eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Craniofacial

Craniofacial, Postpalatoplasty Speech Dysfunction: Multimedia

Author: Peter D Witt, MD, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco; Medical Director, Department of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Central California
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 26, 2008

Multimedia

Schematic lateral view of the velopharynx illustr...Media file 1: Schematic lateral view of the velopharynx illustrating anatomy.
Schematic lateral view of the velopharynx illustr...

Schematic lateral view of the velopharynx illustrating anatomy.

Schematic bird's-eye view of the velopharynx illu...Media file 2: Schematic bird's-eye view of the velopharynx illustrating directional movements of the representative closure patterns.
Schematic bird's-eye view of the velopharynx illu...

Schematic bird's-eye view of the velopharynx illustrating directional movements of the representative closure patterns.

Palatal lift. Hard and soft palatal components ar...Media file 3: Palatal lift. Hard and soft palatal components are shown.
Palatal lift. Hard and soft palatal components ar...

Palatal lift. Hard and soft palatal components are shown.

Palatal lift in situ.Media file 4: Palatal lift in situ.
Palatal lift in situ.

Palatal lift in situ.

Preoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velophary...Media file 5: Preoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velopharynx. One and 2 are the lateral pharyngeal wall, 3 is the velum, and 4 is a tonsil.
Preoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velophary...

Preoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velopharynx. One and 2 are the lateral pharyngeal wall, 3 is the velum, and 4 is a tonsil.

Postoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velophar...Media file 6: Postoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velopharynx, indicating an open pharyngeal flap as a central subtotal midline obstruction; 2 patent velopharyngeal ports are visible laterally.
Postoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velophar...

Postoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velopharynx, indicating an open pharyngeal flap as a central subtotal midline obstruction; 2 patent velopharyngeal ports are visible laterally.

Postoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velophar...Media file 7: Postoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velopharynx, indicating 2 lateral pharyngeal walls opposed against a pharyngeal flap to effect complete velopharyngeal closure.
Postoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velophar...

Postoperative nasoendoscopic view of the velopharynx, indicating 2 lateral pharyngeal walls opposed against a pharyngeal flap to effect complete velopharyngeal closure.

Sutures are placed bilaterally in the soft palate...Media file 8: Sutures are placed bilaterally in the soft palate to enhance visualization. A midline incision divides the soft palate to the posterior nasal spine.
Sutures are placed bilaterally in the soft palate...

Sutures are placed bilaterally in the soft palate to enhance visualization. A midline incision divides the soft palate to the posterior nasal spine.

Soft palate flaps are retracted.Media file 9: Soft palate flaps are retracted.
Soft palate flaps are retracted.

Soft palate flaps are retracted.

An incision is made along the dotted line on the ...Media file 10: An incision is made along the dotted line on the posterior pharyngeal wall down to the prevertebral fascia. A pharyngeal flap is created. A "book flap" incision that will line the lateral ports with mucous membrane is then made bilaterally on the nasal surface of the soft palate.
An incision is made along the dotted line on the ...

An incision is made along the dotted line on the posterior pharyngeal wall down to the prevertebral fascia. A pharyngeal flap is created. A "book flap" incision that will line the lateral ports with mucous membrane is then made bilaterally on the nasal surface of the soft palate.

The pharyngeal flap is plotted with indelible ink...Media file 11: The pharyngeal flap is plotted with indelible ink and elevated to the prevertebral fascia. Two soft palate flaps are opened laterally.
The pharyngeal flap is plotted with indelible ink...

The pharyngeal flap is plotted with indelible ink and elevated to the prevertebral fascia. Two soft palate flaps are opened laterally.

The free inferior edge of the pharyngeal flap is ...Media file 12: The free inferior edge of the pharyngeal flap is sutured to the posterior edge soft palate.
The free inferior edge of the pharyngeal flap is ...

The free inferior edge of the pharyngeal flap is sutured to the posterior edge soft palate.

