eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Eyelids

Blepharoplasty, Lower Lid Transconjunctival

Author: D Glynn Bolitho, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCSC, FCS(SA), Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California at San Diego; Private Practice, LaJolla, California
Coauthor(s): Foad Nahai, MD, Professor, Department of Surgery, Emory University
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Oct 3, 2006

Introduction

The transconjunctival blepharoplasty is receiving increasing attention as an alternate technique to traditional transcutaneous blepharoplasty. Many of the lower lid malpositions appear to be obviated by the use of this technique (Silkiss, 1992; Zarem, 1993). Transcutaneous blepharoplasty has been associated with the round eye appearance, inferior scleral show, and frank ectropion, which is the invariable consequence of overgenerous skin resection.

More conservative skin resection obviates some of these complications, particularly when a lower lid tightening procedure is added. These techniques include wedge excision, lateral canthoplasty or canthopexy, and periosteal flap fixation based on the lateral orbital margin. Transconjunctival blepharoplasty has been advocated to limit the incidence of these complications, particularly in patients with minimal skin laxity or predominant fat herniation who otherwise would not require skin excision.

This article reports the authors' experience with consecutive transconjunctival blepharoplasty performed by the senior author (FN) and compares the results with those achieved using conventional transcutaneous blepharoplasty techniques. A total of 177 patients were operated on over a 34-month period with a mean follow-up time of 2.4 months (range 1-18 mo). This experience suggests that the transconjunctival approach is a safe, effective procedure with minimal complications and is useful in the younger patient with isolated fat excess as well as in the older patient with manifestations of mild-to-moderate skin redundancy.

History of the Procedure

This technique has been practiced in Europe for almost 70 years. The first description by Bourget in 1928 was followed by the account of Tessier in 1973 of this approach for blepharoplasty, trauma, and congenital deformities. Isolated reports of this technique for blepharoplasty began appearing in the North American literature during the 1970s and early 1980s (Tomlinson, 1975; Baylis, 1989) but the landmark contribution by Zarem and Resnick (1991) propelled this procedure into more widespread acceptance.

Although earlier studies focused on the young patient with isolated fat excess, these authors expanded the indications to include older patients with some degree of cutaneous redundancy. They reported excellent results and a reduced incidence of postoperative lower lid complications. The authors' experience with this technique has been highly favorable, with fewer complications and less apparent morbidity than with the transcutaneous approach.

Presentation

History and physical examination

Preoperative evaluation includes a thorough history and physical examination. Identify herniated fat pads and note the degree of skin laxity. Carefully assess lower lid tone in all patients. Test visual acuity and perform an unanesthetized Schirmer test in selected patients. As several authors have observed, fat pad herniation is best tested with the patient's eyes in an upward gaze (Soll, 1993). Evaluate lower lid laxity by elevating the central lid with the examining forefinger or thumb and by testing lid return using the lower lid snap test. A lax lower lid may be an indication for lateral canthopexy or wedge excision in some patients.

Indications

Although initial reports focused on the young patient with isolated fat herniation, the indications have been broadened somewhat to include patients with modest skin laxity (Zarem, 1991). Further experience with this technique has resulted in expansion of the indications for its use. Transconjunctival blepharoplasty has been recognized as useful in patients with fat excess and fine skin wrinkling and in those with apparent skin and fat excess in whom fat excision alone allows for redraping of the lower lid skin into an acceptable contour with elimination of the skin laxity.

Lower lid blepharoplasty does not eradicate fine skin wrinkling regardless of which technique is used. This issue is better addressed with either chemical peels or laser resurfacing. Use of transconjunctival upper blepharoplasty may be reserved for the patient with a high tarsal crease with no central or lateral fat pad herniation and minimally redundant upper eyelid skin and for patients who present with residual fullness of the upper eyelid following prior blepharoplasty.

Relevant Anatomy

Inferior periorbital fat is contained posteriorly by the capsulopalpebral fascia and overlying conjunctiva of the posterior fornix (see Image 1). The capsulopalpebral fascia fuses superiorly with the inferior tarsal muscle, which inserts into the lower border of the tarsal plate. Anteriorly, the fat is bounded by the orbital septum, which separates it from the overlying orbicularis oculi muscle and lower lid skin.

Transconjunctival blepharoplasty permits access to the orbital fat by an incision through the inferior fornical conjunctiva and capsulopalpebral fascia without any disruption of the skin and muscle of the lower lid. This results in a reduction in the risk of ectropion and round eye syndrome, which may complicate the transcutaneous approach.

