eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Body Contouring

Body Contouring, Buttocks Surgery

Author: Neal R Reisman, MD, JD, Chief of Plastic Surgery, St Luke's Episcopal Hospital; Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine
Coauthor(s): Azita Madjidi, MD, MS, Clinical Assistant Professor in Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Oct 29, 2009

Introduction

Aesthetic surgery of the buttocks encompasses many forms. Patients may seek to enhance buttock shape with buttock implants, autologous fat transfer, autologous tissue flaps, excisional procedures, or liposuction. Patients with traumatic buttock injuries and contour deformities from injections also require reconstruction, often with fat injections, autologous tissue flaps, and alloplastic implants. The dramatic increase in body contouring after massive loss associated with bariatric surgical treatments for obesity has also extended to buttock contouring. Skeletal and weight loss–associated gluteal deformities are often severe in nature and have also increased interest in these procedures.

The function of the buttock musculature in stability and gait is an important consideration and often has an impact on the procedure chosen for correction in reconstructive procedures. Its impact on aesthetic procedures is less clinically relevant. The history, definition, frequency, etiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, aesthetics, classification, and surgical treatment options are discussed in this article.

History of the Procedure

Throughout history, artistic endeavors have documented our preoccupation with the human form as a representation of femininity and fecundity. Careful analysis, mathematical interpretation, and recreation of the human form have remained popular pursuits. Recent studies in evolutionary biology have suggested a strong correlation between the "hour-glass" figure and not only female reproductive potential but also general physical health and psychological health. This correlation is best summarized by an ideal waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 that transcends cultures, is temporally stable, and is cross-generational. The callipygian form best represents this history.

Buttock contour surgery, in contrast, has a short history compared with the field of plastic surgery or art history. Pressure sores and traumatic deformities of this area have been treated for some time, but buttock contour improvement has become an acceptable and frequent request as demands for body improvement have increased. Patients' desire to look their best and the increased safety of liposuction and other body contouring techniques have dramatically increased the awareness of contour problems of the buttock. Recently, demographic changes in the United States coupled with changing societal fashion preferences, codification of aesthetic norms, as well as procedural improvements have increased interest in buttock contouring surgery by patients and surgeons alike.

The first reported attempts to surgically contour the buttock region in the medical literature were described by Bartels and colleagues in 1969. A mammary implant was placed unilaterally in the subcutaneous plane of the gluteal region to correct a deformity. This was closely followed by bilateral placement for aesthetic correction of platypygia. Problems associated with implant migration, capsular contracture, and migration quickly led to alternative placement in a submuscular plane between the gluteus maximus muscle and the gluteus medius muscle. A small submuscular space and anatomic constraints limited significant augmentation with a round implant. The inherent limitations of this procedure led to the development of intramuscular as well as subfascial planes for gluteal contouring with both silicone gel and silicone elastomer implants with more anatomic shapes.

Contemporaneously, liposuction emerged as the most popular body contouring technique. Liposuction was used to reduce the accumulation of fat in all regions of the body. Specifically, it was successfully applied to the flanks and back and the surrounding aesthetic units of the gluteal region. The success of these interventions in improving buttock contouring quickly led to its adoption as the primary form of contouring this region. Increasing reports of success with autologous fat transfer techniques and the popularity of liposuction led to adoption of aesthetic gluteal contouring with fat injections.

Recently, the dramatic increase in body contouring after massive weight loss associated with bariatric surgical treatments for obesity has also extended to buttock contouring. These severe deformities have accelerated the recent development of various autologous tissue flaps and excisional body contouring procedures to treat this patient population. The limitation of implant design availability in the United States and associated complications have limited the widespread adoption of implant augmentation of the gluteal region.

