Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.


Vascular Hand Injury Treatment & Management

  • Author: Zubin J Panthaki, MD, CM, FACS, FRCSC; Chief Editor: Joseph A Molnar, MD, PhD, FACS  more...
Updated: Apr 09, 2015

Medical Therapy

Conservative, nonsurgical management of arteriographically detected, nonocclusive, and asymptomatic arterial injuries in the upper extremity remains controversial. Injuries such as intimal flaps, vessel narrowing, small false aneurysms, and arteriovenous fistulae in which the artery and its runoff remain intact may be amenable to observation alone. Frykberg and colleagues reported an 89% rate of resolution or stability of minimal injuries without surgical treatment over 10 years.[35]


Surgical Therapy

Initial evaluation and management

Initial evaluation and management of upper extremity vascular injuries follow the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines established by the American College of Surgeons. The management of life-threatening injuries always takes precedence over the management of limb-threatening injuries.

Repair of peripheral vascular injuries

Repair of peripheral vascular injuries remains a challenging task. The operative sequence consists of access, exposure, control, and repair. Temporary vascular control can usually be accomplished with the application of digital pressure or a blood pressure cuff. An attempt to blindly clamp a bleeding vessel is not recommended because of the hazard of injuring peripheral structures such as nerves. For the upper extremity, the patient should be positioned supine with the arm extended and abducted 90°. A contralateral unaffected limb should always be included in the surgical field in the event that an autogenous vein graft is necessary. Incisions in the extremities are designed longitudinally over the injured vessel and are extended proximally and distally as necessary. If initial repair of associated nerve and tendon injuries is not feasible, they should be tagged with sutures or surgical clips for later repair.

Gaining access and exposure without causing iatrogenic injury is a fundamental goal of the operative procedure. The axillary artery is approached through an infraclavicular incision that extends to the deltopectoral groove. Proximal supraclavicular control is sometimes necessary, but resection of the middle third of the clavicle adds little benefit. Endovascular control may be possible when active extravasation is identified during arteriography.

The proximal brachial artery is approached through a medial incision in the upper arm at the groove between the biceps and the triceps. The distal brachial artery and its bifurcation are exposed at the antecubital fossa beneath the biceps tendon through an S-shaped incision.

Distal forearm vessels can be exposed with longitudinal incisions over the course of the artery. Controversy exists with regard to repair of the radial and ulnar artery in the forearm, especially at the level of the wrist. Common sense would dictate that repair of an injured radial or ulnar artery is mandatory if the palmar arch is incomplete or if the ulnar or radial vessel was previously interrupted. However, in a traumatic setting, assessment of the patency or communication of the palmar arches may not be possible.

Review of the literature would suggest that ligation of an isolated radial or ulnar artery is appropriate. Though Rothkopf et al demonstrated an 82% patency rate after repair of single vessels,[36] multiple other studies demonstrate overall patency rates of single vessel repairs at 46-48%.[37, 38] Johnson et al go further to point out that claudication did not result in any of their patients treated with ligation, though hand weakness and cold insensitivity were noted in 50% and 12%, respectively of those patients who had concomitant nerve injury. These results would suggest that ligation of a single vessel injury at the level of the distal forearm and wrist is appropriate in most situations. When both are injured, the ulnar artery repair takes precedence due to role as the dominant arterial supply to the hand.

Proximal and distal control should be obtained before the injury is exposed. An intraluminal Foley balloon catheter is a useful adjunct, especially in injuries to the proximal axillary artery. After the artery is exposed and controlled, areas of contusion, subintimal hematoma, and devitalized segments of the vessel are debrided. Gentle thrombectomy with a Fogarty catheter and flushing with heparinized saline solution, proximal and distal in the vessel lumina, are performed subsequently. Systemic anticoagulation is rarely used in acute trauma. Overinflation of the Fogarty balloon should be avoided because this can potentially tear the intima, resulting in thrombosis of the affected vessel. Topical lidocaine or papaverine is useful to relieve spasm, especially in the small vessels of the distal forearm and hand.

