Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Brachial Plexus Hand Surgery

  • Author: Alan Bienstock, MD; Chief Editor: Joseph A Molnar, MD, PhD, FACS  more...
 
Updated: Nov 11, 2013
 

Background

Obstetric brachial plexus palsy is a well known, challenging condition that afflicts 1% of births. The resulting deformity varies greatly in severity, and recovery is difficult to predict. Since the advent of microsurgical techniques and a trend for secondary reconstruction, studies have evolved to assess the surgical treatment of these injuries. Over the last 2 decades, several referral centers have blossomed to treat this complex problem in a multidisciplinary approach by using standardized treatment protocols.

Most obstetric injuries to the brachial plexus involve the upper trunk and cervical nerve roots C5 and C6. Shoulder function is commonly impaired. Secondary residual deformities, such as the internal rotation and adduction deformity of the upper extremity, arise from prolonged conservative management or failed surgical treatment. Several authors advocate early primary exploration and microsurgical repair because of improved long-term outcomes. A large variety of reconstructive modalities involving nerve grafting, plexus neurolysis, nerve transfers, tendon transfers, muscle releases, neurotizations, and free muscle transplantations have surfaced to treat the deficits. The objectives are to restore hand function, elbow flexion, and shoulder abduction.

Next

History of the Procedure

The renowned British obstetrician Smellie is attributed with providing the first medical description of obstetrica brachial plexus palsy. In his 1768 treatise on midwifery, he reported a case of transient bilateral arm paralysis in a newborn after difficult labor.

In 1861, Duchenne invented the term obstetric palsy of the brachial plexus after examining 4 infants with paralysis of identical muscles in the arm and shoulder. He described the physical findings and recognized that traction was the source.

In 1875, Erb studied brachial plexus injuries in adults. He concluded that palsies of the deltoid, biceps, and subscapularis are derived from a lesion at the level of C5 and C6. In the same year, Klumpke described lesions of C8 and thoracic nerve T1 in birth palsy and associated the Horner sign with lower-trunk lesions of the brachial plexus.

Kennedy presaged modern primary brachial plexus reconstruction with his attempts to resect proximal plexus neuromas and to perform primary suture repair in 1903. Fairbank identified the secondary muscle deformities, which evolve from long-standing paralysis and espoused muscle release to combat the characteristic features of internal rotation and adduction.

Because of Seddon's disappointing outcomes with nerve grafts to treat a traction injury, surgical treatment steered away from primary repair and toward muscle releases and transfers. The investigative work continued to focus on pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. However, the initial enthusiasm for surgical treatment of obstetric brachial plexus palsy was not applied until 1984. Gilbert and Tassin implemented modern technologic advances and began a new surgical era by reporting encouraging operative outcomes in 180 patients.[1] Because of their encouraging results with early surgical intervention, primary nerve repair for obstetrica brachial plexus palsy resurfaced. Narakas,[2] Terzis,[3] Kawabata,[4] Boome,[5] Alanen,[6] Slooff, Laurent,[7] and Clarke[8] later supported their conclusions.

Previous
Next

Problem

Obstetric brachial plexus injuries can be classified into 4 main categories: classic Erb or upper type, intermediate type, Klumpke or lower type, and total brachial plexus injury.

Most brachial plexus injuries are the classic Erb or upper type and occur at spinal nerves C5 and C6. A classic waiter's-tip arm position caused by a muscle imbalance holds the shoulder in an adducted, internally rotated position with the elbow in extension, the forearm in pronation, and the wrist and fingers in flexion because of variable weakness in the wrist and finger extensors.

In a proximal lesion, a winged scapula and weakness of the suprascapularis and infrascapularis muscles are apparent. If the lesion occurs distally and involves the upper trunk, the dorsal scapular and long thoracic nerves are spared, and function of the rhomboid and serratus anterior muscles is preserved. In addition, the upper-type lesion affects the function of the sternocostal portion of the pectoralis major muscle, which accounts for the appearance of forward flexion-contracture of the shoulder.

