eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Breast

Breast Augmentation, Submuscular: Multimedia

Author: Jay M Pensler, MD, Aesthetic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Private Practice; Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Nov 9, 2009

Multimedia

(Above) Preoperative view of 28-year-old woman wi...Media file 1: (Above) Preoperative view of 28-year-old woman with micromastia. She has had 2 children. Note the small breast has decreased upper pole fullness. (Below) Postoperative view after submuscular augmentation with a round implant. Notice increased fullness of the upper poles of the breasts. Submuscular placement makes it difficult to appreciate the edge of the implant.
(Above) Preoperative view of 28-year-old woman wi...

(Above) Preoperative view of 28-year-old woman with micromastia. She has had 2 children. Note the small breast has decreased upper pole fullness. (Below) Postoperative view after submuscular augmentation with a round implant. Notice increased fullness of the upper poles of the breasts. Submuscular placement makes it difficult to appreciate the edge of the implant.

(Above) Preoperative view of 26-year-old woman wi...Media file 2: (Above) Preoperative view of 26-year-old woman with minimal upper pole fullness and asymmetric breasts. (Below) Postoperative result after submuscular placement of anatomically shaped implants. Notice increased lower pole fullness and absence of upper pole fullness relative to the round implant shown in Image 1.
(Above) Preoperative view of 26-year-old woman wi...

(Above) Preoperative view of 26-year-old woman with minimal upper pole fullness and asymmetric breasts. (Below) Postoperative result after submuscular placement of anatomically shaped implants. Notice increased lower pole fullness and absence of upper pole fullness relative to the round implant shown in Image 1.

(Above) A 24-year-old woman with an A-cup breast....Media file 3: (Above) A 24-year-old woman with an A-cup breast. (Below) Postoperative result after subglandular placement with 460-mL implants. Note the lower position of the implant when placed in a subglandular position.
(Above) A 24-year-old woman with an A-cup breast....

(Above) A 24-year-old woman with an A-cup breast. (Below) Postoperative result after subglandular placement with 460-mL implants. Note the lower position of the implant when placed in a subglandular position.

(Above) Preoperative view of a 27-year-old patien...Media file 4: (Above) Preoperative view of a 27-year-old patient desiring augmentation. (Below) Postoperative view after augmentation with a round implant. Notice the smooth contour in the upper pole. The end of the implant is not perceptible because of submuscular placement.
(Above) Preoperative view of a 27-year-old patien...

(Above) Preoperative view of a 27-year-old patient desiring augmentation. (Below) Postoperative view after augmentation with a round implant. Notice the smooth contour in the upper pole. The end of the implant is not perceptible because of submuscular placement.

(Above) Preoperative view of 23-year-old patient ...Media file 5: (Above) Preoperative view of 23-year-old patient with micromastia. (Below) Postoperative view after augmentation with detachment of the inferior half of the pectoralis musculature from the sternal attachments to provide cleavage. Note increased medial projection.
(Above) Preoperative view of 23-year-old patient ...

(Above) Preoperative view of 23-year-old patient with micromastia. (Below) Postoperative view after augmentation with detachment of the inferior half of the pectoralis musculature from the sternal attachments to provide cleavage. Note increased medial projection.

More on Breast Augmentation, Submuscular

Overview: Breast Augmentation, Submuscular
Treatment: Breast Augmentation, Submuscular
Follow-up: Breast Augmentation, Submuscular
Multimedia: Breast Augmentation, Submuscular
References

References

  1. Ellenberg AH, Braun H. A 3 1/2-year experience with double-lumen implants in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1980;65(3):307-13. [Medline].

  2. McKinney P, Tresley G. Long-term comparison of patients with gel and saline mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1983;72(1):27-31. [Medline].

  3. Slade CL, Peterson HD. Disappearance of the polyurethane cover of the Ashley Natural Y prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1982;70(3):379-83. [Medline].

  4. Cronin T, Gerow F. Augmentation mammoplasty: A new "natural feel" prosthesis. In: Broadbent TR, ed. Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation; 1964.

  5. 32. Bondurant S, Ernster V, Herdman R, eds; Committee on the Safety of Silicone Breast Implants, Institute of Medicine. Safety of Silicone Breast Implants. The National Academies Press Web site. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9602. Accessed November 9, 2009.

  6. Deapen D. Breast implants and breast cancer: a review of incidence, detection, mortality, and survival. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):70S-80S. [Medline].

  7. Cunningham B. The Mentor Core Study on Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):19S-29S; discussion 30S-32S. [Medline].

