eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Breast

Breast Reduction, Superior Pedicle: Treatment

Author: James Neal Long, MD, Assistant Professor of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham and Kirklin Clinics
Coauthor(s): Dean R Cerio, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham; Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Sep 25, 2009

Treatment

Medical Therapy

In patients with macromastia who are obese, physician-directed weight loss programs that include diet and exercise may help reduce symptoms but are unlikely to lead to complete resolution alone. Often, patients find it difficult to exercise due to the physically limiting effects of macromastia.

Surgical Therapy

Breast reduction surgery directs its intentions toward 2 primary alterations in breast habitus. The first goal is a reduction in weight, with a consequent reduction in size. Second, by placing most retained breast tissue at or above the inframammary fold, a favorable change in weight vectors on the upper thorax and spine is produced. While the surgeon always strives to provide good shape, aesthetic contour, and bilateral symmetry, reduction mammaplasty should be considered an operation to improve function. Aside from the aesthetic improvement, which is always sought and often realized, resultant patient-noted benefits, such as relief from upper back and shoulder pain and the increased ability to engage in the activities of daily living, remain essential to patient satisfaction.

Preoperative Details

Marking may differ significantly from the familiar Wise pattern. The surgeon may choose to use markings which permit a pure vertical closure. The author has found that pure vertical closure can be more difficult to achieve in cases where patients have a greater excess of skin than of volume. In such cases, tailoring an inframammary skin excision can improve cosmetic appearances by reducing inferior bunching and eliminating dog-ear redundancies. Often, this tailor tacking approach will yield inframammary scars that are significantly shorter than would be possible with inferior-pedicled, Wise pattern reductions. These shorter incisions are the byproduct of dermoparenchymal shaping by means of intraparenchymal pillar suturing rather than relying on the traditional skin resections to achieve desired shape. Another direct benefit from this phenomenon is a tension-free skin closure.

Proposed nipple location is set with the "A" point (top of the keyhole) approximately 2 cm below the anteriorly transposed inframammary fold. Medial and lateral skin excision limits are identified by lateral and medial displacement of breast tissue using the native breast meridian as the reference line. The breast meridian should be delineated by marks at the clavicle and below the inframammary fold (IMF), each of which is relatively immobile during displacement. The ultimate result of this process should be a vertically oriented oval topped by a mosque-shaped dome with its apex approximately 2 cm below the anteriorly transposed IMF and its lower limit 2-4 cm above the native IMF.

Anticipating resection volume helps direct marking of skin. The use of a McKissock-type keyhole can be helpful but is not required, since opportunity for custom siting is available after resection. If developing the nipple-areola complex (NAC) inset position (keyhole) is deferred, do not over-resect skin cephaladly, since this will force unfavorably high NAC positioning in order to avoid scar extension above the NAC.

The author prefers to develop a mosque-shaped keyhole for NAC insetting during de-epithelialization and development of the pedicle, as this method saves time. Skin markings are conservative, with the lower limit of the resection between 2 cm and 4 cm above the native IMF; this location depends on the anticipated resection volume. If necessary, additional skin can be removed postresection. Since this technique employs intraparenchymal pillar suturing to achieve breast shaping, significant, if any, additional skin resection to improve contour is usually not required. Small skin redundancies tend to retract in short order because of inferior resectional or liposuction thinning coupled with an absence of skin loading. Be aware that skin of poor quality is unlikely to retract and should be resected.

  • Pedicle markings differ based on choice of either superior or superomedial pedicles. The upper border of the superomedial pedicle should obliquely divide the intended NAC inset position between its inferomedial one third and the superolateral two thirds. The lower border is an oblique line, drawn within the planned skin resection margins, that respects and reflects the oblique traverse of the parasternal perforators into the pedicle.
  • Draw the lateral limb by dropping a vertical line straight down from the starting point of the lateral limb of the inverted "V" where the circular component of the new areolar defect comes together; the width of the pedicle varies according to its length.

    Preoperative markings of a superomedial pedicle r...

    Preoperative markings of a superomedial pedicle reduction. Notice that the base of the pedicle is made wider for longer nipple transpositions.

    Preoperative markings of a superomedial pedicle r...

    Preoperative markings of a superomedial pedicle reduction. Notice that the base of the pedicle is made wider for longer nipple transpositions.

  • The superior pedicle reduction has a pattern of de-epithelization that comes down caudally from the intended NAC inset position, encompassing the new nipple areolar complex and extending approximately 1 cm around it and approximately 2 cm below its caudal border.

    Preoperative markings of a superior pedicle techn...

    Preoperative markings of a superior pedicle technique breast reduction.

    Preoperative markings of a superior pedicle techn...

    Preoperative markings of a superior pedicle technique breast reduction.