An upper type of obstetric brachial plexus palsy can be extensive and involve C7, resulting in an injury with the aforementioned findings in addition to slight flexion because of radial nerve involvement. This involvement causes weakness of the triceps and increases involvement of wrist extensors and finger extensors.

An intermediate lesion predominantly involves C7 with occasional involvement of C8 and T1. The affected arm is abducted, the elbow is flexed, and the wrist and fingers are flaccid.

The Klumpke or lower type of brachial plexus palsy is rare. Some authors even question its existence. In this type of injury, paralysis is confined to the hand, with an ipsilateral Horner syndrome if the injury is proximal.

Total brachial plexus palsy, the second most common type of injury, is characterized by complete arm paralysis, decreased sensation, and a pale extremity.

About 73% of cases manifest as injuries to the upper cervical roots, 25% are total plexus injuries, and 2% are isolated lower or Klumpke palsy.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

The rate of obstetric brachial plexus palsy is 1-3 cases per 1000 live births. This rate has remained unchanged since the beginning of this century. With the present birth rate, 4000 new cases of obstetrica brachial plexus palsy are estimated to occur each year in the United States.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy are gestational diabetes, forceps delivery, vacuum extraction, and shoulder dystocia.

Obstetric brachial plexus palsy is associated with shoulder dystocia, which most frequently occurs in infants with fetal macrosomia. The incidence is also higher in male individuals than in female individuals. The right side is affected more often than the left because the most common position of the descending fetus is the left occiput anterior position in which the mother's pubis compresses the baby's right shoulder.

Multiparous women are most likely to deliver a neonate with obstetric brachial plexus palsy than women who are nulliparous. Mothers who previously delivered large babies with brachial plexus palsy are predisposed to deliver future children with the palsy. Cesarean delivery should be considered for mothers with this history.

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Upper brachial plexus injuries most commonly occur in macrosomic infants during vaginal delivery in which shoulder dystocia results in excessive traction on C5 and C6 by forcibly separating the head and shoulder. Neonates in the breech orientation can also present with rupture. Because the last part extracted is often the baby's head, the C5-C7 roots can rupture, commonly in bilateral fashion.

The lower type of brachial plexus injury may occur during breech extraction in which forcible arm abduction places traction on the lower roots.

Total brachial plexus palsy usually occurs in difficult vertex or breech deliveries. The upper spinal nerves usually rupture, and the lower spinal nerves are avulsed, as signified by the Horner sign. In rare instances, the lower roots may be caught between the clavicle and the first rib; in these cases, the injury appears as a rupture instead of an avulsion.

Severe brachial plexus injuries are often associated with but not predicted because of clavicular fractures, which are the most common bony injuries in birth trauma, especially in the presence of shoulder dystocia. The stretch-injury mechanism of obstetric brachial plexus injury, as proposed above, applies to most cases. However, the injury is a result of excessive traction and not always preventable. The literature includes cases that occurred in uncomplicated vaginal deliveries, in cesarean deliveries, and in smaller-than-average birth weight infants. Authors have recently suggested that congenital brachial plexus palsy is a possible etiology; in this injury, abnormal intrauterine posture induces pressure neuropathy.

Previous
Next

Presentation

Clinical examination

Careful and detailed history taking and physical examination are imperative for diagnosing obstetric brachial plexus injuries.[9] These evaluations can be difficult in young patients and infants because of their inability to cooperate. The surgeon must acquire information about the pregnancy, neonatal period, and delivery as they pertain to gestational age, birth weight, presentation, type of and length of labor, use of forceps, shoulder dystocia or fractures, and Apgar scores, among other factors.

The treatment team must look at the patient's arm at rest and evaluate the chest and for abdominal excursion to ascertain if phrenic nerve injury is present. Fluoroscopy can be performed to evaluate a suspected injury. A Horner sign and/or absent paraspinal muscle activity signifies avulsion of a nerve root.

