Orthopaedics: An Account of the Study and Practice of Orthopaedics from the Earliest Times to the Modern Era. Park Ridge, NJ: Parthenon Publishing; 1990.

  15. Zimmerman, Moe JH, Winter RB. Determination of "normal" thoracic kyphosis: a roentgenographic study of 121 "normal" children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Nov-Dec. 20(6):796-8. [Medline].

  16. Wenger DR. Idiopathic scoliosis. Wenger DR, Rang M, eds. The Art and Practice of Children's Orthopaedics. New York: Raven Press; 1993.

  17. Bick EM. Book of Orthopaedics. New York: Hafner Publishing; 1968.

  18. Negrini S, Zaina F, Romano M, Negrini A, Parzini S. Specific exercises reduce brace prescription in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective controlled cohort study with worst-case analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Jun. 40(6):451-5. [Medline].

  19. Hibbs RA. A report of fifty-nine cases of scoliosis treated by the fusion operation. By Russell A. Hibbs, 1924. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Apr. 6:4-19. [Medline].

  20. Shands AR, Barr JS, Colonna PC. End-Result Study of the Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis: Report of the Research Committee of the American Orthopaedic Association. J Bone Joint Surg. 1941. 23:963-977.

  21. Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis: correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. June 1962. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Feb. 84-A (2):316. [Medline].

  22. Hall JE. Spinal surgery before and after Paul Harrington. Spine. 1998 Jun 15. 23(12):1356-61. [Medline].

  23. Dimeglio A. Growth in pediatric orthopaedics. Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL, eds. Lovell & Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. 33-62.

  24. Dimeglio A. Growth of the Spine Before Age 5 Years. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993. 1:102-107.

  25. Letellier K, Azeddine B, Parent S, Labelle H, Rompré PH, Moreau A, et al. Estrogen cross-talk with the melatonin signaling pathway in human osteoblasts derived from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. J Pineal Res. 2008 May 26. [Medline].

  26. Moreau A, Akoumé Ndong MY, Azeddine B, Franco A, Rompré PH, Roy-Gagnon MH, et al. [Molecular and genetic aspects of idiopathic scoliosis. Blood test for idiopathic scoliosis]. Orthopade. 2009 Feb. 38(2):114-6, 118-21. [Medline].

  27. Bagnall K, Raso VJ, Moreau M, et al. The effects of melatonin therapy on the development of scoliosis after pinealectomy in the chicken. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Feb. 81(2):191-9. [Medline].

  28. Barrack RL, Wyatt MP, Whitecloud TS 3rd, et al. Vibratory hypersensitivity in idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988 Jul-Aug. 8(4):389-95. [Medline].

  29. Wyatt MP, Barrack RL, Mubarak SJ, et al. Vibratory response in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 Nov. 68(5):714-8. [Medline].

  30. McInnes E, Hill DL, Raso VJ, et al. Vibratory response in adolescents who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Sep. 73(8):1208-12. [Medline].

  31. Kindsfater K, Lowe T, Lawellin D, et al. Levels of platelet calmodulin for the prediction of progression and severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Aug. 76(8):1186-92. [Medline].

  32. Hadley-Miller N, Mims B, Milewicz DM. The potential role of the elastic fiber system in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Aug. 76(8):1193-206. [Medline].

  33. Mehlman CT, Araghi A, Roy DR. Hyphenated history: the Hueter-Volkmann law. Am J Orthop. 1997 Nov. 26(11):798-800. [Medline].

  34. Cheng JC, Guo X. Osteopenia in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A primary problem or secondary to the spinal deformity?. Spine. 1997 Aug 1. 22(15):1716-21. [Medline].

  35. Aronsson DD, Stokes IA, Rosovsky J, Spence H. Mechanical modulation of calf tail vertebral growth: implications for scoliosis progression. J Spinal Disord. 1999 Apr. 12(2):141-6. [Medline].

  36. Mente PL, Stokes IA, Spence H, Aronsson DD. Progression of vertebral wedging in an asymmetrically loaded rat tail model. Spine. 1997 Jun 15. 22(12):1292-6. [Medline].

  37. Stokes IA, Aronsson DD. Disc and vertebral wedging in patients with progressive scoliosis. J Spinal Disord. 2001 Aug. 14(4):317-22. [Medline].

  38. Antoniou J, Arlet V, Goswami T, et al. Elevated synthetic activity in the convex side of scoliotic intervertebral discs and endplates compared with normal tissues. Spine. 2001 May 15. 26(10):E198-206. [Medline].

