eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Chest

Chest Reconstruction, Sternal Dehiscence

Author: Mark A Grevious, MD, FACS, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Associate Program Director, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago
Coauthor(s): Raja Ramaswamy, MS, The Chicago Medical School; Ginard I Henry, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, Medical Student Faculty Coordinator, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine; Plastic Surgeon, Weiss Memorial Hospital; Rani Ramaswamy, MS, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science/The Chicago Medical School; Kendra J Grubb, MD, MHA, Resident Physician, Department of General Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Apr 13, 2009

Introduction

In 1957, the introduction of the median sternotomy to allow access to intrathoracic organs by Julian et al revolutionized the field of thoracic surgery. Since this landmark introduction, sternal wound infection and dehiscence have been reported to occur in approximately 0.5-8.4% of cases. Sternal dehiscence is the process of separation of the bony sternum, which often is accompanied by mediastinitis (infection of the deep soft tissues). In thoracic and trunk reconstruction, plastic surgeons play a crucial role in addressing wound healing issues and reconstructive techniques of the chest wall. The management of chest wall reconstruction from sternal dehiscence has evolved considerably over the past half century.

History of the Procedure

After introduction of the midline sternotomy into clinical practice, sternal infection rates began to rise; this was directly associated with high complication rates. Initially, sternal dehiscence was treated conservatively with open drainage and debridement with packing. Complications included graft exposure, desiccation of wound margins, osteomyelitis, and, ultimately, death. These complications often led to significant morbidity, with reported mortality rates exceeding 50%. Shumaker and Mandelbaum introduced the concept of closed management with catheter-antibiotic irrigation in 1963.1 This reduced mortality rates from 50% to 20% overall. Despite this dramatic reduction, catheter-induced erosion of major vessels and resultant fatal hemorrhage was a major risk. Thus, incentive to improve methods of wound care continued.

One of the most common reasons for mediastinal infections, and ultimate sternal dehiscence, is sternal instability. Following a sternotomy, the structural integrity of the sternum is significantly compromised. This explains the importance for the surgeon to take time and use meticulous technique when performing a sternotomy. If a midline sternotomy is not placed properly, sternal instability is almost certain to follow, and the patient is at a much higher risk for mediastinitis.

The management of sternal wounds

Managing infected sternal wounds changed with the introduction of the principles of wide debridement and muscle and myocutaneous flap transposition. This management strategy of sternal wound infections was instituted in 1976 when Lee et al introduced the concept of the flaps to reduce dead space in the anterior mediastinum by using the greater omental flap.2 In 1980, Jurkiewicz et al introduced the concept of muscle and myocutaneous flaps, which dramatically improved effectiveness of management of sternal dehiscence and infection.3 Mathes also contributed with the concept of using muscle flaps in wounds with osteomyelitis.4

The use of vascularized regional tissue allowed for greater blood flow, obliteration of dead space, and faster healing time directly from quicker infection resolution. Since the introduction of the omental flap, several other flaps have been introduced to repair chest wall defects. The institution of flaps have led to a decrease in mortality rate of 10%.

Despite these advances, sternal infection and mediastinitis continue to pose clinical management issues. Currently, management of sternal wounds involves a multidisciplinary approach. Time-sensitive, nonsurgical management techniques include early debridement, microbiological analysis, and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Soft tissue flaps do not address repair of the bony sternum, which can lead to chronic pain, paradoxical motion, impaired pulmonary function testing, and cosmetic disapproval from the patient. A relevant development to sternal wound issues has been the development of vacuum-assisted closure devices (VAC) by Argenta and Morykwas, which serve as a bridge between debridement and reconstruction.5

A broad range of surgical strategies are currently being used including myo/myocutaneous flaps. In order to address the issue of bony sternal repair, several institutions are now turning toward sternal rewiring and reconstruction with rigid sternal fixation using transverse and longitudinal plates.6,7,8,9,10,11 Additionally, a sternal clamp device, to reduce sternal instability, has now been introduced into the market with promising results, although long-term clinical data are not yet available.

