eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Eyelids

Blepharoplasty, Upper Lid: Treatment

Author: Gregory Caputy, MD, PhD, Chief, Department of Plastic Surgery, Aesthetica Plastic and Laser Surgery Center of Honolulu
Coauthor(s): Bhupendra Patel, MD, FRCS, Professor of Ophthalmic Plastic and Facial Cosmetic Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: May 31, 2009

Treatment

Surgical Therapy

A dramatic change has occurred over the past few years in the performance of upper eyelid blepharoplasties. Unlike the major skin and fat resections that many plastic surgeons were taught, conservative skin resection with adequate but not skeletonizing fat resection and the production of a well-defined and deep upper eyelid fold are the ideal results of surgery. Anatomic knowledge has largely fueled this change, as have unsatisfactory results from simple skin and fat resection over the years. The anchor or fold blepharoplasty yields a much more predictable and cleaner palpebral fold than standard previous techniques.

For the Asian double-eyelid procedure, basically 3 operations are possible. The first involves simple suture techniques that pass through the conjunctiva and cause stitch adherence between the deep dermis and the fascial network. The disadvantages of this procedure are the ease with which the stitches detach, its nonpermanent nature, and the resulting static fold. Its advantage is that it is nonincisional.

The tarsus fixation method, although more permanent and predictable, also has the disadvantage of producing a static fold, which is present in the closed eyelid.

The levator aponeurosis method, which has changed into the invagination or anchor method of fixation, produces a dynamic fold with natural and predictable adherence between the levator aponeurosis and the deep dermis. This is the preferred method of upper eyelid blepharoplasty and is described in detail. Simple upper eyelid blepharoplasty also is discussed.

Preoperative Details

The preoperative assessment is discussed in Clinical. Stemming from this is the preoperative plan, which should include what the surgical procedure addresses and in what amount.

  • Plan the exact height of the upper eyelid fold, the amount of skin to be resected, and the amount of fat from each compartment.
  • Assess the lacrimal gland position along with the need for resuspension.
  • Assess the need for ptosis correction and plan for levator aponeurosis shortening, if necessary.
  • Tarsal height can be assessed readily by inverting the upper lid completely and measuring the height. The tarsus is 1-2 mm shorter than this because of the thickness of the conjunctiva and lash presence when this is performed.
  • The author prefers to make a written diagrammatic plan prior to the procedure and have the plan and preoperative photographs available during surgery.
  • Prepping and draping is standard.
  • Pinpoint electrocautery should be available. A vascular plexus at the superior edge of the tarsus often needs cautery at that depth.

Intraoperative Details

The procedure described is used with minor alteration for invagination (anchor) blepharoplasty and for the formation of palpebral folds in patients with low or nonexistent folds.

  • Begin the procedure with demarcation on the skin of the desired conservative skin resection with the patient in both upright and supine postures. More skin is necessary in the upper lid for invagination than in classic blepharoplasty, since the skin is not draped straight over the lid upon opening but folds as the skin normally folds back into the lid upon opening.
  • Place the fold at the mid point of the skin resection, which is curvilinear with slight flaring laterally or, in some patients, a simple overturned "U." If a fold already exists and its position is optimal but skin is still in excess, resecting from above the position of the fold is best to avoid disrupting the normal skin attachments and still have the fold fall within the depth of the palpebral fissure.
  • Infiltrate local anesthetic evenly throughout the upper eyelid.
  • Excise the skin and achieve hemostasis with pinpoint electrocautery. This procedure and subsequent deep tissue manipulations and resections can be performed by laser, although, in the author's experience, the skin heals slightly faster if at least that resection is performed by scalpel.
  • Resect a sliver of orbicularis oculi muscle to reveal the preaponeurotic fat. Resect this according to the preoperative plan with careful hemostasis of the base. A laser is useful in this process.
  • Additionally, after the amount of fat to be resected has been delineated and freed, a small amount of local anesthetic injected into its base allows for pain-free removal.
  • At this point, simple standard blepharoplasty deviates from the anchor procedure. In the simple procedure, the preaponeurotic fat is resected as desired, followed by entry into the orbital septum either in defined pinpoint fashion or by opening it along its length. The desired amount of orbital fat is resected, followed by reapproximation of the septal fascia. The skin then is reapproximated, and the procedure is complete. No dissection occurs down to the conjoined fascia; therefore, little danger exists of damage to the levator mechanism.
  • In the anchor procedure, the dissection is continued down to the conjoined fascia or orbital septum (depending on height above the tarsus).
  • Enter the septum either partially or along its length depending on the exposure required for the necessary levator work.
  • Describing ptosis correction is outside the scope of this article. For purposes of this discussion, make partial openings into the orbital septum and resect the predetermined amount of fat.
  • Place 6-0 Vicryl sutures through the levator aponeurosis/conjoined tendon and into the deep dermis of the upper (cephalic) eyelid skin flap.
  • Ask the patient to open and close the eyes. Ascertain folding and symmetry after the procedure has been performed on the opposite side.
  • A vascular arcade is present at the base of the tarsus; attain careful hemostasis if this plane is entered.
  • The eye may not open completely because of swelling and, occasionally, irritation by blood from the Müller muscle. Once this has resolved, complete eye opening is apparent.
  • Complete the procedure by suturing the inferior skin flap to the superior flap with 6-0 fast-absorbing or nylon sutures.
  • Apply triple antibiotic ointment and cool packs in the recovery area for approximately 1 hour.
  • The medial epicanthoplasty or lateral canthopexy and/or canthoplasty procedure is generally performed prior to the upper eyelid procedure in operative sequence. If the upper eyelid requires textural skin rejuvenation, laser resurfacing or laser nonresurfacing rejuvenation can be performed at this or a later time.