The surgical team should perform a detailed inspection and test the bulk, range of motion, and strength of all muscles on the patient's back, upper extremity, wrist, and hand (eg, trapezius, rhomboids, and latissimus dorsi muscles). Particular attention should be paid to shoulder abduction, adduction, and internal and external rotation. Contracture of the pectoralis major can be assessed by palpating the anterior axillary fold during external rotation. Likewise, subscapularis contracture can be assessed by palpating the posterior axillary fold during shoulder abduction. The physician should inspect the clavicle, ribs, and humerus to determine if the patient has any fractures or dislocations. If found, such injuries must be confirmed or ruled out by using radiographs.

Grading systems

The information garnered from the patient examination must be quantified and translated to reliable outcome measures to evaluate the postoperative results and to permit consistent comparison with results from other centers.

Several scales for grading muscle function are available, but none are ideal for universal application in evaluating infant motor function.

The British Medical Research Council (MRC) Motor Grading Scale was created to assess brachial plexus injuries in adults, but it has limited application in young children because of the lack of patient cooperation. Gilbert and Tassin modified the MRC scale to decrease the effect of the amount of strength used in the test.[1] However, this simplification also decreases the descriptive value of the results because 1 grade describes a widened range of motor function.

The best measurement of outcome is overall function, as assessed by evaluating joint range of motion rather than motor function of individual muscles. This method is described in the Mallet grading system.

Previous
Next

Indications

Most patients with obstetric brachial plexus palsy present with a flail arm at birth. The paralysis frequently regresses, and recovery may be complete. The percentage of patients who undergo spontaneous recuperation is somewhat controversial. The discrepancies are likely attributable to inconstant study designs. Reported recovery rates vary in the range of 10-92%.

If the nerve injury is limited to neurapraxia or axonotmesis, recovery begins within a few days and is completed by the time the infant is aged 3 months. However, if the injury is relatively severe, such as in neurotmesis or avulsion, this period may be prolonged and the recovery incomplete or absent. In patients with such injuries, muscular imbalance causes abnormal stresses, and progressive joint contractures and bony deformities develop.

Because early surgical intervention optimizes functional outcome in patients who do not spontaneously recover, a reliable marker is needed to identify these patients. In the ideal case, early prediction of whether surgical intervention will be required with good sensitivity (to not miss patients who require surgery) and good specificity (to avoid unnecessary surgery) are possible. Gilbert and Tassin used biceps muscle function at age 3 months to predict recovery in their surgical decision making.[1] They assume that if deltoid and biceps function is not started by 3 months, ultimate function is likely to be poor.

A 1994 study demonstrated that use of elbow flexion as a criterion resulted in the incorrect prediction of recovery in 12.8% of patients.[10] Combining 2 or more parameters as determinants of recovery was most reliable. Adding an assessment of finger extension to elbow flexion reduced the error rate to 5.2%. Therefore, evaluation has shifted toward multiple muscle groups from a single muscle to determine the timing for surgery.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

Formation of the brachial plexus begins in early development in the fourth week of gestation. Because the sclerotome directs axonal growth, nerve formation follows the dorsal rotation of the upper limb bud. Axons from the ventral column motor cells start to grow toward the sclerotome cell mass, forming the ventral root. The dorsal root similarly forms by axons growing in the opposite direction from the dorsal root ganglion cells. As a consequence, the anterior divisions of the brachial plexus are destined to innervate the ventral muscles, and the posterior divisions innervate the dorsal or extensor muscles.

Anterior and posterior nerve roots emerge from the spinal cord and converge to form spinal nerves C5, C6, C7, C8, and T1 of the brachial plexus. If C4 makes a substantive contribution to C5, the brachial plexus is termed prefixed. If T2 makes a substantive contribution to T1, the plexus is termed postfixed. C5 innervates the deltoid, C6 innervates the biceps, C7 innervates the triceps, and C8 and T1 innervate the hand musculature.

