eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Craniofacial
Craniofacial, Distraction Osteogenesis: Follow-up
Updated: Jun 30, 2009
Outcome and Prognosis
With increasing clinical experience, the long-term outcome and the specific role of distraction osteogenesis are better defined today. Clearly, distraction can generate bone with the capacity for remodeling and adaptation to functional loads. However, distraction osteogenesis is likely incapable of restoring the normal development of a once dysplastic pattern of craniofacial growth. Distraction techniques allow the surgeon to intervene earlier in childhood to restore the facial form and function, but the extent to which it eliminates subsequent conventional procedures remains uncertain.
Future and Controversies
As with conventional orthognathic surgery, distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton should be considered one of the many tools in the armamentarium of a surgeon. Compared to orthopedic lengthening and rotations of long bones, craniofacial distraction is highly complex. Challenges include carefully placed osteotomies to mobilize facial elements and the multidirectional vectors of distraction. The last 5 years have seen exciting advances in computer-assisted surgery. Newly designed software can simulate osteotomies and planned distraction in difficult, asymmetric cases. Cone beam CT scanners, which provide excellent bony resolution at a fraction of the radiation, are now available for intraoperative CT imaging and postoperative follow-up.
The extent to which distraction osteogenesis will replace conventional approaches depends largely on technical innovations that will allow for implantable multidirectional devices that can be easily activated and controlled remotely with minimal incisions.
More on Craniofacial, Distraction Osteogenesis |
| Overview: Craniofacial, Distraction Osteogenesis |
| Workup: Craniofacial, Distraction Osteogenesis |
| Treatment: Craniofacial, Distraction Osteogenesis |
Follow-up: Craniofacial, Distraction Osteogenesis |
| Multimedia: Craniofacial, Distraction Osteogenesis |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Ilizarov GA. The Transosseous Osteosynthesis: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects of the Regeneration and Growth of Tissue. New York: Springer-Verlag;1992.
McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1992;89(1):1-8; discussion 9-10. [Medline].
Steinberg B, Fattahi T. Distraction osteogenesis in management of pediatric airway: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Aug 2005;63(8):1206-8. [Medline].
Denny AD. Distraction osteogenesis in Pierre Robin neonates with airway obstruction. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 2004;31(2):221-9. [Medline].
Fritz MA, Sidman JD. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 2004;12(6):513-8. [Medline].
Li HY, Lee LA. Sleep-disordered Breathing in Children. Chang Gung Med J. May-Jun 2009;32(3):247-57. [Medline].
Kaban LB, Seldin EB, Kikinis R, Yeshwant K, Padwa BL, Troulis MJ. Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. May 2009;67(5):996-1008. [Medline].
Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg. May 1997;8(3):181-5; discussion 186. [Medline].
Chin M, Toth BA. Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1997;100(4):819-30; discussion 831-2. [Medline].
Nada RM, Sugar AW, Wijdeveld MG, et al. Current practice of distraction osteogenesis for craniofacial anomalies in Europe: A web based survey. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. May 15 2009;[Medline].
Cohen SR, Boydston W, Burstein FD. Monobloc distraction osteogenesis during infancy: report of a case and presentation of a new device. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1998;101(7):1919-24. [Medline].
Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Friede H, Ko EW. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 2004;114(6):1382-92; discussion 1393-4. [Medline].
Grubb J, Smith T. Practical applications of distraction osteogenesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Sep 2004;126(3):271-2. [Medline].
McCarthy JG. Distraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1999.
Menezes RD, Zhao L, Patel PK, Modi V. Volumetric changes in the oropharyngeal airway following bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis in Pierre Robin Sequence. J Craniofac Surg. Article submitted July 2008.
Mikhail L, Samchukov JB, Cope A. Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis. CV Mosby; 2001.
Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1995;96(4):825-40; discussion 841-2. [Medline].
Wan DC, Nacamuli RP, Longaker MT. Craniofacial bone tissue engineering. Dent Clin North Am. Apr 2006;50(2):175-90, vii. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
distraction osteogenesis, bone lengthening, de novo bone formation, osteotomized bone segments, maxillary deformity, osteogenesis, mandible distraction, craniofacial deformity, hemifacial microsomia, mandibular hypoplasia, tracheostomy, neonatal distraction, pierre robin, Pierre Robin, hypoplastic mandible, mandible surgery, facial surgery, pediatric facial surgery, midfacial deformity, dentofacial deformity, deficient alveolar ridge, orbitofrontal advancement


Follow-up: Craniofacial, Distraction Osteogenesis