Vertical Bipedicle Breast Reduction 

  • Author: Bhupesh Vasisht, MD, FACS; Chief Editor: James Neal Long, MD, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Mar 29, 2012
 

Background

The purpose of bilateral breast reduction surgery is to reduce the size of hypertrophic breasts. Occasionally, unilateral breast reduction is performed to create symmetry with a smaller or reconstructed contralateral breast. The vertical, bipedicle, reduction mammaplasty is one of various techniques employed by some surgeons to reduce breast volume. Any breast reduction technique should prioritize patient safety, demonstrate reproducibility, and maintain breast aesthetics.

Next

History of the Procedure

The bipedicle (full thickness vertical dermal flap) breast reduction, or McKissock reduction mammaplasty, has long been a standard to which other operative methods of breast reduction have been compared. Paul Kendrick McKissock, a California plastic surgeon, published his procedure in the March 1972 issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.[1] He initially developed the procedure as a modification of the Strombeck procedure[2] and refined it during the decade preceding publication. He is credited with making it a safe and reproducible operation. Since that time, his original technique has been modified by many surgeons, but the original principles have remained.

Previous
Next

Problem

Women with macromastia can develop back and neck pain. The shoulders can become progressively notched from the pressure of the bra straps. The area under the breast can often develop intertrigo, which is characterized by frequent rash and skin breakdown. Frequent headaches may occur. Physical activity can be cumbersome and positioning for sleep may be difficult. Presently, only operative treatment can correct female breast hypertrophy. Breast reduction surgery alleviates the symptoms produced by mammary hypertrophy. The vertical bipedicle reduction mammaplasty can be adapted to the entire range of size and volume encountered in breast hypertrophy.

For information on other breast reduction techniques, see the Breast section of Medscape Reference’s Plastic Surgery journal.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

The number of breast reduction procedures performed each year has increased. According to a recent publication by the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, breast reduction was the fifth most frequent cosmetic procedure performed in the United States in 2006.[3] A total of 145,822 patients that underwent this procedure, although no specific information is available as to the specific techniques used in each surgery.[3]

In a study published in 2004, Rohrich et al reported that the McKissock technique is used by 4.8 percent of US plastic surgeons.[4] The most common technique is the inferior pedicle technique, used by 44.1 percent of the plastic surgeons surveyed.[4] The McKissock technique represents the fifth most commonly preferred technique in the United States.

Previous
Next

Presentation

History

Bilateral breast hypertrophy presents at puberty or soon thereafter. Teenage females with large breasts frequently report that they are subjected to ridicule from their peers. This can represent the psychosocial component of the problem. Some women develop breast hypertrophy during pregnancy that persists even beyond. In extremely rare instances, rapidly progressive unremitting breast enlargement known as virginal breast hypertrophy may occur.

The symptoms of female breast hypertrophy relate to muscular discomfort. Patients report back pain, neck pain, shoulder discomfort, and even headache. Patients report poor posture due to the excessive weight of the breasts. Occasionally, ulnar nerve paresthesia can occur. Poor hygiene in the submammary crease leads to irritations, rashes, and even cutaneous infections.

Shoulder grooves develop over time from the pressure exerted by bra straps. If a bra is not worn, activities and even sleep may be difficult. Women with large breasts frequently report that they cannot participate in sports. Once this affects the patient's activities of daily living, the patient seeks medical attention.

Physical examination

Physical examination confirms the diagnosis of breast hypertrophy and attempts to rule out the possibility of breast cancer. Breast examination is typically performed with the patient in the seated and then recumbent positions. The breasts are assessed for any lumps, masses, scars, skin dimpling, or nipple discharge. The distance from the sternal notch to the nipple is often greater than 21 cm. The position of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is noted in relation to the rest of the glandular tissue and the inframammary fold (IMF). Body surface area and excess breast tissue weight are estimated.

Secondary skeletal effects are examined by asking the patient to lean forward and examining vertical spinal alignment. Bra strap grooves are assessed for depth and skin breakdown. Intertrigo is assessed by lifting each breast and closely examining the skin for breakdown and rashes. Preoperative photographs to document mammary hypertrophy complete the physical examination.

Consultations

The treating plastic surgeon may seek the help of a general surgeon for evaluation of breast nodularity or an abnormal mammogram. Consultation with a spine surgeon is recommended to assess the back pain. Orthopedic surgeons may need to assess the patient for shoulder or other musculoskeletal pain.

Previous
Next

Indications

  • Muscular pain in the neck, shoulder, and back as a result of mammary hypertrophy
  • Shoulder grooving from bra straps
  • Intermittent intertrigo in the submammary region or cleavage area
  • Alteration of activities of daily living as a result of enlarged breasts
Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

The female breast is a glandular structure that varies in volume and shape. It occupies the area overlying the second to sixth ribs extending from the sternum to the anterior axillary line (see the image below). The center of each nipple-areola complex lies approximately 21 cm from the sternal notch. In women with mammary hypertrophy, that distance is longer and can sometimes reach more than 40 cm.

Anatomy of the breast. Anatomy of the breast.

The arterial supply of the breasts is from the lateral branches of the intercostal arteries, the lateral thoracic artery, and the perforating branches of the internal mammary artery. The nipple receives most of its blood supply from musculocutaneous perforating vessels from the pectoralis major muscle. These vessels travel through the breast tissue and supply the nipple-areola complex. An additional and substantial dermal plexus of arteries also supplies the nipple-areola complex and forms the basis of the vertical bipedicle technique.

