eMedicine Specialties > Orthopedic Surgery > Trauma
General Principles of Fracture Care
Updated: Mar 5, 2009
Introduction
With the burden of musculoskeletal disease at the forefront of health care worldwide, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared 2000-2010 the Bone and Joint Decade.1,2
Trauma causes more than 140,000 deaths per year in the United States, is the leading cause of death for those aged 1-34 years, and causes more years of lost productivity before age 65 years than coronary artery disease, cancer, and stroke combined.3 Each year, more than 50 million Americans undergo medical treatment for an injury.3 The estimated lifetime cost of these injuries is over $400 billion.
Problem
A fracture is defined as a disruption in the integrity of a living bone, involving injury to the bone marrow, periosteum, and adjacent soft tissues. Many types of fractures exist, such as pathologic, stress,4 and greenstick fractures. When a fracture occurs, it is described radiographically and clinically in terms of the following factors:
- Anatomy: The fracture is described with relation to the bones involved and the location within the bone (diaphysis, metaphysis, physis, epiphysis).
- Articular surface involvement: Does the fracture have intra-articular involvement? Is there intra-articular displacement or gapping?
- Displacement: Is the distal fracture fragment displaced compared with the proximal fragment? To what degree or percentage is the fracture displaced?
- Angulation: The angular deformity is defined in degrees in terms of the distal fragment in relation to the proximal fragment or with respect to the proximal apex of the distal fragment.
- Rotation: Rotational deformity is described both clinically and radiographically.
- Shortening: Has the fracture caused shortening of the involved bone? To what extent has shortening occurred?
- Fragmentation: The Muller AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen [Association for Osteosynthesis]) Comprehensive Classification of Fractures provides a standardized description of fracture patterns, making communication regarding such injuries more precise and understandable.
- A multifragmentary fracture is one that has several breaks in the bone, creating more than 2 fragments.
- Wedge fractures are either spiral (low energy) or bending (high energy) and allow the proximal and distal fracture fragments to contact each other.
- The complex multifragmentary fracture is a segmental fracture or one in which there is no contact between the proximal and distal fragments without the bone shortening.
- Simple fractures are spiral, oblique, or transverse.
- Management of multifragmentary fractures may be more complicated than that for simple fractures.
- Soft-tissue involvement: Is the fracture open or closed? Is associated neurologic and/or vascular injury present? Is there muscle damage or is compartment syndrome (CS) evident? Gustilo et al described a classification of open fractures comprising 3 types5 :
- Type I: The wound is smaller than 1 cm, clean, and generally caused by a fracture fragment that pierces the skin (ie, inside-out injury). This is a low-energy injury.
- Type II: The wound is longer than 1 cm, not contaminated, and without major soft-tissue damage or defect. This is also a low-energy injury.
- Type III: The wound is longer than 1 cm, with significant soft-tissue disruption. The mechanism often involves high-energy trauma, resulting in a severely unstable fracture with varying degrees of fragmentation. Type III fractures are also subdivided into the following:
- IIIA: The wound has sufficient soft tissue to cover the bone without the need for local or distant flap coverage.
- IIIB: Disruption of the soft tissue is extensive, such that local or distant flap coverage is necessary to cover the bone. The wound may be contaminated, and serial irrigation and debridement procedures are necessary to ensure a clean surgical wound (see Image 1 ).
- IIIC: Any open fracture associated with an arterial injury that requires repair is considered type IIIC. Involvement of vascular surgeons is generally required (see Image 2).
The soft-tissue injury component of trauma has become increasingly important with respect to fracture treatment outcomes. The Gustilo classification has been shown to have only moderate intraobserver and interobserver reliability in terms of fracture classification.6 The Tscherne7 and Hanover fracture scales are classification systems that allow for a greater evaluation of the soft-tissue injury relative to wound size, area of skin loss, and underlying soft-tissue damage.8
The use of a classification system is important as it facilitates communication among clinicians, as well as assists clinicians in the following: decision making, anticipating potential problems, suggesting treatment options, predicting patient and surgical outcomes, and documenting cases.8
Frequency
Fracture incidence is multifactorial and often complicated by such factors as the patient's age, sex, comorbidities, lifestyle, and occupation. In the United States, 5.6 million fractures occur each year, corresponding to a 2% incidence.9 Almost 6000 fractures were treated in an orthopedic trauma unit in Edinburgh, Scotland, in one year.10 The overall fracture incidence in the Scottish case series was 1.13% in men and 1.16% in women. Interestingly, there was a bimodal distribution of fractures in males, with a high incidence in young men and a second rise in men starting at the age of 60 years. In women, there was a unimodal distribution of fractures, with a rise around the time of menopause. For a study of tibial shaft fractures among Canadian orthopedia trauma surgeons, see Busse et al11 . For frequency of hip fractures, see Gjertsen et al; Parker; and Holt et al.12,13,14
Etiology
Fractures occur when the force applied to a bone exceeds the strength of the involved bone. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors are important with respect to fractures.15 Extrinsic factors include the rate at which the bone’s mechanical load is imposed and the duration, direction, and magnitude of the forces acting on the bone. Intrinsic factors include the involved bone’s energy-absorbing capacity, modulus of elasticity, fatigue, strength, and density.