Problem

Problems associated with sternal dehiscence include issues both before and after debridement. Predebridement issues include frank infection and bony destruction of the sternum. Postdebridement issues include possibly sternal instability, paradoxical motion, and pain.

Frequency

Current literature reflects that anywhere from 0.5-8.4% of median sternotomy incisions are complicated with wound infections, leading to sternal dehiscence.7,10,11 With the introduction of flaps to cover sternal defects, mortality rate from sternal wound dehiscence is approximately 10%.7,10,11 Long-term mortality studies following rigid fixation have yet to be reported.

Etiology

Factors associated with sternal wound dehiscence

Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the development of sternal wound infection and dehiscence. These theories include inadequate sternal fixation leading to instability and dehiscence of the overlying skin incision and inadequate surgical drainage. Further theories suggest a localized ischemic osteomyelitis. This theory suggests that sternal wires become loose, leading to sternal instability, which ultimately leads to skin dehiscence and osteomyelitic infection. The most commonly cultured organism is Staphylococcus Aureus.

Several retrospective and prospective studies have identified factors relating to increasing risk of sternal dehiscence. Patient risk factors include obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), chronic cough from tobacco abuse, steroid therapy, hypertension, immunosuppression, and advanced age. Operative risk factors include single or bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting (significantly decreases blood supply to ipsilateral hemithorax), prolonged operation, excessive hemorrhage, reoperation, break in sterile technique, and the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump.

Pathophysiology

Wound dehiscence is the partial or complete separation of the layers of the incision. A compromise in factors responsible for wound healing can lead to wound dehiscence. These factors include inadequate nutrition, compromised circulation, and surgical factors. Surgical factors include placing sutures under excessive tension or insufficient tension. Circulatory factors include the presence of diabetes, coagulopathies, or other vascular-related issues. Adequate nutritional intake is also required for proper wound healing.

Presentation

Factors associated with mortality include septicemia, perioperative myocardial infarction, and use of the intra-aortic balloon pump. Strict aseptic technique, attention to hemostasis, and precise motionless sternal approximation are advocated to prevent mediastinitis.

In the clinical evaluation of suspected mediastinitis or sternal dehiscence, careful repeated examination of the patient is warranted. If the patient has multiple risk factors for dehiscence or impairment to wound healing, he or she must be examined at closer intervals. Findings of erythema, fever, tachycardia, increased leukocyte count, purulent discharge, and sternal instability are clinical indicators of sternal dehiscence.

If clinical deterioration of the patient or further signs of breakdown are observed (ie, increased erythema, drainage, separation of incision), immediately obtain wound cultures, administer broad-spectrum antibiotics, and perform swift aggressive debridement. Follow with either the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device (to serve as a bridge to reconstruction) or reconstruction with flap coverage or rigid sternal plating. This combination can reduce the incidence of mortality, decrease hospital stay, rapidly propel the patient's recovery from thoracic surgery, and avert the severe complications of mediastinitis.

Pairolero and Arnold have based their classification of sternal wounds on timing of presentation of infection; this classification divides wounds into 3 categories.12 This classification system does not indicate the type of reconstruction necessary for management of each type of sternal wound. Type II and III wounds are typically referred to plastic surgeons for reconstruction.

  • Type I: Type I wounds occur in the first few days postoperatively, contain early wound separation with or without sternal instability, and are characterized by serosanguineous drainage without cellulitis, osteomyelitis, or costochondritis.
  • Type II: Type II wounds occur within the first few weeks and are characterized by drainage, cellulitis, mediastinal suppuration, and positive cultures. Type II wounds are characterized by fulminant mediastinitis.
  • Type III: Type III wounds occur months to years after surgery and are characterized by the presence of chronic draining sinus tracts, localized cellulites, osteomyelitis, or retained foreign bodies. Mediastinitis is a rare complication of type III wounds.

Indications

The main indications for sternal reconstruction are sternal instability with dehiscence, early or subacute infections, and repair after tumor resection.

