Buttocks Contouring Treatment & Management

  • Author: Neal R Reisman, MD, JD; Chief Editor: Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Aug 23, 2011
 

Medical Therapy

The claims that a cellulite cream can reduce prominent areas generated excitement, but the claims never materialized as fact. Medical therapy has no place in contour surgery of the buttock.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Contour surgery of the buttock is achieved mainly through a surgical approach. Assessment of the deformity organizes therapies into reduction treatments, contour irregularity treatments, and augmentation treatments.

Augmentation Options

Buttock implants

A silicone gel implant is inserted under each gluteus maximus muscle through a 5- to 8-cm midline incision over the tail bone.[1] The procedure is performed either under general anesthesia or local anesthesia and sedation. The procedure usually takes about 2 hours and is mostly done as an outpatient procedure or overnight stay. The recovery is about 4-6 weeks before resuming normal activities. This is a preferred procedure for those who do not have excess fat stores or whose excess fat is not enough to allow for appropriate buttock enhancement. This procedure causes more pain than do other common cosmetic surgeries. It may take up to 6-8 months before the muscle relaxes and the implant is no longer felt.

Fat injection

Gentle liposuction is used to remove fatty tissue from donor sites such as the abdomen, flanks, and thighs. The removed fat is injected into the desired areas through small incisions with a fine canula. This is less invasive than implant surgery and the recovery is much faster. It allows for resuming activity in 2 days and full activity in 2 weeks. However, partial resorption of the fat may occur, and multiple sessions may be required to obtain the desired shape. The incisions are small and scarring is minimal. This technique uses the patient's own body fat; therefore, no rejection or foreign body reaction occurs. The liposuction to harvest the fat adds the additional benefit of body contouring in areas of excessive fat.

Rearrangement of local tissue during body contouring procedure

Using local subcutaneous flaps during a lower body lift can be a valid option for buttock augmentation in patients after massive weight loss.[2, 3] For patients with underprojected buttocks and some degree of ptosis, implants or fat injection alone may not be sufficient for restoring the contour. Autologous dermal flaps allow a buttock lift along with augmentation.

Reduction Treatments

Reduction treatments are the most common. They include suction lipectomy through conventional means, suction lipectomy with ultrasound assistance, and superficial liposculpture.

Suction lipectomy with tumescent anesthesia is the most common method of contour buttock improvement. A small, 2-4 mm cannula is commonly used, with the incision hidden in the buttock crease or the upper-outer buttock area. The buttock can be sculpted nicely with this modality.

Ultrasonic-assisted liposuction may be used when a large volume of lipodystrophy is found in the buttock. The ultrasonic machine assists with liquifying the fat and facilitates removal by conventional techniques. In the past, a somewhat larger incision was often required; however, because cooling is now integrated within the cannula and skin protectors are no longer required, this is no longer an issue. The tissues should be cooled, and skin care precautions should be used.

Superficial liposuction is another method of reshaping the buttock. The cannula is 2 mm and may be a different configuration of open ports to ensure a smoother result. This method can alter a square buttock into a desirable round shape. It may be combined with other methods to produce the overall result the patient seeks. Indeed, that lateral buttock area may be reshaped into a more athletic form by liposuction of the "sensuous triangle" described by Schlesinger.[4, 5]

A study by Avendano-Valenzuela et al indicated that improved aesthetic contouring of the gluteal region is achieved by tailoring techniques for liposuction and lipoinjection according to individual anatomical zones.[6] The reduced need for more aggressive surgical procedures decreases the risk of complications, recovery time and postoperative scarring.

Contour irregularities may be treated by the above methods, by scar revisions, and by augmentation of contour depressions using fat grafting or other autologous materials.

Studies have shown cosmetic improvement with a combination of selective liposuction and lipoinjection.[7]

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

Approach patient expectations with a reasonable preoperative plan. Mark the patient, highlighting contour irregularities and areas to be treated; discuss scar placement with the patient. Confirm operative positioning to ensure proper technique and exposure. Be aware of intravenous fluid intake, and prepare the tumescence fluid to prevent Xylocaine or epinephrine toxicity or overdoses. Discuss fluid requirements in advance.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Position the patient to best expose the area for surgery. This may involve a prone position, which requires appropriate padding and support for the hips and chest areas. A lateral position also may be used; give the same considerations to the axillae and legs. Many surgeons prepare their patients while the patients are awake and standing and then permit them to lie, already prepared, on a sterile operating table; this allows movements and different positioning. Be aware that some patients find this method uncomfortable and demeaning.