Temporary intraluminal shunting with restoration of distal perfusion may also be of great value if associated unstable fractures are present, as it prevents prolonged distal ischemia of the extremity during fixation prior to definitive vascular repair.

The type of vascular repair depends on the extent of arterial damage. Primary repair with an end-to-end anastomosis is performed with a running or interrupted nonabsorbable monofilament suture, depending on the size of the vessel. A meticulous surgical technique must be used to avoid a purse-string effect. If a large gap prevents tension-free repair, reversed saphenous or cephalic-vein autogenous interposition grafts must be used for reconstruction. Although polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts have been used successfully in trauma, synthetic conduits should be avoided if possible because they increase the risk for infection and for an inferior patency rate, especially in small vessels. Feliciano and colleagues reported an increased rate of thrombosis with small-bore PTFE grafts.[39]

All repairs must be covered with viable soft tissue, and external compression of the vascular repair must be avoided. Intraoperative completion arteriography must be performed, and palpable distal pulses should be documented after repair. Venous injury to the upper extremity rarely requires repair because the collateral network is extensive. Ligation of the venous injury is typically well tolerated.

Endovascular treatment

Since 1991, an increasing variety of vascular injuries are proving amenable to endovascular treatment. Endovascular procedures are effective and decrease morbidity. They are attractive alternatives to standard surgical techniques, which require wide exposure and dissection, especially in proximal injuries. Transcatheter embolization with coils can be used to manage selected arterial injuries, such as low-flow arteriovenous fistulas and active bleeding from noncritical arteries. Endoluminal repair of false aneurysms, large arteriovenous fistulas, intimal flaps, and focal lacerations, has been performed using stent-graft technology. Castelli and colleagues reported a 100% immediate success rate in managing 9 axillosubclavian arterial injuries.[40] However, careful patient selection must be emphasized.[41] Studies monitoring the long-term patency of these stent-grafts are still needed.

Management of compartment syndrome

Although the incidence of compartment syndrome is lower in the upper extremity than in the lower extremity, fasciotomy should be considered with any arterial repair.[1] The clinical manifestation of reperfusion injury and increased fascial compartment pressure must be identified promptly and treated aggressively. Compartment syndrome is caused by increased pressure in the fascial compartment that results in muscle and nerve ischemia.[2] Early physical findings and symptoms suggestive of compartment syndrome include extreme pain that is disproportionate to the level of injury and increased pain with passive movement of the affected compartmental muscles. Other suggestive though less reliable signs and symptoms of compartment syndrome include paralysis, paresthesia, pallor, swollen compartments, and decreased sensation.

Pulselessness of the extremity is a late and unreliable sign of compartment syndrome, as pulses are commonly present during the early stages of compartment syndrome. Normal tissue pressure is generally agreed to be less than 10 mm Hg. Many authors recommend fasciotomies when the tissue pressure is 10-30 mm Hg less than the diastolic blood pressure. When borderline tissue pressure measurements exist, serial examinations should be conducted at one-hour intervals. Repeat examinations should be conducted by the same examiner in an effort to maintain consistency of the readings. If tissue pressure 10-30 mm Hg less than the diastolic pressure occurs, then fasciotomy should be performed.[42]

The upper extremity includes the compartments of the arm, forearm, and hand. The arm has 2 compartments: anterior and posterior. The forearm contains 3 compartments: the volar, dorsal, and mobile wad compartments. The hand contains 4 compartments: the central, thenar, hypothenar, and interossei compartments.

Straight lateral and medial incisions are used to decompress the anterior and posterior arm compartments, respectively. Dorsal and volar incisions are used in the forearm. The dorsal incision should be straight, whereas the volar incision should follow a lazy S-shape to avoid scar contracture. The incision may extend over the midproximal wrist to decompress the carpal tunnel at the same time. Five incisions are typically used to decompress the hand: 2 incisions placed on the dorsum of the hand over the 2nd and 4th metacarpals, 1 volar incision over the carpal tunnel, and 2 volar incisions, one each on the thenar and hypothenar eminences, respectively.