  39. Bylski-Austrow D, Wall E, Kolata R. Endoscopic mechanical spinal hemiepiphysiodesis modifies spine growth. Presented at: The Orthopaedic Research Society 46th Annual Meeting; 2000; Orlando, Fla.

  40. Bylski-Austrow DI, Wall EJ, Kolata RJ. Endoscopic nonfusion spinal hemiepiphysiodesis: preliminary studies in a porcine model. Sevastik JA, Diab KM, eds. Research into Spinal Deformities. Burke, VA: IOS Press; 1999. vol 2: 270-3.

  41. Wall EJ, Bylski-Austrow D, Kolata RJ. Endoscopic mechanical spinal hemiepiphysiodesis modifies spinal growth. Presented at: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 68th Annual Meeting; 2001; San Francisco, Calif.

  42. Miller NH, Justice CM, Marosy B. Familial idiopathic scoliosis: evidence of X-linked susceptibility locus. Presented at: The Scoliosis Research Society 36th Annual Meeting; 2001; Cleveland, Ohio.

  43. Inoue M, Minami S, Kitahara H, et al. Idiopathic scoliosis in twins studied by DNA fingerprinting: the incidence and type of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Mar. 80(2):212-7. [Medline].

  44. Kesling KL, Reinker KA. Scoliosis in twins. A meta-analysis of the literature and report of six cases. Spine. 1997 Sep 1. 22(17):2009-14; discussion 2015. [Medline].

  45. Wise CA, Barnes R, Gillum J, et al. Localization of susceptibility to familial idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2000 Sep 15. 25(18):2372-80. [Medline].

  46. Stirling AJ, Howel D, Millner PA, et al. Late-onset idiopathic scoliosis in children six to fourteen years old. A cross-sectional prevalence study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Sep. 78(9):1330-6. [Medline].

  47. Rogala EJ, Drummond DS, Gurr J. Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar. 60(2):173-6. [Medline].

  48. Albanese SA. Idiopathic scoliosis: etiology and evaluation. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Pediatrics. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2002. 287-96.

  49. Henderson MH Jr, Rieger MA, Miller F, Kaelin A. Influence of parental age on degree of curvature in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Jul. 72(6):910-3. [Medline].

  50. Karol LA, Johnston CE 2nd, Browne RH, Madison M. Progression of the curve in boys who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Dec. 75(12):1804-10. [Medline].

  51. Tsutsui S, Pawelek J, Bastrom T, Lenke L, Lowe T, Betz R, et al. Dissecting the effects of spinal fusion and deformity magnitude on quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15. 34(18):E653-8. [Medline].

  52. Koch KD, Buchanan R, Birch JG, et al. Adolescents undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: how physical and psychological characteristics relate to patient satisfaction with the cosmetic result. Spine. 2001 Oct 1. 26(19):2119-24. [Medline].

  53. Zhang J, Wang D, Chen Z, Gao J, Yu X, Sun H, et al. Decrease of Self-Concept in Adolescent Patients With Mild to Moderate Scoliosis After Conservative Treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 1. 36(15):E1004-E1008. [Medline].

  54. Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Poitras B, et al. The Ste-Justine Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Cohort Study. Part I: Description of the study. Spine. 1994 Jul 15. 19(14):1551-61. [Medline].

  55. Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Poitras B, et al. The Ste-Justine Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Cohort Study. Part II: Perception of health, self and body image, and participation in physical activities. Spine. 1994 Jul 15. 19(14):1562-72. [Medline].

  56. Mayo NE, Goldberg MS, Poitras B, et al. The Ste-Justine Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Cohort Study. Part III: Back pain. Spine. 1994 Jul 15. 19(14):1573-81. [Medline].

  57. Poitras B, Mayo NE, Goldberg MS, et al. The Ste-Justine Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Cohort Study. Part IV: Surgical correction and back pain. Spine. 1994 Jul 15. 19(14):1582-8. [Medline].

  58. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC. Analysis of instrumentation/fusion survivorship without reoperation after primary posterior multiple anchor instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J. 2009 Oct 10. [Medline].

  59. Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Schootman M. Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15. 34(20):2191-7. [Medline].

  60. Yaszay B, Jazayeri R, Lonner B. The effect of surgical approaches on pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jun. 22(4):278-83. [Medline].

  61. Gitelman Y, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Auerbach JD, Sides BA. Pulmonary Function in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Relative to the Surgical Procedure: A 10-Year Follow-up Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15. 36(20):1665-72. [Medline].