Once the patient is sterilized, prepared, and draped, make incisions on the preoperative marks and use a tumescence infusion for liposuction correction. Use caution to infuse marked areas and avoid nerves and deeper structures. For lipoplasty treatments, use different cannulas to achieve the optimal result for the patient and his or her specific needs. Use some type of dressing, usually a compression garment, at the completion of contour improvement.

Prepare and position patients seeking augmentation or scar revision as appropriate. Determine the pocket for augmentation preoperatively, and surgically create it with great care to avoid nerve and vascular structures and disruption of gluteal musculature. Close the incision and tape it well so the pocket remains as dissected.

Plan scar revisions similarly, with additional assistance from autologous fat injections or alloplastic materials to correct depressions. Subcuticular closures are usually used, and dressing completes the procedure.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Examine the patient postoperatively for general operative recovery and specific incision healing. Examine all areas. Advise the patient to avoid exercise and increased activity for approximately 3 weeks. Provide customary incision and operative site care.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

The patient must understand that while immediate results are observed, the final results are usually achieved from 6 months to 1 year after the procedure. Massage and, occasionally, ultrasound treatment may help smooth areas of operative unevenness or swelling. Patients who have undergone liposuction should wear a compression garment until most of the swelling has subsided.

Previous
Next

Complications

Many complications are possible, including unmet expectations, unevenness or irregularities (contour problems), anesthesia reactions, toxicity from Xylocaine or epinephrine, and remaining local areas of numbness.

Unmet expectations

The patient's expectations may differ from the results unless a good informed consent process that includes realistic possibilities was used. This is included as a complication because patients often desire impossible results. This may be avoided by rejecting patients with unreasonable and persistent expectations.

Contour problems

Contour problems are not uncommon with lipoplasty. They may be prevented somewhat by using small cannulas and a cross pattern to avoid disproportionate fat removal. In addition, keep the customary cannula away from the superficial area. Specific cannulas are available for superficial lipoplasty. Burns and hypertrophic scarring are more common with ultrasonic-assisted lipoplasty if the skin is not kept cool and protected. Infuse tumescence fluid into areas of ultrasonic usage; also, use moist towels and a skin protector or use constant infiltration of the cannula with cooling fluid through an integrated sheath.

Anesthetic and other general complications

Anesthetic and general complications can occur. They often involve fluid overload, lack of adequate replacement, and general anesthetic complications. Ensure good communication between the anesthesia team and the surgeon regarding the patient's requirements. Prone positioning is difficult for the anesthesia team.

Lidocaine toxicity occurs if excessive doses are administered via tumescence fluids. The usual adult maximum dose is 300 mg; distribute this through the combination of tumescence fluids. Typically, 4 mg/kg is the maximum level, but with combined epinephrine, this may actually approach 7 mg/kg. Much higher levels can be used safely, but guidelines are not readily available. The overall dose is important. It is also accepted that some degree of partitioning of the injected tumescence exists, and a portion is removed by suction lipectomy. As much as 35 mg/kg (tumescence) can be used.

Symptoms of lidocaine toxicity appear as CNS toxicity (eg, anxiety, apprehension, restlessness, nervousness, disorientation, confusion, dizziness, blurred vision, tremors, nausea and/or vomiting, shivering, seizures). Manifestations of drowsiness, unconsciousness, respiratory depression, and respiratory arrest are also possible. During anesthesia, maintaining blood pressure may be difficult and increased bleeding may occur.

Toxicity from epinephrine may cause symptoms. Limit the administration over the period of tumescence, and discuss patient stability with the anesthesia team.

Persistent numbness

Local areas of numbness may persist for a long time. The best plan is to discuss this possibility before the surgery. Usually, such areas eventually improve and sensation returns. During this period, it is important for the patient to gently massage and desensitize the area to prevent a neuroma or pain development. A full recovery may require 2 years or longer.

Complications specific to surgery type

With buttock implantation, complications include infection, wound dehiscence and implant exposure, reoperation, rupture of the implant, seroma, capsular contracture, asymmetry, implant shift, overcorrection, sciatic nerve injury, and paresthesia. Rates vary in different reported series.