The nerve roots are encased by an endoneurial sheath, then by the dura, followed by a layer of epidural tissue. The endoneurial sheath and dura become the perineurium, and the epidural tissue forms the epineurium of the spinal nerves as they emerge from the intervertebral foramina. These layers serve to provide strength, elasticity, and integrity to the spinal nerve, rendering nerve roots more susceptible to injury than spinal nerves.

The roots of nerves C5 and C6 are anchored to the transverse processes by a dense fibrous sheath, which protect them from avulsion. However, these roots are still prone to rupture. The incidence of avulsion injuries of the lower nerve roots is increased because these roots do not contain ligamentous attachments, a lack which makes them anatomically vulnerable.

The extent of injury to a nerve is inversely proportional to its length. The length of a nerve root increases in a caudal direction, where the upper nerve roots are most susceptible to injury.

Disruption or injury to the nerve root can be classified as supraganglionic or infraganglionic lesions in terms of the dorsal root ganglion. In both types of lesions, the motor and sensory functions are completely lost. In supraganglionic lesions, sensory conduction studies are normal because the disruption occurs proximal to the sensory neuron bodies and because Wallerian degeneration does not occur. The spinal nerves receive gray rami communicantes; the first 4 are from the superior cervical ganglion, the fifth and sixth are from the middle cervical ganglion, the seventh and eighth are from the inferior cervical ganglion, and the thoracic nerves are from the corresponding ganglia. White rami communicantes are preganglionic sympathetic fibers from the spinal cord at T1-T5 that ascend to form the cervical ganglia.

Horner syndrome occurs as a result of disruption of the communicating branch that supplies the sympathetics to the stellate ganglion. Ciliary nerve dysfunction manifests as weakness of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle (ptosis), dilator pupillae muscle (myosis), Müeller muscle (enophthalmos), and decreased sweat secretion (anhydrosis). This usually signifies an avulsion of T1 because the preganglionic sympathetic fibers leave the spinal nerve soon after it appears from the intervertebral foramen.

Spinal nerves divide to provide the posterior rami, which supply the paraspinal muscles, and the ventral rami, which proceed to form the brachial plexus. Therefore, denervation of the cervical erector spinae muscles also indicates a proximal, preganglionic injury. The nerves of the brachial plexus are located in a triangular area of the neck and travel to the axilla. This triangle is demarcated by the posterior edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, the anterior border of the trapezius muscle, and the clavicle; the omohyoid muscle bisects this triangle. Its upper portion contains the upper and middle trunks along with the scalene muscles, and its lower portion contains the lower trunk and subclavian vessels.

The narrow posterior scalene space, between the anterior and middle scalene muscles, marks the branching of the upper and middle trunks into posterior and anterior divisions. The lower trunk separates into the posterior and anterior divisions as it travels between the anterior and middle scalene muscles, posterior to the first rib and subclavian artery. As they descend below the clavicle, the 3 posterior divisions unite to form the posterior cord, the upper 2 anterior divisions form the lateral cord, and the lower anterior division continues as the medial cord; these structures are named after their respective locations around the subclavian artery. The cords then divide into terminal branches, forming the intricate framework of the brachial plexus.

The medial and lateral sural cutaneous nerves join to form the sural nerve proper, which runs posteriorly between the heads of the gastrocnemius muscle to innervate the dorsolateral aspect of the calf and foot.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

After approximately 18 months of denervation, the muscle atrophies, and reinnervation is not possible because the motor endplate is absent. At this point, only tendon reconstruction or free muscle transfers are indicated.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Alan Bienstock, MD Consulting Staff, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, St Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital

Alan Bienstock, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

John Y S Kim, MD, MA Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation; Consulting Staff, Northwestern Plastic Surgery

John Y S Kim, MD, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Received grant/research funds from Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation for principal investigator.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

