Latissimus Flap Breast Reconstruction 

  • Author: John YS Kim, MD; Chief Editor: James Neal Long, MD, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Jul 22, 2011
 

Background

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy has evolved over the last century to be an integral component in the therapy for patients with breast cancer. Breast reconstruction originally was designed to reduce postmastectomy complications and to correct chest wall deformity, but its value has been recognized to extend past this limited view of use. The goals for patients undergoing reconstruction are to correct the anatomic defect and to restore form and breast symmetry. The surgical options for breast reconstruction involve the use of endoprostheses (implants), autogenous tissue transfers, or a combination of both.

Within the last 30 years, the technical emphasis has focused on the use of tissue expanders with implants, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous transfer, and the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap to achieve adequate breast restoration.[1] Although all of these methods are individually sufficient for reconstruction, surgical feasibility and patient preference dictate their use.[2]

Reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap produces a breast with ptosis and projection while maintaining the natural consistency and feel of normal tissue. This flap provides ample bulk for reconstruction due to the large surface of the muscle. In many patients, the flap can be used without the use of an implant, restoring volumes of up to 1.5 L in large patients or with the use of modified techniques.[3, 4] It restores the anterior chest wall with healthy tissue, particularly of benefit in patients who previously have undergone irradiation. The latissimus muscle flap is a workhorse flap for salvage of failed expander-implant reconstructions. The flap also provides trophic stimulation to the surrounding tissues without increased disease morbidity or interference with mammographic evaluation. See the image below.

Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Women's Health Center and Cancer and Tumors Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Mastectomy, Breast Lumps and Pain, Breast Self-Exam, and Breast Cancer.

Next

History of the Procedure

Iginio Tansini first used the technique of transfer of the latissimus dorsi muscle on its anterior arc of rotation in 1897.[5] This Italian surgeon presented his novel concept for the coverage of chest wall defects that resulted from breast amputation as it was performed during this period. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap and overlying skin were rotated anteriorly about the axillary insertion. Later, in 1912, Stefano d'Este performed a version of this procedure described by Tansini for reconstruction of the mastectomy defect.[6]

In 1936, Hutchins went into extensive detail of his use of the latissimus dorsi for prevention of lymphedema that occurred after mastectomy.[7] He hypothesized that the ipsilateral arm and chest morbidity was due to the destruction of the axillary lymphatics and subsequent scarring that occurred after removing the pectoralis major and minor. Therefore, by re-establishing the axillary lymphatic framework imparted by these muscles with the transfer of the latissimus dorsi, he found that lymphedema could be attenuated. The latissimus dorsi was believed to be a mirror image of the pectoralis muscles, and it could serve to mimic the soft tissue defect left after removal of these structures. Hutchins described 12 successful cases in his report, in which he also noted that the latissimus dorsi transfer was useful in preventing edema while concurrently providing a healthy base for skin grafts and laying the foundation for reconstruction of the breast using transposed abdominal fat grafts.

Davis in 1949 and Darrell Campbell in 1950 made use of the flap for correction of anterior thoracic wall defects.[8, 9] Davis reconstructed a 30 x 14-cm defect created after resection of rib chondrosarcoma.[8] The lesion, which extended from the midaxillary line to the sternum and spanned the fourth to seventh ribs, was covered using a fascia lata graft and an overlying pedicle graft from the anterior portion of the latissimus muscle.

Around the same time, Campbell included the use of the latissimus dorsi anterior pedicle in a description of a procedure for repair of thoracic wall lesions that were the result of surgical extirpation of locally invasive malignancy.[9] In his procedure, he also used a fascia lata graft with latissimus dorsi, which subsequently was covered by a split-thickness skin graft. The experience of both surgeons corroborated Hutchins' findings that the latissimus dorsi anterior pedicle muscle flap was a reliable flap that provided protection and elasticity to the chest wall as well as adequate nutrition to adjacent structures.