The anterior cutaneous branches of the first to seventh intercostal nerves innervate the skin of the medial breast and the lateral cutaneous branches of the second to seventh intercostal nerves the lateral breast. The anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of the fourth intercostal nerve innervate the nipple-areola complex. Additional innervation to this complex is by the cutaneous branches of the third and fifth intercostal nerves.

For more information about the relevant anatomy, see Breast Anatomy.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

The main contraindication for breast reduction surgery is the patient's preoperative medical condition. Patients with history of coronary arterial disease, thromboembolic disease, chronic lung disease, and chronic kidney disease are often not good candidates for surgery in general. An evaluation by the patient's primary physician is important in determining whether she is a good candidate. Patients who smoke are encouraged to stop smoking at least 4 weeks before surgery and not smoke for at least 4 weeks after the surgery.

Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Bhupesh Vasisht, MD, FACS  Voluntary Clinical Instructor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School; Private Practice, South Shore Plastic Surgery

Bhupesh Vasisht, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and New Jersey Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Patricia K Gomuwka, MD, FACS  Consulting Staff, Department of Plastic Surgery, Riverside Regional Medical Center

Patricia K Gomuwka, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Physician Executives, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, Medical Society of Virginia, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Pankaj Tiwari, MD  Assistant Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Saleh M Shenaq, MD†  Former Director and Founder, The International Brachial Plexus Institute; Former Chief, Section of Plastic Surgery, Methodist Hospital, Houston

Saleh M Shenaq, MD† is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Physician Executives, American College of Surgeons, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Society of Gene Therapy, American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Trauma Society, Association for Academic Surgery, International College of Surgeons, Lipoplasty Society of North America, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Society for Neuroscience, Society of Surgical Oncology, Southern Medical Association, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD  Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

James Neal Long, MD, FACS  Associate Professor of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital and Kirklin Clinics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine; Chief of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand, and Microsurgery, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center

James Neal Long, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Sigma Xi, Southeastern Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, and Southeastern Surgical Congress

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. McKissock PK. Reduction mammaplasty with a vertical dermal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1972;49(3):245-52. [Medline].

  2. STROMBECK JO. Mammaplasty: report of a new technique based on the two-pedicle procedure. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1960;13:79-90. [Medline].

  3. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2007;[Full Text].

  4. Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA, Brown SA, Tonadapu P, Foster B. Current Preferences for Breast Reduction Techniques: A Survey of Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons 2002. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2004;114(7):1724-1733. [Full Text].

  5. Abramo AC. A Superior Vertical Dermal Pedicle for the Nipple-Areola: An Alternative for Severe Breast Hypertrophy and Ptosis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Jul 7 2011;[Medline].

  6. Slezak S, Dellon AL. Quantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1993;91(7):1265-9. [Medline].

  7. Schnur PL, Schnur DP, Petty PM, et al. Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1997;100(4):875-83. [Medline].

  8. Cunningham BL, Gear AJ, Kerrigan CL, et al. Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 2005;115(6):1597-604. [Medline].

  9. Shermak MA, Chang D, Buretta K, Mithani S, Mallalieu J, Manahan M. Increasing age impairs outcomes in breast reduction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2011;128(6):1182-7. [Medline].

  10. Godwin Y, Wood SH, O'Neill TJ. A comparison of the patient and surgeon opinion on the long-term aesthetic outcome of reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg. Sep 1998;51(6):444-9. [Medline].

  11. Chao JD, Memmel HC, Redding JF, et al. Reduction mammaplasty is a functional operation, improving quality of life in symptomatic women: a prospective, single-center breast reduction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2002;110(7):1644-52; discussion 1653-4. [Medline].

  12. Glatt BS, Sarwer DB, O'Hara DE, et al. A retrospective study of changes in physical symptoms and body image after reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1999;103(1):76-82; discussion 83-5. [Medline].

  13. Jaspars JJ, Posma AN, van Immerseel AA, et al. The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg. Jun 1997;50(4):249-59. [Medline].

  14. Schnur PL, Schnur DP, Petty PM, et al. Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1997;100(4):875-83. [Medline].

  15. Scott GR, Carson CL, Borah GL. Maximizing outcomes in breast reduction surgery: a review of 518 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 2005;116(6):1633-9; discussion 1640-1. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Macromastia with marked notching of the shoulders from bra straps and striking intertrigo of the medial aspect of the breasts.
Preoperative surgical diagram of the classic Wise pattern or inferior pedicle reduction technique. The typical measurements are shown.
The markings for the vertical bipedicle reduction is essentially the same as for the inferior pedicle reduction. The shaded area depicts the tissue that will be preserved. This will be the vascular supply to the new nipple areolar complex once it is transposed to its new location.
Intraoperative schematic demonstrating the bipedicle flap. The medial and lateral flaps are brought into the midline and sutured at the inframammary fold. The letter M represents the meridian or the axis for the breast on which the reduction is maintained.
Preoperative and postoperative images. Preoperative measurement of nipple to sternal notch was 32 cm bilaterally. Over 1300 g of tissue were removed from each breast during the vertical bipedicle reduction mammaplasty procedure on this patient.
Preoperative and postoperative images. Preoperative measurement of nipple to sternal notch was 44 cm bilaterally. Over 3000 g of tissue were removed from each breast during the vertical bipedicle reduction mammaplasty procedure on this patient.
Anatomy of the breast.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.