Problem

Buttock contour defects are common, and patients often seek some form of correction. The treatment choices must match the patient's concerns while not interfering with the necessary function of this area. Long-term approaches are an important consideration, as are scarring and unreasonable expectations. The patient may be concerned with a cellulite-contour irregularity of the skin and desire correction that may not be obtainable. Superficial corrections should be performed with great care to avoid further contour irregularities and detachment of the skin from underlying structures. The inferior fullness below the infragluteal crease or fold is one problem area. Many patients seek contouring of this area, yet excess removal may result in buttock ptosis, which is difficult to correct.

Patients seeking augmentation or enhancement of the buttock should recognize the consequences of implants that are required to withstand a person's weight and activity requirements. The same concerns apply to corrections of traumatic depressions and treatment by fat injections. Lastly, a round buttock with a convex surface demonstrates a groove and depression if a scar crosses the convexity. Restoring the projection and smooth characteristics of the buttock is difficult when normal curvature is distorted.

Frequency

Body contouring of the buttock increased dramatically from 1997-2005. Gluteal augmentation has increased 10% in the last year, but statistics have only recently been collected. Buttock lifts have increased 142%, and body lifts have increase 459% over this same period. The refinement of liposuction, autologous fat transfer, autologous flaps, excisional procedures, and alloplastic implants has contributed to the increase in the number of successful treatments. Liposuction and its progeny of ultrasonic-assisted and superficial liposuction have also had an impact. Codification of gluteal aesthetic standards has added the finesse necessary to achieve the balance between form and function.

Etiology

The etiology of buttock contour defects can be genetic, traumatic, or acquired. A disproportionately large buttock significantly affects some young men and women; often, these persons are unable to wear fitted clothes or participate in desired activities. The genetically absent buttock (often as significant a genetic defect as a disproportionately large buttock) is also equally undesirable because it does not adequately fill out clothing. Uncommonly, genetic lipodystrophies also affect the gluteal region.

Traumatic defects of the buttock that produce contour problems obscure the curve of the buttock and often create a notch or groove that is clearly visible in swimwear and knit fabric clothes. The patient seeks correction and states a desire to return to the preinjury form. Automobile and workplace accidents and animal bites are common etiologies of contour defects. Iatrogenic deformities caused by failure to accurately repair all anatomic layers during surgical procedures in the trochanteric and gluteal region are also commonly seen.

A scar or defect that crosses the curvature of the buttock usually leaves a depression and groove that requires some form of correction. Furthermore, contour irregularities and overresection associated with liposuction are common causes of gluteal deformities. The authors still see patients with depressions from steroid injections and undrained, resolving hematomas of the buttock. Gluteal compartment syndrome is also a rare but serious clinical condition associated with traumatic injuries.

Acquired gluteal deformities are often associated with aging, menopause, weight gain, sun damage, skeletal deformities associated with obesity, and massive weight loss associated with bariatric surgical procedures. Aging, sun damage, and massive weight loss usually lead to skin laxity and buttock ptosis. Menopause and skeletal changes associated with obesity usually leads to a diminished gluteal aesthetic that is more refractory to surgical interventions.

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of the traumatic defect is relatively simple. A hematoma that remains unrecognized produces a pressure point from within, which reduces the normal fat levels of the buttock form. When the hematoma is drained or resorbed, a depression remains. Traumatic defects from loss of tissue that is either surgically closed or allowed to secondarily resolve often result in contour irregularities. Steroid injections placed within the fatty portion of the buttock can cause absorption and atrophy of fat cells, which also produce a marked depression and thinning of the skin.

Contour defects of the buttock include the above conditions and genetic increases, decreases, and asymmetries that reflect society's range of shapes.

Presentation

The patient seeks a plastic surgeon to correct contour deformities of the buttock. The discussion may involve an overly large buttock or a buttock that does not adequately fill out jeans. The range of superficial contour irregularities, from an absent buttock crease or infrabuttock fold to a square buttock, also may include the patient declaring that his or her cellulite creates an uneven and unsmooth buttock. The surgeon should listen intently to the patient's comments and expectations of results.