Sutures are placed between the pharyngeal flap an...Media file 13: Sutures are placed between the pharyngeal flap and the nasal edges of the soft palate. The raw surfaces arising from the origin of the pharyngeal flap are closed by simple approximation of tissue.
Sutures are placed between the pharyngeal flap an...

Sutures are placed between the pharyngeal flap and the nasal edges of the soft palate. The raw surfaces arising from the origin of the pharyngeal flap are closed by simple approximation of tissue.

Two flaps from the soft palate used to cover the ...Media file 14: Two flaps from the soft palate used to cover the raw tissue of the pharyngeal flap are sutured to the base of the pharyngeal flap.
Two flaps from the soft palate used to cover the ...

Two flaps from the soft palate used to cover the raw tissue of the pharyngeal flap are sutured to the base of the pharyngeal flap.

The oral side of the soft palate is sealed to con...Media file 15: The oral side of the soft palate is sealed to conceal the pharyngeal flap.
The oral side of the soft palate is sealed to con...

The oral side of the soft palate is sealed to conceal the pharyngeal flap.

Immediate postoperative view from the oral cavity.Media file 16: Immediate postoperative view from the oral cavity.
Immediate postoperative view from the oral cavity.

Immediate postoperative view from the oral cavity.

Schematic of lateral view. A catheter has been pa...Media file 17: Schematic of lateral view. A catheter has been passed transnasally and attached to the uvula.
Schematic of lateral view. A catheter has been pa...

Schematic of lateral view. A catheter has been passed transnasally and attached to the uvula.

Schematic showing proposed incisions (dashed line...Media file 18: Schematic showing proposed incisions (dashed lines).
Schematic showing proposed incisions (dashed line...

Schematic showing proposed incisions (dashed lines).

Schematic showing elevation of both tonsillar pil...Media file 19: Schematic showing elevation of both tonsillar pillar flaps.
Schematic showing elevation of both tonsillar pil...

Schematic showing elevation of both tonsillar pillar flaps.

Schematic showing rotation of palatopharyngeal fl...Media file 20: Schematic showing rotation of palatopharyngeal flaps through 90°. It is ready for attachment to the posterior pharyngeal wall.
Schematic showing rotation of palatopharyngeal fl...

Schematic showing rotation of palatopharyngeal flaps through 90°. It is ready for attachment to the posterior pharyngeal wall.

Schematic showing a completed sphincter pharyngop...Media file 21: Schematic showing a completed sphincter pharyngoplasty. Flaps are overlapped and are sutured to each other and the posterior pharyngeal wall.
Schematic showing a completed sphincter pharyngop...

Schematic showing a completed sphincter pharyngoplasty. Flaps are overlapped and are sutured to each other and the posterior pharyngeal wall.

Complete nasopharyngeal stenosis.Media file 22: Complete nasopharyngeal stenosis.
Complete nasopharyngeal stenosis.

Complete nasopharyngeal stenosis.

More on Craniofacial, Postpalatoplasty Speech Dysfunction

References

References

  1. Loney RW, Bloem TJ. Velopharyngeal dysfunction: recommendations for use of nomenclature. Cleft Palate J. Oct 1987;24(4):334-5. [Medline].

  2. Folkins JW. Velopharyngeal nomenclature: incompetence, inadequacy, insufficiency, and dysfunction. Cleft Palate J. Oct 1988;25(4):413-6. [Medline].

  3. Witt PD, D'Antonio LL. Velopharyngeal insufficiency and secondary palatal management: A new look at an old problem. In: Hardesty RA, ed. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1993:707.

  4. Golding-Kushner KJ, Argamaso RV, Cotton RT, et al. Standardization for the reporting of nasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy: a report from an International Working Group. Cleft Palate J. Oct 1990;27(4):337-47; discussion 347-8. [Medline].

  5. Marsh JL. Management of velopharyngeal dysfunction: differential diagnosis for differential management. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 2003;14(5):621-8; discussion 629. [Medline].

  6. Trost-Cardamone JE. Coming to terms with VPI: a response to Loney and Bloem. Cleft Palate J. Jan 1989;26(1):68-70. [Medline].