Intraoperative Details

  • The superomedial pedicled mammoplasty begins by de-epithelization of the pedicle and circumscription of the NAC with the breasts placed in mammostats to provide skin stretch and hemostasis. The pedicle is developed by incision along markings straight down to but not through the loose areolar connective tissue plane directly above the superficial pectoralis major muscle fascia.
  • Excess breast tissue is removed in a dermoglandular en-bloc resection with minimal undermining. Areas of redundancy addressed are superior, lateral, and inferior. Conservative resection superiorly is advised in order to prevent inadequate deep support of the transposed NAC at its inset site, which can result in nipple retraction. During resection, dermoglandular lateral flaps 2-3 cm thick are preserved, as they have the benefit of improved vascularity and retained structural integrity. This thick subdermal tissue retained on the lateral flap is helpful in preventing skin dimpling when lateral pillar sutures are placed.

    Thin-skin undermining in a mastectomy plane at the inferomedial (caudal to the pedicle) and inferolateral (caudal to the thicker lateral dermoglandular flap) aspects of resection allows for a straight vertical closure without unsightly inferior bulging in all but the largest of reductions. The lateral flap transition from its superior thicker region to the inferior thinner zone is roughly determined as the area where the lateral Wise pattern skin resection would have been performed. Subcutaneous contour irregularities after transposition can be addressed by SAL, which may also be used for fine contouring after final closure.
  • After resection, the approximate 4-o'clock position of the NAC is affixed to the apex of the mosque-shaped keyhole inset site. A dermal back cut at the most inferior portion of the de-epithelialized pedicle may be required to achieve an adequate arc of rotation. This is particularly true in pedicles that are relatively short and wide. Because of the benefit of greater perforator capture, wider pedicle bases are advised when tenable. The pedicle soft tissue bulk is transposed superomedially and secured in position by intraparenchymal suturing to unify the medial (the now transposed lower pedicle border) and lateral (the thicker portion of the lateral breast flap) pillars. The positional interrelation of the pillars can be manipulated by the surgeon to achieve the desired breast shape. The pillar positioning that is selected should reflect a tension-free NAC inset.

    Breast reduction, superior pedicle. The pedicle, ...

    Breast reduction, superior pedicle. The pedicle, now developed, is imbricated superiorly into the new NAC inset position.

    Breast reduction, superior pedicle. The pedicle, ...

    Breast reduction, superior pedicle. The pedicle, now developed, is imbricated superiorly into the new NAC inset position.


    Breast reduction, superior pedicle. The NAC is in...

    Breast reduction, superior pedicle. The NAC is into the new position. Vertical closure, no inframammary incision line. The lateral dimpling is from intraparenchymal pillar suturing and typically settles out completely within 6 weeks.

    Breast reduction, superior pedicle. The NAC is in...

    Breast reduction, superior pedicle. The NAC is into the new position. Vertical closure, no inframammary incision line. The lateral dimpling is from intraparenchymal pillar suturing and typically settles out completely within 6 weeks.

  • The superior pedicle technique varies in that the pedicle is developed along lines directly inferior to the NAC inset position and that resection is inferiorly based. Once resection is complete, the pedicle is folded superiorly to be inset without rotation of the NAC.
  • Drains are optional.

Postoperative Details

Evaluate the surgical site for presence of hematoma and for sensitivity and viability of the NAC.

Follow-up

Postoperatively, the patient should wear a soft support brassiere without under wire for 3-6 weeks, dependent on observed patient healing.

Complications

Incidence of complications is similar to other techniques of reduction mammoplasty. Hauben reported on 212 patients; in 1 patient total loss of the NAC occurred (the first time he used this technique, the pedicle length was 26 cm, and the patient was a heavy smoker). In addition, he had another partial loss of the NAC. Decreased sensation of the NAC was present, but no incidence was quoted; nipple retraction was present in 2% of patients and hematoma in 2.26%. No transfusion was necessary.11

Finger et al reported only 2 partial losses of the NAC (<25%) and decreased sensation in 15% in 148 patients (291 breasts). Other complications were hypertrophic scars, nipple retraction, and dog-ears. Average blood loss was 200 mL.12

Hugo and McClellan reported on 34 patients (68 breasts) with an average of 760 g resected and 12 cm of nipple transposition. One patient (1.4%) had a partial loss of the NAC, and 2 (3%) had infections.6

More on Breast Reduction, Superior Pedicle

Overview: Breast Reduction, Superior Pedicle
Workup: Breast Reduction, Superior Pedicle
Treatment: Breast Reduction, Superior Pedicle
Follow-up: Breast Reduction, Superior Pedicle
Multimedia: Breast Reduction, Superior Pedicle
References

References

  1. Lassus C. Breast reduction: evolution of a technique--a single vertical scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1987;11(2):107-12. [Medline].