David W Chang, MD, FACS Associate Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas Medical School at Houston

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Joseph A Molnar, MD, PhD, FACS Medical Director, Wound Care Center, Associate Director of Burn Unit, Professor, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Joseph A Molnar, MD, PhD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, North Carolina Medical Society, Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Peripheral Nerve Society, Wound Healing Society, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Received grant/research funds from Clinical Cell Culture for co-investigator; Received honoraria from Integra Life Sciences for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from Healogics for board membership; Received honoraria from Anika Therapeutics for consulting; Received honoraria from Food Matters for consulting.

Acknowledgements

Milton B Armstrong, MD, FACS Associate Professor of Clinical Surgery, Associate Professor of Clinical Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Leonard M Miller School of Medicine

Milton B Armstrong, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Hand Surgery, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and National Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Gilbert A, Tassin JL. Surgical repair of the brachial plexus in obstetric paralysis [in French]. Chirurgie. 1984. 110(1):70-5. [Medline].

  2. Narakas AO. Lesions found when operating traction injuries of the brachial plexus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1993. 95 Suppl:S56-64. [Medline].

  3. Terzis JK, Liberson WT, Levine R. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Hand Clin. 1986 Nov. 2(4):773-86. [Medline].

  4. Kawabata H, Masada K, Tsuyuguchi Y, et al. Early microsurgical reconstruction in birth palsy. Clin Orthop. 1987 Feb. (215):233-42. [Medline].

  5. Boome RS, Kaye JC. Obstetric traction injuries of the brachial plexus. Natural history, indications for surgical repair and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Aug. 70(4):571-6. [Medline].

  6. Alanen M, Halonen JP, Katevuo K, Vilkki P. Early surgical exploration and epineural repair in birth brachial palsy. Z Kinderchir. 1986 Dec. 41(6):335-7. [Medline].

  7. Laurent JP, Lee R, Shenaq S, et al. Neurosurgical correction of upper brachial plexus birth injuries. J Neurosurg. 1993 Aug. 79(2):197-203. [Medline].

  8. Clarke HM, Curtis CG. An approach to obstetrical brachial plexus injuries. Hand Clin. 1995 Nov. 11(4):563-80; discussion 580-1. [Medline].

  9. Limthongthang R, Bachoura A, Songcharoen P, Osterman AL. Adult brachial plexus injury: evaluation and management. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013 Oct. 44(4):591-603. [Medline].

  10. Michelow BJ, Clarke HM, Curtis CG, et al. The natural history of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Apr. 93(4):675-80; discussion 681. [Medline].

  11. Terzis JK, Vekris MD, Soucacos PN. Outcomes of brachial plexus reconstruction in 204 patients with devastating paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Oct. 104(5):1221-40. [Medline].

  12. Gao KM, Lao J, Zhao X, Gu YD. Outcome of contralateral C7 nerve transferring to median nerve. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Oct. 126(20):3865-8. [Medline].

  13. Leechavengvongs S, Ngamlamiat K, Malungpaishrope K, Uerpairotkit C, Witoonchart K, Kulkittiya S. End-to-Side Radial Sensory to Median Nerve Transfer to Restore Sensation and Relieve Pain in C5 and C6 Nerve Root Avulsion. J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Feb. 36(2):209-15. [Medline].

  14. Soldado F, Bertelli J. Free gracilis transfer reinnervated by the nerve to the supinator for the reconstruction of finger and thumb extension in longstanding C7-T1 brachial plexus root avulsion. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 May. 38(5):941-6. [Medline].

  15. Brown KL. Review of obstetrical palsies. Nonoperative treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1984 Jan. 11(1):181-7. [Medline].

  16. Chuang DC, Ma HS, Borud LJ, Chen HC. Surgical strategy for improving forearm and hand function in late obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 May. 109(6):1934-46. [Medline].