  62. Wei-Jun W, Xu S, Zhi-Wei W, Xu-Sheng Q, Zhen L, Yong Q. Abnormal anthropometric measurements and growth pattern in male adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan. 21(1):77-83. [Medline].

  63. Hensinger RN. Acute back pain in children. Instr Course Lect. 1995. 44:111-26. [Medline].

  64. Ramirez N, Johnston CE, Browne RH. The prevalence of back pain in children who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Mar. 79(3):364-8. [Medline].

  65. Cheung KM, Luk KD. Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Aug. 79(8):1144-50. [Medline].

  66. Klepps SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective comparison of flexibility radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2001 Mar 1. 26(5):E74-9. [Medline].

  67. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Dec. 65(9):1302-13. [Medline].

  68. Cummings RJ, Loveless EA, Campbell J, et al. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Aug. 80(8):1107-11. [Medline].

  69. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Bridwell KH, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Aug. 80(8):1097-106. [Medline].

  70. Coonrad RW, Murrell GA, Motley G, et al. A logical coronal pattern classification of 2,000 consecutive idiopathic scoliosis cases based on the scoliosis research society- defined apical vertebra. Spine. 1998 Jun 15. 23(12):1380-91. [Medline].

  71. Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Mar. 72(3):320-7. [Medline].

  72. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Mar. 72(3):328-33. [Medline].

  73. Schwend RM, Hennrikus W, Hall JE, Emans JB. Childhood scoliosis: clinical indications for magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jan. 77(1):46-53. [Medline].

  74. Ozturk C, Karadereler S, Ornek I, Enercan M, Ganiyusufoglu K, Hamzaoglu A. The role of routine magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop. 2009 Jun 9. [Medline].

  75. Gagnon S, Jodoin A, Martin R. Pulmonary function test study and after spinal fusion in young idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1989 May. 14(5):486-90. [Medline].

  76. Kearon C, Viviani GR, Kirkley A, Killian KJ. Factors determining pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Aug. 148(2):288-94. [Medline].

  77. Graham EJ, Lenke LG, Lowe TG, et al. Prospective pulmonary function evaluation following open thoracotomy for anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2000 Sep 15. 25(18):2319-25. [Medline].

  78. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Linville DL. Comparison of push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliotic curves. Spine. 2000 Jan. 25(1):76-81. [Medline].

  79. Upadhyay SS, Ho EK, Gunawardene WM, et al. Changes in residual volume relative to vital capacity and total lung capacity after arthrodesis of the spine in patients who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Jan. 75(1):46-52. [Medline].

  80. Vedantam R, Crawford AH. The role of preoperative pulmonary function tests in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. Spine. 1997 Dec 1. 22(23):2731-4. [Medline].

  81. Soucacos PN, Soucacos PK, Zacharis KC, et al. School-screening for scoliosis. A prospective epidemiological study in northwestern and central Greece. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Oct. 79(10):1498-503. [Medline].

  82. Little DG, Song KM, Katz D, Herring JA. Relationship of peak height velocity to other maturity indicators in idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 May. 82(5):685-93. [Medline].

  83. Aroeira RM, Leal JS, de Melo Pertence AE. New method of scoliosis assessment: preliminary results using computerized photogrammetry. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 1. 36(19):1584-91. [Medline].

  84. Rivard CH, Coillard C, Leroux MA. SpineCor: A New Therapeutic Approach for Idiopathic Scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2000. 9(4):293-294.

  85. Hsu JD, Slager UT, Swank SM, Robinson MH. Idiopathic scoliosis: a clinical, morphometric, and histopathological correlation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988 Mar-Apr. 8(2):147-52. [Medline].

  86. Puzas JE, O'Keefe RJ, Lieberman JR. The orthopaedic genome: what does the future hold and are we ready?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Jan. 84-A(1):133-41. [Medline].

  87. Herring JA. Idiopathic scoliosis. Tachdjian's Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002. 213-321.

  88. Lloyd-Roberts GC, Pilcher MF. Structural Idiopathic Scoliosis in Infancy: A Study of Natural History of 100 Patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965. 47B:520-3.

  89. Ceballos T, Ferrer-Torrelles M, Castillo F, Fernandez-Paredes E. Prognosis in infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Sep. 62(6):863-75. [Medline].

  90. Mehta MH. The rib-vertebra angle in the early diagnosis between resolving and progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 May. 54(2):230-43. [Medline].

  91. McAlindon RJ, Kruse RW. Measurement of rib vertebral angle difference. Intraobserver error and interobserver variation. Spine. 1997 Jan 15. 22(2):198-9. [Medline].