  2. Arie G. Una nueva tecnica de mastoplastia. Rev Iber Latino Am Cir Plast. 1957;3:28.

  3. Pitanguy I. Surgical correction of breast hypertrophy. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1967;20:78.

  4. Weiner DL, Aiache AE, Silver L, Tittiranonda T. A single dermal pedicle for nipple transposition in subcutaneous mastectomy, reduction mammaplasty, or mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1973;51(2):115-20. [Medline].

  5. Orlando JC, Guthrie RH Jr. The superomedial dermal pedicle for nipple transposition. Br J Plast Surg. Jan 1975;28(1):42-5. [Medline].

  6. Hugo NE, McClellan RM. Reduction mammaplasty with a single superiorly-based pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1979;63(2):230-4. [Medline].

  7. Arufe HN, Erenfryd A, Saubidet M. Mammaplasty with a single, vertical, superiorly-based pedicle to support the nipple-areola. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1977;60(2):221-7. [Medline].

  8. Hall-Findlay EJ. A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1999;104(3):748-59; discussion 760-3. [Medline].

  9. Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, Holle J. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 2000;105(3):905-9. [Medline].

  10. Landau AG, Hudson DA. Choosing the superomedial pedicle for reduction mammaplasty in gigantomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 2008;121(3):735-9. [Medline].

  11. Hauben DJ. Experience and refinements with the supero-medial dermal pedicle for nipple-areola transposition in reduction mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1984;8(3):189-94. [Medline].

  12. Finger RE, Vasquez B, Drew GS, Given KS. Superomedial pedicle technique of reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1989;83(3):471-80. [Medline].

  13. Davison SP, Mesbahi AN, Ducic I, Sarcia M, Dayan J, Spear SL. The versatility of the superomedial pedicle with various skin reduction patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 2007;120(6):1466-76. [Medline].

  14. Choi M, Unger J, Small K, Tepper O, Kumar N, Feldman D, et al. Defining the kinetics of breast pseudoptosis after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg. May 2009;62(5):518-22. [Medline].

  15. Conroy WC. Reduction mammaplasty with maximum superior subdermal vascular pedicle. Ann Plast Surg. Mar 1979;2(3):189-94. [Medline].

  16. Cruz-Korchin N, Korchin L. Breast-feeding after vertical mammaplasty with medial pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 15 2004;114(4):890-4. [Medline].

  17. de Araujo Cerqueira A. Mammoplasty: breast fixation with dermoglandular mono upper pedicle flap under the pectoralis muscle. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Jul-Aug 1998;22(4):276-83. [Medline].

  18. Hall-Findlay EJ. A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1999;104(3):748-59; discussion 760-3. [Medline].

  19. Hall-Findlay EJ. Pedicles in vertical breast reduction and mastopexy. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2002;29(3):379-91. [Medline].

  20. Hauben D. Reduction mammoplasty using a superomedial dermal pedicle. In: Reduction Mammaplasty. Lippincott William & Wilkins; 1990:239-54.

  21. Lassus C. A 30-year experience with vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1996;97(2):373-80. [Medline].

  22. Malata CM, Bostwick II J. Breast reduction with the superior parenchymal pedicle: T-scar approach. Operative Techniques in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1999;6(2):126-135.

  23. Ohlsen L, Skoog V. Skoog's technique of reduction mammaplasty. In: Reduction Mammaplasty. Lippincott William & Wilkins; 1990:193-232.

  24. Reus WF, Mathes SJ. Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1988;82(4):644-52. [Medline].

  25. Robbins LB, Hoffman DK. The superior dermoglandular pedicle approach to breast reduction. Ann Plast Surg. Sep 1992;29(3):211-6. [Medline].

  26. Rodier-Bruant C, Wilk A, Rosenstiel M, Nisand G, Meyer C. [Does the choice of mammoplasty pedicle influence the shape of reduced the reduced-sized breast?]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. Aug 1995;40(4):404-11. [Medline].

  27. Thorek M. Possibilities in the reconstruction of the human form. N Y Med J. 1922;116:572.

  28. van der Meulen JC. Superomedial pedicle technique of reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1989;84(6):1005. [Medline].

  29. Weiner D. Breast reduction: The superior pedicle technique (dermal and composite). In: Reduction Mammaplasty. Lippincott William & Wilkins; 1990:233-8.

Further Reading

Keywords

breast reduction, breast surgery, superior pedicle, breast reduction superior pedicle, reduction mammoplasty superomedial pedicle, reduction mammoplasty superior pedicle, breast reduction, nipple-areolar complex, NAC, Lejour, Hall-Findlay, Lassus

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

James Neal Long, MD, Assistant Professor of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham and Kirklin Clinics
James Neal Long, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Sigma Xi, Southeastern Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, and Southeastern Surgical Congress
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Dean R Cerio, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Pankaj Tiwari, MD, Assistant Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.