  7. D'Antonio LL, Snyder LS, Samadani S. Tonsillectomy in children with or at risk for velopharyngeal insufficiency: effects on speech. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct 1996;115(4):319-23. [Medline].

  8. Kummer AW. Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies: Effects on Speech and Resonance. San Diego, Calif: Singular Press; 2001.

  9. Wyatt R, Sell D, Russell J, et al. Cleft palate speech dissected: a review of current knowledge and analysis. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1996;49(3):143-9. [Medline].

  10. Witt PD, Marsh JL, McFarland EG, et al. The evolution of velopharyngeal imaging. Ann Plast Surg. Dec 2000;45(6):665-73. [Medline].

  11. Tachimura T, Nohara K, Fujita Y, et al. Change in levator veli palatini muscle activity for patients with cleft palate in association with placement of a speech-aid prosthesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Sep 2002;39(5):503-8. [Medline].

  12. Witt PD, Rozelle AA, Marsh JL, et al. Do palatal lift prostheses stimulate velopharyngeal neuromuscular activity?. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Nov 1995;32(6):469-75. [Medline].

  13. Witt PD, Miller DC, Marsh JL, et al. Limited value of preoperative cervical vascular imaging in patients with velocardiofacial syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1998;101(5):1184-95; discussion 1196-9. [Medline].

  14. Marsh JL, Grames LM, Holtman B. Intravelar veloplasty: a prospective study. Cleft Palate J. Jan 1989;26(1):46-50. [Medline].

  15. D'Antonio LL. Correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency using the Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty. West J Med. Aug 1997;167(2):101-2. [Medline].

  16. Sommerlad BC, Mehendale FV, Birch MJ, et al. Palate re-repair revisited. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. May 2002;39(3):295-307. [Medline].

  17. LaRossa D. The state of the art in cleft palate surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. May 2000;37(3):225-8. [Medline].

  18. Sloan GM. Posterior pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty: the state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Mar 2000;37(2):112-22. [Medline].

  19. Argamaso RV, Shprintzen RJ, Strauch B, et al. The role of lateral pharyngeal wall movement in pharyngeal flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1980;66(2):214-9. [Medline].

  20. Whitaker LA, Randall P, Graham WP, et al. A prospective and randomized series comparing superiorly and inferiorly based posterior pharyngeal flaps. Cleft Palate J. Oct 1972;9:304-11. [Medline].

  21. Trier WC. The pharyngeal flap operation. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1985;12(4):697-710. [Medline].

  22. Riski JE, Serafin D, Riefkohl R, et al. A rationale for modifying the site of insertion of the orticochea pharyngoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1984;73(6):882-94. [Medline].

  23. Johns DF, Cannito MP, Rohrich RJ, et al. The self-lined superiorly based pull-through velopharyngoplasty: plastic surgery-speech pathology interaction in the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1994;94(3):436-45. [Medline].

  24. Hogan VM. A clarification of the surgical goals in cleft palate speech and the introduction of the lateral port control (l.p.c.) pharyngeal flap. Cleft Palate J. Oct 1973;10:331-45. [Medline].

  25. Warren DW. Velopharyngeal orifice size and upper pharyngeal pressure-flow patterns in normal speech. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1964;33:148-62. [Medline].

  26. Warren DW, Devereux JL. An analog study of cleft palate speech. Cleft Palate J. Apr 1966;3:103-14. [Medline].

  27. Kummer AW, Briggs M, Lee L. The relationship between the characteristics of speech and velopharyngeal gap size. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Nov 2003;40(6):590-6. [Medline].

  28. Mehendale FV, Sommerlad BC. Gross unilateral abnormalities of the velum and pharynx. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Jul 2002;39(4):461-8. [Medline].

  29. Argamaso RV, Levandowski GJ, Golding-Kushner KJ, et al. Treatment of asymmetric velopharyngeal insufficiency with skewed pharyngeal flap. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Jul 1994;31(4):287-94. [Medline].