  17. Chuang DC, Mardini S, Ma HS. Surgical strategy for infant obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: experiences at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Jul. 116(1):132-42; discussion 143-4. [Medline].

  18. Clarke HM, Al-Qattan MM, Curtis CG, Zuker RM. Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: results following neurolysis of conducting neuromas-in-continuity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Apr. 97(5):974-82; discussion 983-4. [Medline].

  19. Gilbert A. Long-term evaluation of brachial plexus surgery in obstetrical palsy. Hand Clin. 1995 Nov. 11(4):583-94; discussion 594-5. [Medline].

  20. Greenwald AG, Schute PC, Shiveley JL. Brachial plexus birth palsy: a 10-year report on the incidence and prognosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984 Nov. 4(6):689-92. [Medline].

  21. Liverneaux PA, Diaz LC, Beaulieu JY, et al. Preliminary results of double nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion in upper type brachial plexus palsies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Mar. 117(3):915-9. [Medline].

  22. Malessy MJ, Thomeer RT, Marani E. The dorsoscapular nerve in traumatic brachial plexus lesions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1993. 95 Suppl:S17-23. [Medline].

  23. Mallet J. Obstetrical paralysis of the brachial plexus. II. Therapeutics. Treatment of sequelae. Must transplants be performed? [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1972. 58:Suppl 1:186. [Medline].

  24. Metaizeau JP, Prevot J, Lascombes P. Obstetrical paralysis. Spontaneous development and results of early microsurgical treatment [in French]. Ann Pediatr (Paris). 1984 Feb. 31(2):93-102. [Medline].

  25. Panasci DJ, Holliday RA, Shpizner B. Advanced imaging techniques of the brachial plexus. Hand Clin. 1995 Nov. 11(4):545-53. [Medline].

  26. Sever JW. Obstetric paralysis: its etiology, pathology, clinical aspects and treatment, with a report of four hundred cases. Am J Dis Child. 1916. 12(6):541-78.

  27. Shenaq SM, Kim JY, Armenta AH, et al. The Surgical Treatment of Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 14. 113(4):54E-67E. [Medline].

  28. Sunderland S. Mechanisms of cervical nerve root avulsion in injuries of the neck and shoulder. J Neurosurg. 1974 Dec. 41(6):705-14. [Medline].

  29. Zhao X, Lao J, Hung LK, et al. Selective neurotization of the median nerve in the arm to treat brachial plexus palsy. An anatomic study and case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Apr. 86-A(4):736-42. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Table. Surgical Treatments and Secondary Procedures
Condition or Deficit Surgical Treatment and Secondary Procedures
Internal rotation, shoulder adduction Muscle releases: subscapularis, pectoralis major and minor



Muscle transfers to the teres minor: latissimus dorsi, teres major



Neurolysis and decompression of the axillary nerve



Poor elbow extension Nerve exploration and neuroplasty of the radial nerve with or without tendon transfers
Poor extension of the wrist and digits Muscle transfers
  • Pronator teres to the extensor carpi radialis brevis
  • Flexor carpi radialis to the extensor digitorum communis
  • Palmaris longus to the extensor pollicis longus
Poor extension of the wrist and fingers if flexors are weak Musculocutaneous nerve transfer



Placation or tenodesis of the extensor digitorum communis



Wrist fusion and tendon transfers



Free muscle transfer



Poor elbow flexion, poor supination Exploration and neuroplasty of the radial and musculocutaneous nerves with or without nerve transfers



Oberlin technique



Double nerve transfer



Fascicular transfers



  • Ulnar nerve to the biceps
  • Median nerve to the brachialis
Elbow flexion contracture Lengthening of the biceps if serial casting is unsuccessful
Poor flexion of the wrist and fingers Nerve exploration and neuroplasty of the median and order nerves



Once muscle transfer



Forearm supination contracture Rerouting of the biceps



Rerouting of the supinator



Forearm pronation contracture Rerouting of the pronator teres
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.