Bones can fracture as a result of direct or indirect trauma. Direct trauma consists of direct force applied to the bone; direct mechanisms include tapping fractures (eg, bumper injury), penetrating fractures (eg, gunshot wound),16 and crush fractures. Indirect trauma involves forces acting at a distance from the fracture site such as tension (traction), compressive, and rotational forces.
Pathophysiology
The 5 phases of fracture healing are the following17 :
- Fracture and inflammatory phase
- Granulation tissue formation
- Callus formation18
- Lamellar bone deposition
- Remodeling
Actual fracture injuries to the bone include insult to the bone marrow, periosteum, and local soft tissues. The most important stage in fracture healing is the inflammatory phase and subsequent hematoma formation. It is during this stage that the cellular signaling mechanisms work through chemotaxis and an inflammatory mechanism to attract the cells necessary to initiate the healing response. Within 7 days, the body forms granulation tissue between the fracture fragments. Various biochemical signaling substances are involved in the formation of the granulation tissue stage, which lasts approximately 2 weeks.
During callus formation, cell proliferation and differentiation begin to produce osteoblasts and chondroblasts in the granulation tissue. The osteoblasts and chondroblasts, respectively, synthesize the extracellular organic matrices of woven bone and cartilage, and then the newly formed bone is mineralized. This stage requires 4-16 weeks.
During the fourth stage, the meshlike callus of woven bone is replaced by lamellar bone, which is organized parallel to the axis of the bone. The final stage involves remodeling of the bone at the site of the healing fracture by various cellular types such as osteoclasts. The final 2 stages require 1-4 years.
Patient factors that influence fracture healing include age,19 comorbidities,20 medication use,21 social factors,22 and nutrition23 (see Table). Other factors that affect fracture healing include the type of fracture,24 degree of trauma,25 systemic and local disease, and infection.26
Patients who have poor prognostic factors in terms of fracture healing are at increased risk for complications of fracture healing such as nonunion (a fracture with no possible chance of healing), malunion (healing of bone in an unacceptable position in any plane), osteomyelitis, and chronic pain.
Table. Patient factors that influence fracture healing.Open table in new window
Table
| Factors | Ideal | Problematic |
| Age, y 19 | Youth | Advanced age (>40 y) |
| Comorbidities 20 | None | Multiple medical comorbidities (eg, diabetes) |
| Medications 21 | None | Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids |
| Social factors 22 | Nonsmoker | Smoker |
| Nutrition 23, 27 | Well nourished | Poor nutrition |
| Fracture type 24 | Closed fracture, neurovascularly intact | Open fracture with poor blood supply |
| Trauma 25 | Single limb | Multiple traumatic injuries |
| Local factors 26 | No infection | Local infection |
| Factors | Ideal | Problematic |
| Age, y 19 | Youth | Advanced age (>40 y) |
| Comorbidities 20 | None | Multiple medical comorbidities (eg, diabetes) |
| Medications 21 | None | Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids |
| Social factors 22 | Nonsmoker | Smoker |
| Nutrition 23, 27 | Well nourished | Poor nutrition |
| Fracture type 24 | Closed fracture, neurovascularly intact | Open fracture with poor blood supply |
| Trauma 25 | Single limb | Multiple traumatic injuries |
| Local factors 26 | No infection | Local infection |
Presentation
Single-limb injury
A thorough history should be elicited for the mechanism of injury and for any accompanying or associated events surrounding the injury; obtaining a history of any previous injury or fracture is mandatory. A complete past medical and surgical history should also be obtained, including medications and allergies, as well as a social (smoking and illicit drug use) and occupational history.
The physical examination must include a thorough inspection of the integument (with documentation). If the fracture is open, a clinical photograph may be taken for documentation purposes. Distal neurologic and vascular status must be assessed and documented. Palpate the entire limb—including the joints above and below the injury—for areas of pain, effusions, and crepitus. Often, accompanying or associated injuries may be present (eg, injuries to the spine with a jumping mechanism of injury). Assessment of range of motion (ROM) may not be possible, but this should be documented. Assessments for ligamentous injury and tendon rupture, as well as other noteworthy tests that surround a special examination of the joints, should be completed and documented.