  8. National Cancer Institute (NCI). NCI Breast Implant Study. NCI Web site. Available at http://www.nci.nih.gov/newscenter/siliconefactsheet. Accessed November 9, 2009.

  9. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants After In-Depth Evaluation Agency Requiring 10 Years of Patient Follow-Up. FDA Web site. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2006/ucm108790.htm. Accessed November 9, 2009.

  10. Jones FR, Tauras AP. A periareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1973;51(6):641-4. [Medline].

  11. Tebbetts JB. Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: long-term follow-up and refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1984;74(5):636-49. [Medline].

  12. Pacella SJ, Codner MA. The transaxillary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 2009;36(1):49-61, vi. [Medline].

  13. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 15 2001;107(5):1255-72. [Medline].

  14. Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW. The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1979;63(6):812-6. [Medline].

  15. Oneal RM, Argenta LC. Late side effects related to inflatable breast prostheses containing soluble steroids. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1982;69(4):641-5. [Medline].

  16. Asplund O. Capsular contracture in silicone gel and saline-filled breast implants after reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1984;73(2):270-5. [Medline].

  17. Pfeiffer P, Jorgensen S, Kristiansen TB, Jorgensen A, Holmich LR. Protective effect of topical antibiotics in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 2009;124(2):629-34. [Medline].

  18. Khan UD. Breast Augmentation, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, and Infection: Comparative Analysis of 1,628 Primary Augmentation Mammoplasties Assessing the Role and Efficacy of Antibiotics Prophylaxis Duration. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Oct 20 2009;[Medline].

  19. Carlesimo B, Cigna E, Fino P, Rusciani A, Tariciotti F, Staccioli S. Antibiotic therapy of transaxillary augmentation mammoplasty. In Vivo. Mar-Apr 2009;23(2):357-62. [Medline].

  20. Ashley FL. A new type of breast prosthesis. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1970;45(5):421-4. [Medline].

  21. Baker JL Jr, Bartels RJ, Douglas WM. Closed compression technique for rupturing a contracted capsule around a breast implant. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1976;58(2):137-41. [Medline].

  22. Courtiss EH, Webster RC, White MF. Selection of alternatives in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1974;54(5):552-7. [Medline].

  23. Cronin TD, Greenberg RL. Our experiences with the silastic gel breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1970;46(1):1-7. [Medline].

  24. De Cholnoky T. Augmentation mammaplasty. Survey of complications in 10,941 patients by 265 surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1970;45(6):573-7. [Medline].

  25. Farina MA, Newby BG, Alani HM. Innervation of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1980;66(4):497-501. [Medline].

  26. Goldwyn R. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Breast. Boston, Mass: Little Brown & Co; 1976.

  27. Irons GB, Arnold PG, Masson JK, Woods JE. Experience with 100 muscle flaps. Ann Plast Surg. Jan 1980;4(1):2-6. [Medline].

  28. Letterman G, Schurter M. History of augmentation mammoplasty. In: Owsley JQ, Peterson RA, eds. Symposium on Aesthetic Surgery of the Breast. St Louis: CV Mosby Co; 1978:243-49.

  29. Lilla JA, Vistnes LM. Long-term study of reactions to various silicone breast implants in rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1976;57(5):637-49. [Medline].

  30. Mahler D, Ben-Yakar J, Hauben DJ. The retropectoral route for breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1982;6(4):237-42. [Medline].

  31. Pensler J. Cosmetic surgery. In: American Medical Association Family Medical Guide. 4th edi. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004:1089-91.

  32. Rees TD, Guy CL, Coburn RJ. The use of inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1973;52(6):609-15. [Medline].

  33. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):8S-16S; discussion 17S-18S. [Medline].

  34. Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, Clemens MW. Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Jan 2009;33(1):44-8. [Medline].

  35. Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2005;116(7):2005-16. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

breast augmentation, submuscular breast augmentation, breast implant, inframammary approach, periareolar approach, transaxillary approach, periumbilical approach, implant rippling, micromastia, breast surgery, silicone implants, gel implants, saline implants

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Jay M Pensler, MD, Aesthetic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Private Practice; Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School
Jay M Pensler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Burn Association, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Chicago Medical Society, Illinois State Medical Society, International College of Surgeons, and Sigma Xi
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Pankaj Tiwari, MD, Assistant Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

James Neal Long, MD, Assistant Professor of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham and Kirklin Clinics
James Neal Long, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Sigma Xi, Southeastern Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, and Southeastern Surgical Congress
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.