  92. Marks DS, Iqbal MJ, Thompson AG, Piggott H. Convex spinal epiphysiodesis in the management of progressive infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1996 Aug 15. 21(16):1884-8. [Medline].

  93. Pratt RK, Webb JK, Burwell RG, Cummings SL. Luque trolley and convex epiphysiodesis in the management of infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1999 Aug 1. 24(15):1538-47. [Medline].

  94. Figueiredo UM, James JI. Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981 Feb. 63-B(1):61-6. [Medline].

  95. Gupta P, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH. Incidence of neural axis abnormalities in infantile and juvenile patients with spinal deformity. Is a magnetic resonance image screening necessary?. Spine. 1998 Jan 15. 23(2):206-10. [Medline].

  96. Molina A, Martin C, Munoz I, et al. Spinal intraosseous arteriovenous malformation as a cause of juvenile scoliosis. A case report. Spine. 1997 Jan 15. 22(2):221-4. [Medline].

  97. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug. 83-A(8):1169-81. [Medline].

  98. Dubousset J, Herring JA, Shufflebarger H. The crankshaft phenomenon. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989 Sep-Oct. 9(5):541-50. [Medline].

  99. Hamill CL, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Posterior arthrodesis in the skeletally immature patient. Assessing the risk for crankshaft: is an open triradiate cartilage the answer?. Spine. 1997 Jun 15. 22(12):1343-51. [Medline].

  100. Roberto RF, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, Denis F. Curve progression in Risser stage 0 or 1 patients after posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997 Nov-Dec. 17(6):718-25. [Medline].

  101. Shufflebarger HL, Clark CE. Prevention of the crankshaft phenomenon. Spine. 1991 Aug. 16(8 Suppl):S409-11. [Medline].

  102. Lee CS, Nachemson AL. The crankshaft phenomenon after posterior Harrington fusion in skeletally immature patients with thoracic or thoracolumbar idiopathic scoliosis followed to maturity. Spine. 1997 Jan 1. 22(1):58-67. [Medline].

  103. Moe JH, Kettleson DN. Idiopathic scoliosis. Analysis of curve patterns and the preliminary results of Milwaukee-brace treatment in one hundred sixty-nine patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Dec. 52(8):1509-33. [Medline].

  104. Lonstein JE, Winter RB. The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A review of one thousand and twenty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Aug. 76(8):1207-21. [Medline].

  105. Noonan KJ, Weinstein SL, Jacobson WC, Dolan LA. Use of the Milwaukee brace for progressive idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Apr. 78(4):557-67. [Medline].

  106. Maruyama T, Takeshita K, Kitagawa T. Milwaukee brace today. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008 May. 3(3):136-8. [Medline].

  107. Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, et al. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 May. 79(5):664-74. [Medline].

  108. Nachemson AL, Peterson LE. Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jun. 77(6):815-22. [Medline].

  109. Allington NJ, Bowen JR. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment with the Wilmington brace. A comparison of full-time and part-time use. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jul. 78(7):1056-62. [Medline].

  110. Payne WK 3rd, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD, et al. Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference?. Spine. 1997 Jun 15. 22(12):1380-4. [Medline].

  111. MacLean WE Jr, Green NE, Pierre CB, Ray DC. Stress and coping with scoliosis: psychological effects on adolescents and their families. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989 May-Jun. 9(3):257-61. [Medline].

  112. DiRaimondo CV, Green NE. Brace-wear compliance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988 Mar-Apr. 8(2):143-6. [Medline].

  113. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Ruszkowski A, et al. Variability of strap tension in brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1999 Feb 15. 24(4):349-54. [Medline].

  114. Wynne JH. The Boston Brace and TriaC systems. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008 May. 3(3):130-5. [Medline].

  115. Kessler JI. Efficacy of a new computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture orthosis in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2008 Jul. 17(4):207-11. [Medline].

  116. Coillard C, Circo A, Rivard CH. A new concept for the non-invasive treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: the Corrective Movement principle integrated in the SpineCor System. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008 May. 3(3):112-9. [Medline].

  117. Gutman G, Benoit M, Joncas J, Beausejour M, Barchi S, Labelle H, et al. The effectiveness of the SpineCor brace for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. comparison with the boston brace. Spine J. 2016 Jan 22. [Medline].

  118. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, et al. Radiographic results of arthrodesis with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A five to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Jun. 80(6):807-14. [Medline].

  119. Mielke CH, Lonstein JE, Denis F, et al. Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A comparative analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Sep. 71(8):1170-7. [Medline].

