eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Craniofacial

Craniofacial, Orthognathic Surgery: Workup

Author: Pravin K Patel, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University School of Medicine; Chief of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Shriners Hospitals for Children; Head of Craniofacial Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital
Coauthor(s): David E Morris, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine; Staff Surgeon, Shriner's Hospital for Children; Andrew Gassman, MD, Resident Physician, Department of General Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center; Linping Zhao, PhD, MSE, Research Specialist and Craniofacial Fellow, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Chicago; Visiting Research Specialist in Biomedical Engineering, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Medical Center; Adjunct Assistant Professor, Bioengineering Department, University of Illinois at Chicago
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 2, 2009

Workup

Imaging Studies

  • Clinical photographs are essential for documentation and to allow for photometric analysis. Use soft-tissue landmarks to obtain angular and linear measurements that can help define the problem quantitatively. Standardize frontal and profile photographs. A clear acetate ruler can be placed next to the patient when the photographs are obtained for reference measurement for magnification; otherwise, a proportionate-type analysis without reliance on absolute values can be used. Images with the lips at repose and during animation (smiling) are obtained; the degree of dental display is noted for each.
  • Skeletal evaluation typically includes radiographic evaluation with ortho–Panorex and cephalometric x-rays.
    • Ortho–Panorex x-rays provide an overview of the stage of dental development, the mandibular anatomy, and gross pathology. Specific films such as occlusal and periapical views can be obtained to further assess the dentition, supporting bone, and interdental spaces.
    • Cephalometric x-rays provide for standardized skull and/or facial views that allow for comparison over time to assess growth in an individual and for comparison of that individual against standardized population norms.
      • Skeletal views can be obtained in lateral and frontal views.
      • Lateral cephalometric x-ray allows for assessment of the elements of the dentofacial skeleton from a sagittal perspective.

        Analysis of the dentofacial skeleton is based on ...

        Analysis of the dentofacial skeleton is based on identifiable radiographic landmarks on a lateral cephalometric x-ray.

        Analysis of the dentofacial skeleton is based on ...

        Analysis of the dentofacial skeleton is based on identifiable radiographic landmarks on a lateral cephalometric x-ray.

      • With lateral cephalometric x-ray, the maxilla can be related to the mandible and each related to their position in the skull base. Simultaneously, the soft-tissue profile can be related to the facial skeleton.

        Lateral cephalometric analysis of the facial skel...

        Lateral cephalometric analysis of the facial skeleton based on Steiner analysis. The positions of the maxilla and mandible each are related spatially to the anterior cranial base and to each other. Note that normative values of the facial elements depend on a normal anterior cranial base inclination and length, which typically are altered in craniofacial conditions.

        Lateral cephalometric analysis of the facial skel...

        Lateral cephalometric analysis of the facial skeleton based on Steiner analysis. The positions of the maxilla and mandible each are related spatially to the anterior cranial base and to each other. Note that normative values of the facial elements depend on a normal anterior cranial base inclination and length, which typically are altered in craniofacial conditions.

      • Lateral cephalometric x-ray also allows the dentition to be related to each other, and each can be related to its own skeletal base, the maxilla, and the mandible.

        Lateral cephalometric analysis of the dentition w...

        Lateral cephalometric analysis of the dentition within the skeletal framework.

        Lateral cephalometric analysis of the dentition w...

        Lateral cephalometric analysis of the dentition within the skeletal framework.

      • Frontal cephalometric x-ray allows for assessment of the degree of facial asymmetry.
      • Obtain quantitative measurements based on key anatomic landmarks (cephalometric analysis). Numerous cephalometric analyses exist, each emphasizing particular skeletal and dental elements. Common analyses include Steiner, Ricketts, and Delaire and are beyond the scope of this overview. For the surgeon, the analysis must be clinically workable, simple to use, and directly relatable to the skeletal elements that can be repositioned. While the analysis is invaluable, do not focus the treatment plan solely on correcting cephalometric abnormalities.
  • Additional radiographs include the following:
    • Periapical films are obtained to determine if sufficient space exists for interdental osteotomies.
    • On occasion, hand wrist films are useful to help determine skeletal age based on the known timing of sequential closure of the epiphyseal growth plates. However, typically facial skeletal maturity is determined by comparison of serial lateral cephalometric films obtained at 6-month intervals.
    • Three-dimensional computerized tomography (3DCT) is increasingly being used for surgical evaluation and planning in academic settings. Preoperative planning using 3DCT offers multiple potential advantages, including the ability to easily consider multiple different surgical approaches to a problem and the ability to characterize degree and direction of skeletal movement at any point over the osteotomized segment (as opposed to only the occlusal level). With advancing technology, such 3D visualization of the patient's anatomic deformity is likely to replace today's conventional 2D cephalometric analysis.
    • In cleft orthognathic surgery, plain film radiographs (occlusal and periapical) and CT are helpful in preoperatively determining the adequacy of bone across a previously bone-grafted alveolar cleft.