Multiple traumatic injuries
The initial assessment of a patient with polytrauma follows the advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocols28 and includes the identification and treatment of life-threatening injuries.29 The first step is evaluation of the individual's airway, breathing, and circulation. Immediate endotracheal intubation and rapid administration of intravenous fluids may be necessary. Spinal precautions must be maintained until injury to the complete spine can be excluded clinically and radiographically (with radiographs or computed tomography [CT] scans). Once the patient is hemodynamically stable, the secondary survey, a complete systems-based physical examination, is performed.
Initial management of fractures
The initial management of fractures consists of realignment of the broken limb segment and then immobilizing the fractured extremity in a splint. The distal neurologic and vascular status must be clinically assessed and documented before and after realignment and splinting. If a patient sustains an open fracture, achieving hemostasis as rapidly as possible at the injury site is essential; this can be achieved by placing a sterile pressure dressing over the injury site (see Open Fractures).
Splinting is critical in providing symptomatic relief for the patient, as well as in preventing potential neurologic and vascular injury and further injury to the local soft tissues. Patients should receive adequate analgesics in the form of acetaminophen or opiates, if necessary.
Management of open fracturesThe treatment goals for open fractures are to prevent infection, to allow the fracture to heal, and to restore function in the injured limb. Once the initial assessment, evaluation, and management of any life-threatening injury are completed, the open fracture is treated. Hemostasis should be obtained, followed by antibiotic administration and tetanus vaccination.
Cefazolin or clindamycin is adequate for type I and type II fracture injuries. If the wound is severely contaminated (type III), an aminoglycoside (eg, gentamicin or tobramycin) should be added to complement treatment. If the injury is a "barnyard injury" or water-type injury, penicillin should also be added to provide prophylaxis against Clostridium perfringens. Tetanus prophylaxis and immunization should be administered to patients who have not been previously immunized.
The prophylactic use of quinolones should not be used because of the rapid development of resistant staphylococci and because quinolones are important drugs in the treatment of implant-related infections.30
Urgent irrigation and debridement (I&D) of the wound in the operating room is mandatory. For type II and type III injuries, serial I&Ds are recommended every 24-48 hours after the initial debridement until a clean surgical wound is ensured. The wound is closed when it is clean and antibiotics are generally continued until 2 days after the final I&D.
Management of the open fracture depends on the site of injury and type of open fracture. The wound is subsequently stabilized either temporarily or definitively. If soft-tissue coverage over the injury is inadequate, soft-tissue transfers or free flaps are performed when the wound is clean and the fracture is definitively treated.
Indications
Fracture management can be divided into nonoperative and operative techniques. The nonoperative technique consists of a closed reduction if required, followed by a period of immobilization with casting or splinting. Closed reduction is needed if the fracture is significantly displaced or angulated.31
If the fracture cannot be reduced, surgical intervention may be required. Indications for surgical intervention include the following:
- Failed nonoperative (closed) management
- Unstable fractures that cannot be adequately maintained in a reduced position
- Displaced intra-articular fractures (>2 mm)
- Patients with fractures that are known to heal poorly following nonoperative management (eg, femoral neck fractures)32
- Large avulsion fractures that disrupt the muscle-tendon or ligamentous function of an affected joint (eg, patella fracture)
- Impending pathologic fractures
- Multiple traumatic injuries with fractures involving the pelvis, femur, or vertebrae
- Unstable open fractures or complicated open fractures
- Fractures in individuals who are poor candidates for nonoperative management that requires prolonged immobilization (eg, elderly patients with proximal femur fractures)
- Fractures in growth areas in skeletally immature individuals that have increased risk for growth arrest (eg, Salter-Harris types III-V)
- Nonunions or malunions that have failed to respond to nonoperative treatment
Contraindications
Contraindications to surgical reconstruction are as follows:
- Active infection (local or systemic) or osteomyelitis
- Soft tissues that compromise the overlying fracture or the surgical approach because of poor soft-tissue quality due to soft-tissue injury or burns, previous surgical scars, or active infection
- Medical conditions that contraindicate surgery or anesthesia (eg, recent myocardial infarction)
- Cases in which amputation would better serve the limb and the patient
More on General Principles of Fracture Care |
Overview: General Principles of Fracture Care |
| Workup: General Principles of Fracture Care |
| Treatment: General Principles of Fracture Care |
| Follow-up: General Principles of Fracture Care |
| Multimedia: General Principles of Fracture Care |
| References |
| Further Reading |
| Next Page » |
References
Lidgren L. The Bone and Joint Decade 2000 -2010. Bull World Health Organ [online]. Sept 2003;81(9):629. [Full Text].