With fat injection, the most commonly reported complications are fat resorption, asymmetry, irregularity, paresthesias, seroma, abscess, and cellulitis.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

The outcome of buttock contour surgery depends on the deformity (see image below). Excellent results are obtained by liposculpture (routine or ultrasonic-assisted). Depressed scars and defects are more difficult to correct because of the curved buttock shape and the scar-contracting elements across the curvature. Implantation of materials to fill defects may not last but should improve the defect.

Body contouring with buttocks surgery. PreoperativBody contouring with buttocks surgery. Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) photographs.

The initial outcome is an improvement but is not the final result. Liposuction usually requires at least 6 months and often 1 year before final results are achieved. Caution the patient about early expectations. Approximately 1 month after surgery, marked improvement is noticeable. The initial postoperative weight gain from fluid retention is gone, and the results are approaching a realized form.

Perform massage and compression of the area to facilitate skin shrinkage to the new form over the next few months. This massage is typically done by the patient at home or by a physical therapist or massage therapist. If some form of compression is not performed, the results will not be optimal. Final results may be noted when anesthesia of operated areas subsides, pinching of the area is possible, and the swollen feeling is gone. The prognosis of contour improvements is good if the patient follows all directions and instructions.

The outlook and prognosis of scar revisions are also good. A rule of scar and trauma revisions is that as long as something is changed with the revision, the results should be different. That is, if an aspect of the scar (eg, trauma, infection, suture technique) can be changed with the scar revision, expect some degree of improvement. Massage and the external addition of silicone sheeting or steroid cream may benefit scar revision.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

The future of contour surgery continues to be positive. More superficial irregularities will be safely addressed with less surgical risk. The cannulas and instruments will continue to undergo refinement, becoming more affordable and more applicable to a wider selection of patients.

Surgical advances and patient demands will always be accompanied by gimmicks. "Magic" creams will continue to be touted to remove cellulite, along with faster and safer machines promising a "too-good-to-believe" result. Patients must be cautious about such promises. Those who make such promises should be investigated thoroughly regarding board certification in plastic surgery and their good reputation. Good results are achieved with careful planning, good patient selection, and surgical skill.

A note must be added regarding the efficacy of the "roller-suction" machines touted to help with cellulite. All large-scale studies of these massage devices, when controlled for weight gain and loss, have shown absolutely no benefit. Herbal wraps and other purportedly magic potions have a similar poor contribution to improving the contour of this area.

An objective measure of the buttock volume or projection is needed to assess the efficacy of each treatment and the long-term result.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Procedures Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Liposuction.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Neal R Reisman, MD, JD  Chief of Plastic Surgery, St Luke's Episcopal Hospital; Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine

Neal R Reisman, MD, JD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Lipoplasty Society of North America, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Azita Madjidi, MD, MS  Clinical Assistant Professor in Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston

Azita Madjidi, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Harris County Medical Society, International Association of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons, and World Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Gregory Caputy, MD, PhD, FICS  Chief Surgeon, Aesthetica Plastic and Laser Surgery Center, Inc

Gregory Caputy, MD, PhD, FICS is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, Canadian Medical Association, International College of Surgeons, International College of Surgeons US Section, Pan-Pacific Surgical Association, and Wound Healing Society

Disclosure: Syneron Corporation Salary Speaking and teaching

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Alan Matarasso, MD, FACS, PC  Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Immed Past President of New York Regional Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Alan Matarasso, MD, FACS, PC is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, International College of Surgeons US Section, New York Academy of Medicine, New York County Medical Society, Pan American Medical Association, and Pan-Pacific Surgical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD  Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS  Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chief, Division of Plastic Surgery, Residency Program Director, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author Robert F Centeno, MD, MBA, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Flores-Lima G, Eppley BL. Body contouring with solid silicone implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar 2009;33(2):140-6. [Medline].

  2. Sozer SO, Agullo FJ, Palladino H. Autologous augmentation gluteoplasty with a dermal fat flap. Aesthet Surg J. Jan-Feb 2008;28(1):70-6. [Medline].

  3. Le Louarn C, Pascal JF. Autologous gluteal augmentation after massive weight loss. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 2008;121(4):1515-6; author reply 1516-7. [Medline].