Relevant Anatomy

The chest wall skeleton consists of the sternum in the anterior midline, bilateral clavicles, 12 pairs of ribs, with the eleventh and twelfth not associated with costal cartilage. The first seven ribs are "true" ribs, and the last 5 are "false" ribs. The eighth, ninth, and tenth ribs attach to the sternum via costal cartilage. The eleventh and twelfth ribs articulate posteriorly with the vertebrae. Anterior chest wall muscles allow for movement of the extremities. The elasticity of the chest wall supports the mechanics of ventilation.

The paired internal thoracic arteries and the deep epigastric arteries provide the main blood supply to the ventral aspect of the chest. This system connects the major vessels of the neck to those in the groin. Many flaps are based on understanding this vascular supply. Collateral blood supply from the acromiothoracic axis is also important to recognize.

The relevant muscles and structures utilized for sternum reconstruction are the pectoralis major, rectus abdominus, latissimus dorsi, and greater omentum. All except the latissimus dorsi can be harvested in the supine position; the latissimus dorsi should be harvested in the lateral decubitus position. The blood supplies for each flap are well-established and described under each individual section.

Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of all reconstructive options is important. For example, the pedicled latissimus flap is a great flap for lateral chest wall defects but often is inadequate to cover large midline sternal defects.

The blood supplies for each flap are well-established, as shown below.

Pectoralis major muscle flap blood supply and opt...

Pectoralis major muscle flap blood supply and options for sternal coverage (a, b, c).

Pectoralis major muscle flap blood supply and opt...

Pectoralis major muscle flap blood supply and options for sternal coverage (a, b, c).


Omentum flap showing its blood supply based on th...

Omentum flap showing its blood supply based on the right or left gastroepiploic arteries.

Omentum flap showing its blood supply based on th...

Omentum flap showing its blood supply based on the right or left gastroepiploic arteries.


Contraindications

Wounds with active purulence require extensive debridement prior to flap coverage and/or rigid fixation.

Additional contraindications for sternal reconstruction are found in patients who are unstable for surgery, including those with poor pulmonary function, poor cardiac reserve, or terminal illness. Hemodynamic stability is required for surgical intervention in patients with sternal dehiscence.

More on Chest Reconstruction, Sternal Dehiscence

Overview: Chest Reconstruction, Sternal Dehiscence
Workup: Chest Reconstruction, Sternal Dehiscence
Treatment: Chest Reconstruction, Sternal Dehiscence
Follow-up: Chest Reconstruction, Sternal Dehiscence
Multimedia: Chest Reconstruction, Sternal Dehiscence
References

References

  1. Shumacker HB, Mandelbaum I. Continuous antibiotic irrigation in the treatment of infection. Arch Surg. 1963;86:384.

  2. Lee AB Jr, Schimert G, Shaktin S, Seigel JH. Total excision of the sternum and thoracic pedicle transposition of the greater omentum; useful strategems in managing severe mediastinal infection following open heart surgery. Surgery. Oct 1976;80(4):433-6. [Medline].

  3. Jurkiewicz MJ, Bostwick J 3d, Hester TR, et al. Infected median sternotomy wound. Successful treatment by muscle flaps. Ann Surg. Jun 1980;191(6):738-44. [Medline].

  4. Mathes SJ. The muscle flap for management of osteomyelitis. N Engl J Med. Feb 4 1982;306(5):294-5. [Medline].

  5. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ, Marks MW, DeFranzo AJ, Molnar JA, David LR. Vacuum-assisted closure: state of clinic art. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 2006;117(7 Suppl):127S-142S. [Medline].

  6. Astudillo R, Bugge M, Cha SO, Niebuhr U, Brose S, Tjomsland O. Reconstruction of chronic aseptic sternal pseudoarthrosis after median sternotomy: initial experience with the Ley prosthesis. Heart Surg Forum. 2008;11(1):E46-9. [Medline].

  7. Dickie SR, Dorafshar AH, Song DH. Definitive closure of the infected median sternotomy wound: a treatment algorithm utilizing vacuum-assisted closure followed by rigid plate fixation. Ann Plast Surg. Jun 2006;56(6):680-5. [Medline].

  8. Plass A, Grunenfelder J, Reuthebuch O, Vachenauer R, Gauer JM, Zund G. New transverse plate fixation system for complicated sternal wound infection after median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. Mar 2007;83(3):1210-2. [Medline].