Often, patients seeking liposculpture of the body ask about the buttock, unaware of the many possibilities of correction available to reshape the buttock. Emphasize and discuss the proportions of the patient, and attempt to maintain the patient within a proportional frame.

The large buttock that severely affects a young woman, preventing her from feeling comfortable in swimwear and knit clothing, and the small buttock that prevents the patient from filling out jeans are examples of culture's negative physiques. The patient may vocalize more on the superficial components of the buttock shape with absent definition and asymmetry. The surgeon must be cautious about specific demands regarding a matched symmetric shape.

Indications

Indications for treatment include a prominent, deficient, or misshapen buttock. As expertise in minute corrections has improved, indications have also increased to allow minor asymmetries, absent creases and folds, and square shapes. All of the above situations are appropriate indications for treatment.

Use caution with superficial irregularities that are more confined to the skin and superficial levels. The patient may describe this as cellulite. Many attempts to correct these deformities have failed and may actually worsen the other initial defects. Caution also must be emphasized concerning the fullness just inferior and parallel to the buttock (the so-called banana deformity). Many patients seek liposuction of this area to create a better fold and contour. However, this area often supports the buttock, and removal leads to further ptosis that is difficult to correct. The surgeon must be cautious in accepting these indications for treatment.

Common indications include large and prominent buttocks, deficient and flat buttocks, lack of or an uneven buttock crease and fold, depressions in the buttock, square buttock shapes, and an irregularly shaped buttock. Possible indications include superficial irregularities and asymmetric or uneven minor ptosis of the buttock.

Contraindications

Because buttock contour surgery is an elective procedure, significant medical problems that could increase the surgical risk are relative contraindications.

More on Body Contouring, Buttocks Surgery

Overview: Body Contouring, Buttocks Surgery
Workup: Body Contouring, Buttocks Surgery
Treatment: Body Contouring, Buttocks Surgery
Follow-up: Body Contouring, Buttocks Surgery
Multimedia: Body Contouring, Buttocks Surgery
References

References

  1. Flores-Lima G, Eppley BL. Body contouring with solid silicone implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar 2009;33(2):140-6. [Medline].

  2. Sozer SO, Agullo FJ, Palladino H. Autologous augmentation gluteoplasty with a dermal fat flap. Aesthet Surg J. Jan-Feb 2008;28(1):70-6. [Medline].

  3. Le Louarn C, Pascal JF. Autologous gluteal augmentation after massive weight loss. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 2008;121(4):1515-6; author reply 1516-7. [Medline].

  4. Centeno RF, Young VL. Clinical anatomy in aesthetic gluteal body contouring surgery. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):347-58. [Medline].

  5. Cuenca-Guerra R, Lugo-Beltran I. Beautiful buttocks: characteristics and surgical techniques. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):321-32. [Medline].

  6. Aiache AE. Gluteal re-contouring with combination treatments: implants, liposuction, and fat transfer. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):395-403. [Medline].

  7. Babuccu O, Gozil R, Ozmen S, et al. Gluteal region morphology: the effect of the weight gain and aging. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar-Apr 2002;26(2):130-3. [Medline].

  8. Bachuk L. Complications with gluteal prosthesis. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1986;Jun (77):1012.

  9. Baroudi R. Body sculpturing. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1984;11(3):419-43. [Medline].

  10. Baroudi R, Moraes M. Philosophy, technical principles, selection, and indication in body contouring surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Winter 1991;15(1):1-18. [Medline].

  11. Bartels RJ, O'Malley JE, Douglas WM, Wilson RG. An unusual use of the Cronin breast prosthesis. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1969;44(5):500. [Medline].

  12. Bruner TW, Roberts TL, Nguyen K. Complications of buttocks augmentation: diagnosis, management, and prevention. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):449-66. [Medline].

  13. Cardenas-Camarena L, Lacouture AM, Tobar-Losada A. Combined gluteoplasty: liposuction and lipoinjection. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1999;104(5):1524-31; discussion 1532-3. [Medline].

