Liposuction Only Breast Reduction Workup

  • Author: Francesca Romana Grippaudo; Chief Editor: James Neal Long, MD, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Mar 28, 2012
 

Laboratory Studies

Obtain a CBC count to obtain a hematocrit and a platelet count.

Obtain prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time to check for a coagulopathy when clinical suspicion exists.

Blood sugar should be in the normal range to avoid delayed healing or susceptibility to infections; check as clinically indicated.

Next

Imaging Studies

An ultrasound scan of both breasts or a mammogram is mandatory to evaluate the percentage of fat tissue in the breast and hence determine eligibility for the procedure.

Sensitivity of mammograms in assessing the glandular-fat tissue ratio in the breast is better than that of ultrasound scan but possibly not as effective as MRI scan.

Mammographic appearance of breast hypertrophy withMammographic appearance of breast hypertrophy with a prevalence of fat tissue over glandular tissue. This mammographic image demonstrates the eligibility of the patient for liposuction of the breast to reduce the hypertrophy.

Obtain a chest radiograph if indicated by examination findings or patient history.

Previous
Next

Other Tests

Obtain photographic documentation to provide to the insurance company for authorization, for comparison of before and after photos to help the patient appreciate the change, and as medicolegal documentation for the surgeon in the event of litigation.

Obtain an ECG as per anesthesia or operating room guidelines.

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

The aspirate can be sent for pathologic examination to exclude carcinoma or other atypia.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Francesca Romana Grippaudo  MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psycology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Francesca Romana Grippaudo is a member of the following medical societies: International Confederation for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Italian Society of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery and Aesthetics

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Daniel Christopher Kennedy, MBBS, FRACS  Consultant Surgeon, Unit Head Supervisor of Surgical Training, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mater Public Hospital; Director of Medical Services, Pacific Day Surgery

Daniel Christopher Kennedy, MBBS, FRACS is a member of the following medical societies: Australian Medical Association and Royal Australasian College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Pankaj Tiwari, MD  Assistant Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Saleh M Shenaq, MD†  Former Director and Founder, The International Brachial Plexus Institute; Former Chief, Section of Plastic Surgery, Methodist Hospital, Houston

Saleh M Shenaq, MD† is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Physician Executives, American College of Surgeons, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Society of Gene Therapy, American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Trauma Society, Association for Academic Surgery, International College of Surgeons, Lipoplasty Society of North America, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Society for Neuroscience, Society of Surgical Oncology, Southern Medical Association, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD  Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

James Neal Long, MD, FACS  Associate Professor of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital and Kirklin Clinics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine; Chief of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand, and Microsurgery, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center

James Neal Long, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Sigma Xi, Southeastern Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, and Southeastern Surgical Congress

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Goes JC, Landecker A. Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty (UAL) in breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Jan-Feb 2002;26(1):1-9. [Medline].

  2. Benelli L. A new periareolar mammaplasty: the "round block" technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Spring 1990;14(2):93-100. [Medline].

  3. Lassus C. Breast reduction: evolution of a technique--a single vertical scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1987;11(2):107-12. [Medline].

  4. Lejour M. Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1994;94(1):100-14. [Medline].

  5. Boni R. Tumescent power liposuction in the treatment of the enlarged male breast. Dermatology. 2006;213(2):140-3. [Medline].

  6. Hodgson EL, Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM. Ultrasonic liposuction in the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 2005;116(2):646-53; discussion 654-5. [Medline].

  7. Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM. Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 2003;111(2):909-23; discussion 924-5. [Medline].

  8. Samdal F, Kleppe G, Amland PF, Abyholm F. Surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. Five years' experience with liposuction. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. Jun 1994;28(2):123-30. [Medline].

  9. Stark GB, Grandel S, Spilker G. Tissue suction of the male and female breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Fall 1992;16(4):317-24. [Medline].

  10. Matarasso A, Courtiss EH. Suction mammaplasty: the use of suction lipectomy to reduce large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1991;87(4):709-17. [Medline].

  11. Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA, Brown SA. Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2004;114(7):1724-33; discussion 1734-6. [Medline].

  12. Grippaudo FR, Kennedy DC. Liposuction reduction mammaplasty using the tumescent technique. Proceedings of 8° European Congress of IPRAS;. June 22-25, 1997;Lisbon, Portugal. 120.

  13. Sadove R. New Observations in Liposuction-Only Breast Reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Mar 9 2005;[Medline].

  14. McMahan JD, Wolfe JA, Cromer BA, Ruberg RL. Lasting success in teenage reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg. Sep 1995;35(3):227-31. [Medline].

  15. Di Giuseppe A. Breast reduction with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2003;112(1):71-82. [Medline].

  16. Brauman D. Liposuction breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 2005;116(5):1558-9; author reply 1559-61. [Medline].

  17. Moskovitz MJ, Muskin E, Baxt SA. Outcome study in liposuction breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2004;114(1):55-60; discussion 61. [Medline].

  18. Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz DF, Gruenert JG, et al. Breast reduction by liposuction in females. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Jun 2011;35(3):402-7. [Medline].

  19. Abboud M, Vadoud-Seyedi J, De Mey A, et al. Incidence of calcifications in the breast after surgical reduction and liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1995;96(3):620-6. [Medline].

  20. Baker TM, Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. What's new in aesthetic surgery. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 1996;23(1):3-16. [Medline].

  21. Brauman D. Reduction mammaplasty by suction alone [letter; comment]. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1994;94(7):1095-6. [Medline].