Occlusion and bleeding from thrombosis are common early complications in the postoperative period. These complications necessitate an immediate reoperation.

Muscle edema that increases compartmental pressure is another complication of vascular injury; pain is the most important symptom. Decompression of the fascial compartments (fasciotomy) is performed to treat this process (see image below).

Decompression of fascial compartments (fasciotomy) Decompression of fascial compartments (fasciotomy).

Nerve injury that causes motor or sensory deficits is another complication that may lead to limb disability. Tissue death and necrosis are complications of prolonged vascular compromise and limb ischemia (see image below).

Prolonged limb ischemia resulting in tissue necros Prolonged limb ischemia resulting in tissue necrosis.

Amputation of the necrotic part is usually the method of treatment (see image below).

Amputation of a hand because of tissue necrosis. Amputation of a hand because of tissue necrosis.

Another serious complication of vascular injury is infection, which requires immediate debridement and antibiotic treatment. Late complications of arterial injury include arteriovenous fistulas and false aneurysms. These complications are usually managed with operative repair.


Outcome and Prognosis

The prognosis of patients with upper extremity vascular injury is typically good but depends on early and aggressive diagnosis and repair of the injured vessels in a timely, tension-free manner. Vigilant monitoring for compartment syndrome with early fasciotomies can prevent long-term disability and promote full functional recovery. Long term follow-up studies in children who underwent vascular reconstructions of the upper extremity showed similar-sized limbs and blood supply.[43] However, they did have a high incidence of asymptomatic enlargement of the reconstructed arteries.[43] Lastly, many of these patients with arterial reconstruction of the upper extremity can suffer from cold intolerance long term, which can be problematic.[44]

In a study of the long-term results of vascular reconstruction in patients with hypothenar hammer syndrome, Endress et al found that 14 out of 18 grafts (78%) were occluded after a mean postoperative period of 118 months. The study involved 16 patients, in whom a total of 18 vein graft reconstructions of the ulnar artery were performed. Although patients with a patent reconstruction had significantly better outcomes with regard to cold intolerance and pain severity than did the other patients, patient scores associated with patent or occluded grafts did not differ statistically on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire.[45]

A study by Wegmann et al suggested that in cases of vascular compromise caused by supracondylar humeral fracture, patients who, after fracture reduction, have a pulseless hand with good capillary refill time may benefit from a strategy of “watchful waiting” rather than vascular surgery. The study included 14 pediatric patients who remained without peripheral pulse following fracture reduction. Although four of the patients (three of whom had prolonged peripheral capillary refill times) underwent vascular surgery, watchful waiting was used in the remaining 10 patients, with blood flow having recovered in all 10 of them by 2- to 6-year follow-up.[46]


Future and Controversies

Treatment of upper extremity vascular injuries has evolved over the past 200 years from mandatory amputation to complex procedures that allow the reconstruction and revascularization of the injured extremity. Functional recovery from devastating vascular injuries of the upper extremity is the norm rather than the exception today. Despite this, technological advances continue to be made that will allow modern surgeons to improve patient outcomes in regards to vascular injuries of the upper extremity. Drug-eluting stents to prevent vessel thrombosis, pharmacologic treatments to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury and implantable continuous monitoring devices to detect flow abnormalities are a few of the technological advances under investigation and research at this time.

Perhaps, one or all of these advances will allow surgeons to treat upper extremity vascular injuries with decreased morbidity and improved functional outcome. Until then, rapid diagnosis, prompt treatment, and hypervigilant monitoring for compartment syndrome will remain the standard of care for these potentially devastating injuries.