The inferior oblique muscle is an important anatomic landmark. It arises from the anteromedial portion of the orbital floor and passes posterolaterally, separating the medial and central fat compartments during its course. The lateral and central fat compartments are separated by the arcuate expansion of the inferior oblique muscle. This diaphanous structure inserts into the orbital rim anterolaterally.

The upper lid classically is divided into an anterior (skin and orbicularis) and a posterior (tarsus and conjunctiva) lamella. The supratarsal fold results from a fusion of levator aponeurosis, orbital septum, and fascia on the deep surface of the orbicularis muscle. The fused layer acts as a sling for the periorbital fat and is higher medially than laterally. In an attempt to divide the orbital septum medially in a conventional blepharoplasty, this fused layer may be damaged inadvertently.

Generally, the presence of either 2 or 3 upper lid fat pads is accepted (Januskiewicz, 1999). The medial fat pad is typically pale yellow or white and lies medial to the levator aponeurosis at the root of the nose. It has a greater connective tissue component and is innervated by the supratrochlear nerve. The middle and lateral fat pads lie on the levator and are a rich butter yellow color. They are innervated by the supraorbital nerve.

Contraindications

Contraindications for those procedure include patients with significant lower eyelid skin laxity, patients with overt festoon formation, and those who are elderly.

More on Blepharoplasty, Lower Lid Transconjunctival

Overview: Blepharoplasty, Lower Lid Transconjunctival
Treatment: Blepharoplasty, Lower Lid Transconjunctival
Follow-up: Blepharoplasty, Lower Lid Transconjunctival
Multimedia: Blepharoplasty, Lower Lid Transconjunctival
References

References

  1. Baylis HI, Long JA, Groth MJ. Transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty. Technique and complications. Ophthalmology. Jul 1989;96(7):1027-32. [Medline].

  2. Bourget J. Notre traitement chirurgical de "poches" sous les yeux sans cicatrice. Arch Gr Belg Chir. 31;133:1928.

  3. Flowers RS. Upper blepharoplasty by eyelid invagination. Anchor blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1993;20(2):193-207. [Medline].

  4. Januszkiewicz JS, Nahai F. Transconjunctival upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1999;103(3):1015-8; discussion 1019. [Medline].

  5. Silkiss RZ, Carroll RP. Transconjunctival surgery. Ophthalmic Surg. Apr 1992;23(4):288-91. [Medline].

  6. Soll SM, Lisman RD, Charles NC, Palu RN. Pyogenic granuloma after transconjunctival blepharoplasty: a case report. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1993;9(4):298-301. [Medline].

  7. Tessier P. The conjunctival approach to the orbital floor and maxilla in congenital malformation and trauma. J Maxillofac Surg. Mar 1973;1(1):3-8. [Medline].

  8. Tomlinson FB, Hovey LM. Transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty for removal of fat. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1975;56(3):314-8. [Medline].

  9. Zarem HA, Resnick JI. Minimizing deformity in lower blepharoplasty. The transconjunctival approach. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1993;20(2):317-21. [Medline].

  10. Zarem HA, Resnick JI. Expanded applications for transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1991;88(2):215-20; discussion 221. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

transconjunctival blepharoplasty, blepharoplasty, lower lid transconjunctival, transcutaneous blepharoplasty, lower lid malpositions, fat herniation, isolated fat herniation, orbital fat, inferior fornical conjunctiva, capsulopalpebral fascia, ectropion, round eye

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

D Glynn Bolitho, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCSC, FCS(SA), Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California at San Diego; Private Practice, LaJolla, California
D Glynn Bolitho, MD, PhD, FACS, FRCSC, FCS(SA) is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, California Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Foad Nahai, MD, Professor, Department of Surgery, Emory University
Foad Nahai, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, British Medical Association, and Medical Association of Georgia
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Neal R Reisman, MD, JD, Associate Chief, Department of Plastic Surgery, Clinical Associate Professor, St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine
Neal R Reisman, MD, JD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American College of Medical Quality, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Lipoplasty Society of North America, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Practice Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center at Swedish Medical Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Al Aly, MD, FACS, Consulting Surgeon, Iowa City Plastic Surgery
Disclosure: Ethicon  Consulting fee Consulting; QMP Royalty Book royalty; Insorb Stapler Consulting fee Consulting; Insorb Stapler Ownership interest None; Medicis Intellectual property rights None

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.