eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Facial Augmentation
Facial Alloplastic Implants, Mandibular Angle: Workup
Updated: Nov 24, 2008
Workup
Imaging Studies
- Cephalometric radiography, using anterior and lateral projections, can be used in patient assessment. The anteroposterior (AP) cephalogram can be used to evaluate the frontal plane and to compare right- and left-sided structures. Further, skeletal and dental midlines can be evaluated. Submental vertex views can be used to assess the transverse plane and the morphology of the zygoma and body of the mandible.
- CT scans and MRI also are becoming popular in assessing maxillofacial abnormalities.
- With the imaging techniques available today, 3-D models can be created to determine the need for soft or hard tissue augmentation, rehearse the procedure, or even to serve as a template for the custom creation of facial implants.
- Preoperative photography from various angles is essential as well.
More on Facial Alloplastic Implants, Mandibular Angle |
| Overview: Facial Alloplastic Implants, Mandibular Angle |
Workup: Facial Alloplastic Implants, Mandibular Angle |
| Treatment: Facial Alloplastic Implants, Mandibular Angle |
| Follow-up: Facial Alloplastic Implants, Mandibular Angle |
| Multimedia: Facial Alloplastic Implants, Mandibular Angle |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Artz JS, Dinner MI. The use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as a permanent filler and enhancer: an early report of experience. Ann Plast Surg. May 1994;32(5):457-62. [Medline].
Maas CS, Gnepp DR, Bumpous J. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex soft-tissue patch) in facial augmentation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Sep 1993;119(9):1008-14. [Medline].
Ramirez OM. RZ mandibular matrix system. In: Instructional Guide. Porex Surgical Inc;1998:1-4. [Full Text].
Kent JN, Misiek DJ, Kinnebrew MC. Alloplastic materials for augmentation in cosmetic surgery. In: Principles of Maxillofacial Surgery. 1992:1769-813.
Aiache AE. Mandibular angle implants. In: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. WB Saunders Co;1992:349-354.
Bartlett SP, Wornom I 3rd, Whitaker LA. Evaluation of facial skeletal aesthetics and surgical planning. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 1991;18(1):1-9. [Medline].
Berghaus A, Mulch G, Handrock M. Porous polyethylene and proplast: their behavior in a bony implant bed. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1984;240(2):115-23. [Medline].
Bessette RW, Casey DM, Shatkin SS, Schaaf NG. Customized silicone rubber maxillofacial implants. Ann Plast Surg. Dec 1981;7(6):453-7. [Medline].
Eppley BL. Alloplastic implantation. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Mosby-Year Book; 1999:1762.
Eppley BL, Prevel CD, Sadove AM, Sarver D. Resorbable bone fixation: its potential role in cranio-maxillofacial trauma. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. 1996;2(1):56-60. [Medline].
Holmes RE, Wardrop RW, Wolford LM. Hydroxylapatite as a bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery: histologic and histometric findings. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Aug 1988;46(8):661-71. [Medline].
Kent JN. An important lesson about biomaterials in the TMJ. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Apr 1991;49(4):442-3. [Medline].
Kent JN, Craig MA. Secondary autogenous and alloplastic reshaping procedures for facial asymmetry. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. Mar 1996;4(1):83-105. [Medline].
Kent JN, Zide MF, Kay JF, Jarcho M. Hydroxylapatite blocks and particles as bone graft substitutes in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Aug 1986;44(8):597-605. [Medline].
Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. April 2005;32(4):279-86. [Medline].
Lacey M, Antonyshyn O. Use of porous high-density polyethylene implants in temporal contour reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. Apr 1993;4(2):74-8. [Medline].
Lassus C. Expanded PTFE in the treatment of facial wrinkles. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Spring 1991;15(2):167-74. [Medline].
Lin PH, Hirko MK, von Fraunhofer JA. Wound healing and inflammatory response to biomaterials. In: Wound Closure Biomaterials and Devices. New York: CRC Press; 1997.
Lo L, Wong F, Chen Y. The Position of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve at the Mandibular Angle:: An Anatomic Consideration for Aesthetic Mandibular Angle Reduction. Annals of Plastic Surgery. July 2004;53(1):50-55. [Medline].
Meyer RA. Restoring facial contour with implanted silicone rubber. J Oral Surg. 1967;24:598.
Ousterhout DK. Mandibular angle augmentation and reduction. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 1991;18(1):153-61. [Medline].
Park JB, Lakes RS. Polymeric implant materials. In: Biomaterials: An Introduction. 1992:141-167.
Romano JJ, Iliff NT, Manson PN. Use of Medpor porous polyethylene implants in 140 patients with facial fractures. J Craniofac Surg. Jul 1993;4(3):142-7. [Medline].
Rubin JP, Yaremchuk MJ. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1997;100(5):1336-53. [Medline].
Schoenrock LD, Reppucci AD. Correction of subcutaneous facial defects using Gore-Tex. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1994;2:373.
Silver FH, Maas CS. Biology of facial implant materials. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1994;2:241-254.
Terino EO. Implants for male aesthetic surgery. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1991;18(4):731-49. [Medline].
Valauri AJ. Maxillofacial prosthetics. In: McCarthy JG. Plastic Surgery. 5. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1990:3497-559.
Wellisz T. Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Fall 1993;17(4):339-44. [Medline].
Whitaker LA. Aesthetic contouring of the facial support system. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1989;16(4):815-23. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
facial alloplastic implants, mandibular implants, craniomaxillofacial reconstruction, facial proportions, facial asymmetry, cosmetic facial implants, aesthetic facial implants, mandible angle augmentation, facial topography, cephalometrics
Workup: Facial Alloplastic Implants, Mandibular Angle