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Zubin J Panthaki, MD, CM, FACS, FRCSC Professor of Clinical Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Associate Professor Clinical Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics, University of Miami, Leonard M Miller School of Medicine; Chief of Hand Surgery, University of Miami Hospital; Chief of Hand Surgery, Chief of Plastic Surgery, Miami Veterans Affairs Hospital

Zubin J Panthaki, MD, CM, FACS, FRCSC is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons, Miami Society of Plastic Surgeons, Medical Council of Canada, Canadian Military Engineers Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


Charles R Volpe, MD Fellow, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Charles R Volpe, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ali M Soltani, MD Attending Surgeon, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hand and Microsurgery, Kaiser Permanente Orange County

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

David W Chang, MD, FACS Associate Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas Medical School at Houston

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Joseph A Molnar, MD, PhD, FACS Medical Director, Wound Care Center, Associate Director of Burn Unit, Professor, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Joseph A Molnar, MD, PhD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, North Carolina Medical Society, Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Peripheral Nerve Society, Wound Healing Society, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Received grant/research funds from Clinical Cell Culture for co-investigator; Received honoraria from Integra Life Sciences for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from Healogics for board membership; Received honoraria from Anika Therapeutics for consulting; Received honoraria from Food Matters for consulting.

Additional Contributors

Anthony E Sudekum, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Plastic Surgery, St John's Mercy Health Center of St Louis

Anthony E Sudekum, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Missouri State Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors Nadeem Chaudhry, MD, FACS, Khaled F Salhab, MD, and Ian C Marrero, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

  1. Fields CE, Latifi R, Ivatury RR. Brachial and forearm vessel injuries. Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Feb. 82(1):105-14. [Medline].

  2. Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG. Vascular trauma and compartment syndromes. Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Feb. 82(1):125-41, xxi. [Medline].

  3. Friedman SG. Early vascular repairs and anastomoses. A History of Vascular Surgery. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell-Futura; 2005. 14-30.

  4. Layton TR. Stonewall Jackson's wounds. J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Nov. 183(5):514-24. [Medline].

  5. Rich NM, Spencer FC. Brachial artery injuries. Rich NM, Spencer FC. Vascular Trauma. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1978. 348-68.

  6. Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Burch J, Beall AC Jr, Jordan GL Jr, De Bakey ME. Five thousand seven hundred sixty cardiovascular injuries in 4459 patients. Epidemiologic evolution 1958 to 1987. Ann Surg. 1989 Jun. 209(6):698-705; discussion 706-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  7. Prichayudh S, Verananvattna A, Sriussadaporn S, Sriussadaporn S, Kritayakirana K, Pak-art R, et al. Management of upper extremity vascular injury: outcome related to the Mangled Extremity Severity Score. World J Surg. 2009 Apr. 33(4):857-63. [Medline].

  8. Clouse WD, Rasmussen TE, Perlstein J, Sutherland MJ, Peck MA, Eliason JL, et al. Upper extremity vascular injury: a current in-theater wartime report from Operation Iraqi Freedom. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006 Jul. 20(4):429-34. [Medline].

  9. White JM, Stannard A, Burkhardt GE, Eastridge BJ, Blackbourne LH, Rasmussen TE. The epidemiology of vascular injury in the wars in iraq and afghanistan. Ann Surg. 2011 Jun. 253(6):1184-9. [Medline].

  10. Klocker J, Falkensammer J, Pellegrini L, Biebl M, Tauscher T, Fraedrich G. Repair of arterial injury after blunt trauma in the upper extremity - immediate and long-term outcome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Feb. 39(2):160-4. [Medline].

  11. Bongard F, Dubrow T, Klein S. Vascular injuries in the urban battleground: experience at a metropolitan trauma center. Ann Vasc Surg. 1990 Sep. 4(5):415-8. [Medline].

  12. van der Sluis CK, Kucey DS, Brenneman FD, Hunter GA, Maggisano R, ten Duis HJ. Long-term outcomes after upper limb arterial injuries. Can J Surg. 1997 Aug. 40(4):265-70. [Medline].

  13. Joshi V, Harding GE, Bottoni DA, Lovell MB, Forbes TL. Determination of functional outcome following upper extremity arterial trauma. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2007 Apr-May. 41(2):111-4. [Medline].

  14. Dragas M, Davidovic L, Kostic D, Markovic M, Pejkic S, Ille T, et al. Upper extremity arterial injuries: factors influencing treatment outcome. Injury. 2009 Aug. 40(8):815-9. [Medline].