[No authors listed]. Bone and joint decade: the initiative [guest editorial]. BJDOnline. Available at http://www.boneandjointdecade.org/default.aspx?contId=229. Accessed May 7, 2007.
Corso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T, Fiebelkorn I, Zaloshnja E. Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj Prev. Aug 2006;12(4):212-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Moran DS, Israeli E, Evans RK, Yanovich R, Constantini N, Shabshin N, et al. Prediction model for stress fracture in young female recruits during basic training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Nov 2008;40(11 Suppl):S636-44. [Medline].
Gustilo RB, Merkow RL, Templeman D. The management of open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Feb 1990;72(2):299-304. [Medline].
Brumback RJ, Jones AL. Interobserver agreement in the classification of open fractures of the tibia. The results of a survey of two hundred and forty-five orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Aug 1994;76(8):1162-6. [Medline].
Tscherne H, Oestern HJ. [A new classification of soft-tissue damage in open and closed fractures (author's transl)] [German]. Unfallheilkunde. Mar 1982;85(3):111-5. [Medline].
Ruedi TP, Buckley R, Moran C, eds. AO Principles of Fracture Management. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2007.
Canale ST. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 10th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 2003.
Court-Brown C, McQueen M, Tornetta P. Trauma. In: Schepsis AA, Busconi BD, Tornetta P, Einhorn TA, eds. Sports Medicine (Orthopedic Surgery Essentials Series). Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
Busse JW, Morton E, Lacchetti C, Guyatt GH, Bhandari M. Current management of tibial shaft fractures: a survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons. Acta Orthop. Oct 2008;79(5):689-94. [Medline].
Gjertsen JE, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Steindal K, Vinje T, et al. The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations. Acta Orthop. Oct 2008;79(5):583-93. [Medline].
Parker MJ. Databases for hip fracture audit. Acta Orthop. Oct 2008;79(5):577-9. [Medline].
Holt G, Smith R, Duncan K, Finlayson DF, Gregori A. Early mortality after surgical fixation of hip fractures in the elderly: an analysis of data from the scottish hip fracture audit. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Oct 2008;90(10):1357-63. [Medline].
Evans FG. Relation of the physical properties of bone to fractures. Instr Course Lect. 1961;18:110-21. [Medline].
Pollak AN, Ficke CJ. Extremity war injuries: challenges in definitive reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Nov 2008;16(11):628-34. [Medline].
Frost HM. The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Nov 1989;248:283-93. [Medline].
Szczêsny G, Interewicz B, Swoboda-Kopec E, Olszewski WL, Górecki A, Wasilewski P. Bacteriology of callus of closed fractures of tibia and femur. J Trauma. Oct 2008;65(4):837-42. [Medline].
Farmer ME, White LR, Brody JA. Race and sex differences in hip fracture incidence. Am J Public Health. Dec 1984;74(12):1374-80. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Loder RT. The influence of diabetes mellitus on the healing of closed fractures. Clin Orthop. Jul 1988;(232):210-6. [Medline].
Giannoudis PV, MacDonald DA, Matthews SJ, et al. Nonunion of the femoral diaphysis. The influence of reaming and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jul 2000;82(5):655-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Kwiatkowski TC, Hanley EN Jr, Ramp WK. Cigarette smoking and its orthopedic consequences. Am J Orthop. Sep 1996;25(9):590-7. [Medline].
Hernandez-Avila M, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, et al. Caffeine, moderate alcohol intake, and risk of fractures of the hip and forearm in middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr. Jul 1991;54(1):157-63. [Medline].
Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, et al, eds. Rockwood & Green's Fractures in Adults. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
Schmeling GJ, Schwab JP. Polytrauma care. The effect of head injuries and timing of skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Sep 1995;318:106-16. [Medline].
Mollitt DL. Infection control: avoiding the inevitable. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 2002;82(2):365-78. [Medline].
Steele B, Serota A, Helfet DL, Peterson M, Lyman S, Lane JM. Vitamin D Deficiency: A Common Occurrence in Both High-and Low-energy Fractures. HSS J. Sep 2008;4(2):143-8. [Medline].
American College of Surgeons. Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors (ATLS): Student Course Manual. 7th ed. Chicago, Ill: American College of Surgeons; 2004.