  4. Centeno RF, Young VL. Clinical anatomy in aesthetic gluteal body contouring surgery. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):347-58. [Medline].

  5. Cuenca-Guerra R, Lugo-Beltran I. Beautiful buttocks: characteristics and surgical techniques. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):321-32. [Medline].

  6. Avendano-Valenzuela G, Guerrerosantos J. Contouring the gluteal region with tumescent liposculpture. Aesthet Surg J. Feb 1 2011;31(2):200-13. [Medline].

  7. Ali A. Contouring of the gluteal region in women: enhancement and augmentation. Ann Plast Surg. Sep 2011;67(3):209-14. [Medline].

  8. Aiache AE. Gluteal re-contouring with combination treatments: implants, liposuction, and fat transfer. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):395-403. [Medline].

  9. Babuccu O, Gozil R, Ozmen S, et al. Gluteal region morphology: the effect of the weight gain and aging. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar-Apr 2002;26(2):130-3. [Medline].

  10. Bachuk L. Complications with gluteal prosthesis. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1986;Jun (77):1012.

  11. Baroudi R. Body sculpturing. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1984;11(3):419-43. [Medline].

  12. Baroudi R, Moraes M. Philosophy, technical principles, selection, and indication in body contouring surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Winter 1991;15(1):1-18. [Medline].

  13. Bartels RJ, O'Malley JE, Douglas WM, Wilson RG. An unusual use of the Cronin breast prosthesis. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1969;44(5):500. [Medline].

  14. Bruner TW, Roberts TL, Nguyen K. Complications of buttocks augmentation: diagnosis, management, and prevention. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):449-66. [Medline].

  15. Cardenas-Camarena L, Lacouture AM, Tobar-Losada A. Combined gluteoplasty: liposuction and lipoinjection. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1999;104(5):1524-31; discussion 1532-3. [Medline].

  16. Cardenas-Restrepo JC, Ahmed JA. Large-volume lipoinjection for gluteal augmentation. Aesthetic Surg J. 2002;22(1):33-8.

  17. Centeno RF. Autologous gluteal augmentation with circumferential body lift in the massive weight loss and aesthetic patient. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):479-96. [Medline].

  18. Centeno RF. Gluteal aesthetic unit classification: A tool to improve outcomes in body contouring. Aesthetic Surg J. 2006;26:200-8.

  19. Chajchir A, Benzaquen I, Wexler E, Arellano A. Fat injection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1990;14(2):127-36. [Medline].

  20. Cocke WM, Ricketson G. Gluteal augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1973;52(1):93. [Medline].

  21. Da Rocha RP. Surgical anatomy of the gluteal region's subcutaneous screen and its use in plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar-Apr 2001;25(2):140-4. [Medline].

  22. de la Pena JA, Lopez-Manjardin H, Gamboa-Lopez F. Augmentation Gluteoplasty: Anatomical and Clinical Considerations. Key Issues Plast Cosmet Surg. Basel, Karger. 2000;17:1-17.

  23. de la Pena JA, Rubio OV, Cano JP, et al. History of gluteal augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):307-19. [Medline].

  24. de la Pena JA, Rubio OV, Cano JP, et al. Subfascial gluteal augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):405-22. [Medline].

  25. de Pedroza LV. Fat transplantation to the buttocks and legs for aesthetic enhancement or correction of deformities: long-term results of large volumes of fat transplant. Dermatol Surg. Dec 2000;26(12):1145-9. [Medline].

  26. Douglas WM, Bartels RJ, Baker JL. An experience in aesthetic buttocks augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 1975;3:471-6.

  27. Erni D, Banic A. [Body contouring by removal of skin and fatty tissue]. Ther Umsch. Apr 1999;56(4):206-11. [Medline].

  28. Ford RD, Simpson WD. Massive extravasation of traumatically ruptured buttock silicone prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg. Jul 1992;29(1):86-8. [Medline].

  29. Gonzalez R. Buttocks lifting: how and when to use medial, lateral, lower, and upper lifting techniques. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):467-78. [Medline].

  30. Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Gluteoplasty: a ten-year report. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991;15(1):85-91. [Medline].