Other Tests

  • Dental models
    • Surgical movement of maxilla and mandible inherently alter the maxillary-mandibular dental occlusion, and as such, careful analysis of the dental models with the orthodontist is essential. The maxillary dental and mandibular dental casts can be studied individually and hand manipulated with each other to assess how the arches are coordinated.
    • Assessment of the models includes space analysis and arch length, transverse width discrepancies, position of the individual tooth within its own arch, and the relationship of the maxillary dentition to the mandibular dentition.
    • Establish the diagnosis from a working problem list generated from the clinical and photographic evaluation, cephalometric analysis, and study dental models.

More on Craniofacial, Orthognathic Surgery

Overview: Craniofacial, Orthognathic Surgery
Workup: Craniofacial, Orthognathic Surgery
Treatment: Craniofacial, Orthognathic Surgery
Follow-up: Craniofacial, Orthognathic Surgery
Multimedia: Craniofacial, Orthognathic Surgery
References

References

  1. Trauner R, Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. Jul 1957;10(7):677-89; contd. [Medline].

  2. Angle EH. Classification of Malocclusion. Dental Cosmos. 1899;41(3).

  3. Posnick JC, Ricalde P. Cleft-orthognathic surgery. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 2004;31(2):315-30. [Medline].

  4. Bell WH. Modern Practice in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1992.

  5. Booth PW, Schendel SA, Hausamen JE. Maxillofacial Surgery. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.

  6. Patel PK. Clinics in Plastic Surgery: Orthognathic Surgery. 34. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier; 2007:[Full Text].

  7. Epker BN, Stella JP, Fish LC. Dentofacial Deformities: Integrated Orthodontic & Surgical Correction. Chicago, Ill: Year Book Medical Pub; 1998.

  8. Eppley BL, Pietrzak WS, Blanton MW. Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon. J Craniofac Surg. Nov 2005;16(6):981-9. [Medline].

  9. Ferraro JW. Fundamentals of Maxillofacial Surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997.

  10. Fonseca RJ, ed. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2000.

  11. Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. Chicago, Ill: Year Book Medical Pub; 2000.

  12. Kaban LB, Pogrel MA, Perrott DH. Complications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Company; 1997.

  13. Posnick JC. Craniofacial and Maxillofacial Surgery in Children and Young Adults. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Company; 2000.

  14. Proffit WR, White Jr RP, Sarver DM. Contemporary Treatment of Dentofacial Deformities. St. Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 2002.

  15. Wolfe SA, Berkowitz S. Plastic Surgery of the Facial Skeleton. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown and Company; 1989.

Further Reading

Keywords

jaw surgery, dentofacial skeletal surgery, facial orthopedic surgery, craniofacial surgery, orthognathic surgery, orthodontics

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Pravin K Patel, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University School of Medicine; Chief of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Shriners Hospitals for Children; Head of Craniofacial Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

David E Morris, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine; Staff Surgeon, Shriner's Hospital for Children
David E Morris, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Chicago Medical Society and Illinois State Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Andrew Gassman, MD, Resident Physician, Department of General Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Linping Zhao, PhD, MSE, Research Specialist and Craniofacial Fellow, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Chicago; Visiting Research Specialist in Biomedical Engineering, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Medical Center; Adjunct Assistant Professor, Bioengineering Department, University of Illinois at Chicago
Linping Zhao, PhD, MSE is a member of the following medical societies: American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association and American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

John Persing, MD, Chief, Professor, Department of Surgery, Sections of Plastic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine
John Persing, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, New York Academy of Sciences, and Society for Neuroscience
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

R Edward Newsome, MD, Program Director and Chief of Plastic Surgery, Henderson Chair in Surgery, Assistant Dean for Graduate Medical Education, Tulane University School of Medicine
R Edward Newsome, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Louisiana State Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.