  120. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Aug. 74(7):1056-67. [Medline].

  121. Rajasekaran S, Dorgan JC, Taylor JF, Dangerfield PH. Eighteen-level analysis of vertebral rotation following Harrington- Luque instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Jan. 76(1):104-9. [Medline].

  122. Jarvis JG, Greene RN. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Correction of vertebral rotation with use of Wisconsin segmental spinal instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov. 78(11):1707-12. [Medline].

  123. Mehlman CT, Crawford AH, Wolf RK. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Endoscopic thoracoplasty technique. Spine. 1997 Sep 15. 22(18):2178-82. [Medline].

  124. Crawford AH, Wall EJ, Wolf R. Video-assisted thoracoscopy. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999 Jul. 30(3):367-85, viii. [Medline].

  125. Wall EJ, Bylski-Austrow DI, Shelton FS, et al. Endoscopic discectomy increases thoracic spine flexibility as effectively as open discectomy. A mechanical study in a porcine model. Spine. 1998 Jan 1. 23(1):9-15; discussion 15-6. [Medline].

  126. Huntington CF, Murrell WD, Betz RR, et al. Comparison of thoracoscopic and open thoracic discectomy in a live ovine model for anterior spinal fusion. Spine. 1998 Aug 1. 23(15):1699-702. [Medline].

  127. Picetti G 3rd, Blackman RG, O''Neal K, Luque E. Anterior endoscopic correction and fusion of scoliosis. Orthopedics. 1998 Dec. 21(12):1285-7. [Medline].

  128. Hoppenfeld S, Gross A, Andrews C, Lonner B. The ankle clonus test for assessment of the integrity of the spinal cord during operations for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Feb. 79(2):208-12. [Medline].

  129. Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, Kim YJ, Buchowski JM, Cheh G, et al. Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs: minimum three-year follow-up of one hundred fourteen cases. Spine. 2008 Jun 15. 33(14):1598-604. [Medline].

  130. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine. 1996 Nov 15. 21(22):2683-8. [Medline].

  131. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Yeasting RA. The quantitative anatomy of the thoracic facet and the posterior projection of its inferior facet. Spine. 1997 Aug 15. 22(16):1811-7; discussion 1818. [Medline].

  132. Boseker EH, Moe JH, Winter RB, Koop SE. Determination of "normal" thoracic kyphosis: a roentgenographic study of 121 "normal" children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Nov-Dec. 20(6):796-8. [Medline].

  133. Regan JJ, Araghi A. Thoracoscopic exposures. In: Zdeblick TA, ed. Anterior Approaches to the Spine. St Louis, Mo:. Quality Medical Publishing. 1999:125-149.

  134. Leong JJ, Curtis M, Carter E, Cowan J, Lehovsky J. Risk of Neurological Injuries in Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Dec 14. [Medline].

  135. McKie JS, Herzenberg JE. Coagulopathy complicating intraoperative blood salvage in a patient who had idiopathic scoliosis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Sep. 79(9):1391-4. [Medline].

  136. Potenza V, Weinstein SL, Neyt JG. Dysfunction of the spinal cord during spinal arthrodesis for scoliosis: recommendations for early detection and treatment. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Nov. 80(11):1679-83. [Medline].

  137. Neyt JG, Weinstein SL. Fracture-dislocation of the lumbar spine after arthrodesis with instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jan. 81(1):111-4. [Medline].

  138. Richards BS. Delayed infections following posterior spinal instrumentation for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Apr. 77(4):524-9. [Medline].

  139. Sanders JO, Herring JA, Browne RH. Posterior arthrodesis and instrumentation in the immature (Risser-grade- 0) spine in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jan. 77(1):39-45. [Medline].

  140. Kostuik JP. Operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Aug. 72(7):1108-13. [Medline].

  141. Dickson JH, Erwin WD, Rossi D. Harrington instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. A twenty-one-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Jun. 72(5):678-83. [Medline].

  142. Roush TF, Crawford AH, Berlin RE, Wolf RK. Tension pneumothorax as a complication of video-assisted thorascopic surgery for anterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis in an adolescent female. Spine. 2001 Feb 15. 26(4):448-50. [Medline].

  143. Huang TJ, Hsu RW. Chylothorax after video-assisted thoracoscopic release for rigid scoliosis. Orthopedics. 2001 Aug. 24(8):789-90. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Mild juvenile scoliosis.
Anteroposterior (AP) radiograph shows mild adolescent scoliosis.
Lateral view of mild adolescent scoliosis.
Moderate scoliosis.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.