Postoperative Details

  • The amount of swelling varies among individuals. Little or no bruising should occur.
  • Remove sutures (or they should dissolve) in 3-5 days.
  • For the first 24 hours, apply intermittent cold packs, followed by nothing for 24 hours and warm packs for the following 24 hours.
  • Approximately 90% of the swelling resolves in 4-5 days.
  • Perform visual checks postoperatively. If the patient reports a "scratchy" feeling in the eye or true pain, seek a corneal abrasion using fluorescein. Seek ophthalmologic consultation as appropriate.

Follow-up

Arrange follow-up visits for the day following the procedure, 2-3 days later for suture removal, 1 week after suture removal, and again after 1 month. Correct release or unevenness of the upper eyelid fold no sooner than 3 months postsurgery, since scar contracture can cause changes in the upper lid during that time. The upper eyelid structures are incredibly fine and unique in composition and interaction. Multiple upper eyelid procedures are discouraged.

Complications

The most severe complication of periorbital surgery is blindness. This generally occurs after retrobulbar bleeding and subsequent compression of the optic nerve with loss of vascular supply. If excessive bleeding is encountered, locate and stop it prior to closure. If increased pressure and bleeding are found in the postoperative period, perform sequential and rapid decompression with release of all sutures (especially deep sutures in this procedure) and vigorously apply measures to control blood pressure and swelling.

If corneal abrasions are frequent, a scleral shield may be used during the procedure as desired by the practitioner. Should this occur, soothing ointment and occlusion for a few days is the best remedy.

The most common complications involve uneven folds, inappropriately high or low folds, or multiple folds. These are basically correctable by reoperation. Most irregularities can be corrected within reason and with consideration of the number of previous procedures and their extent as an indication of intralid scarring. If a portion of the upper eyelid fold releases and a fold is no longer apparent, taking down the entire lid and repeating the procedure is not necessary. The section can be reopened and dissection carried down to the levator followed by dermis-to-aponeurosis sutures and closure. When simple blepharoplasty is performed, little danger of damage to these deeper structures exists.

Closely monitor postoperative ptosis. If it does not resolve within 3 months, perform correction. Alteration of levator function with the procedure is rare, and reanastomosis of the aponeurosis should yield a good result. Similarly, lagophthalmos is rare, since skin resection is minimal. In performing this procedure without the noted complications, take advantage of the ability of the patient and surgeon to assess function on the operating table.

Other complications such as infection, stitch abscess, Vicryl extrusion, and excessive bleeding are rare; address these complications in the normal manner.

More on Blepharoplasty, Upper Lid

Overview: Blepharoplasty, Upper Lid
Workup: Blepharoplasty, Upper Lid
Treatment: Blepharoplasty, Upper Lid
Follow-up: Blepharoplasty, Upper Lid
Multimedia: Blepharoplasty, Upper Lid
References

References

  1. Sayoc BT. Surgery of the Oriental eyelid. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 1974;1(1):157-71. [Medline].

  2. Millard DR Jr. Aesthetic aspects of reconstructive surgery. Ann Plast Surg. Nov 1978;1(6):533-41. [Medline].

  3. Fernandez LR. Double eyelid operations in the Oriental in Hawaii. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1960;25:257.

  4. Flowers RS. Upper blepharoplasty by eyelid invagination. Anchor blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1993;20(2):193-207. [Medline].

  5. Siegel RJ. Essential anatomy for contemporary upper lid blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1993;20(2):209-12. [Medline].

  6. Jacono AA, Moskowitz B. Transconjunctival versus transcutaneous approach in upper and lower blepharoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. Feb 2001;17(1):21-8. [Medline].

  7. Kang DH, Koo SH, Choi JH, Park SH. Laser blepharoplasty for making double eyelids in Asians. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 2001;107(7):1884-9. [Medline].

  8. Lee Y, Kwon S, Hwang K. Correction of sunken and/or multiply folded upper eyelid by fascia-fat graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2001;107(1):15-9. [Medline].

  9. Rohrich RJ, Coberly DM, Fagien S, Stuzin JM. Current concepts in aesthetic upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 2004;113(3):32e-42e. [Medline].

  10. Stasior OG, Ballitch HA 2nd. Ptosis repair in aesthetic blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1993;20(2):269-73. [Medline].

  11. Zide BM, Jelks GW. Surgical Anatomy of the Orbit. New York: Raven Press; 1985.

  12. Bi YL, Zhou Q, Xu W, Rong A. Anterior lamellar repositioning with complete lid split: a modified method for treating upper eyelids trichiasis in Asian patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Oct 20 2008;[Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

blepharoplasty, invagination blepharoplasty, fold blepharoplasty, double-fold procedure in Asian patients, eye job, invagination techniques

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Gregory Caputy, MD, PhD, Chief, Department of Plastic Surgery, Aesthetica Plastic and Laser Surgery Center of Honolulu
Gregory Caputy, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, Canadian Medical Association, Hawaii Medical Association, International College of Surgeons, International College of Surgeons US Section, Pan-Pacific Surgical Association, and Wound Healing Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Bhupendra Patel, MD, FRCS, Professor of Ophthalmic Plastic and Facial Cosmetic Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine
Bhupendra Patel, MD, FRCS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons of England, and Royal Society of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Neil R Reisman, MD,  Chief of Plastic Surgery, St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital; Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine
Neil R Reisman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Lipoplasty Society of North America, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Residency Program Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics
Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, and Medical Association of the State of Alabama
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Lars M Vistnes, MD, FRCSC, FACS, Professor of Surgery, Emeritus, Stanford University Medical Center
Lars M Vistnes, MD, FRCSC, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.