Wang AM, Yin X, Sun HZ, DU QY, Wang ZM. Damage control orthopaedics in 53 cases of severe polytrauma who have mainly sustained orthopaedic trauma. Chin J Traumatol. Oct 2008;11(5):283-7. [Medline].
Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. Oct 14 2004;351(16):1645-54. [Medline].
McManus JG, Morton MJ, Crystal CS, McArthur TJ, Helphenstine JS, Masneri DA, et al. Use of ultrasound to assess acute fracture reduction in emergency care settings. Am J Disaster Med. Jul-Aug 2008;3(4):241-7. [Medline].
Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF. Treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 2008;90(10):2254-66. [Medline].
Bryant LR, Song WS, Banks KP, Bui-Mansfield LT, Bradley YC. Comparison of planar scintigraphy alone and with SPECT for the initial evaluation of femoral neck stress fracture. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 2008;191(4):1010-5. [Medline].
Yang HL, Wang GL, Niu GQ, Liu JY, Hiltner E, Meng B, et al. Using MRI to determine painful vertebrae to be treated by kyphoplasty in multiple-level vertebral compression fractures: a prospective study. J Int Med Res. Sep-Oct 2008;36(5):1056-63. [Medline].
Rang M. Children's Fractures. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott; 1983.
O'Toole RV, Andersen RC, Vesnovsky O, Alexander M, Topoleski LD, Nascone JW, et al. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone. J Orthop Trauma. Nov-Dec 2008;22(10):709-15. [Medline].
Wagner F, Frigg R, eds. AO Manual of Fracture Management: Internal Fixators. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2006.
Lambotte A. L'intervention operatoire dans les fractures recentes et anciennes. In: Relter LF, ed. Fractures. Brussels, Belgium: Henri Lamertin; 1907.
Roberts CS, Pape HC, Jones AL, et al. Damage control orthopaedics: evolving concepts in the treatment of patients who have sustained orthopaedic trauma. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:447-62. [Medline].
Bone LB, Johnson KD, Weigelt J, Scheinberg R. Early versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1989;71(3):336-40. [Medline].
von Volkmann R. Verletzungen und krannkheiten der bewwgungsorgane. In: Pitha FJ, Billroth T, eds. Handbuch der Allegemeinen und Speziellen Chirurgie. Vol 2. Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke; 1872:234-920.
[No authors listed]. Prevention of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with low dose aspirin: Pulmonary Embolism Prevention (PEP) Trial. Lancet. Apr 15 2000;355(9212):1295-302. [Medline].
Madsen JL. Bone SPECT/CT detection of a sequestrum in chronic-infected nonunion of the tibia. Clin Nucl Med. Oct 2008;33(10):700-1. [Medline].
Tu YK, Chen AC, Chou YC, Ueng SW, Ma CH, Yen CY. Treatment for scaphoid fracture and nonunion--the application of 3.0 mm cannulated screws and pedicle vascularised bone grafts. Injury. Oct 2008;39 Suppl 4:96-106. [Medline].
Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury. 1997;28 (suppl 1):A20-30. [Medline].
Further Reading
Clinical guidelines
Evaluating infants and young children with multiple fractures. American Academy of Pediatrics - Medical Specialty Society. 2006 Sep. 5 pages. NGC:005253
Evidence-based care guideline for femoral shaft fractures. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center - Hospital/Medical Center. 2002 Dec 9 (revised 2006 Jul 21; reviewed 2006 Dec). 19 pages. NGC:005206
Rib fractures. American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society. 1995 (revised 2005). 5 pages. NGC:004640
Stress/insufficiency fracture, including sacrum, excluding other vertebrae. American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society. 1995 (revised 2005). 7 pages. NGC:004785
Clinical trials
Clinical Study of the U-Plate Fracture Repair System to Treat Rib Fractures
Re-Evaluation of GAmma3 Intramedullary Nails in Hip Fracture (REGAIN)
Management of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus Using Lateral vs. Crossed K-Wires
Allomatrix Injectable Putty in Distal Radius Fractures
Comparison of Balloon Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty in Subacute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
Percutaneous Autologous Bone-Marrow Grafting for Open Tibial Shaft Fracture
Keywords
fracture care, fracture management, open fracture, closed fracture, broken bone, traumatic bone injury, open reduction and internal fixation, ORIF, external fixation , ankle fracture, femur fracture, elbow fracture, hip fracture, cervical spine fracture, tibia and fibula fracture, vertebral fracture, knee fracture, humerus fracture, wrist fracture, pelvic fracture, foot fracture, forearm fracture




Overview: General Principles of Fracture Care