eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Breast
Breast Reduction, Vertical Bipedicle: Follow-up
Updated: Aug 20, 2008
Outcome and Prognosis
Outcome studies for breast reduction most often are not procedure-specific. The goal of breast reduction surgery should take into account patient safety; it should be reproducible, restore preoperative functional loss, and maintain the aesthetics of the breasts.
Slezak and Dellon studied patients with gigantomastia.5 They found that postoperative sensory outcome depends on a combination of factors, but most patients with gigantomastia have improved nipple sensation after a McKissock breast reduction.5
An outcome study from the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona, was published in 1997.6 Of the respondents in the study, 94.2% believed the procedure was successful. Patients saw an improvement in body image, the ability to find clothes that fit, and the capacity to participate in sports. They experienced a decrease in notching of the shoulders from bra straps and decreases in shoulder pain, upper back pain, neck pain, and intertrigo. Pain or numbness in the hands, headaches, arm pain, and breast pain also decreased. Symptoms were either relieved or partially relieved in 88% of respondents. Of the respondents, 97.3% reported that they definitely or probably would undergo the procedure again. This outcome study supported the hypothesis that reduction mammaplasty is an effective procedure and the treatment of choice for symptomatic mammary hyperplasia.
A more recent study analyzing breast reduction complications was derived from the Breast Reduction Assessment: Value and Outcomes (BRAVO) study.7 The resection weight correlated with increased risk and absolute number of complications. Delayed wound healing also correlated with resection weight and was inversely related to increasing age.
A British study assessed the aesthetic outcome of reduction mammaplasty.8 Most patients rated the aesthetic outcomes of their surgery significantly higher than the consultants did. For both surgeons and patients, scarring was the most frequent cause of reported dissatisfaction. Silicone gel sheeting in the postoperative period may help mitigate these scars.
Symptomatic relief and improved body image has been shown in many studies that assess breast reduction.9,8 Among women who are obese and those who are not obese, no significant difference was reported concerning the resolution of physical symptoms or improvement in body image.8
Future and Controversies
Several variations in surgical technique may offer an opportunity to reduce the extent of scarring in the small-to-moderate volume breast. No current medical treatment for female breast hypertrophy exists.
More on Breast Reduction, Vertical Bipedicle |
| Overview: Breast Reduction, Vertical Bipedicle |
| Workup: Breast Reduction, Vertical Bipedicle |
| Treatment: Breast Reduction, Vertical Bipedicle |
Follow-up: Breast Reduction, Vertical Bipedicle |
| Multimedia: Breast Reduction, Vertical Bipedicle |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
McKissock PK. Reduction mammaplasty with a vertical dermal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1972;49(3):245-52. [Medline].
STROMBECK JO. Mammaplasty: report of a new technique based on the two-pedicle procedure. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1960;13:79-90. [Medline].
Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2007;[Full Text].
Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA, Brown SA, Tonadapu P, Foster B. Current Preferences for Breast Reduction Techniques: A Survey of Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons 2002. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2004;114(7):1724-1733. [Full Text].
Slezak S, Dellon AL. Quantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1993;91(7):1265-9. [Medline].
Schnur PL, Schnur DP, Petty PM, et al. Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1997;100(4):875-83. [Medline].
Cunningham BL, Gear AJ, Kerrigan CL, et al. Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 2005;115(6):1597-604. [Medline].
Godwin Y, Wood SH, O'Neill TJ. A comparison of the patient and surgeon opinion on the long-term aesthetic outcome of reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg. Sep 1998;51(6):444-9. [Medline].
Chao JD, Memmel HC, Redding JF, et al. Reduction mammaplasty is a functional operation, improving quality of life in symptomatic women: a prospective, single-center breast reduction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2002;110(7):1644-52; discussion 1653-4. [Medline].
Glatt BS, Sarwer DB, O'Hara DE, et al. A retrospective study of changes in physical symptoms and body image after reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1999;103(1):76-82; discussion 83-5. [Medline].
Jaspars JJ, Posma AN, van Immerseel AA, et al. The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg. Jun 1997;50(4):249-59. [Medline].
Schnur PL, Schnur DP, Petty PM, et al. Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1997;100(4):875-83. [Medline].
Scott GR, Carson CL, Borah GL. Maximizing outcomes in breast reduction surgery: a review of 518 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 2005;116(6):1633-9; discussion 1640-1. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
breast reduction, vertical bipedicle, breast surgery, breast hypertrophy, large breasts, bilateral breast reduction, breast reduction surgery, breast reduction procedure, nipple-areola complex, NAC, inframammary fold, IMF, nipple-areolar complex, bilateral reduction mammaplasty, hypertrophic breast, hyperplastic breasts, vertical dermal flaps, breast reduction, vertical bipedicle
Follow-up: Breast Reduction, Vertical Bipedicle