  22. Courtiss EH. Reduction mammaplasty by suction alone. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1993;92(7):1276-84; discussion 1285-9. [Medline].

  23. Gasparotti M. Superficial liposuction: a new application of the technique for aged and flaccid skin. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Spring 1992;16(2):141-53. [Medline].

  24. Goddio AS. Skin retraction following suction lipectomy by treatment site: a study of 500 procedures in 458 selected subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1991;87(1):66-75. [Medline].

  25. Gorney M. Caveat against using ultrasonically assisted lipectomy in aesthetic breast surgery [letter; comment]. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1998;101(6):1741. [Medline].

  26. Gray LN. Liposuction breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. May-Jun 1998;22(3):159-62. [Medline].

  27. Klein JA. Tumescent technique for local anesthesia improves safety in large- volume liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1993;92(6):1085-98; discussion 1099-100. [Medline].

  28. Matarasso A. Suction mammaplasty: the use of suction lipectomy to reduce large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 2000;105(7):2604-7; discussion 2608-10. [Medline].

  29. Matarasso A. Superficial suction lipectomy: something old, something new, something borrowed.... Ann Plast Surg. Mar 1995;34(3):268-72; discussion 272-3. [Medline].

  30. Moskovitz MJ. Liposuction breast reduction: reply. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(5):1559-1561.

  31. Pers M, Nielsen IM, Gerner N. Results following reduction mammaplasty as evaluated by the patients. Ann Plast Surg. Dec 1986;17(6):449-55. [Medline].

  32. Teimourian B, Massac E, Wiegering CE. Reduction suction mammoplasty and suction lipectomy as an adjunct to breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1985;9(2):97-100. [Medline].

  33. Williams CW. Adolescent breast maldevelopment: buying time with liposuction. Aust N Z J Surg. Dec 1993;63(12):983-4. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
The skin is pierced 2 cm above the inframammary fold, in the mid line.
The right breast is infiltrated up to tumescence with solution; the left breast already has been infiltrated.
Appearance of the right breast after a liposuction of 700 mL.
Appearance of both breasts at the end of the procedure. The liposuction of the right breast is 700 mL; the liposuction of the left breast is 600 mL.
At the end of the procedure, elastic tape is used to mould the breast in the new shape and position.
Mammographic appearance of breast hypertrophy with a prevalence of fat tissue over glandular tissue. This mammographic image demonstrates the eligibility of the patient for liposuction of the breast to reduce the hypertrophy.
The material suctioned from the breast appears as a yellow, fatty, bloodless fluid.
A 22-year-old patient, preoperative view. Bra size is 40E. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 33.5 cm on the right breast and 32 cm on the left breast.
Appearance 6 weeks after breast reduction by suction alone; 22-year-old patient. Preoperatively, bra size was 40E. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple was 33.5 cm on the right breast and 32 cm on the left breast. During the procedure, 800 mL was removed from each breast. Postoperative bra size is 38C. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 29 cm on the right breast and 28 cm on the left breast.
A 22-year-old patient, preoperative view. Bra size is 40E. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 33.5 cm on the right breast and 32 cm on the left breast.
Appearance 6 weeks after breast reduction by suction alone; 22-year-old patient. Preoperatively, bra size was 40E. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple was 33.5 cm on the right breast and 32 cm on the left breast. During the procedure, 800 mL was removed from each breast. Postoperative bra size is 38C. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 29 cm on the right breast and 28 cm on the left breast.
Right lateral preoperative view; 22-year-old patient. Bra size is 40E. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 33.5 cm on the right breast and 32 cm on the left breast.
Right lateral view 6 weeks after breast reduction by suction alone; 22-year-old patient. Preoperatively, bra size was 40E. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple was 33.5 cm on the right breast and 32 cm on the left breast. During the procedure, 800 mL was removed from each breast. Postoperative bra size is 38C. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 29 cm on the right breast and 28 cm on the left breast.
A 24-year-old patient, preoperative view. Preoperative bra size is 36DD. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 25.5 cm on the right breast and 24.5 cm on the left breast.
A 24-year-old patient, view 6 weeks postoperatively. Preoperative bra size was 36DD. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple was 25.5 cm on the right breast and 24.5 cm on the left breast. Postoperative bra size is 36C. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 22 cm on each breast.
A 24-year-old patient, postoperative lateral view at dressing change. Preoperative bra size was 36DD. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple was 25.5 cm on the right breast and 24.5 cm on the left breast. Postoperative bra size is 36C. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 22 cm on each breast. Note the ecchymosis on the lateral part of the breast.
A 24-year-old patient, postoperative view at first dressing change. Preoperative bra size was 36DD. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple was 25.5 cm on the right breast and 24.5 cm on the left breast. Postoperative bra size is 36C. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 22 cm on each breast.
A 36-year-old patient, preoperative view. Bra size is 38D. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 31.5 cm on each breast.
A 36-year-old patient, appearance 2 months after breast reduction by suction alone; 570 mL was removed from the right breast and 550 mL from the left breast. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 28 cm on the right breast and 28 cm on the left breast. Preoperatively, bra size was 38D. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple was 31.5 cm on each breast
A 36-year-old patient, preoperative lateral view. Bra size is 38D. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 31.5 cm on each breast.
A 36-year-old patient, lateral view of the breast 2 months after breast reduction by suction alone; 570 mL was removed from the right breast and 550 mL from the left breast. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple is 28 cm on the right breast and 28 cm on the left breast. Preoperatively, bra size was 38D. The distance from the jugular notch to the nipple was 31.5 cm on each breast
Female breast, anterior view.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.