  15. Jackson MR. Upper extremity arterial injuries in athletes. Semin Vasc Surg. 2003 Sep. 16(3):232-9. [Medline].

  16. Smith HE, Dirks M, Patterson RB. Hypothenar hammer syndrome: Distal ulnar artery reconstruction with autologous inferior epigastric artery. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Dec. 40(6):1238-42. [Medline].

  17. Bravman JT, Ipaktchi K, Biffl WL, Stahel PF. Vascular injuries after minor blunt upper extremity trauma: pitfalls in the recognition and diagnosis of potential "near miss" injuries. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2008 Nov 25. 16(1):16. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  18. Ejrup B, Fischer B, Wright IS. Clinical evaluation of blood flow to the hand. The false-positive Allen test. Circulation. 1966 May. 33(5):778-80. [Medline].

  19. Greenhow DE. Incorrect performance of Allen’s test-ulnar artery flow erroneously presumed inadequate. Anesthesiology. 1972. 37:356-7.

  20. Benit E, Vranckx P, Jaspers L, Jackmaert R, Poelmans C, Coninx R. Frequency of a positive modified Allen's test in 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996 Aug. 38(4):352-4. [Medline].

  21. Jarvis MA, Jarvis CL, Jones PR, Spyt TJ. Reliability of Allen's test in selection of patients for radial artery harvest. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Oct. 70(4):1362-5. [Medline].

  22. Glavin RJ, Jones HM. Assessing collateral circulation in the hand--four methods compared. Anaesthesia. 1989 Jul. 44(7):594-5. [Medline].

  23. Barbeau GR, Arsenault FA, et al. Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparision with the Allen’s test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J. 2004. 147:489-93.

  24. Lawson D, Norley I, Korbon G, Loeb R, Ellis J. Blood flow limits and pulse oximeter signal detection. Anesthesiology. 1987 Oct. 67(4):599-603. [Medline].

  25. Fuhrman TM, Reilley TE, Pippin ED. Comparision of digital blood pressure, plethysmography, and the modified Allen’s test as means of evaluating the collateral circulation to the hand. Anaesthesia. 1992. 47:959-61.

  26. Johansen K, Lynch K, Paun M, Copass M. Non-invasive vascular tests reliably exclude occult arterial trauma in injured extremities. J Trauma. 1991 Apr. 31(4):515-9; discussion 519-22. [Medline].

  27. Busquéts AR, Acosta JA, Colón E, Alejandro KV, Rodríguez P. Helical computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of traumatic arterial injuries of the extremities. J Trauma. 2004 Mar. 56(3):625-8. [Medline].

  28. Meissner M, Paun M, Johansen K. Duplex scanning for arterial trauma. Am J Surg. 1991 May. 161(5):552-5. [Medline].

  29. Fry WR, Smith RS, Sayers DV, Henderson VJ, Morabito DJ, Tsoi EK, et al. The success of duplex ultrasonographic scanning in diagnosis of extremity vascular proximity trauma. Arch Surg. 1993 Dec. 128(12):1368-72. [Medline].

  30. Mollberg NM, Wise SR, Banipal S, Sullivan R, Holevar M, Vafa A, et al. Color-Flow Duplex Screening for Upper Extremity Proximity Injuries: A Low-Yield Strategy for Therapeutic Intervention. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb 11. [Medline].

  31. Seamon MJ, Smoger D, Torres DM, Pathak AS, Gaughan JP, Santora TA, et al. A prospective validation of a current practice: the detection of extremity vascular injury with CT angiography. J Trauma. 2009 Aug. 67(2):238-43; discussion 243-4. [Medline].

  32. Peng PD, Spain DA, Tataria M, Hellinger JC, Rubin GD, Brundage SI. CT angiography effectively evaluates extremity vascular trauma. Am Surg. 2008 Feb. 74(2):103-7. [Medline].

