eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Craniofacial

Craniofacial, Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair

Author: Pravin K Patel, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University School of Medicine; Chief of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Shriners Hospitals for Children; Head of Craniofacial Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital
Coauthor(s): Raja Ramaswamy, MS, The Chicago Medical School; Mitchell F Grasseschi, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; Private Practice, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; David E Morris, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine; Staff Surgeon, Shriner's Hospital for Children
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Apr 13, 2009

Introduction

The presence of bilateral cleft lip and palate has the potential to significantly alter facial form and structure. The central third of the face is distorted by the bilateral cleft, and restoring the normal facial form is one of the primary goals for the reconstructive surgeon.


Preoperative and postoperative images of a child ...

Preoperative and postoperative images of a child born with a complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Preoperative and postoperative images of a child ...

Preoperative and postoperative images of a child born with a complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.


For information on other cleft lip, palate, and nasal procedures, see the following eMedicine Plastic Surgery articles:

History of the Procedure

The history of bilateral cleft lip repair has evolved from discarding the premaxilla and prolabium and approximating the lateral lip elements to a definitive lip and primary cleft nasal repair utilizing the underlying musculature. Accompanying the evolution of surgical repair is the increasingly important role of orthodontic support with early presurgical alveolar and nasal molding.1 Repositioning the maxillary and alveolar segments into a more anatomic position allows the surgeon to repair the lip and associated nasal deformity under more optimal conditions. The reader is referred to the references cited for a more detailed historical review of individual repairs and supportive management.

Problem

The cleft affects the obvious facial form as an anatomic deformity and has functional consequences, affecting the child's ability to eat, speak, hear, and breathe. Consequently, rehabilitation of a child born with a facial cleft must involve a multidisciplinary approach and be staged appropriately with the child's development. The need for intervention must be balanced against its subsequent effect on normal growth. In the child born with a bilateral cleft, the surgeon initially is faced with a protrusive premaxilla and the difficulty of achieving adequate columellar length and vertical height to the lip during reconstruction.

Bilateral cleft lip repair. (A) The prolabial wid...

Bilateral cleft lip repair. (A) The prolabial width is typically set at 4-5 mm. (B) The prolabial flap is elevated to the base of the columella. The adjacent flaps are turned over to create a labial sulcus. (C) The orbicularis oris muscle, dissected from the overlying skin, is approximated across the midline. (D) The skin is approximated, and the Cupid's bow is created from the lateral vermilion flaps.

Bilateral cleft lip repair. (A) The prolabial wid...

Bilateral cleft lip repair. (A) The prolabial width is typically set at 4-5 mm. (B) The prolabial flap is elevated to the base of the columella. The adjacent flaps are turned over to create a labial sulcus. (C) The orbicularis oris muscle, dissected from the overlying skin, is approximated across the midline. (D) The skin is approximated, and the Cupid's bow is created from the lateral vermilion flaps.


Frequency

The overall occurrence of cleft lip with or without cleft palate is approximately 1 in 750-1000 live births, making it the second most common congenital deformity (after club foot). Incidence varies by race, with clefts occurring more commonly in Asians (1 in 500 births), less frequently in Caucasians (1 in 750 births), and even less frequently in African Americans (1 in 2000 births). These racial variations in incidence are not observed with the isolated cleft palate. In terms of gender, the incidence of cleft lip/palate is more common in males, while the incidence of cleft palate alone is more common in females.

The most common presentation is cleft lip and palate (approximately 45%), followed by cleft palate alone (35%) and cleft lip alone (approximately 20%). Unilateral cleft lips are more common than bilateral cleft lips and occur more commonly on the left side (left cleft lip:right cleft lip:bilateral cleft lip - 6:3:1). In a large series reported in the literature, bilateral clefts are observed in approximately 15% of patients with clefts.2,3,4

Bilateral clefts occur in approximately 1 in 5000-6500 births based on the overall occurrence. According to CDC estimates, the overall incidence of orofacial clefts is 1 in 596, with the highest incidences occurring in Native Americans (3.6 in 1000) and the lowest in African Americans.5,6

According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), 18,859 cleft lip and palate reconstructive procedures were performed in the United States in 2007.7 These statistics include procedures performed by ASPS members as well as other board-certified physicians most likely to perform plastic surgery procedures.

Etiology

Clefting is a multifactorial issue, with both genetic and environmental causes cited. The observation of clustered cases of facial clefts in a particular family indicates a genetic basis. Clefting of the lip and/or palate is associated with more than 150 syndromes. The overall incidence of associated anomalies (eg, cardiac) is approximately 30% (more common with isolated cleft palate).