  9. Raman J, Straus D, Song DH. Rigid plate fixation of the sternum. Ann Thorac Surg. Sep 2007;84(3):1056-8. [Medline].

  10. Voss B, Bauernschmitt R, Brockmann G, Lange R. Osteosynthetic thoracic stabilization after complete resection of the sternum. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Aug 2007;32(2):391-3. [Medline].

  11. Voss B, Bauernschmitt R, Will A, Krane M, Kross R, Brockmann G. Sternal reconstruction with titanium plates in complicated sternal dehiscence. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Apr 30 2008;[Medline].

  12. Pairolero PC, Arnold PG. Management of recalcitrant median sternotomy wounds. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Sep 1984;88(3):357-64. [Medline].

  13. Song DH, Wu LC, Lohman RF, Gottlieb LJ, Franczyk M. Vacuum assisted closure for the treatment of sternal wounds: the bridge between debridement and definitive closure. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2003;111(1):92-7. [Medline].

  14. Davison SP, Clemens MW, Armstrong D, Newton ED, Swartz W. Sternotomy wounds: rectus flap versus modified pectoral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 15 2007;120(4):929-34. [Medline].

  15. Nahai F, Rand RP, Hester TR, et al. Primary treatment of the infected sternotomy wound with muscle flaps: a review of 211 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1989;84(3):434-41. [Medline].

  16. Cicilioni OJ, Stieg FH, Papanicolaou G. Sternal wound reconstruction with transverse plate fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 15 2005;115(5):1297-303. [Medline].

  17. Pai S, Gunja NJ, Dupak EL, et al. In vitro comparison of wire and plate fixation for midline sternotomies. Ann Thorac Surg. Sep 2005;80(3):962-8. [Medline].

  18. KLS Martin LP. The RSC Talon System. KLS Martin LP Web site. Available at http://www.rapidsternalclosure.com/medical/talon.php. Accessed March 9, 2009.

  19. Agarwal JP, Ogilvie M, Wu LC. Vacuum-assisted closure for sternal wounds: a first-line therapeutic management approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 15 2005;116(4):1035-40; discussion 1041-3. [Medline].

  20. Ascherman JA, Patel SM, Malhotra SM. Management of sternal wounds with bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps in 114 consecutively treated patients: refinements in technique and outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1 2004;114(3):676-83. [Medline].

  21. Baskett RJ, MacDougall CE, Ross DB. Is mediastinitis a preventable complication? A 10-year review. Ann Thorac Surg. Feb 1999;67(2):462-5. [Medline].

  22. Bryant LR, Spencer FC, Trinkle JK. Treatment of median sternotomy infection by mediastinal irrigation with an antibiotic solution. Ann Surg. Jun 1969;169(6):914-20. [Medline].

  23. Chen Y, Almeida AA, Mitnovetski S, Goldstein J, Lowe C, Smith JA. Managing deep sternal wound infections with vacuum-assisted closure. ANZ J Surg. May 2008;78(5):333-6. [Medline].

  24. Davison SP, Clemens MW, Armstrong D, Newton ED, Swartz W. Sternotomy wounds: rectus flap versus modified pectoral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 15 2007;120(4):929-34. [Medline].

  25. Dimarakis I, Oswal D, Nair UR. Single stage sternal reconstruction using titanium mesh for dehiscence following open-heart surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. Feb 2005;4(1):49-51. [Medline].

  26. Fernando B, Muszynski C, Mustoe T. Closure of a sternal defect with the rectus abdominis muscle after sacrifice of both internal mammary arteries. Ann Plast Surg. Nov 1988;21(5):468-71. [Medline].

  27. Graeber GM, McClelland WT. Current concepts in the management and reconstruction of the dehisced median sternotomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;16(1):92-107. [Medline].

  28. Greig AV, Geh JL, Khanduja V, Shibu M. Choice of flap for the management of deep sternal wound infection--an anatomical classification. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(4):372-8. [Medline].

  29. Imren Y, Selek H, Zor H, Bayram H, Ereren E, Tasoglu I, et al. The management of complicated sternal dehiscence following open heart surgery. Heart Surg Forum. 2006;9(6):E871-5. [Medline].