In 1974, Brantigan published the results of 10 years of experience using the same procedure.[10] Brantigan treated 22 patients using the Hutchins modification of the radical mastectomy and reported excellent cosmetic results vis-à-vis the typical radical mastectomy. He also demonstrated the use of this flap in covering more extensive resections involving the internal mammary lymph chain, giving the surgeon the security of having mobile tissue between the pleura and skin.

The work done in the late 1970s presaged the contemporary use of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction. With the understanding of the vascular connections to the skin provided by the underlying muscle and the idea of a myocutaneous flap proposed by McCraw in 1977, the use of the latissimus dorsi was expanded to include the overlying skin island.[11] William Schneider reported successful transfer of the muscle and skin combination.[12] He found the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap particularly useful for restoration of breast volume, replacement of the lost subclavicular contour once provided by the pectoralis major muscle, and restoration of deficient skin following mastectomy. Olivari, in 1976,[13] and Muhlbauer and Olbrisch, in 1977,[14] further exploited the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction after mastectomy in patients with radiation damage to the skin and chest wall.

In 1977, Bostwick elaborated on the indication and strategy of postmastectomy breast reconstruction.[15] His experience with the latissimus dorsi flap involved 52 patients over a 2-year period and included the use of the muscle flap alone, the use of the myocutaneous island flap, and permutations of both involving silicone prostheses. His technique, with minor variation from those previously described, consistently provided adequate skin coverage and replacement of the breast mound contour, resulting in increased breast symmetry and improved cosmetic result.

Since Tansini's original idea, the latissimus dorsi flap has evolved to incorporate a wide range of applications for breast and chest wall reconstruction. The most recent advances involve subtleties in procedure and planning that have improved aesthetic and functional outcomes. Even with its loss of popularity secondary to the use of the TRAM flap in recent years, the latissimus dorsi flap remains an acceptable and reliable option for breast reconstruction in the appropriate patient population.

Previous
Next

Indications

Patient selection

  • Thin habitus
  • Previous abdominal operations (including abdominoplasty)
  • Preferred dorsal donor site
  • Failed implant or TRAM reconstruction
  • Patients desiring future pregnancy

Adequate evaluation of candidates for breast reconstruction is dependent on many factors, including patient health, body habitus, contralateral breast size and shape, extent of mastectomy, site of mastectomy scar, and patient preference. Generally, healthy patients may be considered candidates for all reconstructive options, while those with significant comorbidities may be unable to tolerate complex autogenous transfers. The extent of the mastectomy defect, with consideration of the infraclavicular and axillary defects, also contributes to the reconstructive decision. Assessment of the quality of the remaining tissue and the amount of skin and soft tissue required to create acceptable symmetry ultimately impacts the decision of which procedure to perform. When an expander-implant reconstruction has failed secondary to infection or irradiated wound dehisence, the latissimus flap can be used for salvage.

Recently, because of the increased use of the TRAM flap, the latissimus dorsi flap often is reserved for patients in whom TRAM reconstruction is contraindicated. This subset of patients includes extremely thin patients in whom the infraumbilical soft tissues are limited and patients who previously have undergone abdominoplasty or other abdominal operations or who have abdominal scars that may entail compromise of the rectus abdominis pedicle. Relative to TRAM reconstruction, the latissimus dorsi is more resistant to the effects of impaired wound healing posed by smoking and diabetes. Additionally, latissimus dorsi reconstruction does not compromise the abdominal wall, which may be of issue in patients desiring future pregnancy.

A variant of the latissimus flap is a muscle flap done through a limited axillary incision that can be used for larger lumpectomy defects.[16]

See the images below.