Environmental causes, such as viral infection (eg, rubella) and teratogens (eg, steroids, anticonvulsants), during the first trimester of pregnancy have been linked to facial clefts. The risk also increases with parental age, especially when older than 30 years, with the father's age appearing to be a more significant factor than the mother's age. Nevertheless, most presentations are of isolated patients within the family without an obvious etiology.

Midfacial development involves several sets of genes, including those involved in cell patterning, proliferation, and signaling. Mutations in any of these genes can change the developmental process and contribute to cleft development. Some of these genes include the DIX gene, sonic hedgehog (SHH) gene, transforming growth factor (TGF) alpha and beta, and interferon regulatory factor (IRF6) gene.

Pathophysiology

While the normal embryologic development of the face is detailed in Head and Neck Embryology, a brief outline relevant to the formation of facial clefts follows.

In short, the branchial arches are responsible for the formation of several areas, including the mouth and lip. Mesenchymal migration and fusion occurs during weeks 4-7 of gestation. The first branchial arch is responsible for the formation of the maxillary and mandibular processes. The maxillary and mandibular prominences form the lateral borders of the primitive mouth or stomodeum. 

Mesenchymal migration and fusion of the primitive somite-derived facial elements (central frontonasal, 2 lateral maxillary, mandibular processes), at 4-7 weeks gestation, are necessary for the normal development of embryonic facial structures. When migration and fusion are interrupted for any reason, a facial cleft develops along embryonic fusion lines. The embryonic development of the primary palate (lip and palate anterior to the incisive foramen) differs from the secondary palate (palate posterior to the incisive foramen).

The developing processes of the medial nasal prominence, lateral nasal prominence, and maxillary prominences form the primary palate. Fusion occurs, followed by "streaming" of mesodermal elements derived from the neural crest. In contrast, the secondary palate is formed by the fusion of palatal processes of the maxillary prominence alone. The difference in embryonic development suggests the possibility of differing degrees of susceptibility to genetic and environmental influences and accounts for the observed variation in incidences. In summary, a bilateral cleft lip results from the failure of fusion of the medial nasal prominences with the maxillary prominences bilaterally.

Kernahan developed a classification scheme in which the defect can be classified onto a Y-shaped symbol. In this diagram, the incisive foramen is represented as the focal point. This system has been applied to both cleft lip and palate.

Millard modification of Kernahan striped-Y classi...

Millard modification of Kernahan striped-Y classification for cleft lip and palate. The small circle indicates the incisive foramen; the triangles indicate the nasal tip and nasal floor.

Millard modification of Kernahan striped-Y classi...

Millard modification of Kernahan striped-Y classification for cleft lip and palate. The small circle indicates the incisive foramen; the triangles indicate the nasal tip and nasal floor.


Presentation

As with the unilateral cleft, a wide range of clinical presentations of the bilateral cleft lip and palate is possible, from the simple microform cleft to the complete cleft bilaterally involving the lip, alveolus, palate, and nose. Bilateral cleft lip is typically classified as either complete or incomplete.

In addition, the cleft may present with varying degrees of asymmetric involvement of the lip and palate. Any degree of combination of involvement of the lip, primary palate, and secondary palate can exist. Recognizing these potentially asymmetric variations is essential in planning operative treatment and evaluating postoperative results.

In the complete form of clefts, the premaxilla is unrestrained by the lateral maxillary segments and the vomer grows anterior to the lateral segments. This distorts the alar cartilages away from the nasal tip and stretches the alae across a widening cleft. The columella is significantly deficient, can be virtually nonexistent and without a distinct demarcation from the prolabium, which also is vertically deficient. No prolabial muscle, philtral columns, dimples, or Cupid's bow is present. No nasal floor is present, as the cleft continues through the palatal shelf along either side of the vomer through the soft palate.

Further treatment planning

Orthodontic treatment can be initiated a few weeks following birth, prior to surgical intervention. Other adjunct procedures include lip adhesion, presurgical orthopedics, primary nasal correction, and nasoalveolar molding. These procedures attempt to reduce the deformity. Nasoalveolar molding is the active molding and repositioning of the nasal cartilage and alveolar processes with an appliance. This orthodontic intervention takes advantage of the plasticity of the cartilage.

Presurgical nasal alveolar molding allows repositioning of the maxillary alveolus and surrounding soft tissues in hopes of reducing wound tension and improving results. Definitive repair is delayed until approximately 3 months of age, depending on physician comfort. A multidisciplinary approach should be carried out over a period of several years for patients with unilateral cleft lip. This multidisciplinary treatment team should include specialists in audiology, ENT, and speech therapy, among others. 

The key difference between the treatment of unilateral versus bilateral cleft lips centers around the concept of aligning the 3 maxillary segments (the lateral lip segments with the prolabial segments). Presurgical orthopedics may be used to prevent the maxillary segments and premaxilla from collapse.