  14. Cardenas-Restrepo JC, Ahmed JA. Large-volume lipoinjection for gluteal augmentation. Aesthetic Surg J. 2002;22(1):33-8.

  15. Centeno RF. Autologous gluteal augmentation with circumferential body lift in the massive weight loss and aesthetic patient. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):479-96. [Medline].

  16. Centeno RF. Gluteal aesthetic unit classification: A tool to improve outcomes in body contouring. Aesthetic Surg J. 2006;26:200-8.

  17. Chajchir A, Benzaquen I, Wexler E, Arellano A. Fat injection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1990;14(2):127-36. [Medline].

  18. Cocke WM, Ricketson G. Gluteal augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1973;52(1):93. [Medline].

  19. Da Rocha RP. Surgical anatomy of the gluteal region's subcutaneous screen and its use in plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar-Apr 2001;25(2):140-4. [Medline].

  20. de la Pena JA, Lopez-Manjardin H, Gamboa-Lopez F. Augmentation Gluteoplasty: Anatomical and Clinical Considerations. Key Issues Plast Cosmet Surg. Basel, Karger. 2000;17:1-17.

  21. de la Pena JA, Rubio OV, Cano JP, et al. History of gluteal augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):307-19. [Medline].

  22. de la Pena JA, Rubio OV, Cano JP, et al. Subfascial gluteal augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):405-22. [Medline].

  23. de Pedroza LV. Fat transplantation to the buttocks and legs for aesthetic enhancement or correction of deformities: long-term results of large volumes of fat transplant. Dermatol Surg. Dec 2000;26(12):1145-9. [Medline].

  24. Douglas WM, Bartels RJ, Baker JL. An experience in aesthetic buttocks augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 1975;3:471-6.

  25. Erni D, Banic A. [Body contouring by removal of skin and fatty tissue]. Ther Umsch. Apr 1999;56(4):206-11. [Medline].

  26. Ford RD, Simpson WD. Massive extravasation of traumatically ruptured buttock silicone prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg. Jul 1992;29(1):86-8. [Medline].

  27. Gonzalez R. Buttocks lifting: how and when to use medial, lateral, lower, and upper lifting techniques. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):467-78. [Medline].

  28. Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Gluteoplasty: a ten-year report. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991;15(1):85-91. [Medline].

  29. Guerrerosantos J. Autologous fat grafting for body contouring. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1996;23(4):619-31. [Medline].

  30. Guerrerosantos J. Secondary hip-buttock-thigh plasty. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1984;11(3):491-503. [Medline].

  31. Hidalgo JE. Submuscular gluteal augmentation: 17 years of experience with gel and elastomer silicone implants. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):435-47. [Medline].

  32. Hunstad JP. Body contouring in the obese patient. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1996;23(4):647-70. [Medline].

  33. Illouz YG. Body contouring by lipolysis: a 5-year experience with over 3000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1983;72(5):591-7. [Medline].

  34. Illouz YG. Illouz's technique of body contouring by lipolysis. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1984;11(3):409-17. [Medline].

  35. Kesselring UK. Body contouring with suction lipectomy. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1984;11(3):393-408. [Medline].

  36. Kinney BM. Body contouring with external ultrasound. Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation DATA Committee. Device and Technique Assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1999;103(2):728-9. [Medline].

  37. Lack EB. Contouring the female buttocks. Liposculpting the buttocks. Dermatol Clin. Oct 1999;17(4):815-22, vi. [Medline].

  38. Lewis JR Jr. Body contouring. South Med J. Aug 1980;73(8):1006-11. [Medline].

  39. Lockwood T. Lower body lift with superficial fascial system suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1993;92(6):1112-22; discussion 1123-5. [Medline].

  40. Lockwood TE. Transverse flank-thigh-buttock lift with superficial fascial suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1991;87(6):1019-27. [Medline].