Preoperative Lumpectomy Defect Preoperative Lumpectomy Defect Postoperative Latissimus Dorsi Reconstruction Postoperative Latissimus Dorsi Reconstruction

Other post-radiation lumpectomy defects can be treated with either a standard myocutaneous flap or a perforator-based thoracodorsal flap.[17]

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

The latissimus dorsi is a flat, triangular-shaped muscle located on the posterior trunk. Its inferior origin arises from the posterior aspect of the iliac crest, lumbar fascia, supraspinal ligament, and the spines of the lower 6 thoracic vertebrate and sacral vertebrate. These muscle fibers traverse the posterior thorax cephalad and receive additional fibers of origin from the lower 4 ribs and the inferior angle of the scapula. At the level of the scapula, around the lower border of the teres major muscle, the fibers begin to merge as they form the posterior wall of the axilla. The insertion of the latissimus dorsi muscle tendon is on the crest of the lesser tubercle of the humerus anterior to the insertion of the teres major muscle.

The distribution of the muscle fibers is superficial to those of the posterior trunk (serratus anterior, serratus posterior, erector spinae) inferiorly and is deep to the trapezius at the superior medial margin. The contraction of these fibers results in the extension, adduction, and medial rotation of the humerus. When contraction is compromised, the teres major and subscapularis muscles compensate these actions.

Innervation

The innervation of the latissimus dorsi muscle is through the thoracodorsal nerve, from the posterior cord of the brachial plexus. This nerve provides motor stimulus originating from the sixth through eighth cervical segments. Posterior branches of the lateral cutaneous segments of the lower intercostal nerves accomplish the sensory innervation to the skin overlying the muscle. This sensory component usually is lost due to the division of these nerves during dissection. The thoracodorsal nerve joins the thoracodorsal artery and vein 3-4 cm prior to entering the lateral edge of the muscle.

Vascular supply [18]

The blood supply to the latissimus dorsi arises from one dominant pedicle and is supported by many segmental vessels (type V pattern of circulation). The thoracodorsal artery branches from the subscapular artery just distal to the circumflex scapular artery and enters the muscle in the posterior axilla 10-11 cm inferior to the origin of its insertion. Just proximal to the entrance of the thoracodorsal artery into the muscle, it gives one or two branches to the serratus anterior. This vascular architecture allows continued perfusion if the proximal portion of the artery is damaged through collateral connections with the lateral thoracic artery.[19, 20]

The segmental arterial contribution is separated into medial and lateral rows. The medial row originates from several segmental branches of the lumbar artery and supplies the muscle origin around the lumbar spine. The posterior intercostal arteries contribute 4-6 perforators to feed the inferior lateral muscle fibers. Venous drainage is accomplished by venae comitantes of their corresponding arteries.

Coverage

The standard arc of rotation of the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is based on its thoracodorsal neurovascular pedicle and humeral insertion. Posteriorly, the flap can be rotated in a cephalad orientation to cover up to the parietal skull. The anterior arc of rotation extends from the middle third of the face to the upper abdomen. Both the anterior and posterior arcs can be used to cover the anterior and posterior upper extremities, respectively, and have been used for functional muscle transfer to correct elbow flexion deformity. Additionally, the standard arc can be extended 5-10 cm in all directions with the detachment of the muscle from its humeral insertion. The standard anterior arc of rotation of the muscle flap provides transfer of the latissimus dorsi for breast reconstruction. Both an implant or expander can be used under the muscle. The advent of tabbed expanders can facilitate positional integrity of the prosthesis.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

  • Posterior thoracotomy
  • Implants not desired
  • Severe cardiac disease
  • Severe pulmonary disease
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

John YS Kim, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation; Consulting Staff, Northwestern Plastic Surgery

John YS Kim, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons and American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Mentor Worldwide LLC Consulting fee Consulting; Mentor Worldwide LLC Grant/research funds Principal Investigator; Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Grant/research funds Principal Investigator; Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Consulting fee Consulting

Coauthor(s)

Jamal M Bullocks, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine; Chief, Plastic Surgery Service, Ben Taub General Hospital, Houston Texas

Jamal M Bullocks, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Cancer Research, American Association of Plastic Surgeons, and Michael E DeBakey International Surgical Society

Disclosure: Thieme Publishing company Royalty Book Author

Arturo Armenta, MD  Staff Physician, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Pankaj Tiwari, MD  Assistant Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

