eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Breast
Breast Reduction, Central Pedicle: Workup
Updated: Apr 20, 2009
Workup
Laboratory Studies
- Order routine lab work according to the criteria for elective surgery under general anesthesia in the practicing physician's hospital. Age, medical history, social habits, and family history influence the need for these tests. If the surgeon has concerns, seek consultation from the patient's primary care provider.
Imaging Studies
- Consider mammography in patients presenting for breast reduction surgery. Current practice suggests that mammograms should be obtained for patients aged 40 years and older. Some surgeons also advocate mammography in patients aged 35-40 years with a family history of breast cancer.
Other Tests
- Determine the need for chest radiographs and ECG according to the criteria for elective surgery under general anesthesia in the practicing physician's hospital. Age, medical history, social habits, and family history influence the need for these tests. If the surgeon has concerns, seek consultation from the patient's primary care provider.
More on Breast Reduction, Central Pedicle |
| Overview: Breast Reduction, Central Pedicle |
Workup: Breast Reduction, Central Pedicle |
| Treatment: Breast Reduction, Central Pedicle |
| Follow-up: Breast Reduction, Central Pedicle |
| Multimedia: Breast Reduction, Central Pedicle |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Hester TR Jr, Bostwick J 3rd, Miller L, Cunningham SJ. Breast reduction utilizing the maximally vascularized central breast pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1985;76(6):890-900. [Medline].
Grant JH 3rd, Rand RP. The maximally vascularized central pedicle breast reduction: evolution of a technique. Ann Plast Surg. Jun 2001;46(6):584-9. [Medline].
Cho BC, Yang JD, Baik BS. Periareolar reduction mammoplasty using an inferior dermal pedicle or a central pedicle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(3):275-81. [Medline].
Surgical and Nonsurgical Procedures: 11-year Comparison, 1997-2007 [database online]. http://www.surgery.org: American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons; 6/23/08. Updated 6/23/08.
2007 Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Trends 1992, 2006, 2007 [database online]. www.plasticsurgery.org: American Society of Plastic Surgeons; 6/23/08. Updated 6/23/08.
de la Torre JI, Vasconez LO. Macromastia and Reduction Mammaplasty. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM. The Breast. Vol 2. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Saunders; 2004:43. [Full Text].
Ayan F, Sakoglu N, Paksoy M, As A, Dogan M. Pregnancy-induced macromastia. Breast J. Sep-Oct 2004;10(5):448. [Medline].
Cruz-Korchin N, Korchin L, González-Keelan C, Climent C, Morales I. Macromastia: how much of it is fat?. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2002;109(1):64-8. [Medline].
Hagerty RC, Hagerty RF. Reduction mammaplasty: central cone technique for maximal preservation of vascular and nerve supply. South Med J. Feb 1989;82(2):183-5. [Medline].
Shewmake KB. Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy. Selected Readings in Plast Surg. 1994;7:30:1-27.
Gonzalez F, Walton RL, Shafer B, et al. Reduction mammaplasty improves symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1993;91(7):1270-6. [Medline].
Courtiss EH, Goldwym RM. Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique. An alternative to free nipple and areola grafting for severe macromastia or extreme ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1977;59(4):500-7. [Medline].
McKissock PK. Reduction mammaplasty by the vertical bipedicle flap technique. Rationale and results. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1976;3(2):309-20. [Medline].
McKissock PK. Invited discussion: Breast reduction utilizing the maximally vascularized central breast pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:899-900.
Parenteau JM, Regnault P. The Regnault "B" technique in mastopexy and breast reduction: a 12-year review. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Spring 1989;13(2):75-9. [Medline].
Yousif NJ, Larson DL, Sanger JR, Matloub HS. Elimination of the vertical scar in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1992;89(3):459-67; discussion 468. [Medline].
Reus WF, Mathes SJ. Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1988;82(4):644-52. [Medline].
Moufarrege R, Beauregard G, Bosse JP, et al. Reduction mammoplasty by the total dermoglandular pedicle. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1985;9(3):227-32. [Medline].
Wise RJ. A preliminary report on a method of planning the mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1956;17(5):367-75. [Medline].
Brown DM, Young VL. Reduction mammoplasty for macromastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993;17(3):211-23. [Medline].
Nahabedian MY, McGibbon BM, Manson PN. Medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 2000;105(3):896-904. [Medline].
Chang P, Shaaban AF, Canady JW, Ricciardelli EJ, Cram AE. Reduction mammaplasty: the results of avoiding nipple-areolar amputation in cases of extreme hypertrophy. Ann Plast Surg. Dec 1996;37(6):585-91. [Medline].
Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R. Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 2005;115(3):743-51; discussion 752-4. [Medline].
Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van de Sijpe K, et al. Evaluation of nipple-areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg. Jun 2003;56(4):360-4. [Medline].
Cruz NI, Korchin L. Lactational performance after breast reduction with different pedicles. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2007;120(1):35-40. [Medline].
Gamboa-Bobadilla GM, Killingsworth C. Large-volume reduction mammaplasty: the effect of body mass index on postoperative complications. Ann Plast Surg. Mar 2007;58(3):246-9. [Medline].
Setälä L, Papp A, Joukainen S, Martikainen R, Berg L, Mustonen P, et al. Obesity and complications in breast reduction surgery: are restrictions justified?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg [serial online]. Nov 24 2007;[Medline]. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17486815.
Chan LK, Withey S, Butler PE. Smoking and wound healing problems in reduction mammaplasty: is the introduction of urine nicotine testing justified?. Ann Plast Surg. Feb 2006;56(2):111-5. [Medline].
Spector JA, Singh SP, Karp NS. Outcomes after breast reduction: does size really matter?. Ann Plast Surg. May 2008;60(5):505-9. [Medline].
Iwuagwu OC. Effects of reduction mammaplasty on pulmonary function and symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2003;112(7):1969-70; author reply 1970. [Medline].
O'Blenes CA, Delbridge CL, Miller BJ, Pantelis A, Morris SF. Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 2006;117(2):351-8. [Medline].
Balch CR. The central mound technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1981;67(3):305-11. [Medline].
Georgiade NG, Serafin D, Morris R, Georgiade G. Reduction mammaplasty utilizing an inferior pedicle nipple-areolar flap. Ann Plast Surg. Sep 1979;3(3):211-8. [Medline].
Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M. Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1 2002;110(3):960-70. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
breast reduction, central pedicle, macromastia, central pedicle breast reduction, reduction mammaplasty, central mound technique, large breasts, mammaplasty, mammoplasty, nipple reconstruction, nipple-areola complex, NAC, inframammary crease, IFM crease, breast reduction technique, reduction surgery, breast reduction pictures, large breast treatment, large breast reduction, large breast surgery, before breast reduction, after breast reduction, deep vein thrombosis, obesity, smoking, complications breast reduction, breast surgery complications, macromastia symptoms, large breast symptoms, breast reduction complications, breast reduction before, breast reduction after
Workup: Breast Reduction, Central Pedicle