  41. Maxwell GP, Gingrass MK. Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a clinical study of 250 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1998;101(1):189-202; discussion 203-4. [Medline].

  42. Mendieta CG. Classification system for gluteal evaluation. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):333-46. [Medline].

  43. Mendieta CG. Intramuscular gluteal augmentation technique. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):423-34. [Medline].

  44. Mladick RA. Male body contouring. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1991;18(4):797-813. [Medline].

  45. Montreal J. Fat tissues as a permanent implant. new instruments and refinements. Aesthetic Surg J. 2003;23(3):213-6.

  46. Pascal JF, Le Louarn C. Remodeling bodylift with high lateral tension. Aesthetic Plast Surg. May-Jun 2002;26(3):223-30. [Medline].

  47. Peren PA, Gomez JB, Guerrerosantos J, Salazar CA. Gluteus augmentation with fat grafting. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Nov-Dec 2000;24(6):412-7. [Medline].

  48. Raposo-Amaral CE, Ferreira DM, Warren SM, Magna LA, Ferreira LM. Quantifying augmentation gluteoplasty outcomes: a comparison of three instruments used to measure gluteal projection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar 2008;32(2):333-8. [Medline].

  49. Roberts TL, Toledo LS, Badin AZ. Augmentation of the Buttocks by Micro Fat Grafting. Aesthetic Surg J. 2001;21(4):311-9.

  50. Roberts TL, Weinfeld AB, Bruner TW, Nguyen K. "Universal" and ethnic ideals of beautiful buttocks are best obtained by autologous micro fat grafting and liposuction. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):371-94. [Medline].

  51. Robles JM. Re: Massive extravasation of traumatically ruptured buttock silicone prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg. Jan 1993;30(1):94. [Medline].

  52. Rohrich RJ, Beran SJ, Kenkel JM, eds. Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction. St. Louis, Mo: Quality Medical Publishers; 1998.

  53. Rohrich RJ, Raniere J Jr, Kenkel JM, Beran SJ. Operative principles for optimizing results in circumferential body contouring with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1999;26(2):305-16; x. [Medline].

  54. Singh D. Universal allure of the hourglass figure: an evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):359-70. [Medline].

  55. Springer RC. Liposuction: an overview. Plast Surg Nurs. 1996;16(4):215-22; quiz 223-4. [Medline].

  56. Teimourian B. Ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1997;100(6):1623-5. [Medline].

  57. Toledo LS. Syringe liposculpture: a two-year experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991;15(4):321-6. [Medline].

  58. Vergara R. Intramuscular gluteal implants: fifteen years' experience. Aesthetic Surg J. 2003;23(2):86-19.

Further Reading

Keywords

buttocks surgery, buttock augmentation, autologous gluteal augmentation, autologous fat transfer, gluteal aesthetics, gluteoplasty, circumferential body lift, buttock liposculpture, buttock shaping, buttock liposuction, buttock reduction

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Neal R Reisman, MD, JD, Chief of Plastic Surgery, St Luke's Episcopal Hospital; Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine
Neal R Reisman, MD, JD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Lipoplasty Society of North America, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Azita Madjidi, MD, MS, Clinical Assistant Professor in Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
Azita Madjidi, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Harris County Medical Society, International Association of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons, and World Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Gregory Caputy, MD, PhD, FICS, Chief Surgeon, Aesthetica Plastic and Laser Surgery Center, Inc
Gregory Caputy, MD, PhD, FICS is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, Canadian Medical Association, International College of Surgeons, International College of Surgeons US Section, Pan-Pacific Surgical Association, and Wound Healing Society
Disclosure: Syneron Corporation Salary Speaking and teaching

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Alan Matarasso, MD, FACS, PC, Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Immed Past President of New York Regional Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Alan Matarasso, MD, FACS, PC is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, International College of Surgeons US Section, New York Academy of Medicine, New York County Medical Society, Pan American Medical Association, and Pan-Pacific Surgical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.