R Edward Newsome†, MD  Former Program Director and Chief of Plastic Surgery, Henderson Chair in Surgery, Former Assistant Dean for Graduate Medical Education, Tulane University School of Medicine

R Edward Newsome†, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Louisiana State Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD  Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

James Neal Long, MD, FACS  Associate Professor of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital and Kirklin Clinics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine; Chief of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand, and Microsurgery, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center

James Neal Long, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Sigma Xi, Southeastern Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, and Southeastern Surgical Congress

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Saleh M Shenaq, MD†, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Bostwick J 3rd, Carlson GW. Reconstruction of the breast. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Jan 1997;6(1):71-89. [Medline].

  2. Elliott LF. Options for donor sites for autogenous tissue breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1994;21(2):177-89. [Medline].

  3. Delay E, Gounot N, Bouillot A, et al. Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: a 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1998;102(5):1461-78. [Medline].

  4. Barnett GR, Gianoutsos MP. The latissimus dorsi added fat flap for natural tissue breast reconstruction: report of 15 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1996;97(1):63-70. [Medline].

  5. Tansini I. Sopra il mio nuovo processo di amputazione della mammella. Gazetta Medica Italiana. 1906;57:141.

  6. D'Este S. La technique de l'amputation de la mamelle pour carcinome mammaire. Rev Chir. 1912;45:194.

  7. Hutchins EH. A method for the prevention of elephantiasis. Surg Gynec Obst. 1939;69:795.

  8. Davis HH, Tollman JP, Brush JH. Huge chondrosarcoma of rib. Surgery. 1949;26:699.

  9. Campbell DA. Reconstruction of the anterior thoracic wall. J Thoracic Surg. 1950;19:456.

  10. Brantigan OC. Evaluation of Hutchins' modification of radical mastectomy for cancer of the breast. Am Surg. Feb 1974;40(2):86-8. [Medline].

  11. McCraw JB, Dibbell DG, Carraway JH. Clinical definition of independent myocutaneous vascular territories. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1977;60(3):341-52. [Medline].

  12. Schneider WJ, Hill HL Jr, Brown RG. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. Oct 1977;30(4):277-81. [Medline].

  13. Olivari N. The latissimus flap. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1976;29(2):126-8. [Medline].

  14. Muhlbauer W, Olbrisch R. The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Chir Plastica. 1977;4:27.

  15. Bostwick J 3rd, Vasconez LO, Jurkiewicz MJ. Breast reconstruction after a radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1978;61(5):682-93. [Medline].

  16. Nakajima H, Fujiwara I, Mizuta N, Sakaguchi K, Ohashi M, Nishiyama A, et al. Clinical outcomes of video-assisted skin-sparing partial mastectomy for breast cancer and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle flap as breast-conserving therapy. World J Surg. Sep 2010;34(9):2197-203. [Medline].

  17. Minabe T, Harii K, Imanishi N. Latissimus dorsi flaps oriented on the lateral intercostal artery perforators: anatomical study and application in autologous breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. April/2011;45:58-65. [Medline].

  18. Bartlett SP, May JW Jr, Yaremchuk MJ. The latissimus dorsi muscle: a fresh cadaver study of the primary neurovascular pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1981;67(5):631-6. [Medline].

  19. Fisher J, Bostwick J 3rd, Powell RW. Latissimus dorsi blood supply after thoracodorsal vessel division: the serratus collateral. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1983;72(4):502-11. [Medline].

  20. Maxwell GP, McGibbon BM, Hoopes JE. Vascular considerations in the use of a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap after a mastectomy with an axillary dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1979;64(6):771-80. [Medline].

  21. Cohen BE, Cronin ED. Breast reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1984;11(2):287-302. [Medline].

  22. Kat CC, Darcy CM, O'Donoghue JM, Taylor AR, Regan PJ. The use of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap for immediate correction of the deformity resulting from breast conservation surgery. Br J Plast Surg. Mar 1999;52(2):99-103. [Medline].