  30. Jones G, Jurkiewicz MJ, Bostwick J, et al. Management of the infected median sternotomy wound with muscle flaps. The Emory 20-year experience. Ann Surg. Jun 1997;225(6):766-76; discussion 776-8. [Medline].

  31. Julian OC, Lopez-Bello M, Dye WS, et al. The median sternal incision in intracardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation: a general evaluation of its use in heart surgery. Surgery. 1957;42:753-761.

  32. Jurkiewicz MJ, Arnold PG. The omentum: an account of its use in the reconstruction of the chest wall. Ann Surg. May 1977;185(5):548-54. [Medline].

  33. Lopez-Monjardin H, de-la-Pena-Salcedo A, Mendoza-Munoz M, et al. Omentum flap versus pectoralis major flap in the treatment of mediastinitis. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1998;101(6):1481-5. [Medline].

  34. McDonald WS, Brame M, Sharp C, Eggerstedt J. Risk factors for median sternotomy dehiscence in cardiac surgery. South Med J. Nov 1989;82(11):1361-4. [Medline].

  35. Moor EV, Neuman RA, Weinberg A, Wexler MR. Transposition of the great omentum for infected sternotomy wounds in cardiac surgery. Report of 16 cases and review of published reports. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. Mar 1999;33(1):25-9. [Medline].

  36. Sarr MG, Gott VL, Townsend TR. Mediastinal infection after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. Oct 1984;38(4):415-23. [Medline].

  37. Schulman NH, Subramanian V. Sternal wound reconstruction: 252 consecutive cases. The Lenox Hill experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2004;114(1):44-8. [Medline].

  38. Stahle E, Tammelin A, Bergstrom R, et al. Sternal wound complications--incidence, microbiology and risk factors. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Jun 1997;11(6):1146-53. [Medline].

  39. Yasuura K, Okamoto H, Morita S, et al. Results of omental flap transposition for deep sternal wound infection after cardiovascular surgery. Ann Surg. Mar 1998;227(3):455-9. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

sternal dehiscence, thoracic reconstruction, trunk reconstruction, wound healing, wound healing pictures, wound treatment, wound closure, chest wound closure, sternal wound healing, sternal wound pictures, sternal wound closure, plastic surgery, sternotomy, chest reconstruction, sternal dehiscence, midline sternotomy incision, midline sternotomy, sternal wound dehiscence, wide debridement, mediastinitis, sternal instability, post tumor resection, sternum reconstruction, vacuum-assisted closure device, VAC, rigid fixation of the sternum, thoracoacromial system, internal mammary arteries, flap transposition, median sternotomy, internal mammary artery, IMA, coronary bypass surgery wound

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Mark A Grevious, MD, FACS, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Associate Program Director, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago
Mark A Grevious, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Association for Academic Surgery
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Raja Ramaswamy, MS, The Chicago Medical School
Raja Ramaswamy, MS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ginard I Henry, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, Medical Student Faculty Coordinator, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine; Plastic Surgeon, Weiss Memorial Hospital
Ginard I Henry, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, California Medical Association, Christian Medical & Dental Society, and National Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Rani Ramaswamy, MS, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science/The Chicago Medical School
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Kendra J Grubb, MD, MHA, Resident Physician, Department of General Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago
Kendra J Grubb, MD, MHA is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and Association of Women Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Dennis P Orgill, MD, PhD, Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Associate Chief of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Dennis P Orgill, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Burn Association, American Medical Association, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, Massachusetts Medical Society, and Plastic Surgery Research Council
Disclosure: Kinetic Concepts, Inc. Grant/research funds Principle Investigator; Isologen Corporation Grant/research funds Principle Investigator; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Royalty None; Brigham and Women's Hospital Royalty None; Regenesis Corporation Scientific Advisory Board Consulting; Kinetic Concepts, Inc. Expert Witness None

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Jaime R Garza, MD, DDS, FACS, Consulting Staff, Private Practice
Jaime R Garza, MD, DDS, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons
Disclosure: Allergan Honoraria Consulting

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.