  31. Guerrerosantos J. Autologous fat grafting for body contouring. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1996;23(4):619-31. [Medline].

  32. Guerrerosantos J. Secondary hip-buttock-thigh plasty. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1984;11(3):491-503. [Medline].

  33. Hidalgo JE. Submuscular gluteal augmentation: 17 years of experience with gel and elastomer silicone implants. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):435-47. [Medline].

  34. Hunstad JP. Body contouring in the obese patient. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1996;23(4):647-70. [Medline].

  35. Illouz YG. Body contouring by lipolysis: a 5-year experience with over 3000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1983;72(5):591-7. [Medline].

  36. Illouz YG. Illouz's technique of body contouring by lipolysis. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1984;11(3):409-17. [Medline].

  37. Kesselring UK. Body contouring with suction lipectomy. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1984;11(3):393-408. [Medline].

  38. Kinney BM. Body contouring with external ultrasound. Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation DATA Committee. Device and Technique Assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1999;103(2):728-9. [Medline].

  39. Lack EB. Contouring the female buttocks. Liposculpting the buttocks. Dermatol Clin. Oct 1999;17(4):815-22, vi. [Medline].

  40. Lewis JR Jr. Body contouring. South Med J. Aug 1980;73(8):1006-11. [Medline].

  41. Lockwood T. Lower body lift with superficial fascial system suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1993;92(6):1112-22; discussion 1123-5. [Medline].

  42. Lockwood TE. Transverse flank-thigh-buttock lift with superficial fascial suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1991;87(6):1019-27. [Medline].

  43. Maxwell GP, Gingrass MK. Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a clinical study of 250 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1998;101(1):189-202; discussion 203-4. [Medline].

  44. Mendieta CG. Classification system for gluteal evaluation. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):333-46. [Medline].

  45. Mendieta CG. Intramuscular gluteal augmentation technique. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):423-34. [Medline].

  46. Mladick RA. Male body contouring. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1991;18(4):797-813. [Medline].

  47. Montreal J. Fat tissues as a permanent implant. new instruments and refinements. Aesthetic Surg J. 2003;23(3):213-6.

  48. Pascal JF, Le Louarn C. Remodeling bodylift with high lateral tension. Aesthetic Plast Surg. May-Jun 2002;26(3):223-30. [Medline].

  49. Peren PA, Gomez JB, Guerrerosantos J, Salazar CA. Gluteus augmentation with fat grafting. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Nov-Dec 2000;24(6):412-7. [Medline].

  50. Raposo-Amaral CE, Ferreira DM, Warren SM, Magna LA, Ferreira LM. Quantifying augmentation gluteoplasty outcomes: a comparison of three instruments used to measure gluteal projection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar 2008;32(2):333-8. [Medline].

  51. Roberts TL, Toledo LS, Badin AZ. Augmentation of the Buttocks by Micro Fat Grafting. Aesthetic Surg J. 2001;21(4):311-9.

  52. Roberts TL, Weinfeld AB, Bruner TW, Nguyen K. "Universal" and ethnic ideals of beautiful buttocks are best obtained by autologous micro fat grafting and liposuction. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):371-94. [Medline].

  53. Robles JM. Re: Massive extravasation of traumatically ruptured buttock silicone prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg. Jan 1993;30(1):94. [Medline].

  54. Rohrich RJ, Beran SJ, Kenkel JM, eds. Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction. St. Louis, Mo: Quality Medical Publishers; 1998.

  55. Rohrich RJ, Raniere J Jr, Kenkel JM, Beran SJ. Operative principles for optimizing results in circumferential body contouring with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1999;26(2):305-16; x. [Medline].

  56. Singh D. Universal allure of the hourglass figure: an evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2006;33(3):359-70. [Medline].

  57. Springer RC. Liposuction: an overview. Plast Surg Nurs. 1996;16(4):215-22; quiz 223-4. [Medline].

  58. Teimourian B. Ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1997;100(6):1623-5. [Medline].

  59. Toledo LS. Syringe liposculpture: a two-year experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991;15(4):321-6. [Medline].

  60. Vergara R. Intramuscular gluteal implants: fifteen years' experience. Aesthetic Surg J. 2003;23(2):86-19.

Previous
Next
 
Body contouring with buttocks surgery. Preoperative (left) and postoperative (right) photographs.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.