  30. HYNES W. Pharyngoplasty by muscle transplantation. Br J Plast Surg. Jul 1950;3(2):128-35. [Medline].

  31. Orticochea M. Construction of a dynamic muscle sphincter in cleft palates. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1968;41(4):323-7. [Medline].

  32. Witt PD, Marsh JL, Muntz HR, et al. Acute obstructive sleep apnea as a complication of sphincter pharyngoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. May 1996;33(3):183-9. [Medline].

  33. Riski JE, Ruff GL, Georgiade GS, et al. Evaluation of the sphincter pharyngoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. May 1992;29(3):254-61. [Medline].

  34. Witt PD, D'Antonio LL, Zimmerman GJ, et al. Sphincter pharyngoplasty: a preoperative and postoperative analysis of perceptual speech characteristics and endoscopic studies of velopharyngeal function. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1994;93(6):1154-68. [Medline].

  35. Witt PD, O'Daniel TG, Marsh JL, et al. Surgical management of velopharyngeal dysfunction: outcome analysis of autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1997;99(5):1287-96; discussion 1297-300. [Medline].

  36. Marsh JL. The evaluation and management of velopharyngeal dysfunction. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 2004;31(2):261-9. [Medline].

  37. Sell D, Ma L. A model of practice for the management of velopharyngeal dysfunction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Oct 1996;34(5):357-63. [Medline].

  38. Witt PD, Wahlen JC, Marsh JL, et al. The effect of surgeon experience on velopharyngeal functional outcome following palatoplasty: is there a learning curve?. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1998;102(5):1375-84. [Medline].

  39. Witt PD, Marsh JL, Marty-Grames L, et al. Management of the hypodynamic velopharynx. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. May 1995;32(3):179-87. [Medline].

  40. Witt P, Cohen D, Grames LM, et al. Sphincter pharyngoplasty for the surgical management of speech dysfunction associated with velocardiofacial syndrome. Br J Plast Surg. Dec 1999;52(8):613-8. [Medline].

  41. Mehendale FV, Birch MJ, Birkett L, et al. Surgical management of velopharyngeal incompetence in velocardiofacial syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Mar 2004;41(2):124-35. [Medline].

  42. D'Antonio LL, Muntz HR, Marsh JL, et al. Practical application of flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy for evaluating velopharyngeal function. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1988;82(4):611-8. [Medline].

  43. Kirschner RE, Cabiling DS, Slemp AE, et al. Repair of oronasal fistulae with acellular dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 2006;118(6):1431-40. [Medline].

  44. Steele MH, Seagle MB. Palatal fistula repair using acellular dermal matrix: the University of Florida experience. Ann Plast Surg. Jan 2006;56(1):50-3; discussion 53. [Medline].

  45. Cole P, Horn TW, Thaller S. The use of decellularized dermal grafting (AlloDerm) in persistent oro-nasal fistulas after tertiary cleft palate repair. J Craniofac Surg. Jul 2006;17(4):636-41. [Medline].

  46. Schoenborn D. Uber eine neue methode der staphylorraphies. Arch F Klin Chir. 1876;19:528-31.

Further Reading

Keywords

nasalance, airflow, nasal rustle, nasal turbulence, abnormal cavity coupling, acoustic energy, nasal resonance, grimace, hyponasality, airway evaluation, sphincter pharyngoplasty, postpalatoplasty speech dysfunction, VPD, velopharyngeal dysfunction, speech dysfunction, pharyngeal flap, sphincter pharyngoplasty, speech impediment, speech therapy, language therapy, mouth prosthesis, speech prosthesis, speech bulb, speech obturator, palatal lift, hypernasality, nasal emission, facial grimacing

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Peter D Witt, MD, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco; Medical Director, Department of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Central California
Peter D Witt, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Association of Pediatric Plastic Surgeons, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Plastic Surgery Research Council
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Larry Hollier, Jr, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Baylor University College of Medicine
Larry Hollier, Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, AO Foundation, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Practice Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center at Swedish Medical Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.