Presurgical orthopedics can involve the following: 

  • Finger massage of prolabium
  • Pressure tape on prolabium
  • Intraoral fixation devices
  • Lip adhesion (can be used to achieve symmetry in asymmetric bilateral cleft situations)
  • Nasoalveolar molding 

The most common appliances used are nasoalveolar molds and intraoral fixation devices. Botulinum toxin is currently being investigated to decrease tension in cleft repair. 

In general, bilateral cleft lip repair techniques have been modified from unilateral cleft lip repair techniques. If the repair is staged, the more severe side is repaired first, and the second side is repaired approximately 3-6 months later.

Indications

Patients born with a cleft lip should undergo surgical repair unless otherwise contraindicated. The goal of reconstruction is to establish normal morphologic facial form and function in order to provide the optimal conditions for the development of dentition, mastication, hearing, speech, breathing, and psychosocial status.

Relevant Anatomy

Understanding normal lip and nasal anatomy is essential to recognize the distortion caused by a facial cleft. The elements of the normal lip are the central philtrum, which is demarcated laterally by the philtral columns and inferiorly by the cupid's bow and tubercle. Just above the junction of the vermilion-cutaneous border is a mucocutaneous ridge referred to as the white roll. Within the red vermilion of the lip are 2 distinct areas: the dry vermilion (the more keratinized portion of the lip that is exposed to air) and the wet vermilion (exposed to the moist environment of the labial mucosa).

The primary muscle of the lip is the orbicularis oris. It has 2 well-defined components: the deep (internal) layer and the superficial (external) layer. The deep fibers run circumferentially from commissure (modiolus) to commissure (modiolus) and function as the primary sphincter for oral feeding. The superficial fibers run obliquely, interdigitating with the other muscles of facial expression to terminate in the dermis, and function to provide subtle shades of expression and precise movements of the lip for speech.

The superficial fibers of the orbicularis decussate in the midline and insert into the skin lateral to the opposite philtral groove, forming the philtral columns. The resulting philtral dimple is centrally depressed, as no muscle fibers directly insert into the dermis in the midline. The tubercle of the lip is shaped by the pars marginalis, the portion of the orbicularis along the vermilion forming the tubercle of the lip with eversion of the muscle.

In the upper lip, the levator labii superioris contributes to the form of the lip. Its fibers arise from the medial aspect of the infraorbital rim and sweep down to insert near the vermilion cutaneous junction. The most medial fibers of the levator labii superioris sweep down to insert near the corner of the ipsilateral philtral column and vermilion-cutaneous junction, helping to define the lower philtral column and the peak of the Cupid's bow.

The nasal muscles are equally important. The levator superioris alaeque arises along the frontal process of the maxilla and courses inferiorly to insert on the mucosal surface of the lip and ala. The transverse nasalis arises along the nasal dorsum and sweeps around the ala to insert along the nasal sill from lateral to medial into the incisal crest and anterior nasal spine. These fibers join with the oblique fibers of the orbicularis and the depressor septi (nasalis), which arises from the alveolus between the central and lateral incisors to insert into the skin of the columellar to the nasal tip and the footplates of the medial crura.

A bilateral cleft thus disrupts the normal termination of the muscle fibers that cross the embryologic fault line of the maxillary and nasal processes, resulting in symmetric but abnormal muscular forces between the normal equilibrium that exists with the nasolabial and oral groups of muscles. With an unrestrained premaxilla, the deformity accentuates with differential growth of the various elements. The alar cartilages are splayed apart and rotate caudally, subluxed from the normal position. Consequently, the nasal tip broadens, the columellar is foreshortened, and the alar bases rotate laterally and cephalad.

Contraindications

  • Malnutrition, anemia, or other pediatric conditions that result in the patient's inability to tolerate general anesthesia are contraindications to this procedure. 
  • Cardiac anomalies that may coexist must be addressed prior to the lip repair.

More on Craniofacial, Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair

Overview: Craniofacial, Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair
Workup: Craniofacial, Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair
Treatment: Craniofacial, Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair
Follow-up: Craniofacial, Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair
Multimedia: Craniofacial, Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair
References

References

  1. Lee CT, Garfinkle JS, Warren SM, Brecht LE, Cutting CB, Grayson BH. Nasoalveolar molding improves appearance of children with bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 2008;122(4):1131-7. [Medline].

  2. Carstens MH. Functional matrix cleft repair: a common strategy for unilateral and bilateral clefts. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 2000;11(5):437-69. [Medline].

  3. Mulliken JB, Wu JK, Padwa BL. Repair of bilateral cleft lip: review, revisions, and reflections. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 2003;14(5):609-20. [Medline].