  23. Chang DW, Youssef A, Cha S, Reece GP. Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1 2002;110(3):751-9; discussion 760-1. [Medline].

  24. De Mey A, Lejour M, Declety A, Meythiaz AM. Late results and current indications of latissimus dorsi breast reconstructions. Br J Plast Surg. Jan 1991;44(1):1-4. [Medline].

  25. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, et al. Breast reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps in previously irradiated patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1994;93(3):460-9; discussion 470-1. [Medline].

  26. Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:455-462. [Medline].

  27. Roy MK, Shrotia S, Holcombe C, et al. Complications of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:162-165. [Medline].

  28. Moore TS, Farrell LD. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1992;89(4):666-72; discussion 673-4. [Medline].

  29. Delay E, Jorquera F, Lucas R. Sensitivity of breasts reconstructed with the autologous latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:302-309. [Medline].

  30. Dixon JM, Venizelos B, Chan P. Latissimus dorsi mini-flap: a technique for extending breast conservation. Breast. Feb 2002;11(1):58-65. [Medline].

  31. Rainsbury RM. Breast-sparing reconstruction with latissimus dorsi miniflaps. Eur J Surg Oncol. Dec 2002;28(8):891-5. [Medline].

  32. Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA. Breast volume replacement using the latissimus dorsi miniflap. ANZ J Surg. Mar 2004;74(3):98-104. [Medline].

  33. Gendy RK, Able JA, Rainsbury RM. Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery. Br J Surg. Apr 2003;90(4):433-9. [Medline].

  34. Yano K, Hosokawa K, Takagi S, et al. Breast reconstruction using the sensate latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 2002;109(6):1897-902; discussion 1903. [Medline].

  35. Bostwick J 3rd, Nahai F, Wallace JG, Vasconez LO. Sixty latissimus dorsi flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1979;63(1):31-41. [Medline].

  36. Carlson GW. Breast reconstruction. Surgical options and patient selection. Cancer. Jul 1 1994;74(1 Suppl):436-9. [Medline].

  37. Chun JK, Sterry TP. Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap based on the serratus branch with microvascular venous augmentation. J Reconstr Microsurg. Feb 2001;17(2):95-8. [Medline].

  38. Guthrie RH, Schwartz GF. Reconstructive and Aesthetic Mammoplasty. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1989.

  39. Hogge JP, Zuurbier RA, de Paredes ES. Mammography of autologous myocutaneous flaps. Radiographics. Oct 1999;19 Spec No:S63-72. [Medline].

  40. Losken A, Schaefer TG, Carlson GW, et al. Immediate endoscopic latissimus dorsi flap: risk or benefit in reconstructing partial mastectomy defects. Ann Plast Surg. Jul 2004;53(1):1-5. [Medline].

  41. Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Reconstructive Surgery: Principles, Anatomy and Technique. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 1997.

  42. Maxwell GP, Hammond DC. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy and surgical management of the patient with high-risk breast disease. In: Gragg and Smith's Plastic Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1997.

  43. McCraw JB, Maxwell GP. Early and late capsular "deformation" as a cause of unsatisfactory results in the latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1988;15(4):717-26. [Medline].

  44. McCraw JB, Papp CT. Latissimus flap for autogenous breast reconstruction. In: Hartrampf's Breast Reconstruction with Living Tissue. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1991:209-48.

  45. Pomel C, Missana MC, Atallah D, Lasser P. Endoscopic muscular latissimus dorsi flap harvesting for immediate breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. Mar 2003;29(2):127-31. [Medline].

  46. Slavin SA, Love SM, Sadowsky NL. Reconstruction of the radiated partial mastectomy defect with autogenous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1992;90(5):854-65; discussion 866-9. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction.
Preoperative Lumpectomy Defect
Postoperative Latissimus Dorsi Reconstruction
Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction; nipple reconstruction.
Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction.
Preoperative markings.
Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction; flap inset.
Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction; implant placement.
Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.