  33. Soto JA, Múnera F, Morales C, Lopera JE, Holguín D, Guarín O, et al. Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis. Radiology. 2001 Jan. 218(1):188-94. [Medline].

  34. Bogdan MA, Klein MB, Rubin GD, McAdams TR, Chang J. CT angiography in complex upper extremity reconstruction. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2004 Oct. 29(5):465-9. [Medline].

  35. Frykberg ER, Crump JM, Dennis JW, Vines FS, Alexander RH. Nonoperative observation of clinically occult arterial injuries: a prospective evaluation. Surgery. 1991 Jan. 109(1):85-96. [Medline].

  36. Rothkopf DM, Chu B, et al. Radial and ulnar artery repairs: assessing patency rates with color Doppler ultrasonographic imaging. J Hand Surg. 1993. 18A:626-8.

  37. Gelberman RH, Nunley JA, et al. The results of radial and ulnar arterial repair in the forearm. Experience in three medical centers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982. 64:383-87.

  38. Johnson M, Ford M, Johansen K. Radial or ulnar artery laceration. Repair or ligate?. Arch Surg. 1993 Sep. 128(9):971-4; discussion 974-5. [Medline].

  39. Feliciano DV, Mattox KL, Graham JM, Bitondo CG. Five-year experience with PTFE grafts in vascular wounds. J Trauma. 1985 Jan. 25(1):71-82. [Medline].

  40. Castelli P, Caronno R, Piffaretti G, Tozzi M, Laganà D, Carrafiello G, et al. Endovascular repair of traumatic injuries of the subclavian and axillary arteries. Injury. 2005 Jun. 36(6):778-82. [Medline].

  41. Danetz JS, Cassano AD, Stoner MC, Ivatury RR, Levy MM. Feasibility of endovascular repair in penetrating axillosubclavian injuries: a retrospective review. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Feb. 41(2):246-54. [Medline].

  42. Raskin KB. Acute vascular injuries of the upper extremity. Hand Clin. 1993 Feb. 9(1):115-30. [Medline].

  43. Konstantiniuk P, Fritz G, Ott T, Weiglhofer U, Schweiger S, Cohnert T. Long-term follow-up of vascular reconstructions after supracondylar humerus fracture with vascular lesion in childhood. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Nov. 42(5):684-8. [Medline].

  44. Klocker J, Peter T, Pellegrini L, Mattesich M, Loescher W, Sieb M, et al. Incidence and predisposing factors of cold intolerance after arterial repair in upper extremity injuries. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug. 56(2):410-4. [Medline].

  45. Endress RD, Johnson CH, Bishop AT, et al. Hypothenar hammer syndrome: long-term results of vascular reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Apr. 40(4):660-665.e2. [Medline].

  46. Wegmann H, Eberl R, Kraus T, et al. The impact of arterial vessel injuries associated with pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Aug. 77(2):381-5. [Medline].

  47. Gulgonen A. Compartment syndrome. Greens Operative Hand Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier; 2005.

  48. Rich NM. Historical and military aspects of vascular trauma. Vascular Trauma. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier Science; 2004.

  49. Rowe VL, Yellin AE, Weaver FA. Vascular injuries of the extremities. Rutherford: Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders; 2005.

  50. Shanmugam V, Velu RB, Subramaniyan SR, Hussain SA, Sekar N. Management of upper limb arterial injury without angiography--Chennai experience. Injury. 2004 Jan. 35(1):61-4. [Medline].

  51. Sise MJ, Shackford SR. Extremity vascular trauma. Vascular Trauma. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier Science; 2004.

  52. Sriussadaporn S, Pak-art R. Temporary intravascular shunt in complex extremity vascular injuries. J Trauma. 2002 Jun. 52(6):1129-33. [Medline].

Arterial anatomy of the upper extremity. a = artery; br = branch.
Arteriogram demonstrates obstruction of flow in the upper extremity.
Decompression of fascial compartments (fasciotomy).
Prolonged limb ischemia resulting in tissue necrosis.
Amputation of a hand because of tissue necrosis.
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.