  4. Noordhoff MS, Cohen M, eds. Bilateral cleft lip. Mastery of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1994;1:566-80.

  5. Cragan JD. Epidemiology of Orofacial Clefts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/bd/macdp/am_940_Cragan.pdf. Accessed April 13, 2009.

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Estimates of and Racial and Ethnic Variations Among Selected Birth Defects. CDC Web site. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/bd/keyfindings/race.htm. Accessed April 13, 2009.

  7. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). 2007 Reconstructive Surgery Procedures and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. 2008. ASPS Web site. Available at http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Media/Press_Kits/Procedural_Statistics.html. Accessed March 10, 2009.

  8. American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. Parameters for Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Cleft Lip/Palate or Other Craniofacial Anomalies. 2000. ACPA Web site. Available at Available at: http://www.acpa-cpf.org/teamcare/Parameters00rev.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2009.

  9. McComb H. Primary repair of the bilateral cleft lip nose: a 15-year review and a new treatment plan. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1990;86(5):882-9; discussion 890-3. [Medline].

  10. McComb H. Primary repair of the bilateral cleft lip nose: a 4-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1994;94(1):37-47; discussion 48-50. [Medline].

  11. Mulliken JB. Correction of the bilateral cleft lip nasal deformity: evolution of a surgical concept. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Nov 1992;29(6):540-5. [Medline].

  12. Mulliken JB. Bilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity: an anthropometric analysis of staged to synchronous repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1995;96(1):9-23; discussion 24-6. [Medline].

  13. Nakajima T, Yoshimura Y, Sakakibara A. Augmentation of the nostril splint for retaining the corrected contour of the cleft lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1990;85(2):182-6. [Medline].

  14. Cutting C, Grayson B, Brecht L, et al. Presurgical columellar elongation and primary retrograde nasal reconstruction in one-stage bilateral cleft lip and nose repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1998;101(3):630-9. [Medline].

  15. Mulliken JB, Wu JK, Padwa BL. Repair of bilateral cleft lip: review, revisions, and reflections. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 2003;14(5):609-20. [Medline].

  16. Bardach J. Salyer and Bardach's Atlas of Craniofacial and Cleft Surgery: Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery. Vol 2. Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1999.

  17. Bardach J, Salyer KE. Surgical Techniques in Cleft Lip and Palate. 2nd ed. Chicago: Mosby Yearbook; 1991.

  18. Berkowitz S, ed. Cleft Lip and Palate. San Diego, Calif: Singular Publishing Group Inc; 1996.

  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate. CDC Web site. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/bd/cleft.htm. Accessed April 13, 2009.

  20. Cohen M, Smith BE, Daw JL. Secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity: functional and esthetic reconstruction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2003;14(4):584-93. [Medline].

  21. Cutting CB, Kamdar MR. Primary bilateral cleft nasal repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 2008;122(3):918-9. [Medline].

  22. Da Silveira AC, Oliveira N, Gonzalez S. Modified nasal alveolar molding appliance for management of cleft lip defect. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2003;14(5):700-3. [Medline].

  23. Fara M. McCarthy ed. Plastic Surgery: Cleft Lip & Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies. Vol 4. W B Saunders Company; 1990.

  24. Grabb WC, Rosenstein SW, Bzoch KR, eds. Cleft Lip and Palate. Boston: Little Brown & Company; 1971.

  25. Millard DR Jr. Cleft Craft. Vol 1, 2, 3. Little Brown & Company; 1976.

  26. Millard DR Jr, Latham RA. Improved primary surgical and dental treatment of clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1990;86(5):856-71. [Medline].

  27. Pham AM, Senders CW. Management of bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug 2006;14(4):278-82. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

bilateral cleft lip repair, bilateral cleft lip, cleft lip and palate, cleft lip, cleft palate, facial cleft, congenital deformities, hare lip, birth defect, cleft lip pictures, cleft lip treatment, cleft lip surgery, birth defect reconstruction

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Pravin K Patel, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University School of Medicine; Chief of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Shriners Hospitals for Children; Head of Craniofacial Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Raja Ramaswamy, MS, The Chicago Medical School
Raja Ramaswamy, MS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mitchell F Grasseschi, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; Private Practice, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

David E Morris, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine; Staff Surgeon, Shriner's Hospital for Children
David E Morris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Chicago Medical Society and Illinois State Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Larry Hollier, Jr, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Baylor University College of Medicine
Larry Hollier, Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, AO Foundation, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

R Edward Newsome, MD, Program Director and Chief of Plastic Surgery, Henderson Chair in Surgery, Assistant Dean for Graduate Medical Education, Tulane University School of Medicine
R Edward Newsome, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Louisiana State Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.